Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Cardiol J ; 18(4): 343-51, 2011.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21769814

ABSTRACT

Despite significant advances in revascularization techniques and medical therapy, there remains a significant population of patients who continue to have intractable angina symptoms. This review aims to define the patients with refractory angina pectoris (RAP) and to present the therapeutic options currently available for this condition. RAP itself is defined and the pharmacological treatment options other than traditional medical therapies are discussed. The latest therapeutic options for this patient population are extensively reviewed. Among the multitude of pharmacological and non-invasive therapeutic options for patients with RAP, ranolazine is a new drug indicated for the treatment of chronic angina, in combination with amlodipine, beta-blockers or nitrates. Enhanced external counterpulsation has not only been shown to improve symptoms, but also to improve long-term ventricular function in these patients. In randomized trials, neurostimulation has been shown to be effective in reducing angina symptoms. Transmyocardial laser revascularization has emerged as an invasive treatment for RAP over the last two decades. Extracorporeal shockwave myocardial revascularization gene therapy and percutaneous in situ coronary venous arterialization are still under investigation.


Subject(s)
Angina Pectoris/therapy , Cardiovascular Agents/therapeutic use , Counterpulsation , Electric Stimulation Therapy , Myocardial Revascularization , Animals , Drug Therapy, Combination , Electric Stimulation Therapy/methods , Humans , Myocardial Revascularization/methods , Treatment Outcome
2.
J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr ; 4(2): 139-41, 2010.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20430346

ABSTRACT

A 29-year-old African American man presented with atypical chest pain. Coronary computed tomographic angiography (64-slice) showed a previously not described variant of dual (duplicated) left anterior descending artery (LAD). Duplication of LAD is a rare anomaly and has been categorized into 4 angiographic subtypes based on the origin, course, and termination of the short and long LAD. Our case is unique in that, unlike previous subtypes, the short LAD originates independently from the left coronary sinus and that the long LAD arises from the right coronary sinus and has an intramyocardial course before reaching the distal interventricular groove. It can be, thus, considered a new variant of dual LAD (type V).


Subject(s)
Chest Pain/diagnostic imaging , Coronary Angiography , Coronary Vessel Anomalies/diagnostic imaging , Tomography, X-Ray Computed , Adult , Humans , Male
3.
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg ; 8(6): 666-71, 2009 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19307243

ABSTRACT

Coronary artery bypass surgery (CABG) and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) are both safe and established treatment modalities of invasive revascularization for patients with coronary artery disease (CAD). However, conflicting information exists when comparing the long-term efficacy of the two methods. The optimal treatment for patients with multivessel coronary artery disease (MVD) is still subject to discussion, given the lack of fairly designed, prospective, randomized data reflecting current practice in the modern era. Furthermore, the clinical outcomes after invasive revascularization differ according to the number of diseased vessels, presence or absence of diabetes, left main disease and left ventricular dysfunction. Hence, the question arises whether we should continue to use the term 'multivessel disease'. Conflicts of available data need to be addressed and overcome so that care of patients with CAD can be successfully tailored. In this review article we try to address some of the above conflicts, in an effort to improve our understanding in the care of patients with multivessel disease. We also provide an evidence-based perspective which may differ from the current standard of practice.


Subject(s)
Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary , Coronary Artery Bypass , Coronary Artery Disease/therapy , Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary/adverse effects , Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary/economics , Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary/instrumentation , Coronary Artery Bypass/adverse effects , Coronary Artery Bypass/economics , Coronary Artery Disease/economics , Coronary Artery Disease/pathology , Coronary Artery Disease/surgery , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Evidence-Based Medicine , Humans , Patient Selection , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Risk Assessment , Severity of Illness Index , Stents , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome
5.
J Am Coll Cardiol ; 50(16): 1523-31, 2007 Oct 16.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17936150

ABSTRACT

Between 25,000 and 75,000 new cases of angina refractory to maximal medical therapy and standard coronary revascularization procedures are diagnosed each year. In addition, heart failure also places an enormous burden on the U.S. health care system, with an estimated economic impact ranging from $20 billion to more than $50 billion per year. The technique of counterpulsation, studied for almost one-half century now, is considered a safe, highly beneficial, low-cost, noninvasive treatment for these angina patients, and now for heart failure patients as well. Recent evidence suggests that enhanced external counterpulsation (EECP) therapy may improve symptoms and decrease long-term morbidity via more than 1 mechanism, including improvement in endothelial function, promotion of collateralization, enhancement of ventricular function, improvement in oxygen consumption (VO2), regression of atherosclerosis, and peripheral training effects similar to exercise. Numerous clinical trials in the last 2 decades have shown EECP therapy to be safe and effective for patients with refractory angina with a clinical response rate averaging 70% to 80%, which is sustained up to 5 years. It is not only safe in patients with coexisting heart failure, but also is shown to improve quality of life and exercise capacity and to improve left ventricular function long-term. Interestingly, EECP therapy has been studied for various potential uses other than heart disease, such as restless leg syndrome, sudden deafness, hepatorenal syndrome, erectile dysfunction, and so on. This review summarizes the current evidence for its use in stable angina and heart failure and its future directions.


Subject(s)
Angina Pectoris/therapy , Counterpulsation/methods , Heart Failure/therapy , Clinical Trials as Topic , Coronary Circulation , Counterpulsation/adverse effects , Counterpulsation/trends , Forecasting , Humans , Ventricular Dysfunction, Left/therapy
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...