Radiological analysis of maxillary artery relationships to key bony landmarks in maxillofacial surgery.

The maxillary artery (MA) is a key structure at risk of injury in numerous oral and maxillofacial surgical (OMS) procedures. Knowledge of safe distances from this vessel to surgically familiar bony landmarks could improve patient safety and prevent catastrophic haemorrhage. Distances between the MA and bony landmarks on the maxilla and mandible were measured using CT angiograms on 100 patients (200 facial halves). The vertical height of the pterygomaxillary junction (PMJ) was mean (SD) measurement of 16 (3) mm. The MA enters the pterygomaxillary fissure (PMF) a mean (SD) distance of 29 (3) mm from the most inferior point of the PMJ. The mean (SD) shortest distance between the MA and medial surface of the mandible was 2 (2) mm (with the vessel directly contacting the mandible in 17% of cases). The branchpoint (bifurcation of the superficial temporal artery (STA) and MA) was directly in contact with the mandible in 5% of cases. The mean (SD) distances between this bifurcation point and the medial pole of the condyle were 20 (5) mm and 22 (5) mm, respectively. A horizontal plane through the sigmoid notch perpendicular to the posterior border of the mandible is a good approximation of the trajectory of the MA. The branchpoint is usually within 5 mm of this line and inferior in 70% of cases. Surgeons should take note that both the branchpoint and the MA contact the surface of the mandible in a significant number of cases.

Gout of the temporomandibular joint and review of the literature.

Gout is a disease characterised by abnormal deposition of monosodium urate crystals, typically affecting the extremities. This report describes a rare case of gout affecting the left temporomandibular joint with erosion of the skull base. A diagnosis of gout was suspected based on CT and MRI and confirmed with CT-guided biopsy. The temporomandibular joint is an uncommon location for a first presentation of gout, with very few cases documented and only three cases of skull base involvement reported in the English literature previously. Given its radiological appearance, it can easily be misdiagnosed as other erosive arthropathies or malignancy. Our paper highlights an unusual location for the first and only manifestation of gout and offers some diagnostic and treatment ideas that may help clinicians to identify and manage this disease.

Mandibular fractures - what a difference 30 years has made.

This single-centre retrospective study aimed to characterise the epidemiology, management, and outcomes of mandibular trauma presenting to the same tertiary trauma centre 30 years apart, including key paradigm shifts in management and techniques. A total of 393 patients presenting with 665 mandibular fractures were managed by the Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery department at The Royal Melbourne Hospital (RMH), Australia, between 2011 and 2016. Data from a previous RMH paper of 205 patients presenting with 376 mandibular fractures between January 1985 and April 1990 were compared. Results showed an increase in presentations (205 to 393 patients) with an increase in the incidence of mandibular trauma (p = 0.0001), females (12% to 14%), and mean age (29 to 31.1) years. Young males remained the dominant cohort (86%) and interpersonal violence (IPV) the most common aetiology (46% to 43%). Mandibular fractures remained commonly associated with other systemic injuries (49% to 42%), occurring most frequently on the left (49%), and at the angle (29.8%), with most occurring at two sites (53%). Significant paradigm shifts in the management of mandibular trauma saw a reduced need for intermaxillary fixation (76% to 30%, p = 0.0001), increased use of extraoral approaches to the fracture, and the use of semi-rigid internal fixation along ideal lines of osteosynthesis (29% to 87%, p = 0.0001). This demonstrated decreased complications including malocclusion, non-union and delayed union, and permanent nerve injury. There was no significant change in infection, dehiscence rates, and temporary nerve damage.

The experience of patients undergoing awake craniotomy for intracranial masses: expectations, recall, satisfaction and functional outcome.

Introduction. Awake craniotomy is a well-established neurosurgical technique for lesions involving eloquent cortex, however, there is little information regarding patients' subjective experience with this type of surgery. Here we explore the expectations, recall, satisfaction and functional outcome of patients undergoing awake craniotomy. Methods. Three semi-structured interviews using closed- and open-ended questions were conducted with each of 26 consecutive patients (17 males, 9 females; aged 16-78 years) who underwent their first awake craniotomy between 2007 and 2009. Seven patients were interviewed retrospectively, 19 prospectively. Clinical data are included. Results. The following themes emerged from this study: (1) most patients demonstrated a good understanding of the rationale behind awake craniotomy; (2) patients felt the asleep-awake-asleep anaesthetic protocol used in this series was appropriate; (3) patients' confidence and preparedness for surgery was high, attributed to preparation by the surgical team. Seven of 26 (27%) patients had no recollection of being awake. Most patients had a positive anaesthetic and surgical experience, while a minority of patients reported experiencing more than slight pain (2/26; 8%) and discomfort (3/26; 12%), fear (4/26; 15%) or claustrophobia (1/26; 4%) intra-operatively. At follow-up (6 weeks post-operatively), most patients were functionally unimpaired; there was only one permanent neurological complication of surgery. We found that 24/26 (92%) patients were satisfied with their experience; one patient had no opinion and another one was unsatisfied. Five of 26 (19%) patients still reported more than slight discomfort, and 3/26 (12%) reported more than slight pain attributable to the surgery. A summary of the English peer-reviewed literature on the patient experience of awake craniotomy is also incorporated. Conclusions. This study confirms that awake craniotomy using the 'asleep-awake-asleep' anaesthetic protocol is a generally safe and well-tolerated procedure associated overall with satisfactory patients' experiences and neurological outcomes.