Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Stud Health Technol Inform ; 216: 1026, 2015.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26262326

ABSTRACT

Difficulty in identification wall chest tumors lead to unnecessary wide resections. Optical navigation and preoperative virtual planning are assets for surgeries that require exactness and accuracy. These tools enable physicians to study real anatomy before surgery and to follow an established pathway during procedure ensuring effectiveness. The aim of this paper is to demonstrate that Preoperative Virtual Planning is a useful tool in chest tumor interventions to define oncological margins successfully. Moreover, it is possible to use a virtual specimen in order to quantify accuracy. Optical navigation has been used in surgical procedures such as neurosurgery, orthopaedics and ENT over the last ten years. This principle is used in order to orientate the surgeon in three dimensional spaces during the surgery. Surgeons are guided intraoperatively with navigation and are able to obtain a correspondence between images acquired and processed before the surgery and the real anatomy.


Subject(s)
Surgery, Computer-Assisted/methods , Thoracic Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Thoracic Neoplasms/surgery , Thoracic Wall/diagnostic imaging , Thoracic Wall/surgery , Humans , Reproducibility of Results , Sensitivity and Specificity , User-Computer Interface
2.
Stud Health Technol Inform ; 216: 672-6, 2015.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26262136

ABSTRACT

The aim of this work is to assess and analyze the discrepancies introduced in the reconstruction of an entire tumoral bone slice from multiple field acquisitions of a large microscopy slide. The reconstruction tends to preserve the original structural information and its error is estimated by comparing the reconstructed images of eight samples against single pictures of these samples. This comparison is held using the Structural Similarity index. The measurements show that smaller samples yield better results. The detected errors are introduced by the insufficiently corrected optical distortion caused by the camera lens, which tends to accumulate along the sample. Nevertheless, the maximum error encountered does not exceed 0.39 mm, which is smaller than the maximum tolerable error for the intended application, stated in 1 mm.


Subject(s)
Bone Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Bone Neoplasms/pathology , Image Enhancement/methods , Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted/methods , Microscopy/methods , Pattern Recognition, Automated/methods , Humans , Machine Learning , Reproducibility of Results , Sensitivity and Specificity
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...