ABSTRACT
To extract meaningful information from scenes, the visual system must combine local cues that can vary greatly in their degree of reliability. Here, we asked whether cue reliability mostly affects visual or decision-related processes, using visual evoked potentials (VEPs) and a model-based approach to identify when and where stimulus-evoked brain activity reflects cue reliability. Participants performed a shape discrimination task on Gaborized ellipses, while we parametrically and independently, varied the reliability of contour or surface cues. We modeled the expected behavioral performance as a linear function of cue reliability and established at what latencies and electrodes VEP activity reflected behavioral sensitivity to cue reliability. We found that VEPs were linearly related to the individual behavioral predictors at around 400 ms post-stimulus, at electrodes over parietal and lateral temporal cortex. The observed cue reliability effects were similar for variations in contour and surface cues. Notably, effects of cue reliability were absent at earlier latencies where visual shape information is typically reported, and also in data time-locked to the behavioral response, suggesting the effects are not decision-related. These results indicate that reliability of visual cues is reflected in late distributed perceptual processes.
Subject(s)
Cues , Evoked Potentials, Visual/physiology , Form Perception/physiology , Neurons/physiology , Visual Cortex/physiology , Adult , Decision Making , Female , Humans , Male , Photic Stimulation , Reproducibility of Results , Young AdultABSTRACT
Every instant of perception depends on a cascade of brain processes calibrated to the history of sensory and decisional events. In the present work, we show that human visual perception is constantly shaped by two contrasting forces exerted by sensory adaptation and past decisions. In a series of experiments, we used multilevel modeling and cross-validation approaches to investigate the impact of previous stimuli and decisions on behavioral reports during adjustment and forced-choice tasks. Our results revealed that each perceptual report is permeated by opposite biases from a hierarchy of serially dependent processes: Low-level adaptation repels perception away from previous stimuli, whereas decisional traces attract perceptual reports toward the recent past. In this hierarchy of serial dependence, "continuity fields" arise from the inertia of decisional templates and not from low-level sensory processes. This finding is consistent with a Two-process model of serial dependence in which the persistence of readout weights in a decision unit compensates for sensory adaptation, leading to attractive biases in sequential perception. We propose a unified account of serial dependence in which functionally distinct mechanisms, operating at different stages, promote the differentiation and integration of visual information over time.
Subject(s)
Decision Making/physiology , Visual Perception/physiology , Adult , Female , Humans , Male , Models, Theoretical , Vision, Ocular/physiology , Young AdultABSTRACT
Growing evidence indicates that the representations of space and time interact in the brain but the exact neural correlates of such interaction remain unknown. Neuroimaging and neuropsychological studies show that processing of temporal information engages a distributed network in the right hemisphere and suggest a link between deficits in spatial attention and deficits in time perception. In the present study we used the procedure of prismatic adaptation (PA) to directionally manipulate spatial attention in order to explore the effect of attentional deviation on time perception in patients with right (RBD) vs. left (LBD) brain damage. In a first experiment, two groups of RBD and LBD patients and two groups of age-matched healthy subjects were submitted to a time reproduction task before and after rightward or leftward PA (between-group design). In a second experiment RBD and LBD patients were submitted to the same task, before and after rightward and leftward PA (within-group design). RBD but not LBD patients presented a time deficit with a clear tendency to underestimate the real time. PA inducing leftward attentional deviation biased time perception toward an underestimation in RBD patients and controls, while it was ineffective in LBD patients. PA inducing a rightward attentional deviation failed to affect time perception in either group. These results underline the effects of PA on temporal deficits in brain damaged patients. The novel finding is that, while a right hemispheric network is critical for explicit timing, a left hemispheric network is necessary for mediating the effects of prismatic adaptation on spatial and temporal perception.