ABSTRACT
AIM: To report the frequency and severity of retinal thickness measurement errors in a Fourier domain optical coherence tomography (FDOCT) device, Cirrus OCT. METHODS: Data from 209 eyes undergoing Cirrus OCT imaging with the Macular Cube protocol were collected. For each eye, the position of the automated retinal boundary lines used by the Cirrus OCT software for thickness calculations was assessed using a 6-point categorical scale. The presence of errors was correlated with various parameters including: retinal morphological features and disease diagnosis. RESULTS: Errors of retinal boundary detection were observed in 57.5% of eyes but were severe in only 9.6% of eyes. The identification of subretinal fluid, subretinal tissue, pigment epithelium detachment or a diagnosis of choroidal neovascularisation was associated with more severe errors. Retinal cysts or a diagnosis of retinal vascular disease were less likely to be associated with significant error. CONCLUSIONS: Retinal thickness measurement errors appear to occur less frequently with Fourier domain OCT (Cirrus OCT), but segmentation errors remain a concern, particularly in assessment of eyes with structurally complex retinal disease. With the recent release of multiple FDOCT systems, assessment of segmentation error may be an important factor in determining the relative merits of these systems.
Subject(s)
Retina/pathology , Retinal Diseases/pathology , Tomography, Optical Coherence/standards , Female , Humans , Male , Multivariate Analysis , Sensitivity and Specificity , Tomography, Optical Coherence/methodsABSTRACT
The capabilities of a patient-oriented digital optical laser-card for the documentation of the image/report unit and for image transmission were assessed. 150 conventional X-rays covering the fields of urology (n = 50), traumatology (n = 50) and orthopaedics (n = 50) were digitised using a CCD scanner and subsequently transmitted to an Image-Transfer Medium (ITM) and to an optical laser-card. The image quality for the detection of relevant diagnostic parameters was evaluated by 4 radiologists and one clinician of the corresponding specialty. Based upon a total of 4740 decision readings for each method, it was found that the optical laser-card reduced the image quality significantly (p < 0.01) in comparison to the digitised ITM images in all fields. Thus, a primary diagnostic statement cannot be made based upon the images of the optical card. However, concomitant documentation of the image and opinion on the card may be used for the transmission of the radiological report, especially to external referring institutions.
