Rhinitis and sleep apnea.

The nose and pharynx begin the upper airway system and represent a continuum. This is the biologic basis for the mutual influences of rhinitis and obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). Sleep-disordered breathing has a large differential diagnosis that includes snoring, upper airway resistance syndrome, and severe OSA. Nasal obstruction is an independent risk factor for OSA, but there is no correlation of daytime nasal resistance with the severity of OSA. However, nasal resistance was an independent predictor of apnea-hypopnea index in a recent study of nonobese OSA patients. Rhinitis alone is associated with mild OSA, but commonly causes microarousals and sleep fragmentation. Reduction of nasal inflammation with topical treatment improves sleep quality and subsequent daytime sleepiness and fatigue. Patient compliance with the nasal continuous positive airway pressure (nCPAP) device is relatively low, in part due to adverse nasal effects.

Comparison of the clinical efficacy of standard and mucoadhesive-based nasal decongestants.

AIMS: To compare two xylometazoline 0.1% preparations: reference commercial solution (RS) and test mucoadhesive solution (TS). METHODS: Twenty subjects with perennial allergic rhinitis (age range 18-69 years, 5 atopic, 7 men) applied randomly in turn TS and RS for 5 days in a double-blind crossover clinical trial. Nasal airflow resistance (NAR), nasal symptoms (6 grade scoring), frequency of application (times/day), and side-effects were recorded. RESULTS: Mean ratio TS/RS of areas under the resistance/time curves for NAR +/- 90% CI: 3.56 +/- 0.92; mean TS-RS differences +/- 95% CI: for congestion: -1.12 +/- 0.59, for frequency of application: -1.10 +/- 0.20. Subjects experienced fewer side-effects with TS. CONCLUSIONS: A mucoadhesive solution with a decongestant had a greater and longer lasting effect on nasal congestion in subjects with perennial allergic rhinitis than the commercially available decongestant solution. It also caused fewer side effects.