Who Is the Geriatric Trauma Patient? An Analysis of Patient Characteristics, Hospital Quality Measures, and Inpatient Cost.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was 2-fold: 1) to investigate the age-related frequency, demographics and distribution of the middle-aged and geriatric orthopedic trauma population and 2) to describe the age-related frequency and distribution of hospital quality measure outcomes and inpatient cost. METHODS: All patients > 55 years of age who required orthopedic, trauma, or neurosurgery consults at 3 hospitals within an academic medical center from 2014 to 2017 were prospectively followed. On initial evaluation, each patient's demographics, injury severity, and functional status were collected. Patients were grouped into low and high-energy mechanism cohorts and divided into 5 groups based on age. Hospital quality measures including length of stay, complications, discharge location, and cost of care was compared between age groups. Data were analyzed using ANOVA and Chi-square tests. RESULTS: A total of 3965 patients were included in this study of which 3268 (82%) sustained low-energy trauma and 697 (18%) sustained high-energy trauma. With increasing age, more patients had more comorbidities, were less likely to be community ambulators, and more likely to use assistive devices (p < 0.05). Patients in older age groups had longer lengths of stay, more complications, were more likely to need ICU level care, and were less likely to be discharged home (p < 0.05). Rates of mortality were also greater in patients of more advanced age in both low and high-energy cohorts, and the calculated risk triage tool (STTGMA) score increased with each age bracket (p < 0.05). Total cost of care differed between age groups in the low-energy cohort (p = 0.003). CONCLUSION: This epidemiological study provides a clear picture of the frequency and distribution of demographic, physiologic characteristics, outcomes, and cost of care in a middle-aged and geriatric orthopedic trauma population as evaluated by the STTGMA risk tool. Risk profiling of geriatric trauma patients allows for the establishment of baseline norms.

Femoral Periprosthetic Fracture Nonunion Management and Outcomes with Nonunion Repair and Retention of Primary Components.

INTRODUCTION: Nonunion of a femoral periprosthetic fracture is a rare occurrence in orthopedic practice. Failure of a periprosthetic fracture to heal can lead to substantial disability and pain for patients as well as the potential need for component revision. Relatively little literature exists describing their management and outcome. METHODS: Eleven patients with femoral periprosthetic fracture nonunion who presented for tertiary care were enrolled in a prospective data registry. Patients were considered to have developed nonunion following failure of progression in radiographic and clinical healing for a 6-month period. All patients were seen at standard postoperative intervals, and outcomes were recorded using the Short Musculoskeletal Function Assessment (SMFA), visual analog scale (VAS) for pain, physical examination, and radiographic examination. Preoperative radiographs were reviewed for classification. RESULTS: Eleven patients had periprosthetic femoral fracture nonunion associated with prior hip (five patients) or knee (six patients) arthroplasty and were included in our study. Mean follow-up time was 30 months. Mean age at time of nonunion surgery was 64.5 years (range: 41.8 to 78.2 years). All patients underwent removal of previous fracture hardware at time of nonunion surgery. Ten (91%) of 11 received autogenous iliac crest bone grafting at time of nonunion surgery. Ten (91%) of the 11 patients went on to union without further intervention. Mean time to union was 7.9 months (SD: 8.0). The one patient that developed a persistent nonunion was complicated by infection requiring multiple irrigation and debridement procedures and total hip explant. The mean improvement in total SMFA score from baseline to final follow-up was 22.6 (p = 0.030). The greatest functional improvement was in the bothersome index at 28.0 (p = 0.028). The mean improvement in VAS pain score from baseline to final follow-up was 4.5 (p = 0.013). DISCUSSION: Periprosthetic fracture nonunions can be successfully treated with operative intervention aimed at compression plating with bone graft and retention of primary components. In addition, successful periprosthetic nonunion repair improves function and pain in these patients.

Patterns and Implications of Early Syndesmotic Screw Failure in Rotational Ankle Fractures.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to identify characteristic patterns of syndesmotic screw (SS) failure, and any effects on clinical outcome. METHODS: A retrospective study was performed using a consecutive series of patients treated with open reduction and internal fixation with trans-syndesmotic screws for unstable ankle fractures with syndesmotic injury between 2015 and 2017. Patient demographics, fracture characteristics and classification, rates and patterns of trans-syndesmotic screw breakage, and backout were analyzed. Functional outcome was assessed using passive range of motion (ROM) and Maryland Foot Score (MFS). RESULTS: A total of 113 patients (67%) had intact screws and 56 patients (33%) demonstrated either screw breakage or backout. Patients with SS failure were younger (P = .002) and predominantly male (P = .045). Fracture classification and energy level of injury were not associated with screw failure. Nine screws (11%) demonstrated backout (2 also broke) and 56 other screws broke. There was no association between the number of screws or cortices of purchase and screw failure. There was a trend toward a higher proportion of screw removal (20%) in this failed SS group compared with the intact SS group (12%) (P = .25), but with similar ankle ROM and MFS (P > .07). CONCLUSION: Syndesmotic screw breakage was common in younger, male patients. Despite similarities in ankle range of motion and clinical outcome scores to patients with intact screws, there was a trend towards more frequent screw removal. This information can be used to counsel patients pre- and postoperatively regarding the potential for screw failure and subsequent implant removal. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, retrospective case-control study.

Unstable Intertrochanteric Hip Repair With Short Cephalomedullary Nail.

INTRODUCTION: Approximately half of all hip fractures are intertrochanteric femur fractures. This video demonstrates the technique of repair of an unstable intertrochanteric hip fracture using a cephalomedullary device. METHODS: The patient is an 88-year-old woman presenting with an intertrochanteric hip fracture secondary to a low-energy injury. The patient was indicated for surgery due to the unstable nature of the fracture. RESULTS: This video demonstrates the cephalomedullary nailing technique for the repair of an unstable intertrochanteric hip fracture after a low-energy injury. Anatomical reduction and stable fixation were obtained with this technique. CONCLUSIONS: The case demonstrates a cephalomedullary technique of intertrochanteric fracture fixation using a cephalomedullary nail. The technique has significant advantages including minimal intraoperative blood loss, shorter operative times, potential for more biological healing with a load-sharing device, and low infection rate.

Repair of Distal Femoral Periprosthetic Nonunion: Linked Nail Plate Construct.

INTRODUCTION: Periprosthetic fracture nonunions represent a rare problem in orthopaedic practice, although their incidence has increased with the increased frequency of joint replacement surgery. This video demonstrates the use of a linked nail-plate construct to repair a distal femoral periprosthetic fracture nonunion. METHODS: The patient is a 93-year-old woman who is 1-year status-post a left distal femoral periprosthetic fracture with known delayed healing. She presents with a low energy trauma and hardware failure. The patient was indicated for operative fixation using a linked nail-plate construct given the patient's previous hardware failure, advanced age, and poor bone quality. RESULTS: This video demonstrates the linked nail-plate technique for the repair of a distal femoral periprosthetic fracture nonunion. Anatomical reduction and stable fixation with bone graft was performed with excellent results. There were no intraoperative or postoperative complications and no issues related to metallurgy. CONCLUSIONS: In this video, we present the case of an atrophic distal femoral periprosthetic nonunion treated with a linked nail-plate construct with autologous bone graft. Although femoral periprosthetic fracture nonunions are a rare occurrence, they can be successfully treated with operative intervention aimed at compression plating with supplemental bone grafting.

Single- vs 2-Screw Lag Fixation of the Medial Malleolus in Unstable Ankle Fractures.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to determine the efficacy of medial malleolar fixation with 1 vs 2 screws. METHODS: Between April 2013 and February 2017, 196 patients who presented at 2 hospitals within one academic institution with an unstable rotational ankle fracture with a medial fracture and were treated operatively by a trained orthopedic surgeon were identified. These patients' charts were reviewed and their injury, radiographic, surgical, and follow-up data recorded. Medial malleolus fragment size was assessed on the anteroposterior (AP) and lateral views of the initial injury radiograph. Functional outcome was assessed using Maryland Foot Score (MFS). Patients were grouped based upon the number of screws utilized to fox the medial malleolar fragment. Data were assessed using Fisher exact tests and independent t tests with SPSS, version 23. RESULTS: Out of the 196 patients who met inclusion criteria, 47 patients (24%) were fixed with 1 medial malleolar screw and 149 patients (76%) were fixed with 2 screws. There were no differences among patients who received 1 vs 2 screws with regard to age, gender, body mass index, American Society of Anesthesiologists grade, or smoking status. The average malleolar fragment size was smaller in those treated with 1 screw on both the AP and lateral radiographic views than those with 2 screws (P = .009, P = .001, respectively). There was no difference between groups in ankle dorsiflexion or plantarflexion at 1 year postoperation (P = .451, P = .581). Patients who received 1 screw did not differ from those who received 2 screws with respect to Maryland Foot Scores (P = .924). There was no difference in rate of revision surgery or need for hardware removal between groups (P = .093). Furthermore, time to healing and postoperative complication rate did not differ between groups. CONCLUSION: The use of a single screw for medial malleolar fixation provided stable fixation to allow ankle fracture healing, without an increase in complications. This information is especially important in situations when the fragment is too small to accommodate multiple fixation points. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, retrospective case-control study.