From opt-out to opt-in consent for secondary use of medical data and residual biomaterial: An evaluation using the RE-AIM framework.

BACKGROUND: Patient records, imaging, and residual biomaterial from clinical procedures are crucial resources for medical research. In the Netherlands, consent for secondary research has historically relied on opt-out consent. For ethical-legal experts who purport passive consent undermines patient autonomy, opt-in consent (wherein affirmative action is required) is seen as the preferred standard. To date, there is little empirical research exploring patient feasibility, organizational consequences, and the potential risks for research based on secondary data. Thus, we applied the RE-AIM framework to evaluate the impact of migrating from an opt-out to an opt-in consent process. METHODS: This evaluation was carried out in Radboud University Medical Center, a large tertiary hospital located in the southeast of the Netherlands. All non-acute, mentally competent patients ≥16 years of age registered between January 13, 2020 and June 30, 2023 were targeted (N = 101,437). In line with the RE-AIM framework, individual and organizational consequences were evaluated across five domains: reach, efficacy, adoption, implementation, and maintenance. RESULTS: 101,437 eligible patients were approached of whom 66,214 (65.3%) consented, 8,059 (7.9%) refused consent and 27,164 (26.8%) had no response. Of the 74,273 patients with a response, 89.1% consented to secondary use. The migration to an opt-in consent system was modestly successful; yet notably, differential response patterns by key sociodemographic characteristics were observed. Adaptions to the process flow improved its effectiveness and resulted in a reasonable response over time. Implementation was most affected by budgetary restraints, thus impeding the iterative approach which could have further improved domain outcomes. CONCLUSION: This evaluation provides an overview of logistical and pragmatic issues encountered when migrating from opt-out to opt-in consent. Response bias remains a major concern. Though not always directly transferable, these lessons can be broadly used to inform other health care organizations of the potential advantages and pitfalls of an opt-in consent system.

Expanding the boundaries of previously obtained informed consent in research: Views from participants in the Personalised Risk-based Mammascreening study.

INTRODUCTION: Understanding participants' concerns and information needs regarding broadened consent is crucial to ensure transparency and participant autonomy. Our study qualitatively examined these issues in women participating in the Personalized RISk-based MAmmascreening study (PRISMA). The original PRISMA informed consent was project-specific (i.e., breast cancer research), limiting the scope of secondary research. We explored participants' needs for broadened consent to preserve informed decision-making while maximising the potential re-use of data. METHODS: Focus groups (FGs) were performed following a semistructured discussion guide. Two independent researchers analysed the data thematically using an inductive approach. FINDINGS: Twenty-three asymptomatic women and 13 women diagnosed with breast cancer were randomly divided into six FGs. Four superordinate themes were identified: (1) Normalization, (2) Attitude towards the pharmaceutical industry, (3) Privacy and (4) Knowledge. Our participants viewed data sharing as an important conduit for advancing medical science. Perceived integrity was more often attributed to noncommercial than commercial parties, with a marked mistrust towards the pharmaceutical industry. Most requested information needs related to data protection. Participants' ideal consent process would confer a range of options; for example, they would be able to choose with whom data can be shared, whether data will be de-identified or anonymous, the expiration date of their consent and how, if requested, general and personal study results would be disclosed. CONCLUSION: Our participants expressed clear information needs and a strong desire to be actively engaged in future data sharing decisions. Given that many researchers collaborate with commercial parties, building public confidence in these institutions would be beneficial. Illustrative examples addressing privacy concerns and clarifying difficult terms would aid consent decision-making. Although our participants displayed great altruism in sharing their data and accepted that broad consent would ultimately facilitate future research, broad consent did not reflect their ideal situation. Dynamic consent may be an option but warrants further feasibility research. PATIENT AND PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: Women were recruited from the general breast cancer screening population. Their perceptions and information needs, as reported in this study, will not only inform broadened consent for PRISMA but ideally guide other consent templates and decisions regarding consent processes.

Recommendations for a Dutch Sustainable Biobanking Environment.

Biobanks and their collections are considered essential for contemporary biomedical research and a critical resource toward personalized medicine. However, they need to operate in a sustainable manner to prevent research waste and maximize impact. Sustainability is the capacity of a biobank to remain operative, effective, and competitive over its expected lifetime. This remains a challenge given a biobank's position at the interplay of ethical, societal, scientific, and commercial values and the difficulties in finding continuous funding. In the end, biobanks are responsible for their own sustainability. Still, biobanks also depend on their surrounding environment, which contains overarching legislative, policy, financial, and other factors that can either impede or promote sustainability. The Biobanking and Biomolecular Research Infrastructure for The Netherlands (BBMRI.nl) has worked on improving the national environment for sustainable biobanking. In this article, we present the final outcomes of this BBMRI.nl project. First, we summarize the current overarching challenges of the Dutch biobanking landscape. These challenges were gathered during workshops and focus groups with Dutch biobanks and their users, for which the full results are described in separate reports. The main overarching challenges relate to sample and data quality, funding, use and reuse, findability and accessibility, and the general image of biobanks. Second, we propose a package of recommendations-across nine themes-toward creating overarching conditions that stimulate and enable sustainable biobanking. These recommendations serve as a guideline for the Dutch biobanking community and their stakeholders to jointly work toward practical implementation and a better biobanking environment. There are undoubtedly parallels between the Dutch situation and the challenges found in other countries. We hope that sharing our project's approach, outcomes, and recommendations will support other countries in their efforts toward sustainable biobanking.

A Stepwise Procedure to Define a Data Collection Framework for a Clinical Biobank.

INTRODUCTION: Current guidelines for clinical biobanking have a strong focus on obtaining, handling, and storage of biospecimens. However, to allow for research tying biomarker analysis to clinical decision making, there should be more focus on collection of data on donor characteristics. Therefore, our aim was to develop a stepwise procedure to define a framework as a tool to help start the data collection process in clinical biobanking. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The Radboud Biobank (RB) is a central clinical biobanking facility designed in accordance with the standards set by the Parelsnoer Institute, a Dutch national biobank originally initiated with eight different disease cohorts. To organize the information of these cohorts, we used our experience and knowledge in the field of biobanking and translational research to identify research domains and information categories to classify data. We extended this classification system to a stepwise procedure for defining a data collection framework and examined its utility for existing RB biobanks. RESULTS: Our approach resulted in the definition of a three-step procedure: (1) Identification of research domains and relevant questions within the field that may benefit from biobank samples. (2) Identification of information categories and accompanying subcategories that are relevant for answering questions in identified research domains. (3) Reduction to an efficient framework based on essentiality and quality criteria. We showed the utility of the procedure for three existing RB biobanks. DISCUSSION: We developed guidelines for the definition of a framework that supports the standardization of the biobank data collection process. Connecting the biobank database to pertinent information collected from the electronic health record will improve data quality and efficiency for both care and research. This is crucial when using the corresponding biospecimens for scientific research. Further, it also facilitates the combination of different clinical biobanks for a specific disease.

Patients to learn from: on the need for systematic integration of research and care in academic health care.

Patients suffering from rare, extreme or extremely complex sets of symptoms have something to expect from efforts to improve care through research. Biomedical research and care have often been approached as distinct worlds which are and should be only loosely connected. For observational research focusing on data drawn from real-world settings, however, that approach is found wanting. Integrating research and care responsibly is the main challenge instead. Integrated IT infrastructures facilitating Personalized medicine and Big Data are crucial components of a learning health care system, in which patients regularly play a double role: as individuals to be treated and as cases to learn from. Drawing on the example of the Dutch Parelsnoer Institute (PSI), a national biobanking and IT infrastructure integrated with clinical care procedures, this article outlines the reforms that are needed. Systematic integration of research and care offers a promising avenue, provided that a number of conditions are met: data and IT infrastructures will require overhauls in order to facilitate secure, high-quality data integration between research and care; institutional focus is needed to bring patient populations and expertise together; ethical frameworks and approaches for integrating research and care responsibly require further elaboration; clinical procedures and professional responsibilities may need to be adapted in order to accommodate research requirements in clinical processes; and involvement of patients and other stakeholders in design and research priority setting is needed to further the goals of real-world and patient relevance. RELEVANCE FOR PATIENTS: Integrating research and care in academic medicine in a more systematic fashion offers a promising perspective to current and future patients. In order to live up to these promises, research and care should be integrated more systematically in academic health science, with patients being included as research participants by default. Data and tissue infrastructures and facilities can provide a platform for doing so. At the same time, many issues remain to be settled. New ethical ways and means for protecting and respecting patient-participants in such a double role are also needed in this respect. In this way a deeper transformation is at stake as well: a change towards a setting in which patients fully take center stage in debate and action on the future of biomedicine.

Accuracy of Hereditary Diffuse Gastric Cancer Testing Criteria and Outcomes in Patients With a Germline Mutation in CDH1.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Germline mutations in the cadherin 1, type 1, E-cadherin gene (CDH1) cause a predisposition to gastric cancer. We evaluated the ability of the internationally accepted hereditary diffuse gastric cancer (HDGC) criteria to identify individuals with pathogenic mutations in CDH1, and assessed their outcomes. The criteria were as follows: families with 2 or more cases of gastric cancer, with at least 1 patient diagnosed with diffuse gastric cancer (DGC) before age 50; families with 3 or more cases of DGC; families with 1 DGC before the age of 40; and families with a history of DGC and lobular breast cancer, with 1 diagnosis before the age of 50. METHODS: We collected results of a CDH1 mutation analysis of 578 individuals from 499 families tested in The Netherlands between 1999 and 2014 (118 families met the HDGC criteria for testing and 236 did not; there were 145 families with incomplete data and/or availability of only first-degree relatives). Data were linked with family histories and findings from clinical and pathology analyses. The Kaplan-Meier method and Cox regression analysis were used to evaluate the overall survival of patients with and without CDH1 mutations. RESULTS: In a cohort study in The Netherlands, the HDGC criteria identified individuals with a germline CDH1 mutation with a positive predictive value of 14% and 89% sensitivity. There were 18 pathogenic CDH1 mutations in 499 families (4%); 16 of these mutations were detected in the 118 families who met the HDGC criteria for testing. One pathogenic CDH1 mutation was detected in the 236 families who did not meet HDGC criteria and 1 in the 145 families with incomplete data and/or availability of only first-degree relatives. No CDH1 mutations were found in the 67 families whose members developed intestinal-type gastric cancer, or in the 22 families whose families developed lobular breast cancer. Among patients who fulfilled the HDGC criteria and had pathogenic CDH1 mutations, 36% survived for 1 year and 4% survived for 5 years; among patients who fulfilled the HDGC criteria but did not carry pathogenic CDH1 mutations, 48% survived for 1 year and 13% survived for 5 years (P = .014 for comparative survival analysis between patients with and without a CDH1 mutation). CONCLUSIONS: All individuals with a CDH1 mutation had a personal or family history of diffuse gastric cancer. Patients with gastric cancer and germline CDH1 mutations had shorter survival times than patients who met the HDGC criteria but did not have CDH1 mutations.

Optimal age to start preventive measures in women with BRCA1/2 mutations or high familial breast cancer risk.

Women from high-risk families consider preventive measures for breast cancer including screening. Guidelines on screening differ considerably regarding starting age. We investigated whether age at diagnosis in affected relatives is predictive for age at diagnosis. We analyzed the age of breast cancer detection of 1,304 first- and second-degree relatives of 314 BRCA1, 164 BRCA2 and 244 high-risk participants of the Dutch MRI-SCreening study. The within- and between-family variance in the relative's age at diagnosis was analyzed with a random effect linear regression model. We compared the starting age of screening based on risk-group (25 years for BRCA1, 30 years for BRCA2 and 35 years for familial risk), on family history, and on the model, which combines both. The findings were validated in 63 families from the UK-MARIBS study. Mean age at diagnosis in the relatives varied between families; 95% range of mean family ages was 35-55 in BRCA1-, 41-57 in BRCA2- and 44-60 in high-risk families. In all, 14% of the variance in age at diagnosis, in BRCA1 even 23%, was explained by family history, 7% by risk group. Determining start of screening based on the model and on risk-group gave similar results in terms of cancers missed and years of screening. The approach based on familial history only, missed more cancers and required more screening years in both the Dutch and the United Kingdom data sets. Age at breast cancer diagnosis is partly dependent on family history which may assist planning starting age for preventive measures.

Exposure to diagnostic radiation and risk of breast cancer among carriers of BRCA1/2 mutations: retrospective cohort study (GENE-RAD-RISK).

OBJECTIVE: To estimate the risk of breast cancer associated with diagnostic radiation in carriers of BRCA1/2 mutations. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study (GENE-RAD-RISK). SETTING: Three nationwide studies (GENEPSO, EMBRACE, HEBON) in France, United Kingdom, and the Netherlands, PARTICIPANTS: 1993 female carriers of BRCA1/2 mutations recruited in 2006-09. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Risk of breast cancer estimated with a weighted Cox proportional hazards model with a time dependent individually estimated cumulative breast dose, based on nominal estimates of organ dose and frequency of self reported diagnostic procedures. To correct for potential survival bias, the analysis excluded carriers who were diagnosed more than five years before completion of the study questionnaire. RESULTS: In carriers of BRCA1/2 mutations any exposure to diagnostic radiation before the age of 30 was associated with an increased risk of breast cancer (hazard ratio 1.90, 95% confidence interval 1.20 to 3.00), with a dose-response pattern. The risks by quarter of estimated cumulative dose <0.0020 Gy, ≥ 0.0020-0.0065 Gy, ≥ 0.0066-0.0173 Gy, and ≥ 0.0174 Gy were 1.63 (0.96 to 2.77), 1.78 (0.88 to 3.58), 1.75 (0.72 to 4.25), and 3.84 (1.67 to 8.79), respectively. Analyses on the different types of diagnostic procedures showed a pattern of increasing risk with increasing number of radiographs before age 20 and before age 30 compared with no exposure. A history of mammography before age 30 was also associated with an increased risk of breast cancer (hazard ratio 1.43, 0.85 to 2.40). Sensitivity analysis showed that this finding was not caused by confounding by indication of family history. CONCLUSION: In this large European study among carriers of BRCA1/2 mutations, exposure to diagnostic radiation before age 30 was associated with an increased risk of breast cancer at dose levels considerably lower than those at which increases have been found in other cohorts exposed to radiation. The results of this study support the use of non-ionising radiation imaging techniques (such as magnetic resonance imaging) as the main tool for surveillance in young women with BRCA1/2 mutations.

Validation study suggested no differential misclassification of self-reported mammography history in BRCA1/2 mutation carriers.

OBJECTIVES: We assessed accuracy of self-reported lifetime mammography history by BRCA1/2 mutation carriers with and without breast cancer. STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING: Within the framework of the HEBON study (The Netherlands Collaborative Group on Hereditary Breast Cancer), 218 Dutch BRCA1/2 mutation carriers had completed a risk factor questionnaire between 2006 and 2007. Accuracy of self-reported lifetime mammography history was assessed by medical record review and calculated by proportion agreement and Cohen's kappa coefficient (κ). RESULTS: For 177 (81%) carriers, validation could be completed. Accuracy of reporting of ever/never exposure was excellent (i.e., agreement ≥ 93%, κ ≥ 0.81) for all time frames (lifetime, before age 30, and at ages 30-39). Accuracy of age at first mammogram was poor to moderate (i.e., 39%, κ=0.37) for exact agreement and improved to almost excellent (i.e., 70%, κ=0.69) for agreement within 1 year, indicating that differences were small. Although cases more often tended to underestimate their exact age at first mammogram, whereas unaffected carriers tended to overestimate, this difference in the direction of inaccuracy was not statistically significant (P=0.237). Accuracy of age at last mammogram was moderate and improved to excellent for agreement within 1 year. Carriers tended to underreport the time since last mammogram ("telescoping") and overreported the number of mammograms. CONCLUSION: Accuracy of self-reported lifetime mammography history in carriers highly varied, depending on the measure under investigation. However, the extent of the observed misclassification was small and mostly nondifferential.

Body weight and risk of breast cancer in BRCA1/2 mutation carriers.

Obesity is an established risk factor for postmenopausal breast cancer in the general population. However, it is still unclear whether this association also exists in BRCA1/2 mutation carriers. We investigated the association between self-reported anthropometric measures and breast cancer risk in a nationwide retrospective cohort study, including 719 BRCA1/2 carriers, of whom 218 had been diagnosed with breast cancer within 10 years prior to questionnaire completion. All time-varying Cox proportional hazards analyses were stratified by menopausal status. For premenopausal breast cancer, no statistically significant associations were observed for any of the anthropometric measures. The association between body mass index (BMI) at age 18 and premenopausal breast cancer risk suggested a trend of decreasing risk with increasing BMI (HR(22.50-24.99 vs. 18.50-22.49) = 0.83, 95% CI = 0.47-1.44 and HR(≥ 25.00 vs. 18.50-22.49) = 0.41, 95% CI = 0.13-1.27). For postmenopausal breast cancer, being 1.67 m and taller increased the risk 1.7-fold (HR = 1.67, 95% CI = 1.01-2.74) when compared to a height <1.67 m. Compared with a current body weight < 72 kg, a current body weight of ≥ 72 kg increased the risk of postmenopausal breast cancer 2.1-fold (95% CI = 1.23-3.59). A current BMI of ≥ 25.0 kg/m², an adult weight gain of 5 kg or more, and a relative adult weight gain of 20% or more were all non-significantly associated with a 50-60% increased risk of postmenopausal breast cancer [HR = 1.46 (0.86-2.51), HR = 1.56 (95% CI = 0.85-2.87), and HR = 1.60 (95% CI = 0.97-2.63), respectively], when compared with having a healthy or stable weight. No associations for body weight or BMI at age 18 were observed. In conclusion, menopausal status seemed to modify the association between body weight and breast cancer risk among BRCA1/2 carriers. We observed no clear association between body weight and premenopausal breast cancer, while overweight and weight gain increased postmenopausal breast cancer risk. Carriers may reduce their risk of postmenopausal breast cancer by maintaining a healthy body weight throughout life.

Reliability of self-reported diagnostic radiation history in BRCA1/2 mutation carriers.

We assessed reliability of self-reported diagnostic radiation history in BRCA1/2 mutation carriers with and without breast cancer. Within the frame-work of the HEBON study, 401 BRCA1/2 mutation carriers completed a baseline (1999-2004) and a follow-up questionnaire (2006-2007). Test-retest reliability of self-reported exposure to chest X-rays, fluoroscopies and mammograms was assessed for the entire study population and by case status.Overall proportion agreement on reporting ever/never exposure was good ([75%), while the corresponding kappa coefficients were between 0.40 and 0.75, indicating at least moderate reliability beyond chance. Reliability of number of exposures was also good ([75%). Proportion agreement on reporting age at first mammogram was low(40%) for exact consistency and moderate (60%) for consistency +/- 1 year. Reliability of age at first mammogram was higher for cases than for unaffected carriers(P\0.001) but this difference disappeared when excluding diagnostic mammograms (P = 0.60). In unaffected carriers proportion agreement on age at last mammogram was 50%. In general, the direction of disagreement on all items was equally distributed. More consistent reporting was mainly determined by a younger age at questionnaire completion. In conclusion, inconsistent self-report of diagnostic radiation by BRCA1/2 mutation carriers was mainly non-differential by disease status.

Physical activity and the risk of breast cancer in BRCA1/2 mutation carriers.

BRCA1/2 mutation carriers have a high lifetime risk of developing breast cancer. Differences in penetrance indicate that this risk may be influenced by lifestyle factors. Because physical activity is one of the few modifiable risk factors, it may provide a target to add to breast cancer prevention in this high-risk population. We examined the association between self-reported lifetime sports activity and breast cancer risk in a nationwide retrospective cohort study, including 725 carriers, of whom 218 had been diagnosed with breast cancer within 10 years prior to questionnaire completion. We found a nonsignificantly decreased risk for ever engaging in sports activity (HR = 0.84, 95%CI = 0.57-1.24). Among women who had participated in sports, a medium versus low level of intensity and duration (i.e., between 11.0 and 22.7 mean MET hours/week averaged over a lifetime) reduced the risk of breast cancer (HR = 0.59, 95%CI = 0.36-0.95); no dose-response trend was observed. For mean hours/week of sports activity, a nonsignificant trend was observed (HR(low versus never) = 0.93, 95%CI = 0.60-1.43; HR(medium versus never) = 0.81, 95%CI = 0.51-1.29; HR(high versus never) = 0.78, 95%CI = 0.48-1.29; p (trend overall) = 0.272; p (trend active women) = 0.487). For number of years of sports activity no significant associations were found. Among women active in sports before age 30, mean MET hours/week showed the strongest inverse association of all activity measures (HR(medium versus low) = 0.60, 95%CI = 0.38-0.96; HR(high versus low) = 0.58, 95%CI = 0.35-0.94; p (trend) = 0.053). Engaging in sports activity after age 30 was also inversely associated with breast cancer risk (HR = 0.63, 95%CI = 0.44-0.91). Our results indicate that sports activity may reduce the risk of breast cancer in BRCA1/2 mutation carriers.

High survivin predicts a poor response to endocrine therapy, but a good response to chemotherapy in advanced breast cancer.

Variants of survivin with differing subcellular localizations might mediate the different functions of survivin, i.e. cell-cycle regulation and apoptosis inhibition. Highly proliferative tumors are more sensitive to chemotherapy, whereas apoptosis resistant cells would be refractory to endocrine therapy. Possibly, this explains incongruent data on the association of survivin with prognosis in breast cancer. Survivin levels were measured using ELISA in 800 x g pellets and 100,000 x g supernatants of breast cancer tissues from patients that were treated with either chemotherapy or endocrine therapy for advanced disease. These fractions might be enriched with nuclear or cytoplasmatic located survivin variants. Survivin levels were associated with tumors with poor prognostic clinical characteristics. For the patients treated with endocrine therapy, the patients with high survivin levels exhibited a significantly shorter progression free survival (PFS) than those who had low levels (pellet survivin Hazard Ratio (HR)=2.74, 95% Confidence Interval (CI)=1.31-5.72, p=0.008 and median PFS 5.8 versus 8.6 months, p=0.006, log-rank; cytosolic survivin HR=3.03, 95% CI=1.45-6.35, p=0.003). In contrast, for patients treated with chemotherapy, those with high cytosolic survivin had a significantly longer PFS than those with low levels (median PFS of 6.2 months, versus 4.7 months for patients with low cytosolic concentrations, p=0.024, log-rank). Thus, high levels of survivin are mainly related with a poor response to endocrine therapy, but a good response to chemotherapy. This phenomenon might be related to the different functions of survivin.

Survivin is an independent prognostic marker for risk stratification of breast cancer patients.

BACKGROUND: Results in previous qualitative studies of the association of the apoptosis inhibitor survivin with prognosis of breast cancer patients have been contradictory. METHODS: Survivin mRNA was measured by quantitative TaqMan reverse transcription-PCR in 275 breast cancer tissues from patients with operable tumors and was correlated with established clinicopathologic factors, relapse-free survival [(RFS); 102 events], and overall survival [(OS); 81 events]. RESULTS: High survivin mRNA concentrations were found mainly in tissues from younger patients and in high-grade cancer tissues. High survivin concentrations were most strongly associated with estrogen receptor- or progesterone receptor-negative tumors. In univariate Cox regression analysis for RFS, survivin concentrations were significantly associated with poor prognosis with a hazard ratio (HR) of 1.99 (95% confidence interval, 1.31-3.02; P = 0.001) for every 10-fold increase in expression. For OS, a significant contribution of survivin to poor prognosis was found with a HR of 2.76 (1.67-4.55; P <0.001). Multivariate analyses were performed including established clinicopathologic factors. For RFS, age (P = 0.027), nodal category (P <0.001), and survivin [HR = 1.78 (1.18-2.68); P = 0.006] contributed significantly to the model. For OS, only nodal category (P <0.001) and survivin [HR = 3.05 (1.83-5.10); P <0.001] were significant. CONCLUSION: Survivin demonstrates a strong, independent, association with poor prognosis. Survivin might be used as a new marker to stratify breast cancer patients for more optimal treatment modalities, or it could be a promising new target for therapy.

Complex of urokinase-type plasminogen activator with its type 1 inhibitor predicts poor outcome in 576 patients with lymph node-negative breast carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: The ability of a solid tumor to grow and metastasize has a significant dependence on protease systems, such as the plasminogen activation system. The plasminogen activation system includes the urokinase-type plasminogen activator (uPA) and plasminogen activator inhibitor type 1 (PAI-1), among other molecules. Both uPA and PAI-1 are established prognostic factors for patients with breast carcinoma. In the current study, the authors investigated whether the complex of uPA with PAI-1 is also associated with the natural course of this malignancy. METHODS: Cytosolic levels of uPA, PAI-1, and the uPA:PAI-1 complex were measured in tumor tissue from 576 patients with lymph node-negative invasive breast carcinoma using quantitative enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays. Patients did not receive adjuvant systemic therapy, and the median follow-up duration was 61 months (range, 2-187 months) after primary diagnosis. Correlations with well known clinicopathologic factors were assessed, and univariate and multivariate survival analyses were performed. RESULTS: uPA:PAI-1 complex levels were positively associated with adverse histologic grade and inversely correlated with estrogen and progesterone receptor status. On univariate analysis, increased levels of the uPA:PAI-1 complex were found to be associated with reduced recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) rates. On multivariate analysis, uPA:PAI-1 complex levels were found to be an independent predictor of OS (P = 0.039), but not RFS (P = 0.240). When uPA and PAI-1 levels were not included in the multivariate analysis, uPA:PAI-1 complex levels became a significant predictor of both RFS and OS (P = 0.029 and P = 0.007, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: The results of the current study demonstrate that uPA:PAI-1 complex levels have prognostic value on univariate analysis. In addition, increased uPA:PAI-1 complex levels were significantly associated with poor OS on multivariate analysis. Increased uPA:PAI-1 complex levels were also significantly associated with reduced RFS rates after the exclusion of uPA and PAI-1 levels from the multivariate analysis model.

Tissue inhibitors of metalloproteinase expression in human breast cancer: TIMP-3 is associated with adjuvant endocrine therapy success.

Tissue inhibitors of matrix metalloproteinase (TIMPs) may be involved in tumour growth, apoptosis, angiogenesis, invasion, and the development of metastases. This study has evaluated the association of the expression levels of the TIMP forms 1, 2, 3, and 4, measured by quantitative real-time RT-PCR, with classical clinicopathological characteristics, ie age, menopausal status, tumour size, histological grade, number of involved lymph nodes, and steroid hormone receptor status, and with disease progression and treatment sensitivity in 273 breast cancer patients. The mRNA levels of TIMP-1 and TIMP-2 were not associated with any known clinicopathological tumour feature. TIMP-3 and TIMP-4 levels were significantly higher in steroid hormone receptor-positive samples, although the levels of TIMP-4 were much lower than those of the other TIMPs. Only TIMP-3 predicted relapse-free survival (RFS) time differently depending on post-surgical treatment as, in particular, the interaction of TIMP-3 with endocrine therapy (p = 0.008, HR = 0.24, 95% CI = 0.09-0.69) contributed significantly to RFS in multivariate Cox regression analysis. In subgroup analyses, the 107 patients treated with tamoxifen differed greatly in prognosis after dichotomization by the median TIMP-3 level (p = 0.0003). Thus, high tumour levels of the matrix metalloproteinases inhibitor and pro-apoptotic factor TIMP-3 are associated with successful tamoxifen treatment of patients with breast cancer.

The complex between urokinase-type plasminogen activator (uPA) and its type-1 inhibitor (PAI-I) independently predicts response to first-line endocrine therapy in advanced breast cancer.

It has been shown that urokinase-type plasminogen activator (uPA) and its main inhibitor (PAI-I) have predictive value for therapy success in advanced breast cancer. Levels of the complex between uPA and PAI-I, formed when both molecules are in their active form, might have superior predictive power. Here, we investigate the association between levels of uPA:PAI-I complex and rate of response to first-line systemic therapy for advanced breast cancer. Tumor tissues of 170 patients with advanced breast cancer were analyzed for uPA:PAI-I complex concentrations using a quantitative enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. The patients received either endocrine therapy (n=96) or chemotherapy (n=74) as first-line treatment after diagnosis of advanced disease. Of the endocrine treated patients, those with high levels of uPA:PAI-I complex showed a shorter progression-free survival (PFS) compared to patients with lower uPA:PAI-I complex levels (P=0.035). Furthermore, in the multivariate regression analysis a significant lower rate of response to first-line endocrine therapy was found in patients with high uPA:PAI-I complex levels compared to patients with low uPA:PAI-I complex levels (odds ratio (OR)=0.27, 95% CI, 0.09-0.59, P=0.018), in addition to the predictive impact of the steroid hormone receptor (ER/PgR) status (OR=2.68, 95% CI, 1.08-6.63, P=0.033). Complex levels did not predict efficacy of chemotherapy in patients with advanced breast cancer. The results show that the plasminogen activation system affects the response to endocrine therapy independent of steroid hormone receptor status and may be of help to further refine the indication for this treatment in individual patients. Further studies are warranted to explain this underlying resistance to endocrine therapy when uPA:PAI-I levels are high.

Mammaglobin is associated with low-grade, steroid receptor-positive breast tumors from postmenopausal patients, and has independent prognostic value for relapse-free survival time.

PURPOSE: The tumor mRNA expression levels of mammaglobin, a novel breast-specific and breast cancer-associated marker, were correlated with disease outcome in 280 patients with primary breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Mammaglobin expression levels were assessed by quantitative reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction in frozen tumor tissue from breast cancer patients with a median age of 60 years (range, 30 to 88 years) and a median follow-up of 85 months (range, 2 to 169 months). RESULTS: High expression levels were associated with low-grade tumors (P =.018), with positive estrogen and progesterone receptor status (P <.001), and postmenopausal status (P =.010). In the analysis of all patients, low tumor mammaglobin expression levels predicted an early relapse both in Cox univariate (hazard ratio [HR], 0.52; 95% CI, 0.34 to 0.79; P =.002) and multivariate regression analyses corrected for the traditional prognostic factors (HR, 0.55; 95% CI, 0.35 to 0.88; P =.012). The association of mammaglobin expression with the rate of relapse was particularly favorable in patients who received adjuvant tamoxifen treatment (HR, 0.35; 95% CI, 0.17 to 0.71; P =.004). CONCLUSION: These results demonstrate that the assessment of the tumor mRNA expression level of the breast-specific protein mammaglobin could be useful to stratify patients for individual adjuvant treatment strategies.

Predictive impact of urokinase-type plasminogen activator: plasminogen activator inhibitor type-1 complex on the efficacy of adjuvant systemic therapy in primary breast cancer.

One of the most thoroughly studied systems in relation to its prognostic relevance in patients with breast cancer, is the plasminogen activation system. This system comprises of, among others, the urokinase-type plasminogen activator (uPA) and its main inhibitor (PAI-1). In this study we investigated whether the uPA:PAI-1 complex is associated with the responsiveness of patients with primary breast cancer to adjuvant systemic therapy. Quantitative enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays were used to assess the levels of uPA, PAI-1, and uPA:PAI-1 complex in 1119 tumors of patients with primary invasive breast cancer. These patients were followed for a median follow-up time of 59 months (range, 2-267 months) after the primary diagnosis. Correlations with well-known clinicopathological factors, and univariate and multivariate survival analyses were performed. High uPA:PAI-1 complex levels were correlated with an adverse histological grade, and inversely associated with negative estrogen and progesterone receptor status. High tumor levels of uPA:PAI-1 complex predicted an early relapse in the univariate relapse-free survival analysis (P < 0.001). The multivariate analysis showed that high uPA:PAI-1 complex levels were associated with a decreased relapse-free survival time (P = 0.033), independently of age, tumor size, number of lymph nodes affected, progesterone receptor status, uPA, adjuvant endocrine, and chemotherapy. More important, it was demonstrated that there is a larger benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy for patients with higher versus lower tumor levels of uPA:PAI-1 complex. The results of this study imply that the expression of uPA:PAI-1 complex independently predicts the efficacy of adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with primary breast cancer.