Validity and reliability of the behavioral signs of respiratory instability (BSRI) © scale during activity for infants with bronchopulmonary dysplasia.

OBJECTIVE: There is no reliable evidence on how best to evaluate the overall status of infants with severe forms of bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD). The Behavioral Signs of Respiratory Instability (BSRI) scale was developed as an objective measure of developmental capacity during occupational and physical therapy sessions. The purpose of this study was to determine the psychometric properties of the BSRI Scale. STUDY DESIGN: The BSRI and Respiratory Severity Score (RSS) were compared for 25 infants with BPD and 15 infants without BPD. A cross-sectional design was used to test inter-rater reliability among 10 NICU occupational and physical therapists. A prospective cohort design was used to evaluate validity. RESULTS: The BSRI demonstrated good to excellent inter-rater reliability (ρ = 0.47-0.91) and was strongly correlated with RSS (ρ = -0.77, p < 0.001; concurrent validity). CONCLUSION: The BSRI Scale has preliminary psychometric support. Standardized measures like the BSRI may provide accurate, objective data that can improve care planning within interdisciplinary teams that supports brain growth and potentially improves neurodevelopment.

The validity, reliability, and time requirement of study model analysis using cone-beam computed tomography-generated virtual study models.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the validity, reliability, and time spent to perform a full orthodontic study model analysis (SMA) on cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT)-generated dental models (Anatomodels) compared with conventional plaster models and a subset of extracted premolars. SETTING AND SAMPLE POPULATION: A retrospective sample of 30 consecutive patient records with fully erupted permanent dentition, good-quality plaster study models, and CBCT scans. Twenty-two extracted premolars were available from eleven of these patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Five evaluators participated in the inter-rater reliability study and one evaluator for the intrarater reliability and validity studies. Agreement was assessed by ICC and cross-tabulations, while mean differences were investigated using paired-sample t-tests and repeated-measures anova. RESULTS: For all three modalities studied, intrarater reliability was excellent, inter-rater reliability was moderate to excellent, validity was poor to moderate, and performing SMA on Anatomodels took twice as long as on plaster. CONCLUSIONS: Study model analysis using CBCT-generated study models was reliable but not always valid and required more time to perform when compared with plaster models.

Assessment of motor development in very low birth weight infants.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of the current investigation was to describe the fine- and gross-motor acquisitions of very low birth weight (VLBW) infants during their first 12 months without imposing traditional assessment assumptions. STUDY DESIGN: A nonrandomized, prospective study was used for a sample consisting of 89 VLBW infants whose motor development was assessed neonatally and at 4, 8, and 12 months chronological age. Fine- and gross-motor assessment items were selected and adapted from three standardized assessment instruments. RESULTS: The fine- and gross-motor systems of development appeared to be relatively independent of one another before the 8-month assessment. Thus, early fine-motor control appeared to develop almost to the exclusion of gross-motor progress. Once fine-motor control was established by 8 months, numerous gross-motor milestones followed and were present at 12 months chronological age. CONCLUSION: Current and previous data continue to define a developmental picture in which VLBW and fullterm infants achieve the same fine- and gross-motor milestones; however, the developmental pathways whereby milestones are achieved, during at least the first 12 months, appear to be different. Accordingly, applying instruments standardized on fullterm infants to the assessment of VLBW babies may not be serving us well on a number of different issues.

Neonatal suck reflex pattern does not predict apnea.

Respiration and suck are gestational age-dependent reflexes modulated in the brain stem. To determine if the suck reflex pattern could be used to predict apnea, the relationship between the two was examined in 28 neonates. The suck reflex was quantified with respect to burst-pause rhythm, amplitude of negative suck pressure, and synchrony of the negative-positive pressure. Apneas were counted 5 days prior to and following measurement of the suck reflex pattern. Increasing gestational age correlated with a lower frequency of apnea (P < .01) and higher suck scores (P < .01). A mature suck reflex pattern, however, failed to predict the occurrence of apnea.

Transition times to oral feeding in premature infants with and without apnea.

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether a significant relationship exists between the presence of apnea and the number of days it takes a premature infant to attain full oral feeding. DESIGN: A two-way analysis of variance factorial design (apnea x aminophylline) was used with infants grouped according to presence or absence of apnea and whether they were receiving aminophylline. SETTING: Neonatal intensive-care and step-down nurseries of a level III teaching hospital. PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS: Eligibility criteria for this study included gestational age of 28-34 weeks, less than 48 hours of mechanical ventilation, and absence of congenital anomalies. Infants were classified into one of four groups: Group 1 (NN) consisted of infants who had no recorded apnea and were not receiving aminophylline (n = 27); group 2 (AA) consisted of infants receiving aminophylline who continued to experience apnea during the transition time to oral feeding, (n = 20); group 3 (NA) consisted of infants receiving aminophylline who did not experience apnea during the transition time to oral feeding (n = 12); and group 4 (AN) were infants who experienced some apnea but never received aminophylline (n = 6). All 65 enrolled subjects completed the study. PROCEDURES: Review of medical records and daily nursing notes to record apnea instances and oral feeding status for each 24-hour period. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The number of days between the first attempted oral feeding and full oral feeding was recorded, as well as number of apnea instances occurring during the transition time. RESULTS: An analysis of variance procedure showed that groups who did not experience apnea had a significantly (F[1, 61] = 10.19, p < .01) shorter transition time (NN = 6.6 days, NA = 5.4 days) than groups who did (AA = 11.3 days, AN = 10.3 days). Apnea was found to be correlated strongly with transition time (R = .42, p < .001). A multiple linear regression forward selection procedure showed apnea to make the greatest contribution to variance in transition time in days with a partial R2 of .18 (p < .001). CONCLUSION: Apnea appears to be a factor that influences the length of time it takes a premature infant to begin receiving full oral feedings.

Motor development, infantile reactions and postural responses of preterm, at-risk infants.

Eighty-nine low-birthweight, preterm infants were enrolled in a longitudinal study to describe motor development, infantile reactions and postural responses during the first chronological year of life and to determine the relationship between these behaviors. There was a clear trend from prevalence of primitive patterns, such as the asymmetric tonic neck reflex, towards a prevalence of mature postural reactions such as the Landau, righting and protective extension reflexes. Statistical analysis suggested that a relationship exists between infantile patterns, automatic postural reactions and motor development that is similar to that accepted as normal in term infant development, when allowance is made for preterm birth. Correlations were also obtained between integration of the tonic labyrinthine response and the presence of the asymmetric tonic neck pattern at the time of hospital discharge and later achievement of motor milestones. These relationships warrant further investigation.