Long-term safety of recombinant human growth hormone in children.

BACKGROUND: Between 1985 and 2006, the National Cooperative Growth Study (NCGS) monitored the safety and efficacy of recombinant human growth hormone (rhGH) in 54,996 children. METHODS: Enrolled patients were followed until rhGH discontinuation. Investigators submitted adverse event reports for targeted events or those potentially rhGH-related. RESULTS: Early concerns about de novo leukemia in patients without risk factors have not been substantiated--three observed vs. 5.6 expected in age-matched general population based on years at risk [standard incidence ratio (SIR), 0.54; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.11-1.58]. De novo malignancies (intracranial and extracranial) were not significantly increased in patients without risk factors (29 confirmed vs. 26 expected; SIR, 1.12; 95% CI, 0.75-1.61). Second neoplasms occurred in 49 patients, of whom 37 had irradiation for their initial tumors (including five of 16 retinoblastoma patients, three of whom had bilateral retinoblastoma) consistent with an increased risk with rhGH. Thirty-three patients developed type 1 diabetes mellitus (DM) (37 expected; SIR, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.62-1.26). Type 2 DM and nonspecified DM were reported in 20 and eight patients, respectively. Two deaths were reported in patients with Prader-Willi syndrome and five deaths from aortic dissection in patients with Turner syndrome. In patients with organic GH deficiency and idiopathic panhypopituitarism, 11 events of acute adrenal insufficiency occurred, including four deaths, consistent with a reported increased risk for adrenal insufficiency in hypopituitary patients with or without rhGH treatment. CONCLUSION: After more than 20 yr, leukemia, a major safety issue initially believed associated with GH, has not been confirmed, but other signals, including risk of second malignancies in patients previously treated with irradiation, have been detected or confirmed through the NCGS. These data further clarify the events associated with rhGH and, although confirming a favorable overall safety profile, they also highlight specific populations at potential risk.

Growth hormone safety update from the National Cooperative Growth Study.

We reviewed adverse event (AE) data in the National Cooperative Growth Study from start-up (1985) until January 1, 1999. Enrollment was 33,161. A total of 2,632 AE reports were received; 863 were serious events, with 156 deaths. The most common cause of death was recurrence of intracranial neoplasm. There were 20 reports of leukemia, and the standard morbidity ratio (SMR) was 0.73 (95% CI: 0.20-1.86) for the four cases without risk factors. There were 35 reports of extracranial nonleukemic malignancy, and the SMR was 0.44 (95% CI: 0.24-0.74) for the 14 cases without risk factors. The recurrence rate for all brain tumors present at baseline was 7.6%, and for craniopharyngiomas, 6.4%. There were 49 reports of intracranial hypertension (20 patients had papilledema), 68 reports of diabetes/hyperglycemia, 45 of slipped capital femoral epiphysis, 136 of scoliosis, and five of pancreatitis. There was no evidence of increased incidence of leukemia or extracranial nonleukemic malignancies among patients without prior risk factors. Intracranial hypertension does not necessarily occur early in growth hormone therapy. Other findings were consistent with past observations.

Optimizing the use of rituximab for treatment of B-cell non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: a benefit-risk update.

Rituximab (Rituxan; Genentech, Inc, South San Francisco, CA and IDEC Pharmaceutical Corporation, San Diego, CA), the first monoclonal antibody approved in the United States for the treatment of cancer, is indicated for the treatment of patients with relapsed or refractory CD20+ low-grade non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. From November 1997 through May 1999, approximately 36,000 patients have been treated with rituximab. Serious cardiopulmonary infusion reactions culminating in death have been reported to occur in approximately 0.04% to 0.07% of patients. Post-approval tumor lysis syndrome has been reported within 12 to 24 hours after the first antibody infusion and is estimated to occur in 0.04% to 0.05% of patients. The risk of tumor lysis appears to be higher in patients with high numbers of circulating malignant cells. Serious infusion-related adverse drug reactions, most often consisting of cardiopulmonary reactions associated with the rapid lysis of large numbers of circulating malignant cells, have been fatal in approximately 0.5 per 1,000 treated patients. Major risk factors include high numbers of circulating malignant lymphoma cells, pulmonary infiltrates or lymphoma involvement, and prior cardiovascular disease. This report updates the safety experience of rituximab therapy with data from clinical trials and postmarketing safety experience, and examines how this information can be used to optimize therapy.

Rituximab therapy in hematologic malignancy patients with circulating blood tumor cells: association with increased infusion-related side effects and rapid blood tumor clearance.

PURPOSE: Rituximab was recently approved for use in relapsed, low-grade non-Hodgkin's lymphoma; however, few data exist regarding the safety of this agent in patients with a high number of tumor cells in the blood. METHODS AND RESULTS: After the observation at our institution of a rapid reduction of peripheral-blood tumor cells with associated severe pulmonary infusion-related toxicity in two patients with refractory hematologic malignancies, data on three additional cases were collected from physician-submitted reports of adverse events related to rituximab treatment. Five patients with hematologic malignancies possessing a high number of blood tumor cells were treated with rituximab and developed rapid tumor clearance. The median age was 68 years (range, 26 to 78 years). Patients were diagnosed with B-cell prolymphocytic leukemia (n = 2), chronic lymphocytic leukemia (n = 2), or transformed non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (n = 1). All of these patients had bulky adenopathy or organomegaly. All five patients developed a unique syndrome of severe infusion-related reactions, thrombocytopenia, rapid decrement in circulating tumor cell load, and mild electrolyte evidence of tumor lysis, and all required hospitalization. In addition, one patient developed ascites. These events resolved, and four patients were subsequently treated with rituximab without significant complications. CONCLUSION: Rituximab administration in patients who have a high number of tumor cells in the blood may have an increased likelihood of severe initial infusion-related reactions. These data also suggest that rituximab may have activity in a variety of other lymphoid neoplasms, such as chronic lymphocytic leukemia and B-cell prolymphocytic leukemia.

Evaluation of the safety and efficacy of ketorolac versus morphine by patient-controlled analgesia for postoperative pain.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To compare ketorolac tromethamine with morphine for pain management after major abdominal surgery. DESIGN: Double-blind, randomized study. SETTING: Hospital recovery room and postoperative surgical unit. PATIENTS: One hundred ninety-one patients with at least moderate pain after major abdominal surgery. INTERVENTIONS: Patients received ketorolac by patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) bolus alone (Ket B), ketorolac by bolus plus infusion (Ket I), or morphine by PCA bolus (morphine), with injectable morphine available for supplementation. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Levels of sedation, pain intensity, pain relief, and adverse events were recorded at baseline, at 2, 4, and 6 hours, and at termination. Supplemental morphine was required by 71% of Ket B patients, 67% of Ket I patients, and 38% of morphine patients (p < or = 0.001 for Ket B vs morphine). Although patients receiving ketorolac required more supplemental morphine than the morphine group (6.0 mg Ket I, 6.2 mg Ket B, 4.0 mg morphine), there was a large morphine-sparing effect in both ketorolac groups (total morphine 6.0 mg Ket I, 6.2 mg Ket B, 33.3 mg morphine). Overall pain relief scores were similar for morphine and Ket I groups, and were lower for Ket B than for morphine (p = 0.002). There were no differences among groups in numbers of patients with adverse events. CONCLUSION: Ketorolac may be effective when administered by PCA device, and has a clear morphine-sparing effect.

The effect of intravenous ketorolac given intraoperatively versus postoperatively on outcome from gynecologic abdominal surgery.

STUDY OBJECTIVES: To examine the effect of timing of an intravenous (i.v.) dose (intraoperative vs. postoperative) of ketorolac tromethamine on pain scores and overall outcome after total abdominal hysterectomy (TAH) and myomectomy. DESIGN: Prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled study. PATIENTS: 248 ASA physical status I and II adult female patients scheduled for elective hysterectomy or myomectomy. INTERVENTIONS: General anesthesia was administered that consisted of thiopental sodium for induction, enflurane or isoflurane in nitrous oxide-oxygen for maintenance, and small doses of fentanyl and midazolam. Patients were randomized into three groups to receive toradol/placebo on a dosing schedule of dose 1 given one-half hour prior to expected end of surgery, dose 2 given on awakening in the postanesthesia care unit, and doses 3, 4, and 5 given at 6, 12, and 18 hours, respectively, after dose 2; Group 1 patients received placebo (saline) for dose 1, ketorolac 60 mg i.v. for dose 2, and ketorolac 30 mg i.v. for doses 3, 4, and 5. Group 2 patients received ketorolac 60 mg i.v. for dose 1, placebo for dose 2, and ketorolac 30 mg i.v. for doses 3, 4, and 5. Group 3 patients received placebo for all doses. All patients were given i.v. morphine PCA postoperatively, and morphine usages, visual analog pain intensity (VAS) scores, as well as adverse events and median times to recovery milestones were recorded. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: VAS scores (mean) before dose 2 were significantly lower in Group 2 than Group 1, as were at-rest evaluations at 15 minutes and one hour. Group 2 patients also had decreased morphine requirements as compared to placebo. Both ketorolac groups (Groups 1 and 2) had significantly higher values for patient and observer overall ratings, case of nursing care, and tolerability as compared to placebo (Group 3). There were no significant differences among groups in adverse events or median times to recovery milestones. CONCLUSIONS: Although it is possible to demonstrate an improvement in early postoperative pain scores with intraoperative ketorolac and better overall ratings of ketorolac both intraoperatively and postoperatively as compared with placebo, the lack of clinically significant differences in analgesic efficacy in the two active study groups indicates the need for a careful consideration by the clinician of the risks versus benefits involved in the administration of antiplatelet medication in the perioperative period.

Comparison of intravenous ketorolac, meperidine, and both (balanced analgesia) for renal colic.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To compare the analgesic efficacy and safety of IV ketorolac, the only nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drug indicated for parenteral use in acute pain in the United States, with IV meperidine and with a combination of the two agents in renal colic. METHODS: We carried out a double-blind, randomized, multicenter clinical trial in the emergency departments of four urban tertiary care teaching hospitals. Our study subjects were 154 patients with suspected renal colic. Each subject received an initial IV dose of ketorolac 60 mg, meperidine 50 mg, or both supplemented as needed beyond 30 minutes with additional doses of meperidine. RESULTS: The main outcome measures were changes in pain-intensity and pain-relief scores, amount of supplemental meperidine required, end-of-study drug tolerability, and adverse events. Analyses of 106 subjects with confirmed renal colic indicated that ketorolac and the combination were significantly better than meperidine alone by all efficacy measures, including pain relief and time elapsed before the need for supplemental meperidine. By 30 minutes, 75% of the ketorolac group and 74% of the combination group had a 50% reduction in pain scores, compared with 23% of the meperidine group (P < .001). The ketorolac and combination groups did not differ significantly in any of the efficacy measures. CONCLUSION: IV ketorolac, alone or in combination with meperidine, was superior to IV meperidine alone in moderate and severe renal colic. Because many subjects in all three treatment groups received supplemental meperidine and because response to ketorolac alone cannot be predicted, clinicians may choose to initiate treatment with a ketorolac-meperidine combination.

Ketorolac versus meperidine for pain relief after orthopaedic surgery.

In this double-blind, randomized, multicenter study, 244 patients with at least moderate pain after major orthopaedic surgery received intramuscular Ketorolac (60 mg followed by 30 mg) or intramuscular meperidine (100 mg or placebo) every 2 to 6 hours as needed for as many as 5 days. Analgesic response was evaluated for 6 hours after initial study drug administration and thereafter each night at bedtime. Both active treatment groups had similar 3-hour summed pain intensity difference and 3-hour total pain relief scores after the first dose that were superior to placebo. The 6-hour summed pain intensity difference and total pain relief scores were significantly higher with Ketorolac than with meperidine or placebo. The mean daily categorical pain intensity scores were comparable with Ketorolac and meperidine, and both were significantly superior to placebo. Patient ratings of overall medication efficacy were significantly better with Ketorolac than with meperidine. In both patient and observer evaluations, Ketorolac was significantly better tolerated than meperidine, and the number of patients reporting adverse events was lower with Ketorolac than with meperidine. Following major orthopaedic surgery, Ketorolac provided effective analgesia that was superior to placebo and at least comparable with meperidine. Ketorolac was better tolerated than meperidine.

Evaluation of the antipyretic effect of ketorolac, acetaminophen, and placebo in endotoxin-induced fever.

The authors studied the antipyretic effect of three intramuscular doses of ketorolac (15, 30, and 60 mg), acetaminophen 650 mg PO, and placebo in healthy male volunteers using an endotoxin-induced fever model. In this double-blind, double-dummy, parallel study, subjects were assigned randomly with equal probability to one of the above treatment groups. Thirty minutes after study medication administration, a 20 unit per kilogram dose of reference standard endotoxin (RSE) was administered intravenously, and temperature was determined every 15 minutes for an 8-hour period. Compared with placebo, all active treatment groups demonstrated a statistically significant reduction in both adjusted area under the temperature-by-time curve (AAUC) and the maximum increase over baseline temperature (dTmax). Furthermore, the 30 mg intramuscular dose of ketorolac demonstrated approximately the same antipyretic activity as the 650 mg oral dose of acetaminophen, and there was a statistically significant dose response across the three ketorolac doses studied (P < .0001). The majority of side effects reported during this study were symptoms associated with fever, including chills, headache, myalgia, and dizziness, all of which are effects of RSE. The frequency of side effects tended to be less in the treatment groups with the greatest antipyretic activity.

Comparison of oral ketorolac, intramuscular morphine, and placebo for treatment of pain after orthopedic surgery.

Using a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel, single-dose, single-center, 6-hour study, we compared the analgesic response and tolerability of oral ketorolac tromethamine and intramuscular morphine sulfate and placebo. The study group comprised 176 patients with moderate, severe, or very severe pain after hip or knee surgery at a teaching hospital. Patients received either 10 mg of ketorolac orally, 10 mg of morphine intramuscularly, 5 mg of morphine IM, or placebo. Patients rated pain intensity at baseline and pain intensity and pain relief at 30 minutes, 1 hour, and hourly thereafter for 6 hours. At study completion, we evaluated overall patient ratings of pain relief and occurrence of adverse events. Summed pain intensity difference scores and total pain relief scores showed the active medications to be significantly superior to placebo and not significantly different from each other. The 10-mg dose of morphine showed a small advantage over ketorolac in peak analgesic effect, but the onset of pain relief was comparable among the active agents. The incidence of adverse events among the active-treatment groups was similar, though there was a numerical trend favoring ketorolac over 10 mg of morphine. We found oral ketorolac to be an effective alternative to parenteral opioids for the treatment of pain after hip or knee surgery in patients who can tolerate oral medication.

The use of ketorolac in the management of postoperative pain.

Ketorolac tromethamine (Toradol) is a nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drug (NSAID) available in intramuscular (IM) and oral formulations for the management of acute pain. Intramuscular ketorolac is the only parenteral NSAID available for analgesic use in the US. The clinical profile is reviewed, and clinical studies most applicable to a postoperative patient are discussed in detail. The results of a clinical study performed at Emory University School of Medicine are presented. In this single-dose study, 176 patients received either 10 mg of oral ketorolac, 5 mg or 10 mg of IM morphine, or placebo after orthopedic surgery. The analgesic efficacy of ketorolac was comparable to both doses of morphine and significantly superior to placebo. Ketorolac, when administered intramuscularly or orally, is a safe and effective analgesic agent for the short-term management of acute postoperative pain and can be used as an alternative to opioid therapy.

Comparison of ketorolac and meperidine in patients with postoperative pain--impact on health care utilization.

A double-blind, randomized study was conducted to compare the effects of intramuscular ketorolac tromethamine and meperidine hydrochloride, and subsequent oral pain medication, on health care utilization and postoperative recovery. Following abdominal hysterectomy or cholecystectomy, 210 patients (aged 18 to 70 years; 189 women, 21 men) were randomly assigned to therapy and evaluated for efficacy, safety, nursing care requirements, functional independence, recovery milestones, and quality of life. The patients received 30 mg of ketorolac intramuscularly every 3 to 6 hours as needed, followed by 10 mg of ketorolac every 4 to 6 hours, or 100 mg of meperidine intramuscularly every 3 to 6 hours as needed, followed by acetaminophen/codeine (600 mg/60 mg) orally every 4 to 6 hours. Patients receiving ketorolac had lower nursing utilization scores and achieved a higher level of functioning than patients receiving meperidine during the first 3 postoperative days. Times to first bowel movement, walking without assistance, and first oral fluids were significantly shorter after ketorolac than meperidine. Mean pain intensity difference (from baseline) scores and pain relief scores when adjusted for baseline pain severity were comparable between ketorolac and meperidine. Most adverse events reported by the patients were mild to moderate; 12 patients in each group withdrew from treatment because of adverse events (nausea, rash, or headache). It is concluded that ketorolac is an effective alternative to meperidine in the management of postoperative pain.

A randomized, double-blind evaluation of ketorolac tromethamine for postoperative analgesia in ambulatory surgery patients.

BACKGROUND: Given the trend toward early discharge of patients after surgery and the inherent adverse effects of opioid analgesics, we compared a new nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drug, ketorolac tromethamine, given intravenously (iv) and then orally, with two commonly prescribed opioid analgesics in ambulatory patients for up to 1 week after surgery. METHODS: In this study incorporating a double-blind, multi-dose design, 221 patients who had moderate or severe pain after surgery were randomized to one of three treatment groups: group K30 received 30 mg iv ketorolac twice, then 10 mg iv every 30 min as required to control pain, up to six doses, followed by 10 mg oral ketorolac every 4-6 h; group F50 received 50 micrograms iv fentanyl at the same time intervals as in group K30, followed by 60 mg codeine plus 600 mg acetaminophen (C+A) orally every 4-6 h; and group F10 received the same combination as did group F50, but only 10 micrograms fentanyl per dose. RESULTS: Compared with 50 micrograms fentanyl iv, 30 mg iv ketorolac provided delayed but otherwise equivalent analgesic effects and was associated with similar side effects. Compared with C+A, 10 mg oral ketorolac was associated with a lower incidence of nausea and somnolence and earlier return of bowel function but not better pain relief, drug tolerability, quality of life, or psychologic well-being. CONCLUSIONS: Ketorolac, when used in an iv and then oral sequence, is a safe and effective analgesic in the ambulatory surgery setting. It has a slower onset than fentanyl, but causes fewer side effects than C+A.

Effect of age on plasma glucose and insulin responses to a test mixed meal.

Plasma glucose and insulin responses to an oral dextrose tolerance test and to a mixed-meal test were determined in fully ambulatory residents of a retirement community. The study population consisted of 127 women and 79 men, whose ages ranged from 47 to 90 years. Progressive hyperglycemia and hyperinsulinemia with age could be demonstrated in the women. These changes were observed with either type of tolerance test and could not be attributed to age-related differences in measurements of body mass index or estimates of physical activity. In contrast, no significant changes with age in either glucose or insulin responses were noted in men. The ability to document increases in the plasma glucose or insulin responses were noted in men. The ability to document increases in the plasma glucose and insulin responses to a mixed meal suggests that aging, at least in women, is associated with day-long elevations of both plasma glucose and insulin concentrations. The possible relationship of these metabolic changes to the development of atherosclerosis merits further consideration.