Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
1.
J Hand Ther ; 35(2): 261-266, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35504766

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: During finger flexion, the tendons of flexor digitorum profundus migrate proximally, along with their attached lumbrical muscles. This incursion was suggested to extend into the Carpal Tunnel. Ultrasonographic imaging can be used to assess in vivo soft tissue behavior and incursion. PURPOSE OF THE STUDY: To clinically quantify the lumbrical muscles incursion in different finger positions. STUDY DESIGN: Cross sectional, observational study. METHODS: The lumbricals of 20 healthy adults with no history of hand injuries were evaluated with neuromuscular ultrasound imaging (n = 160 lumbricals). The lumbrical muscles migration was measured as the participants actively moved their fingers from full extension to 50% flexion, and 100% flexion. RESULTS: Of the 160 lumbricals measures, the incursion occurred at 18.1% of fingers at 50% finger flexion, and increased to 79.4% during full finger flexion. The lumbricals migrated a total of 2.99 cm after full finger flexion, and ended up 0.76 cm (SD = 0.86 cm) inside the Carpal Tunnel. The metacarpophalangeal joint range of motion of the index finger at the point where the lumbricals entered the distal border of the Transverse Carpal Ligament was 84.4° (SD = 6.8°). The Carpal Tunnel cross-sectional area during finger extension was 1.68 (0.35) cm2, and increased to 1.81 (0.33) cm2 after full finger flexion. CONCLUSION: This study showed direct evidence of lumbrical incursion into the Carpal Tunnel during finger flexion. The cross-sectional area of the Carpal Tunnel increased during full finger flexion in comparison to full finger extension, supplementing the evidence of increase content within the Carpal Tunnel. The findings of this study have significant clinical implications for the conservative treatment of the Capral Tunnel Syndrome.


Subject(s)
Carpal Tunnel Syndrome , Movement , Adult , Carpal Tunnel Syndrome/diagnostic imaging , Cross-Sectional Studies , Fingers/diagnostic imaging , Fingers/physiology , Hand , Humans , Ligaments , Movement/physiology
2.
Occup Ther Int ; 2020: 8914372, 2020.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32934613

ABSTRACT

This exploratory study was aimed at evaluating the current status of global occupational therapy practice on the use of assessments for clients with cognitive impairments and providing recommendations for ongoing evidence. We targeted international occupational therapy clinicians working with clients experiencing neurocognitive impairments. 323 occupational therapists from a wide range of clinical practice areas participated in the study. A large number of therapists used noncognitive specific assessments with a focus on functional approaches. The most commonly used standardized assessments were the COPM (56.7%), followed by MMSE (54.2%) and MoCA (45.5%), while the nonstandardized assessments were clinical observation (38.4%) and generic ADL assessment (34.1%). The use of main assessments was significantly different across world regions (p < 0.05), as were the reasons for choosing them (p < 0.05). The occupational therapists' use of assessment tools with clients suffering from neurocognitive impairments is inconsistent across the globe. The identification of international best practices for selecting and implementing proper outcome measures is warranted. It is essential to promote the development of an occupational therapy initiative to support the use of appropriate assessments at the international levels to facilitate consistent best practice.


Subject(s)
Attitude of Health Personnel , Cognitive Dysfunction/rehabilitation , Occupational Therapists/organization & administration , Occupational Therapy/organization & administration , Professional-Patient Relations , Female , Humans , Mental Disorders/rehabilitation , Professional Role
3.
Med Princ Pract ; 28(2): 158-166, 2019.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30504709

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: In Kuwait, knowledge and attitudes of the health care teams toward occupational therapy practice (OTP) have not been investigated. This current study sought to explore the knowledge about and attitudes of interdisciplinary team members toward OTP. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: This cross-sectional study involved developing and validating a tool to serve the purpose of the study. We used a modified Delphi method to develop a tool that assessed occupational therapy (OT) knowledge (OT areas of practice, domains, and philosophy) as well as attitudes toward OTP. Descriptive statistics were utilized, and nonparametric tests were used to compare knowledge and attitudes along with the demographic data. RESULTS: A convenience sample of 98 participants from various disciplines participated in this study. The tool was found to have an adequate content validity for a total of 27 items and satisfactory reliability (internal consistency); Cronbach's α-values for the knowledge and attitudes subscales were 0.88 and 0.74, respectively. The overall knowledge level of OTP among the participants was limited, whereas their attitudes were favorable. Characteristics of being a female (p = 0.01), a nurse (p = 0.02), and working experiences ≥10 years (p = 0.01) contributed significantly to the knowledge of OTP. The results further indicated that participants working in general hospitals (p = 0.02) and working with occupational therapists (p < 0.001) showed significantly better attitudes toward OTP. CONCLUSION: For effective collaborative practice and better patients' outcomes, the study findings recommend the development of interprofessional initiative committees targeting educational settings as well as clinical environments.


Subject(s)
Clinical Competence/standards , Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Interdisciplinary Communication , Occupational Therapy/statistics & numerical data , Adult , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Socioeconomic Factors
4.
Scand J Occup Ther ; 24(2): 83-88, 2017 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26853687

ABSTRACT

Background Rehabilitation professionals must be astute at recognizing, assessing, and treating individuals with cognitive deficits. No research is available to examine cognitive rehabilitation practices applied to individuals with neurological conditions in Kuwait. OBJECTIVES: To identify the use of cognitive assessments, the availability of resources, and the barriers to cognitive rehabilitation practices in Kuwait. Methods Face-to-face interviews were conducted with health care professionals working with adult individuals with neurological conditions. These professionals included occupational therapists, speech-language pathologists, psychiatrists, and neurologists. Results The most commonly used cognitive based assessments are MMSE (41%), and MoCA and LOTCA (15.2%). The only clinical assessment used is the Line-Bisection Test (2.2%). The most used occupation-based assessments are FIM (6.5%), COPM (4.3%), the Interest Checklist (2.2%), and the Barthel Index (2.2%). Resources related to cognitive rehabilitation in Kuwait that are unavailable to practitioners include journal clubs (91%), special interest groups (89%), and continuing education programmes (82.6%). Barriers to cognitive rehabilitation practice included lack of sufficient funds for continuing education, lack of time, lack of standardized assessments, and lack of inter-professional teamwork. Conclusion Many adults in Kuwait live with cognitive impairment. There is a need to develop appropriate evidence-based cognitive rehabilitation clinical guidelines in Kuwait.


Subject(s)
Attitude of Health Personnel , Cognition Disorders/rehabilitation , Health Personnel/education , Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale/standards , Education, Continuing/standards , Humans , Interviews as Topic , Kuwait , Surveys and Questionnaires
5.
Pain Res Manag ; 2016: 5719380, 2016.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28127233

ABSTRACT

Background. Several studies have reported an association between chronic pain and reduction of cognitive abilities of adults living in Western cultures. No literature could be found on the relationship between chronic pain and cognition among Middle Eastern adults. Objective. To compare four of the most commonly reported cognitive domains [memory, attention, processing speed, and executive functioning] among Middle Eastern adults with and without chronic pain. Methods. This matched group comparative study included 69 community residing and functionally independent Middle Eastern adults. Forty participants had chronic pain and 29 were pain-free. We administered five standardized cognitive assessments that are independent of culture and language to measure variable tasks of memory, attention, processing speed, and executive functioning. The study was conducted in a rehabilitation research setting with a controlled environment. Results. Evidence of decreased cognitive processing was found in patients with chronic pain. The chronic pain participants performed significantly worse than the pain-free participants on the cognitive measures of long-term memory, selective attention, processing speed, and executive functioning. Conclusion. The effect of Middle Eastern culture on the cognitive abilities of patients with chronic pain was negligible. Despite the wide variations between Eastern and Western cultures, the performance of our Middle Eastern participants in this study was consistent with performance of Western adults reported in previous studies.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...