A new inguinal approach for the obturator nerve block: anatomical and randomized clinical studies.

BACKGROUND: Obturator nerve block is highly recommended for knee surgery in addition to a femoral nerve block. The main disadvantage of the classic approach at the pubic tubercle is low patient acceptance due to pain and discomfort. The authors hypothesized that the use of a new inguinal obturator nerve block technique would reduce pain and discomfort in patients. METHODS: The inguinal approach was simulated in five fresh cadavers. Injection of latex was performed in two cadavers. The location of the needle and the extent of latex solution were analyzed. Fifty patients scheduled to undergo arthroscopic knee surgery were randomly assigned to receive obturator nerve block using either the inguinal (n = 25) or the pubic tubercle approach (n = 25). RESULTS: In all cadavers, the needle was close to the obturator nerve branches, which were surrounded by the latex solution. In the clinical study, visual analog scale pain scores and discomfort of block placement were significantly lower in the inguinal group compared with the pubic tubercle group (P < 0.01). In the inguinal group, there was a significant decrease in block performance time (P < 0.05) and in bolus of propofol and fentanyl used for the procedure (P < 0.01). Twenty minutes after application of the block, adductor strength decrease, occurrence, and location of cutaneous distribution of the obturator nerve were not significantly different between the groups. The incidence of minor complications was significantly increased in the pubic tubercle group (P < 0.05). No major complications were observed. CONCLUSIONS: The new inguinal approach decreases patient discomfort and pain of block placement as well as the time and sedation and analgesics required for a similar quality of sensory and motor block compared with the pubic tubercle approach.

Severe imported malaria: clinical presentation at the time of hospital admission and outcome in 42 cases diagnosed from 1996 to 2002.

The objectives of this retrospective study were to describe initial clinical profiles and subsequent outcome of adult patients in France who were diagnosed with severe imported malaria, as defined by the World Health Organization (WHO). Forty-two patients diagnosed from 1996 to 2002 were included (median age: 30 years, men: 78%, non-immune persons: 74%, return from Africa: 100%, inappropriate antimalarial chemoprophylaxis: 95%). At the time of hospital admission, jaundice (62%), hyperparasitemia (56%), and prostration (52%) were the most frequent findings, followed by acute renal failure (31%). Other findings, as described by the WHO criteria, were less common. Twenty-three patients presented only with jaundice, hyperparasitemia, or prostration in isolation, or in combination. Of these 23, five non-immune persons subsequently developed coma, shock, acute respiratory distress syndrome or acute renal failure; this led to death in 2 of these cases. This suggests that non-immune persons with imported malaria who present with jaundice, hyperparasitemia, or prostration should be admitted to the intensive care unit for close monitoring.

Development and validation of a perioperative satisfaction questionnaire.

BACKGROUND: Satisfaction is considered a valuable measure of outcome of healthcare processes. Only a few anesthesia-related validated questionnaires are reported. Because their scope is restricted to specific clinical contexts, their use remains limited. The objective of the current study was to develop and validate a self-reported questionnaire, Evaluation du Vecu de l'Anesthesie Generale (EVAN-G), assessing the satisfaction of the perioperative period surrounding general anesthesia. METHODS: Development of the EVAN-G questionnaire comprised a phase of item generation and a phase of psychometric validation. The patient sample was generated to be proportionally matched to the population of patients undergoing general anesthesia in France. The structure of the questionnaire was identified studying interitem, item-dimension, and interdimension correlations and factor analyses. Data were concurrently gathered to assess external validity. The discriminant validity was determined by comparison of scores across well known patient groups. Reliability was assessed by computation of Cronbach alpha coefficients and by test-retest. RESULTS: Eight hundred seventy-four patients were recruited in eight anesthesia departments. The EVAN-G includes 26 items; six specific scores and one global index score are available. Correlations between EVAN-G scores and other concurrent measures supported convergent validity. The EVAN-G correlated poorly with age, American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status, total anesthesia time, and number of previous anesthesias. Significantly higher satisfaction was reported by patients older than 65 yr, belonging to the laryngeal mask group. Reliability and reproducibility were shown. CONCLUSION: The EVAN-G adds important information oriented toward patients' perceptions. The authors' approach provides a novel, valid, and reliable tool that may be used in anesthesia practice.

[Intensive care for burn patients]. / Réanimation du brûlé.

Improvement in intensive care procedures allowed patients with extensive burns to survive, leading to develop new technics for cutaneous coverage. During initial stage of burn, internal fluid shifts can impair hemodynamic function and lead to large fluid infusion which has to be monitored. Afterwards, nutritional care by artificial nutrition, and prevention of infection, especially cutaneous infection by antibacterial topical creams, are the principal factors which improve vital prognosis.