Ifosfamide bolus followed by five days continuous infusion in extensively pretreated patients with advanced breast cancer: a phase II study.

PURPOSE: A phase II study with ifosfamide in pretreated patients with advanced breast cancer was performed to determine the objective response rate, the toxicity and the feasibility of the regimen. METHODS & STUDY DESIGN: Patients enrolled had advanced breast cancer pretreated with at least one previous regimen of chemotherapy for advanced disease. Treatment consisted of ifosfamide infused at a dose of 2 g/m2 iv in 4 hrs followed by ifosfamide, 8 g/m2 iv in 120 hrs in ambulatory treatment, using a portable external pump system. The total dose of ifosfamide was 10 g/m2; mesna (4 g/m2 iv) was administered mixed with ifosfamide in 120 hrs Cycles were repeated every 3 weeks. Three patients were pretreated with neoadjuvant and 15 with adjuvant chemotherapy. All patients were treated for advanced disease (median number of regimens, 1; range, 1-3): 21 with the cyclophosphamide-containing regimen and 15 with adryamicin. Sixteen patients received one or more lines of endocrine therapy. Fifteen patients had dominant site in viscera, 6 in bone, and only one in soft tissue; 17 patients had more than one site of disease. RESULTS: Twenty-two patients were enrolled and all were assessable for response and toxicity. A partial response was reached in 5 patients (23%; 95% confidence limits 5% to 60%). Hematologic toxicity was the dose-limiting side effect; grade 4 leukopenia occurred in 10 patients (46%). CONCLUSIONS: Considering the response rate obtained in our series of intensively pretreated patients, the results seem to indicate that the regimen is active and could be included among the possible options in the treatment of patients with refractory, poor-prognosis, advanced breast carcinoma.

Bolus versus 5-day continuous infusion of cisplatin with mitomycin and vindesine in the treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): a phase III prospective randomised trial of the Italian Oncology Group for Clinical Research (GOIRC).

The aim of this randomised trial was to compare the efficacy of bolus versus continuous infusion cisplatin combined with mitomycin C and vindesine (MVP) for chemotherapy-naive patients with stage IIIB-IV non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). 97 patients (49 given bolus cisplatin-arm A and 48 given continuous infusion cisplatin--arm B) were evaluable for response. In arm A, 2 patients achieved a complete response (CR), 21 achieved a partial response (PR), whilst in arm B, 14 patients achieved a PR (29%) (P = 0.07). Median survival was 8 months in both arms. Myelosuppression was the most frequent and severe toxicity, with a higher incidence of grade 3-4 leucopenia in arm A when compared with arm B (44% versus 25%). In conclusion, there is no advantage for a cisplatin 5 day infusion in the MVP regimen.

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy with continuous infusion of cisplatin and fluorouracil in stage II-IV, M0 squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck.

AIMS AND BACKGROUND: The aim of the study was to assess the activity and the toxicity of cisplatin (DDP) and fluorouracil (FU) administered by continuous infusion as neoadjuvant chemotherapy for patients with stage II-IV, M0 squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. METHODS: Thirty previously untreated patients were submitted to chemotherapy with DDP (20 mg/m2) and FU (1000 mg/m2), both in continuous infusion for 5 days, repeated every 21 days, for a maximum of 5 cycles. Following completion of chemotherapy, the patients underwent radiotherapy; in some patients surgery was performed immediately after chemotherapy. All patients were monitored for response, time to failure, survival, treatment-related events and toxicity. RESULTS: All patients were evaluated for response; after chemotherapy the complete response rate was 27% and the partial response rate 33%. Twenty-four patients underwent radiotherapy: the overall response rate was 83% (complete response 79%). After a median follow-up of 34 months, the median survival time was 22 months with a median time to failure of 15 months. Acute vascular accidents were the main and unexpected adverse events, with 2 deaths for pulmonary embolism and 1 for stroke. The response rate to the regimen does not seem to be better than that obtained with the standard combination of cisplatin bolus and fluorouracil continuous infusion. The disadvantage of the regimen is that it causes more discomfort for the patient in that it requires hospitalization. CONCLUSIONS: For this reason, we believe that there are no elements for recommending the schedule as neoadjuvant treatment of patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck or as an experimental arm in a randomized trial.