ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: Complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS) is a painful disease that leads to chronic pain and disability. Bisphosphonates are largely used in the real-life for the treatment of CRPS, but data on long-term effectiveness and its predictors are lacking. METHODS: We conducted a longitudinal observational study on patients with type I CRPS treated with IV neridronate (100 mg on 4 occasions). Clinical and demographic characteristics were collected at baseline, after 3 months (M3) and after 12 months (M12). Multivariable logistic regression was employed to determine the factors associated with long-term response to treatment. RESULTS: 103 patients with type I CRPS treated with IV neridronate were included in the study. Mean VAS pain at baseline was 79.1 mm and decreased significantly at M3 (-45.9 mm, 95% CI 40.1 to 51.8) and M12 (-61.6 mm, 95% CI 55.3 to 67.9). Hyperalgesia and allodynia resolved in 84.3% and 88.1% of patients at M12. Loss of motion resolved in 53.5% of patients. The predictors of excellent response were gender (male better), predisposing event to CRPS (no event being better than any predisposing event), site of CRPS (lower limb being better), and early response at M3 on VAS pain (2.5 times the chance of being excellent responder every 10 mm decrease). CONCLUSIONS: In this real-life study neridronate was associated with rapid and progressive improvement of symptoms of CRPS which was maintained up to 3 years of follow-up. The predictors of excellent response were early response, lower limb localisation, absence of predisposing events and male gender.
ABSTRACT
Efavirenz is a non-nucleoside-reverse-transcriptase-inhibitor used as part of highly-active-antiretroviral-therapy for the treatment of the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) type 1 infection. The present paper aims to describing the impact of efavirenz dose reduction on the pharmaceutical budget at the Verona University Hospital. A budget impact analysis comparing two prescribing scenarios was conducted: all patients treated with the efavirenz full dose (600 mg per day) vs. a proportion of patients treated with a reduced dose (200-400 mg per day). All outpatients referring to the Infectious Disease Clinic in the period November 2009-October 2011 were selected. Out of 132 patients treated with efavirenz, 25 were not considered, mainly due to a too short treatment period. Of the remaining 107 patients, 68 received the full dose, while 39 received a reduced dosage. The analysis included the cost of the drug and of diagnostic tests, from the National Health Service perspective. The daily dose reduction of efavirenz saved 54,664 euros (a 30% expenditure reduction). In sum, new strategies for pharmaceutical system sustainability are necessary; despite forthcoming expiring patents of several drugs, spending on antiretroviral drugs is expected to rise. This paper suggests a way of linking clinical benefits and cost reduction.
