[The psychological taking charge of the oncological patient: a 3 years study on the activities of psychologists of the Piedmont and Aosta Valley Oncology Network.] / La presa in carico psicologica del paziente oncologico: uno studio di 3 anni sulle attività degli psiconcologi della Rete Oncologica Piemonte e Valle d'Aosta.

INTRODUCTION: Tumor pathology is a bio-psycho-social event that has consequences for a person's life from all points of view, physical, psychological, relational and social. The mental discomfort that chronic pain and neoplastic pathology brings with it is present in 25-40% of cases, but the request for help to a psychologist, where not provided for by a specific diagnostic therapeutic assistance path, is in the case of medical pathologies less than 3%. The Piedmont and Valle d'Aosta Oncology Network has the role of coordinating the network of services that deal with the care of the cancer patient, including those relating to psycho-oncology. The article presents data relating to the activities of psycho-oncologists of the Network in the years 2017, 2018 and 2019. METHODS: A shared tool is used to collect the data, a database, made up of various variables deemed necessary to be able to photograph the activities carried out by the psycho-oncologists belonging to the Network. The database has been the subject of comparison between psychologists and has led to continuous revisions of the tool from 2017 to 2019, more accurate version. RESULTS: The 3-year study involved 2188 (2017), 3341 (2018) and 3457 (2019) adult patients or their families treated by psycho-oncologists. Patients are predominantly female with breast cancer, married/cohabiting, whose pre-eminent discomfort is anxiety, combined with the depressive component. The psychological intervention is mainly psychological support (level 2). DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: Psychological management is an important intervention in the path of the cancer patient. The systematic collection of data made it possible to detect an increase in patients who accessed the psycho-oncology service, from an estimate of 1/3% in 2009 to 4.6% in 2018/2019.

Are quality indicators for radiotherapy useful in the evaluation of service efficacy in a new based radiotherapy institution?

AIMS AND BACKGROUND: A number of documents assess the need for quality assurance in radiotherapy, which must be constantly monitored and possibly improved. In this regard, a system that confirms the quality of a department has been suggested and quality indicators have been used to improve the quality of the service. The National Health Service (Istituto Superiore di Sanità) approved a National Research Project to increase the quality of radiotherapy. The aim of the present study was to analyze the practical feasibility and efficacy of the quality indicators elaborated by the National Health Service study group in a radiotherapy unit. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The voluntary accredited program was carried out by the Radiotherapy Department of IRCC in Candiolo from June to August 2002. We analyzed 8 of the 13 indicators according to the National Health Service Project. For this purpose, 133 consecutive patients treated in our Unit were analyzed, and the results are reported according to the appropriate indicator (number of staff related to patients treated, waiting list, case history accuracy, multidisciplinary approach, number of treatment plans performed by CT, number of fields per fraction, number of portal imaging performed per overall treatment, and patient satisfaction). RESULTS: The number of professional staff related to the number of patients treated was easy to calculate and it could be the basis for further evaluation. The overall waiting time was 55.4 days, and it changed for different radiotherapy goals. We obtained 80% conformity in case-history accuracy. The number of multidisciplinary consultations performed ranged between 50% and 100%. The number of CT plans was about 1.6 +/- 0.9 plans per patient. The mean number of fields performed per day and per patient is 3.5 +/- 1.7 and was in agreement with the fact that more than 50% of treatments in our Center were performed with conformal radiotherapy. An average of 16.7 +/- 10.0 portal imaging per case was performed. The percentage of patient satisfaction with the staff obtained a very high compliance. CONCLUSIONS: The self evaluation promoted by the National Health Service Project allows the monitoring of the activities of the service in order to asses critical factors and it can be the starting point to improve the quality of the service and to compare national and international quality assurance results.