The Impact of a Postmastectomy Chest Wall Scar Boost on Local Recurrence-free Survival in High-risk Patients.

INTRODUCTION: A scar boost following postmastectomy radiation to a total dose of > 50 Gy can be considered in cases of invasive breast cancer with high-risk features including advanced tumor stage, lymphovascular space invasion (LVSI), and positive margins. The purpose of this study was to determine the impact of a scar boost on 5-year local recurrence-free survival (LRFS). MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 140 patients with invasive breast cancer treated with mastectomy and postmastectomy radiation at a single institution between 2007 and 2016. Patients received 50 to 50.4 Gy to the chest wall and the majority of scar boosts were 9 to 10 Gy. LRFS was examined using the Kaplan-Meier method and univariable Cox regression. RESULTS: A total of 140 patients met inclusion criteria with a median follow-up time of 48 months. Ninety-four (67.1%) patients did receive a scar boost and 46 (32.9%) patients did not. On subset analysis of patients with LVSI or positive margins, 5-year LRFS was 79.3% in patients treated with scar boost compared with 71.1% in patients without a scar boost (P = .537). In patients with T3 or T4 disease, 5-year LRFS was 80.9% in those who received scar boost and 71.6% in patients who did not (P = .967). The use of a scar boost was not associated with a significant improvement in LRFS on Cox regression (hazard ratio, 0.83; 95% confidence interval, 0.37-1.84; P = .654). CONCLUSION: Use of a scar boost following postmastectomy radiation decreased the absolute percentages of local recurrences in patients with high-risk features; however, this did not translate into a statistically significant benefit.

Racial disparities in tumor features and outcomes of patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the tonsil.

OBJECTIVE: To identify differences in 3-year overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) based on race in patients with tonsillar squamous cell carcinoma. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 80 patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the tonsil treated between 2006 and 2015. Overall survival and DFS curves comparing white and black patients were generated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Cox regression was used to determine covariables associated with OS and DFS. RESULTS: Forty-one percent of the patients in this cohort were black and 59% were white. Three-year OS for black patients was 45.5% versus 88.1% for white patients (P = 0.003). Three-year DFS for black patients was 41.1% versus 66.6% in white patients (P = 0.001). Black race (hazard ratio [HR] 4.81, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.48-15.6, P = 0.009) and lack of insurance (HR 9.50, 95% CI 2.92-13.0, P < 0.009) were independently associated with worse OS on multivariable analysis. Black patients were more likely to have high-risk tumor features. Black patients with stage IV disease (American Joint Committee on Cancer, 7th edition) had decreased OS as compared to white patients, 41.4% versus 82.1% (P = 0.005). There was a trend toward worse OS in human papillomavirus (HPV)-negative black patients compared to HPV-negative white patients. Uninsured black patient experienced worse OS than white patients without insurance, 22.2% versus 68.1%, respectively (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Significant racial disparities were found in presentation, tumor, and nodal characteristics, as well as in outcomes in this group of patients with tonsillar cancer. The difference in HPV-associated tonsillar cancer is likely the primary cause of these disparities, but other factors may also contribute to inferior outcomes in black patients. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3 Laryngoscope, 129:643-654, 2019.

Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for Stage I Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Retrospective, Single-Center Study of 55 Patients.

Purpose/Objective(s): Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) is an effective treatment for patients with early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who are not surgical candidates or who refuse surgical management. In this study, we report on our clinical outcomes and toxicity in the treatment of early-stage NSCLC with SBRT. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Fifty-five patients with 59 T1-2N0M0 NSCLC lesions were treated at our institution between December 2009 and August 2014. The majority of the patients [38 (69%)] were treated with 50 Gy in 5 fractions, 7 patients (13%) with 48 Gy in 4 fractions, 8 patients (14%) with 60 Gy in 3 fractions, 1 patient (2%) with 62.5 Gy in 10 fractions, and 1 patient (2%) with 54 Gy in 3 fractions. Tumor response was evaluated using RECIST 1.1, and toxicity was graded using the CTCAE (Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events) version 3.0. The primary endpoints of this retrospective review included rates of overall survival, disease-free and progression-free survival, local failure, regional failure, and distant failure. A secondary endpoint included radiation-related toxicities. RESULTS: The median follow-up was 23.8 months (range 1.1-57.6). The 3-year local control, progression-free survival, and overall survival rates were 91, 55, and 71%, respectively. The median age at diagnosis was 67.9 years (range 51.4-87.1). There were a total of 54 T1N0 tumors (92%) and 5 T2N0 lesions (8%). Adenocarcinoma was the most common pathology, comprising 54% of the lesions. A total of 16 of the patients (29%) failed. Among these, 5 local (9%), 14 regional (25%), and 4 distant failures (7%) were observed. On follow-up, one patient had grade 2 and another had grade 5 pneumonitis. Three patients experienced grade 2 chest wall tenderness. Two patients had grade 1 rib fractures, one of which could not be discerned from radiation-induced toxicity versus a traumatic fall. CONCLUSION: The University of Mississippi Medical Center SBRT experience has shown that SBRT provides satisfactory local control and overall survival rates with minimal toxicity in early-stage NSCLC patients.

Axillary lymph node treatment in breast cancer: an update.

Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNbx) is the standard of care for staging of breast cancer. Patients with a negative sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNbx) do not undergo axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) or regional nodal irradiation (RNI). However, if a patient has a positive sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNbx), then axillary lymph nodal dissection (ALND) is the standard treatment. Recent studies, notably the Z-0011 and MA-20 trials, have demonstrated that omission of axillary lymph nodal dissection (ALND) did not decrease overall survival. MA-20 demonstrated that inclusion of regional nodal irradiation (RNI) in addition to axillary lymph nodal dissection (ALND) did increase survival when compared to axillary lymph nodal dissection (ALND) without regional nodal irradiation (RNI). Ongoing studies are randomizing patients to axillary lymph nodal dissection (ALND) or regional nodal irradiation (RNI) after a positive sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNbx).