Parenting and childhood obesity research: a quantitative content analysis of published research 2009-2015.

BACKGROUND: A quantitative content analysis of research on parenting and childhood obesity was conducted to describe the recent literature and to identify gaps to address in future research. METHODS: Studies were identified from multiple databases and screened according to an a priori defined protocol. Eligible studies included non-intervention studies, published in English (January 2009-December 2015) that focused on parenting and childhood obesity and included parent participants. RESULTS: Studies eligible for inclusion (N = 667) focused on diet (57%), physical activity (23%) and sedentary behaviours (12%). The vast majority of studies used quantitative methods (80%) and a cross-sectional design (86%). Few studies focused exclusively on fathers (1%) or included non-residential (1%), non-biological (4%), indigenous (1%), immigrant (7%), ethnic/racial minority (15%) or low-socioeconomic status (19%) parents. DISCUSSION: While results illustrate that parenting in the context of childhood obesity is a robust, global and multidisciplinary area of inquiry, it is also evident that the vast majority of studies are conducted among Caucasian, female, biological caregivers living in westernized countries. Expansion of study foci and design is recommended to capture a wider range of caregiver types and obesity-related parenting constructs, improve the validity and generalizability of findings and inform the development of culture-specific childhood obesity prevention interventions and policies. © 2016 World Obesity.

Switching to gatekeeping: changes in expenditures and utilization for children.

BACKGROUND: Gatekeeping has been a central strategy in the cost-containment initiatives of managed care organizations. Little empirical research describes the impact of switching into a gatekeeping plan on health care expenditures and utilization for children. OBJECTIVE: To determine the likelihood of a parent with a chronically ill child enrolling in a health plan with gatekeeping, as well as the effects of gatekeeping on health care expenditures and utilization for children, especially those with chronic conditions. DESIGN: We followed a cohort of 1839 children who either voluntarily switched to a gatekeeping plan or remained in an indemnity plan from 1991 through 1994. Study participants were children of employees of a large hospital. The gatekeeping plan was virtually identical to the previous indemnity plan except for lower monthly employee contribution and the requirement for a primary care physician to preapprove subspecialty referrals. We determined the likelihood of a household containing a child with a chronic condition enrolling in the gatekeeping plan, as well as mean annual total, subspecialty, and primary care expenditures and utilization for all children and children with chronic conditions. RESULTS: Households switching to gatekeeping were less likely to have children with chronic illness (8% vs 15%). Total and subspecialty expenditures for all children decreased more in the gatekeeping group (53% and 59%, respectively) than in the indemnity group (11% and 6%, respectively). For children with chronic conditions, mean visits to subspecialists decreased 57% in the gatekeeping group but increased 31% in the indemnity group. Mean visits to primary care physicians decreased 23% in the gatekeeping group compared with 13% in indemnity group. CONCLUSION: Parents of children with a chronic condition were much less likely than other parents to switch to a gatekeeping plan. Switching to gatekeeping was associated with reduced visits to specialists but did not increase the involvement of primary care physicians in the management of children with chronic conditions. The implications of these findings for the health of children are unknown.