ABSTRACT
Fear of hypoglycemia and hyperglycemia can lead to inappropriate diabetes self-management and untoward health outcomes. We report two patients, representative of these opposite conditions, who benefited from hybrid closed-loop technology. In the patient with fear of hypoglycemia, time in range improved from 26 to 56% and the patient did not present with severe hypoglycemia. Meanwhile, the patient with hyperglycemia aversiveness had a drastic reduction in time below range, from 19 to 4%. We conclude that hybrid closed-loop technology was an effective tool for improvement of glucose values in two patients with fear of hypoglycemia and hyperglycemia aversiveness, respectively.
Subject(s)
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1 , Hyperglycemia , Hypoglycemia , Humans , Blood Glucose , Blood Glucose Self-Monitoring , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1/drug therapy , Fear , Hyperglycemia/prevention & control , Hypoglycemia/prevention & control , Hypoglycemic Agents/therapeutic use , Insulin/therapeutic use , Insulin Infusion SystemsABSTRACT
The Flash Guide (FG) for insulin dosing (A. Chico, C. González) was the first document intended for FreeStyle Libre® (FSL) user patients to help with decision-making depending on glucose level and trend. The objective of the study was to evaluate the usefulness of and the level of satisfaction with the recommendations given by the FG in a group of patients with type 1 diabetes (DM1) who were FSL users. It included 31 subjects (54% women; age 41 ± 15 years; DM duration 21 ± 14 years; 22 with FSL > 12 months) who were provided with the FG. They completed a questionnaire on decision-making depending on glucose trend in different situations (before and three months after using the FG), and a satisfaction questionnaire (ad hoc). Demographic, clinical and glycaemic control data were collected. The percentage of subjects who used glucose trend in decision-making after receiving the FG increased: for adjusting insulin (51 vs. 83; p = 0.016), action without insulin (51 vs. 90%; p = 0.001), and in special circumstances. The FG was evaluated as very useful (4.19/5). There were no significant changes in glycaemic control, although the percentage of data gathered increased significantly (89.07 vs. 94.46%; p = 0.042). In conclusion, the FG was evaluated well for managing glucose trends with FSL by the patients with DM1 analysed, increasing their use of trend in decision-making, with no changes in glycaemic control, but with more data gathered.
Subject(s)
Blood Glucose Self-Monitoring , Blood Glucose , Adult , Blood Glucose/analysis , Female , Glucose , Humans , Insulin/therapeutic use , Male , Middle Aged , Patient Satisfaction , Personal SatisfactionABSTRACT
The Flash Guide (FG) for insulin dosing (A. Chico, C. González) was the first document intended for FreeStyle Libre® (FSL) user patients to help with decision-making depending on glucose level and trend. The objective of the study was to evaluate the usefulness of and the level of satisfaction with the recommendations given by the FG in a group of patients with type 1 diabetes (DM1) who were FSL users. It included 31 subjects (54% women; age 41±15 years; DM duration 21±14 years; 22 with FSL>12 months) who were provided with the FG. They completed a questionnaire on decision-making depending on glucose trend in different situations (before and three months after using the FG), and a satisfaction questionnaire (ad hoc). Demographic, clinical and glycaemic control data were collected. The percentage of subjects who used glucose trend in decision-making after receiving the FG increased: for adjusting insulin (51 vs. 83; P=.016), action without insulin (51 vs. 90%; P=.001), and in special circumstances. The FG was evaluated as very useful (4.19/5). There were no significant changes in glycaemic control, although the percentage of data gathered increased significantly (89.07 vs. 94.46%; P=.042). In conclusion, the FG was evaluated well for managing glucose trends with FSL by the patients with DM1 analysed, increasing their use of trend in decision-making, with no changes in glycaemic control, but with more data gathered.
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Clinical ultrasound is a technique that increases diagnostic capacity and facilitates clinical decision making. The objective is to develop and validate an ultrasound training methodology oriented to the clinical practice of the family physician. METHODS: Quasi-experimental study, with a before/after design, a control group, and 1 year of follow-up. Twenty family physicians working in primary care health centers with a list of over 800 patients will be included, as well as a control group of family physicians with similar characteristics in terms of age, sex, and patient list. A structured training process oriented to the clinical practice of the family physician, primary care clinical ultrasound classroom (AECAP), will be carried out, and the improvement of knowledge and skills of the participants will be evaluated, as well as the improvement of the quality of care based on clinical indicators. DISCUSSION: The family physician is in a privileged situation allows increasing the performance of ultrasound in frequent clinical situations and reducing care hours. We hope that the results obtained in this study demonstrate the effectiveness of the structured training method (AECAP) and support the generalization of ultrasound in primary health care. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study was approved by the Medical Research Ethics Committee of Salamanca on December 17, 2018 (cod 2018 11 134). The trial was registered in ClinicalTrials.gov provided by the US National Library of Medicine-number: NCT04283383.
