Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 35
Filter
1.
J Pediatr Intensive Care ; 13(2): 174-183, 2024 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38919688

ABSTRACT

Central line-associated bloodstream infections (CLABSIs) are the most frequent pediatric hospital-acquired infections and significantly impact outcomes. The aim of this study was to estimate the attributable mortality for CLABSIs in pediatric and neonatal patients in Greece. A retrospective matched-cohort study was performed, in two tertiary pediatric hospitals. Inpatients with a central line in neonatal and pediatric intensive care units (NICUs and PICUs), hematology/oncology units, and a bone marrow transplantation unit between June 2012 and June 2015 were eligible. Patients with confirmed CLABSI were enrolled on the day of the event and were matched (1:1) to non-CLABSI patients by hospital, hospitalization unit, and length of stay prior to study enrollment (188 children enrolled, 94 CLABSIs). Attributable mortality was estimated. During the study period, 22 patients with CLABSI and nine non-CLABSI patients died (23.4 vs. 9.6%, respectively, p = 0.011), leading to an attributable mortality of 13.8% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 3.4-24.3%). Children in PICUs were more likely to die, presenting an attributable mortality of 20.2% (95% CI = - 1.4-41.8%), without reaching, however, statistical significance. After multiple logistic regression, patients with CLABSI were four times more likely to die (odds ratio [OR] = 4.29, 95% CI = 1.28-14.36, p = 0.018). Survival analysis showed no difference in time to death after study enrollment between patients with CLABSI and non-CLABSI patients (log-rank p = 0.137, overall median survival time = 7.8 months). Greek pediatric mortality rates are increased by the CLABSI occurrence, highlighting the importance of infection prevention strategies.

2.
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol ; 41(3): 342-354, 2020 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31898557

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To estimate the attributable mortality, length of stay (LOS), and healthcare cost of pediatric and neonatal healthcare-acquired bloodstream infections (HA-BSIs). DESIGN: A systematic review and meta-analysis. METHODS: A systematic search (January 2000-September 2018) was conducted in PubMed, Cochrane, and CINAHL databases. Reference lists of selected articles were screened to identify additional studies. Case-control or cohort studies were eligible for inclusion when full text was available in English and data for at least 1 of the following criteria were provided: attributable or excess LOS, healthcare cost, or mortality rate due to HA-BSI. Study quality was evaluated using the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme Tool (CASP). Study selection and quality assessment were conducted by 2 independent researchers, and a third researcher was consulted to resolve any disagreements. Fixed- or random-effect models, as appropriate, were used to synthesize data. Heterogeneity and publication bias were evaluated. RESULTS: In total, 21 studies were included in the systematic review and 13 studies were included in the meta-analysis. Attributable mean LOS ranged between 4 and 27.8 days; healthcare cost ranged between $1,642.16 and $160,804 (2019 USD) per patient with HA-BSI; and mortality rate ranged between 1.43% and 24%. The pooled mean attributable hospital LOS was 16.91 days (95% confidence interval [CI], 13.70-20.11) and the pooled attributable mortality rate was 8% (95% CI, 6-9). A meta-analysis was not conducted for cost due to lack of eligible studies. CONCLUSIONS: Pediatric HA-BSIs have a significant impact on mortality, LOS, and healthcare cost, further highlighting the need for implementation of HA-BSI prevention strategies.


Subject(s)
Bacteremia , Cross Infection , Health Care Costs/statistics & numerical data , Length of Stay , Sepsis , Adult , Bacteremia/economics , Bacteremia/mortality , Case-Control Studies , Child , Child, Preschool , Cohort Studies , Cross Infection/economics , Cross Infection/microbiology , Cross Infection/mortality , Female , Humans , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Length of Stay/economics , Length of Stay/statistics & numerical data , Male , Middle Aged , Sepsis/economics , Sepsis/mortality , Young Adult
3.
Patient Prefer Adherence ; 13: 1093-1110, 2019.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31371927

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To quantify rheumatology patient preferences and willingness to pay (WTP) for features differentiating enhanced from standard self-injection devices and to investigate differences among subgroups. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), psoriatic arthritis (PsA), and axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) were recruited in the UK. A discrete-choice experiment was used to elicit preferences; respondents were presented with 10 choices between 3 different devices: a free standard disposable device, and 2 hypothetical reusable devices characterized by presence/absence of skin sensor, injection speed control, on-screen instructions, injection reminders, electronic log, and large grip. Every hypothetical device included a cost component to assess WTP for each enhanced feature. A random-parameters logit model was used to estimate preference weights and WTP. RESULTS: Data were collected from 323 respondents by electronic survey (15/11/2017-15/02/2018; RA: 108; PsA: 103; axSpA: 112). On average, the skin sensor was the most preferred feature (£30), followed by injection speed control, injection reminders, electronic log (~£20 each), on-screen instructions (~£12), and a device with a small, rather than large grip (~£7). Similar preferences for attributes were observed across condition subgroups except for grip size: axSpA patients preferred small grip (~£27); PsA patients preferred large grip (~£19). Overall, respondents preferred reusable devices with all enhanced features (WTP value: £85) over the standard device. RA patients exhibited a higher WTP (£145) than PsA (£102) or axSpA (£62) for the same enhanced device. CONCLUSION: Patients positively valued reusable self-injection devices with enhanced features, which may improve patient experience, potentially improving treatment adherence, clinical, and economic outcomes.

4.
Pharmacoeconomics ; 37(8): 995-1010, 2019 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31012025

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Diabetic retinopathy (DR) affects approximately one-third of people diagnosed with diabetes, can be sight-threatening, and generates significant human and economic burden. Over the last 2 decades, newer therapies have emerged, offering significant clinical benefits, however at a cost. Given the scarcity of available budgets, the cost effectiveness of these newer treatments is of vital importance to policy makers. METHODS: A systematic review was conducted in the PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane, HEED and CRD databases to find and evaluate economic evaluations assessing the cost effectiveness of alterative DR treatments. Studies were assessed for their eligibility, findings and quality, and are presented in this systematic review. RESULTS: Of the 5254 studies retrieved from the literature search, 17 were included in this review. For patients with proliferative DR, when early pars plana vitrectomy was compared with pan-retinal laser photocoagulation, similar cost per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) was observed between the two. Treatment with either intravitreal ranibizumab (IVR) or intravitreal bevacizumab (IVB) falls within acceptable cost-effectiveness thresholds in the diabetic macular oedema (DMO) population; however, in the non-DMO population, the marginal benefit of IVR or IVB in relation to the marginal cost relative to laser does not justify their use. Among the anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) therapies, IVB appears more attractive from an economic point of view due to its lower cost. For patients with DMO, studies indicate that a combination therapy of IVR or IVB with laser and, to a lesser degree, as monotherapy, are cost effective relative to laser monotherapy; IVR plus laser is cost effective relative to laser plus triamcinolone; and laser combined with triamcinolone injections is reportedly more cost effective over IVR for pseudophakic eyes only. Moreover, fluocinolone implants appear cost effective compared with sham implants, or when treating refractory DMO. IVR administered either pro re nata (PRN) or as 'treat and extend' dominated intravitreal aflibercept (IVA) in a few studies. On the other hand, IVR monotherapy or with laser (as well as IVA) does not compare favourably relative to IVB monotherapy or with laser. CONCLUSIONS: Interpretation of cost-effectiveness data should be treated with caution in this case; details of the therapeutic regimen, such as dosage and frequency, and clinical efficacy of the treatments should be considered in relation to policy-making decisions. Given the scarcity of resources, the ever-increasing significance of health technology assessment, and the substantial differences in the methodologies of the studies presented in this review, there is a pressing need for more advanced and standardised approaches to assessing the effectiveness and cost effectiveness of the emerging anti-VEGF pharmacotherapies for the treatment of DMO.


Subject(s)
Diabetic Retinopathy/drug therapy , Quality-Adjusted Life Years , Angiogenesis Inhibitors/administration & dosage , Angiogenesis Inhibitors/economics , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Diabetic Retinopathy/economics , Diabetic Retinopathy/pathology , Glucocorticoids/administration & dosage , Glucocorticoids/economics , Humans , Laser Therapy/economics , Laser Therapy/methods , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor A/antagonists & inhibitors
5.
J Infect Public Health ; 12(3): 372-379, 2019.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30616938

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Central line-associated bloodstream infections (CLABSIs) are the most frequent pediatric hospital-acquired infections and are associated with significant morbidity and healthcare costs. The aim of our study was to determine the attributable length of stay (LOS) and cost for CLABSIs in pediatric patients in Greece, for which there is currently a paucity of data. METHODS: A retrospective matched-cohort study was performed in two tertiary pediatric hospitals. Inpatients with a central line in neonatal and pediatric intensive care units, hematology/oncology units, and a bone marrow transplantation unit between June 2012 and June 2015 were eligible. Patients with confirmed CLABSI were enrolled on the day of the event and were matched (1:1) to patients without CLABSI (non-CLABSIs) by hospital, unit, and LOS prior to study enrollment (188 children enrolled, 94 CLABSIs). The primary outcome measure was the attributable LOS and cost. Baseline demographic and clinical characteristics were recorded. Attributable outcomes were calculated as the differences in estimates of outcomes between CLABSIs and non-CLABSIs, after adjustment for propensity score and potential confounders. RESULTS: There were no differences between the two groups regarding their baseline characteristics. After adjustment for age, gender, matching characteristics, central line management after study enrollment, and propensity score, the mean LOS and cost were 57.5days and €31,302 in CLABSIs versus 36.6days and €17,788 in non-CLABSIs. Overall, a CLABSI was associated with a mean (95% CI) adjusted attributable LOS and cost of 21days (7.3-34.8) and €13,727 (5,758-21,695), respectively. No significant difference was detected in LOS and cost by hospitalization unit. CONCLUSIONS: CLABSIs were found to impose a significant economic burden in Greece, a finding that highlights the importance of implementing CLABSI prevention strategies.


Subject(s)
Bacteremia/epidemiology , Catheter-Related Infections/epidemiology , Length of Stay , Bacteremia/economics , Bacteremia/prevention & control , Catheter-Related Infections/economics , Catheter-Related Infections/prevention & control , Child Health Services/economics , Female , Greece/epidemiology , Health Care Costs , Hospitals, Pediatric , Humans , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Male , Retrospective Studies
6.
Appl Health Econ Health Policy ; 16(5): 591-607, 2018 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29987759

ABSTRACT

Policy makers in countries, aiming to build and expand their healthcare systems and coverage, need effective procedures to support the most efficient use of limited financial resources. Tendering is commonly deployed to minimize and fix the purchasing price for the contract duration, especially for off-patent pharmaceuticals. While tenders can reduce acquisition costs, they may also expose the healthcare systems to risks including drug shortages, quality trade-offs, and ultimately, compromised patient health outcomes. Careful planning is therefore required. The effectiveness and impact of tendering were examined in different healthcare settings to establish good tender practices and to develop guidance for tender stakeholders in countries with expanding healthcare coverage for the effective conduct. The literature was reviewed for tender practices and outcomes in all countries, and tender experts from one multi-national pharmaceutical company in 17 countries with expanding healthcare coverage were surveyed on current tender practices. Tendering is a common practice for multisource pharmaceuticals in most countries worldwide. However, countries with expanding healthcare coverage specifically are vulnerable to the risks of defective tendering practices. Risk factors include non-transparent tender practices, a lack of consistency, unclear tender award criteria, a focus on lowest price only, single-winner tendering, and generally, a lack of impact monitoring. If well planned, managed, and conducted, tenders can be advantageous. Countries with expanding healthcare coverage should approach tenders strategically to achieve the desired improvements in healthcare. The good tender practices derived from this study may guide policy makers and purchasers in countries with expanding healthcare coverage on how to expand access to healthcare at an affordable cost. These include the use of multiple selection criteria and performance monitoring. Plain Language Summary Decision makers in countries aiming to expand their healthcare systems must best use the limited money available for healthcare. Tendering is commonly deployed for pharmaceuticals produced by multiple manufacturers (so-called multisource pharmaceuticals), to choose the product with the lowest price. Through tenders, purchasers request offers from suppliers for the needed products.The ultimate purpose of our research was to develop a guidance on robust tender processes. Therefore, we reviewed the literature to examine the effectiveness and impact of current tendering practices. In addition, we conducted a survey among tender experts from one pharmaceutical company in 17 countries with expanding healthcare coverage.In both the survey and the literature review, we confirmed that worldwide, tendering is a common practice for multisource pharmaceuticals. However, defective tendering practices may increase the vulnerability for some risks including abuse due to intransparent processes, lack of consistency, unclear tender award criteria, a focus on lowest price only, single winner tendering, and generally, a lack of impact monitoring after the end of the tender process.Hence, tenders must be well planned, managed, and conducted to be advantageous. Countries with defined and transparent tender frameworks and processes will be better equipped to achieve the desired improvements in the healthcare systems. 'Good tender practices' include the clear definition of requirements to be used as selection criteria in addition to acquisition costs, and for monitoring of the tender success. 'Good tender practices' may help to manage cost and improve healthcare at the same time.


Subject(s)
Delivery of Health Care/organization & administration , Pharmaceutical Preparations/supply & distribution , Cost Control/economics , Cost Control/methods , Cost Control/organization & administration , Delivery of Health Care/economics , Delivery of Health Care/methods , Drug Costs , Humans , Pharmaceutical Preparations/economics
7.
Eur Heart J Qual Care Clin Outcomes ; 4(2): 81-90, 2018 04 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29325012

ABSTRACT

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) and transcatheter mitral valve repair (TMVR) are increasingly used for managing patients with valvular heart disease to whom surgery presents a high-risk. As these are costly procedures, a systematic review of studies concerned with their economic assessment was undertaken. The search was performed in PubMed and the Cochrane Library and followed recommended methodological steps. Studies were screened and their data were retrieved and were synthesized using a narrative approach. Twenty-four, good to high quality, evaluations were identified, representing different viewpoints, modelling techniques and willingness-to-pay thresholds. Studies show that in high-risk patients with symptomatic aortic stenosis, TAVI may be cost-effective compared with medical management (MM) across many health care settings. In contrast, studies of TAVI compared with surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) yield conflicting and inconclusive results. The limited data available show that TMVR may also be cost-effective relative to MM in mitral valve disease. Existing evidence indicates that transcatheter techniques may be cost-effective options, relative to MM, in high-risk patients with valvular disease. Nonetheless, more research is needed to establish their economic value further, to investigate the drives of cost-effectiveness, and to evaluate surgical with transcatheter techniques in aortic valvular disease.


Subject(s)
Cardiac Catheterization/economics , Heart Valve Diseases/surgery , Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation/economics , Models, Economic , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Heart Valve Diseases/economics , Humans
8.
Eur Heart J ; 39(16): 1481-1495, 2018 04 21.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29370377

ABSTRACT

Aims: Cohorts of millions of people's health records, whole genome sequencing, imaging, sensor, societal and publicly available data present a rapidly expanding digital trace of health. We aimed to critically review, for the first time, the challenges and potential of big data across early and late stages of translational cardiovascular disease research. Methods and results: We sought exemplars based on literature reviews and expertise across the BigData@Heart Consortium. We identified formidable challenges including: data quality, knowing what data exist, the legal and ethical framework for their use, data sharing, building and maintaining public trust, developing standards for defining disease, developing tools for scalable, replicable science and equipping the clinical and scientific work force with new inter-disciplinary skills. Opportunities claimed for big health record data include: richer profiles of health and disease from birth to death and from the molecular to the societal scale; accelerated understanding of disease causation and progression, discovery of new mechanisms and treatment-relevant disease sub-phenotypes, understanding health and diseases in whole populations and whole health systems and returning actionable feedback loops to improve (and potentially disrupt) existing models of research and care, with greater efficiency. In early translational research we identified exemplars including: discovery of fundamental biological processes e.g. linking exome sequences to lifelong electronic health records (EHR) (e.g. human knockout experiments); drug development: genomic approaches to drug target validation; precision medicine: e.g. DNA integrated into hospital EHR for pre-emptive pharmacogenomics. In late translational research we identified exemplars including: learning health systems with outcome trials integrated into clinical care; citizen driven health with 24/7 multi-parameter patient monitoring to improve outcomes and population-based linkages of multiple EHR sources for higher resolution clinical epidemiology and public health. Conclusion: High volumes of inherently diverse ('big') EHR data are beginning to disrupt the nature of cardiovascular research and care. Such big data have the potential to improve our understanding of disease causation and classification relevant for early translation and to contribute actionable analytics to improve health and healthcare.


Subject(s)
Cardiovascular Diseases/therapy , Electronic Health Records/statistics & numerical data , Translational Research, Biomedical , Big Data , Cardiovascular Diseases/diagnosis , Humans , Translational Research, Biomedical/methods
9.
Heart ; 104(9): 745-752, 2018 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29092914

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Cardiac disease is the leading cause of indirect maternal mortality. The aim of this study was to analyse to what extent socioeconomic factors influence the outcome of pregnancy in women with heart disease. METHODS: The Registry of Pregnancy and Cardiac disease is a global prospective registry. For this analysis, countries that enrolled ≥10 patients were included. A combined cardiac endpoint included maternal cardiac death, arrhythmia requiring treatment, heart failure, thromboembolic event, aortic dissection, endocarditis, acute coronary syndrome, hospitalisation for cardiac reason or intervention. Associations between patient characteristics, country characteristics (income inequality expressed as Gini coefficient, health expenditure, schooling, gross domestic product, birth rate and hospital beds) and cardiac endpoints were checked in a three-level model (patient-centre-country). RESULTS: A total of 30 countries enrolled 2924 patients from 89 centres. At least one endpoint occurred in 645 women (22.1%). Maternal age, New York Heart Association classification and modified WHO risk classification were associated with the combined endpoint and explained 37% of variance in outcome. Gini coefficient and country-specific birth rate explained an additional 4%. There were large differences between the individual countries, but the need for multilevel modelling to account for these differences disappeared after adjustment for patient characteristics, Gini and country-specific birth rate. CONCLUSION: While there are definite interregional differences in pregnancy outcome in women with cardiac disease, these differences seem to be mainly driven by individual patient characteristics. Adjustment for country characteristics refined the results to a limited extent, but maternal condition seems to be the main determinant of outcome.


Subject(s)
Heart Diseases/epidemiology , Pregnancy Complications, Cardiovascular/epidemiology , Pregnancy Outcome/epidemiology , Adult , Analysis of Variance , Female , Global Health , Humans , Maternal Age , Pregnancy , Prospective Studies , Registries , Residence Characteristics/statistics & numerical data , Socioeconomic Factors
10.
Health Policy ; 121(4): 363-377, 2017 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28314467

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To determine the association between copayment, medication adherence and outcomes in patients with Heart failure (HF) and Diabetes Mellitus (DM). METHODS: PubMed, Scopus and Cochrane databases were searched using combinations of four sets of key words for: drug cost sharing; resource use, health and economic outcomes; medication adherence; and chronic disease. RESULTS: Thirty eight studies were included in the review. Concerning the direct effect of copayment changes on outcomes, the scarcity and diversity of data, does not allow us to reach a clear conclusion, although there is some evidence indicating that higher copayments may result in poorer health and economic outcomes. Seven and one studies evaluating the relationship between copayment and medication adherence in DM and HF population, respectively, demonstrated an inverse statistically significant association. All studies (29) examining the relationship between medication adherence and outcomes, revealed that increased adherence is associated with health benefits in both DM and HF patients. Finally, the majority of studies in both populations, showed that medication adherence was related to lower resource utilization which in turn may lead to lower total healthcare cost. CONCLUSION: The results of our systematic review imply that lower copayments may result in higher medication adherence, which in turn may lead to better health outcomes and lower total healthcare expenses. Future studies are recommended to reinforce these findings.


Subject(s)
Cost Sharing/economics , Diabetes Mellitus/drug therapy , Heart Failure , Medication Adherence , Patient Outcome Assessment , Chronic Disease/economics , Diabetes Mellitus/economics , Drug Costs , Health Care Costs , Humans
11.
OMICS ; 21(2): 67-73, 2017 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28118098

ABSTRACT

In modern healthcare systems, the available resources may influence the morbidity, mortality, and-consequently-the level of healthcare provided in every country. This is of particular interest in developing countries where the resources are limited and must be spent wisely to address social justice and the right for equal access in healthcare services by all the citizens in economically viable terms. In this light, the current allocation is, in practice, inefficient and rests mostly on each country's individual political and historical context and, thus, does not always incorporate decision-making enabled by economic models. In this study, we present a new economic model, specifically for resource allocation for genomic medicine, based on performance ratio, with potential applications in diverse healthcare sectors, which are particularly appealing for developing countries and low-resource environments. The model proposes a new method for resource allocation taking into account (1) the size of innovation of a new technology, (2) the relative effectiveness in comparison with social preferences, and (3) the cost of the technology, which permits the measurement of effectiveness to be determined differently in the context of a specific disease and then to be expressed in a relative form using a common performance ratio. The present work expands on previous work for innovation in economic models pertaining to genomic medicine and supports translational science.


Subject(s)
Delivery of Health Care/methods , Genomics/methods , Resource Allocation , Models, Economic , Precision Medicine
12.
OMICS ; 20(5): 274-82, 2016 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27096406

ABSTRACT

Genomic Medicine aims to improve therapeutic interventions and diagnostics, the quality of life of patients, but also to rationalize healthcare costs. To reach this goal, careful assessment and identification of evidence gaps for public health genomics priorities are required so that a more efficient healthcare environment is created. Here, we propose a public health genomics-driven approach to adjust the classical healthcare decision making process with an alternative methodological approach of cost-effectiveness analysis, which is particularly helpful for genomic medicine interventions. By combining classical cost-effectiveness analysis with budget constraints, social preferences, and patient ethics, we demonstrate the application of this model, the Genome Economics Model (GEM), based on a previously reported genome-guided intervention from a developing country environment. The model and the attendant rationale provide a practical guide by which all major healthcare stakeholders could ensure the sustainability of funding for genome-guided interventions, their adoption and coverage by health insurance funds, and prioritization of Genomic Medicine research, development, and innovation, given the restriction of budgets, particularly in developing countries and low-income healthcare settings in developed countries. The implications of the GEM for the policy makers interested in Genomic Medicine and new health technology and innovation assessment are also discussed.


Subject(s)
Decision Making , Delivery of Health Care/economics , Genomics , Models, Economic , Developing Countries , Humans , Quality of Life
13.
Hellenic J Cardiol ; 57(1): 33-8, 2016.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26856199

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Cardiac rhythm management devices (CRMDs) have proven their clinical effectiveness for patients with heart rhythm disorders. Little is known about safety and complication rates during the implantation of these devices. This study demonstrated the complication rates related to CRMD implantation, and estimated the additional hospital stay and cost associated with the management of complications. METHODS: During a period of one year, a total of 464 consecutive recipients underwent CRMD implantation and were followed for 2 years. Finally, data were analyzed for 398 patients who completed the two-year follow up, resulting in a total of 796 patient-years. RESULTS: Of the 201 patients with initial pacemaker (PM) implantations, 6 (2.99%) had seven complications (5 patients had lead dislodgement, 1 of them twice), and 1 patient developed pocket infection. Of the 117 PM replacements, 1 (0.85%) patient developed a complication (pocket erosion). Two patients with complications (1 with an initial PM and 1 with a replacement) died before completing the follow up for reasons unrelated to cardiac causes. There were no complications in either initial implantations (69 patients) or replacements (11 patients) of implantable cardioverter-defibrillators. The average prolongation of the hospital stay was 7 days, ranging from 1 to 35 days, resulting in 17,411 of total additional direct hospital costs. CONCLUSION: This study found relatively low rates of complications in patients undergoing CRMD implantation, initial or replacement, in our center, compared with other studies. The additional hospitalization days and costs attributable to these complications depend on the nature of the complication.


Subject(s)
Arrhythmias, Cardiac/therapy , Defibrillators, Implantable/adverse effects , Length of Stay/economics , Pacemaker, Artificial/adverse effects , Arrhythmias, Cardiac/economics , Cost of Illness , Defibrillators, Implantable/economics , Female , Humans , Male , Pacemaker, Artificial/economics , Postoperative Complications , Prospective Studies , Surveys and Questionnaires , Treatment Outcome
14.
Int J Cardiol ; 203: 279-81, 2016 Jan 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26519686

ABSTRACT

Cardiovascular disease and cancer represent the two leading causes of death in the Western World. Still, cardiovascular disease causes more deaths and more hospitalizations than cancer. Although mortality rates of both conditions are generally declining, this is not true for heart failure (HF). The prevalence of HF is increasing, although its incidence has been stabilized, mainly because of the population aging. The survival of patients with HF is overall worse than those with cancer. In addition, HF failure is the most common reason for hospitalization in the elderly, while hospitalization for HF is followed by adverse prognosis and represents the main contributor to the huge financial expenditure caused by the syndrome. The outcome of HF patients and thus its medical and socioeconomic burden may be improved by the more efficient in-hospital management of patients, the enhancement of adherence to guideline-recommended therapies, the identification and treatment of comorbid conditions and the introduction of more effective medical therapies.


Subject(s)
Heart Failure/economics , Heart Failure/epidemiology , Hospitalization/economics , Neoplasms/economics , Neoplasms/epidemiology , Aged , Cost of Illness , Delivery of Health Care/economics , European Union , Female , Guideline Adherence/economics , Hospitalization/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Incidence , Male , Prevalence , Socioeconomic Factors , United States
15.
Eur Heart J Qual Care Clin Outcomes ; 2(1): 6-15, 2016 01 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29474585

ABSTRACT

The need to develop better policies for increasing the efficiency and effectiveness of cardiac care and for reducing the burden of cardiovascular disease, necessitates the availability of data on the economic, political, and organizational aspects of cardiac care. The European Society of Cardiology has this started collecting such data together with the National Cardiac Societies from across Europe. In particular, descriptive and quantitative data concerning the economy, demographics, socioeconomics, health status, health system, and health policies are gathered for every single member country of the European Society of Cardiology, alongside data concerning the number of cardiac care physicians, hospitals, beds, laboratories, interventions, and reimbursement figures. These data will be helpful in an effort to understand in more depth the dynamics of healthcare systems from a cardiology perspective and to identify trends, disparities, gaps, and best practice models, all of which will be useful for making recommendations to improve decision and policy making concerning the cardiac care field at national and cross national level.

17.
Value Health ; 18(8): 1098-104, 2015 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26686796

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: This observational study aimed to identify clinical variables and health system characteristics associated with incomplete guideline application in drug treatment of patients with chronic heart failure (HF) across 15 countries. METHODS: Three data sets were used: European Society of Cardiology Heart Failure Registry, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development's Health System Characteristics Survey, and Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development Health Statistics 2013. Patient and country variables were examined by multilevel, multiple logistic regression. The study population consisted of ambulatory patients with chronic HF and reduced ejection fraction. Inappropriateness of prescription of pharmacological treatments was defined as patients not prescribed at least one of the two recommended treatments (angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors/angiotensin-receptor blockers and beta-blockers) or treated with both medications but at suboptimal dosage and in absence of documented contraindication/intolerance. RESULTS: Of 4605 patients, 1097 (23.8%) received inappropriate drug prescriptions with a large variation within and across countries, with 18.5% of the total variability accounted for by between-country health structure characteristics. Patient-level characteristics such as having mitral regurgitation (odds ratio 1.4; 95% confidence interval 1.1-1.7) was significantly associated with inappropriate prescription of recommended drugs, whereas chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (odds ratio 0.7; 95% confidence interval 0.5-0.9) was associated with more appropriate prescriptions. Among the country-level variables, incentives or obligation to comply with guidelines increased the probability of prescription appropriateness. CONCLUSIONS: Combining clinical variables with health system characteristics is a promising exercise to explain the appropriateness of recommended drug prescriptions. Such an understanding can help decision makers to design more effective policies to improve adherence to guidelines, improve health care outcomes, and potentially reduce costs.


Subject(s)
Cardiovascular Agents/therapeutic use , Guideline Adherence/statistics & numerical data , Heart Failure/drug therapy , Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development/statistics & numerical data , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Adrenergic beta-Antagonists/therapeutic use , Aged , Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Cardiovascular Agents/administration & dosage , Chronic Disease , Drug Utilization , Female , Health Services Accessibility , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive/drug therapy , Quality of Health Care , Registries , Stroke Volume
18.
Cost Eff Resour Alloc ; 13: 10, 2015.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26097434

ABSTRACT

The aim of this study was to compare the cost-utility of the first available single-pill triple combination antihypertensive therapy containing valsartan (V), amlodipine (A) and hydrochlorothiazide (H), with each of the same components dual combinations in patients with moderate to severe hypertension. A Markov model with eight health states was constructed. The short-term effect of antihypertensive treatment on blood pressure was extrapolated through the Hellenic SCORE and Framingham risk equations, estimating the long-term survival and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) saved. Costs and outcomes were evaluated over lifetime, divided into annual cycles and discounted at 3.0 % with 2013 as reference year. The analysis was conducted by the Greek third-party-payer perspective. The triple combination treatment cost was estimated at €16,525 compared to €15,480 for V/A, €14,125 for V/H and €11,690 for A/H. The QALYs saved with the triple combination were 12.76 vs. 12.64, 12.61 and 12.38 for double combinations respectively. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of the triple combination versus V/A and A/H was far lower than the Greek GDP per capita (€8,690/QALY and €12,695/QALY, respectively) and really close for V/H (€16,192/QALY), suggesting V/A/H combination to be cost-effective. Extensive sensitivity analyses confirmed the robustness of the results. The probability that the triple combination is cost effective was more than 90 % at a willingness-to-pay threshold of €18,000/QALY. This is the first study to evaluate the cost-utility of a single-pill triple combination. The single-pill V/A/H therapy is a cost-effective antihypertensive choice for the treatment of moderate to severe hypertension, compared to its dual components.

19.
Hellenic J Cardiol ; 56(2): 149-53, 2015.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25854444

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: The effective provision of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) increases patient survival and reduces in-hospital mortality. Nursing staff, as front-line healthcare professionals, are often the first present at cardiovascular arrests and respond by providing CPR. Their training has an impact on the efficiency of CPR and consequently on health outcomes; thus, assessment of their status in that respect may provide useful information for decision making. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was undertaken in an NHS hospital in Greece to assess the theoretical knowledge of nurses and assistant nurses in relation to CPR. The study population surveyed consisted of nurses and assistant nurses of a specific public hospital. RESULTS: The study revealed that nursing staff had poor theoretical knowledge, with a mean score for correct answers in the written test of 50.6 ± 25.9% and a mean 4.1 ± 2 correct answers. Fifty-three percent of participants reported taking part in a refresher course after attending a first course, while only 13.2% had participated in a relevant training program during the last 6 months prior to the study. Registered nurses who possessed a university (p=0.016) or a technological institution (p<0.001) diploma, achieved 36.1% and 20.9% higher mean scores, respectively, in the written test in comparison to assistant nurses. The vast majority (91.9%) of the participants expressed their willingness to participate in CPR training courses. CONCLUSIONS: It is crucial for nursing staff to participate in CPR courses in order to refresh and update their theoretical knowledge and performance skills and consequently to improve the safety and effectiveness of care.


Subject(s)
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation/nursing , Educational Status , Nursing Staff , Staff Development/methods , Adult , Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation/methods , Cross-Sectional Studies , Educational Measurement/methods , Female , Greece , Health Care Surveys , Hospitals, Public , Humans , Male , Nursing Staff/education , Nursing Staff/standards , Quality Improvement
20.
Clinicoecon Outcomes Res ; 7: 85-93, 2015.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25653545

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: We aimed to estimate the total mean annual treatment cost of different therapy options for patients with moderate-to-severe rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in Greece. METHODS: A cost-minimization approach was adopted. An economic model was developed to estimate the direct costs of the three widely used treatments within a 1-year time horizon, from a health care payer perspective, either for new or for existing patients. Data on resource use, dose escalation, and frequency of therapy were based on a nationwide field survey of rheumatologists. Other analyses were also undertaken based on evidence from the literature. Total cost comprised the cost of drugs, administration, and hospital day care visits. Unit cost data were obtained from the price bulletin and the government gazettes issued by the Ministry of Health. Due to the short time horizon of the study, the cost was not discounted. RESULTS: The mean annual total cost per new (or per existing) responder patient on etanercept was estimated at €9,845 (€9,840), and the total cost on etanercept/methotrexate (MTX) was estimated at €9,857 (€9,852). Therapy with etanercept had lower annual cost relative to adalimumab and infliximab. On an annual basis, it was estimated that the difference between etanercept monotherapy and adalimumab monotherapy was €544 (€1,323). Similarly, the difference between etanercept/MTX and infliximab/MTX was €1,871 (€1,490) and €543 (€1,323), respectively, relative to adalimumab/MTX. Results remained constant under other scenario analyses undertaken. CONCLUSION: In the real-life practice setting in Greece, where dose intensity and frequency differences occur, etanercept alone or in combination with MTX, if prescribed as per label, represents the option with lower annual cost per patient when compared with adalimumab or infliximab in patients with RA. These results hold true as long as the assumptions and data used in the analysis remain stable and may alter if any of the underlying parameters, such as drug price, change.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...