ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To identify features differentiating bipolar disorder (BP) from borderline personality disorder (BPD) and with each condition variably defined. METHOD: Participants were assigned a BP or BPD diagnosis on the basis of DSM criteria and, separately, by clinical judgment, and undertook a diagnostic interview and completed self-report measures. RESULTS: Predictors of BPD status varied according to diagnostic decisions, but with the most consistent items being childhood sexual abuse, childhood depersonalization, personality variables relating to relationship difficulties and sensitivity to criticism, and the absence of any BP family history. Across diagnostic groups, personality measure items alone predicted diagnostic allocation with an accuracy of 81-84%, the refined study variables other than hypo/manic features improved the classification rates to 88%, and when the presence or absence of hypo/manic features was added, classification rates increased to 92-95%. CONCLUSION: Study findings indicate that BPD can be differentiated from BP with a high degree of accuracy.
Subject(s)
Bipolar Disorder/diagnosis , Borderline Personality Disorder/diagnosis , Diagnosis, Differential , Adolescent , Child , Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders , Female , Humans , Male , Self Report , Young AdultABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the general health status of asylum seekers and their access to health services. DESIGN: Prospective questionnaire survey. SETTING: A community-based asylum seeker centre in Sydney from March to September 1994, before the Limited Health Care Assistance Scheme had taken effect. PARTICIPANTS: Forty of 57 eligible asylum seekers from 21 different countries attending English language classes. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Results on the traumatic events section of the Harvard Trauma Questionnaire, a postmigratory problem checklist, the COOP Functional Health Assessment charts, the Duke-University of Northern Carolina Health Profile, and a structured interview to assess difficulties in accessing health care in Australia. RESULTS: More than 30 of the 40 participants reported exposure to past trauma. Asylum seekers were more impaired in their emotional health than a normative group of patients with minor (P < 0.001) and serious (P < 0.001) medical illnesses, and more impaired in role functioning than those with minor medical illnesses (P < 0.001). Twenty or more reported symptoms of nervousness, headache, and/or depression; 28 reported having pain in the previous four weeks. Twenty-seven reported major difficulties in accessing dental services. The same number reported problems in obtaining general medical care; the most important reason cited was not having a Medicare card. CONCLUSIONS: Although a selective sample, the asylum seekers in our study appeared to be suffering substantial levels of emotional and somatic symptoms, yet, for most, access to health care was a major problem. The effectiveness of recent sequential changes to the provisions covering welfare and health care for asylum seekers needs to be closely monitored.
