Standardized Bench Test Evaluation of Biomechanical Characteristics of Stents Used in Right Ventricular Outflow Tract Revalvulation.

PURPOSE: Pre-stenting of the right ventricular outflow tract (RVOT) is commonly performed before percutaneous pulmonary valve implantation (PPVI), to relieve obstruction, prevent valved stent fractures, and provide a landing zone. This study aimed to evaluate the biomechanical characteristics of the stents currently used to perform pre-stenting of the RVOT. METHODS: We assessed five commercially available stents: Cheatham-Platinum Stent ("CP Stent"), AndraStent XL, AndraStent XXL, Optimus XL, and Optimus XXL. Following stent deployment at nominal pressure, radial and longitudinal elastic recoils and radial resistance were measured. The bending stiffness of the stents crimped onto the balloons was also evaluated. RESULTS: Three samples were tested for each stent. Our study showed no significant difference between the stent platforms in terms of radial elastic recoil, which was relatively low (< 10%). The longitudinal elastic recoil was also low for all the devices (< 5%). Significant differences were observed in radial resistance (P < 0.001). CP Stent and AndraStent XL exhibited the highest radial resistances. The bending stiffnesses of the stents crimped on their balloons were significantly different (P < 0.00001). Optimus XL and XXL were more flexible than the other stents. CONCLUSION: This study highlights the significant differences between the stents currently used in RVOT pre-stenting. Stents with good radial resistance are preferred, especially for calcified vessels, and flexibility is crucial for tortuous vessels. We proposed an algorithm for selecting the most suitable stent according to the need for radial force and flexibility, which will help inform clinicians considering RVOT revalvulation.

P2Y12 Inhibitor Loading Time Before Elective PCI and the Prevention of Myocardial Necrosis.

BACKGROUND: There are dated and conflicting data about the optimal timing of initiation of P2Y12 inhibitors in elective percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Peri-PCI myocardial necrosis is associated with poor outcomes. We aimed to assess the impact of the P2Y12 inhibitor loading time on periprocedural myocardial necrosis in the population of the randomized Assessment of Loading With the P2Y12 Inhibitor Ticagrelor or Clopidogrel to Halt Ischemic Events in Patients Undergoing Elective Coronary Stenting (ALPHEUS) trial, which compared ticagrelor with clopidogrel in high-risk patients who received elective PCI. METHODS: The ALPHEUS trial divided 1809 patients into quartiles of loading time. The ALPHEUS primary outcome was used (type 4 [a or b] myocardial infarction or major myocardial injury) as well as the main secondary outcome (type 4 [a or b] myocardial infarction or any type of myocardial injury). RESULTS: Patients in the first quartile group (Q1) presented higher rates of the primary outcome (P = 0.01). When compared with Q1, incidences of the primary outcome decreased in patients with longer loading times (adjusted odds ratio [adjOR], 0.70 [0.52.-0.95]; P = 0.02 for Q2; adjOR 0.65 [0.48-0.88]; P < 0.01 for Q3; adjOR 0.66 [0.49-0.89]; P < 0.01 for Q4). Concordant results were found for the main secondary outcome. There was no interaction with the study drug allocated by randomization (clopidogrel or ticagrelor). Bleeding complications (any bleeding ranging between 4.9% and 7.3% and only 1 major bleeding at 48 hours) and clinical ischemic events were rare and did not differ among groups. CONCLUSIONS: In elective PCI, administration of the oral P2Y12 inhibitor at the time of PCI could be associated with more frequent periprocedural myocardial necrosis than an earlier administration. The long-term clinical consequences remain unknown.

Coronary artery assessment on pre transcatheter aortic valve implantation computed tomography may avoid the need for additional coronary angiography.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the percentage of coronary angiography that can be securely avoided by the interpretation of coronary arteries on pre transcatheter aortic valve implantation CT (TAVI-CT), using CT images obtained with deep-learning reconstruction and motion correction algorithms. MATERIAL AND METHOD: All consecutive patients who underwent TAVI-CT and coronary angiography, from December 2021 to July 2022 were screened for inclusion in the study. Patients who had previous coronary artery revascularization or who did not undergo TAVI were excluded. All TAVI-CT examinations were obtained using deep-learning reconstruction and motion correction algorithms. On TAVI-CT examinations, quality and stenosis of coronary artery were analyzed retrospectively. When insufficient image quality and/or when diagnosis or doubt of one significant coronary artery stenosis, patients were considered as having possible coronary artery stenosis. The results of coronary angiography were used as the standard of reference for significant CAS. RESULTS: A total of 206 patients (92 men; mean age, 80.6 years) were included; of these 27/206 (13%) had significant coronary artery stenosis on coronary angiography and were referred for potential revascularization. Sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value, positive predictive value, and accuracy of TAVI-CT to identify patients requiring coronary artery revascularization was 100% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 87.2-100%), 100% (95% CI: 96.3-100%), 54% (95% CI: 46.6-61.6), 25% (95% CI: 17.0-34.0%) and 60% (95% CI: 53.1-66.9%) respectively. Intra- and inter observer variability was substantial agreement for quality and decision to recommend coronary angiography. Mean reading time was 2 ± 1.2 (standard deviation) min (range: 1-5 min). Overall, TAVI-CT could potentially rule out indication for revascularization for 97 patients (47%). CONCLUSION: Analysis of coronary artery on TAVI-CT using deep-learning reconstruction and motion correction algorithms can potentially safely avoid coronary angiography in 47% of patients.

Management and outcomes of ventricular septal defects after acute myocardial infarction: A multicenter retrospective study.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: The mortality rate of patients with post-myocardial infarction (MI) ventricular septal defects (VSDs) is high, and the benefit of surgery is unclear. We aimed to investigate the management and outcomes of post-MI VSD over a 10-year period in a large cohort. METHODS: Data of patients with post-MI VSD admitted in three French university hospitals from 2008 to 2019 were examined. The characteristics of those who underwent surgery were compared with those who received medical treatment. Mortality risk factors, survival curves, and outcomes at 30 days and 1 year after treatment were determined. RESULTS: Of the 92 patients whose data were examined, 50 underwent surgery and 42 received exclusive medical treatment. All patients were critically ill. Overall, 76.1% of patients received inotropic support, and 63% received mechanical ventilation. Circulatory assistance, mainly via intra-aortic balloon pump and extra-corporeal membrane oxygenation, was provided to 46.7% patients, with 14.1% requiring a second assistance. The median time to surgery was 4 days. At 1 year, mortality was 46% in those who underwent surgery and 83.3% in those treated medically (p < .001). Survival curves at 1 and 3 months showed major differences, and the survival rate showed little change 30 days after treatment. Cardiogenic shock and cardiac arrest emerged as risk factors for mortality. CONCLUSIONS: In our retrospective, multicenter study, the mortality resulting from post-MI VSD did not seem to improve over the last decade. Although surgery carried considerable risks, it improved survival.

Comorbidities may offset expected improved survival after transcatheter aortic valve replacement.

Aims: After transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR), cardiovascular and non-cardiovascular comorbidities may offset the survival benefit from the procedure. We aimed to describe the relationships between that benefit and patient comorbidities. Methods and results: The study pooled two European cohorts of patients with severe aortic stenosis (AS-pooled): one with patients who underwent (cohort of AS patients treated by TAVR, N = 233) and another with patients who did not undergo TAVR (cohort of AS patients treated medically; N = 291). The investigators collected the following: calcification prognostic impact (CAPRI) and Charlson scores for cardiovascular and non-cardiovascular comorbidities, activities of daily living (ADL)/instrumental activities of daily living (IADL) scores for frailty as well as routine Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) score and Logistic Euroscore. Unlike ADL/IADL scores, CAPRI and Charlson scores were found to be independent predictors of 1-year all-cause death in the AS-pooled cohort, with and without adjustment for STS score or Logistic Euroscore; they were thus retained to define a three-level prognostic scale (good, intermediate, and poor). The survival benefit from TAVR-vs. no TAVR-was stratified according to these three prognosis categories. The beneficial effect of TAVR on 1-year all-cause death was significant in patients with good and intermediate prognosis, hazard ratio (95% confidence interval): 0.36 (0.18; 0.72) and 0.32 (0.15; 0.67). That effect was reduced and not statistically significant in patient with poor prognosis [0.65 (0.22; 1.88)]. Conclusion: The study showed that, beyond a given comorbidity burden (as assessed by CAPRI and Charlson scores), the probability of death within a year was high and poorly reduced by TAVR. This indicates the futility of TAVR in patients in the poor prognosis category.

Outcomes of emergency transcatheter aortic valve replacement in patients with cardiogenic shock: A multicenter retrospective study.

Rescue transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) in patients with cardiogenic shock is challenging, and there is limited literature on these critical patients. The aim of this study was to determine the characteristics and outcomes of patients undergoing TAVR, feasibility and safety of the procedure, and 1-year mortality factors. Thirty-eight patients with severe aortic disease and cardiogenic shock admitted to two French hospitals from 2015 to 2019 were included. The patients were critical, 78.9% of them had a left ventricular ejection fraction of <30%, and all of them received inotropic support. "Valve-in-valve" procedures were performed in 15.8% and 13.2% underwent balloon aortic valvuloplasty before TAVR. Edwards Sapien3® and Medtronic CoreValve EvolutR® were used. The survival probability remained reasonable for patients with cardiogenic shock who underwent rescue TAVR. The 30-day mortality rate was 7.9% and 21.1% at 1 year. No patient died during the intervention. The procedure was safe, with few complications except for acute kidney failure, the development of a left bundle branch block, and the need for pacemaker implantation. Both functional and echocardiographic results were good at 1 year, although 29% of the patients underwent rehospitalization within 1 year. The development of a left bundle branch block was found to be a mortality risk factor. This procedure is a safe and effective therapy with acceptable survivorship in critically ill patients. The benefits to their quality of life should be evaluated in future studies, and the need for providing early cardiac resynchronization therapy must be emphasized.

Mitral valve-in-valve and valve-in-ring procedures: Midterm outcomes in a French nationwide registry.

OBJECTIVES: Report contemporary outcomes in patients included in the Mitragister registry and treated with transcatheter mitral valve implantation for failed surgical annuloplasty rings or deteriorated bioprosthesis. BACKGROUND: Midterm survival rates have been reported, but little is known about contemporary morbimortality endpoints. METHODS: The primary safety outcome was the technical success rate. The primary efficacy composite endpoint was a composite of cardiovascular mortality and heart failure hospitalizations. RESULTS: From 2016 to 2021, 102 patients (median age: 81 [74;84] years, 61% female, Euroscore II 11.0% [7.8;16.0]) undergoing valve-in-valve (ViV; n = 89) or valve-in-ring (ViR; n = 13) procedures were consecutively included. At baseline, ViR group patients had worse left ventricular ejection fraction (50% vs. 60%; p = 0.004) and more frequently severe regurgitation (46% vs. 15%; p = 0.014). The primary safety outcome was 95%: 77% and 98% in the ViR and ViV populations, respectively, (p = 0.014). At intermediate follow-up (6-12 months) clinical improvement was notable, 88% of the patients were in NYHA class ≤ II (vs. 25% at baseline; p < 0.001). At a mean follow-up of 17.1 ± 11.0 months, the primary efficacy composite reached 27%. By multivariate analysis, paravalvular leak (PVL) was the only independent predictor (hazard ratio: 2.39, 95% confidence interval: 1.08-5.29; p = 0.031) while ViR was not found statistically associated (p = 0.456). CONCLUSIONS: This study confirms the safety and efficacy of the mitral ViV procedure. ViR patients appear at higher risk of procedural complications. The presence of PVL could be associated with markedly worse midterm prognosis. Whatever the intervention, procedural strategies to reduce PVL incidence remain to be assessed to prevent latter adverse outcomes.

Length of Stay in Older Patients Undergoing Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: Value of a Geriatric Approach.

BACKGROUND: For patients with transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR), increased length of stay (LOS) is associated with increased long-term mortality. The main objective of our study was to analyze the association between geriatrics factors and the hospital LOS for older patients undergoing TAVR for severe aortic stenosis. METHODS: This retrospective single-center study included all patients aged ≥75 who underwent TAVR between January 2018 and January 2019. Hospital LOS and postoperative complications were analyzed regarding the geriatric factors recorded during a systematic preoperative, comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA). The individualized-care plans established after the preoperative CGA were also analyzed. RESULTS: median LOS of the 196 patients included was 6 days (interquartile range: 4-8), and 29% of patients had prolonged LOS. In a multivariable analysis, the preoperative factors associated with a prolonged hospital LOS were EuroSCORE I (p value = 0.02), prior major neurocognitive disorders (p value = 0.01), femoral access (p value <0.001), all complications (p value <0.001), and discharge in a rehabilitation center (p value <0.001). One-fourth (27%) of the patients had at least 1 geriatric complication. After CGA, 69 patients did not need any geriatric recommendation, whereas for the 127 other patients, an individualized-care plan was established but only 46 (36%) of them were followed up. CONCLUSION: Our results favor the preoperative screening for major neurocognitive disorders in order to reduce LOS. Furthermore, the proposed individual-care plans after CGA were poorly followed. Practitioners may perceive the preoperative CGA as a screening tool, but its primary objective is to develop an individualized-care plan as a prehabilitation plan in order to optimize the physical, functional, and social issues.

Impact of Severe Sarcopenia on Rehospitalization and Survival One Year After a TAVR Procedure in Patients Aged 75 and Older.

BACKGROUND: Transcatheter aortic-valve replacement (TAVR) reduces mortality and improves quality of life in patients with severe aortic valve stenosis. One third of patients have no benefit one year after TAVR. Sarcopenia, an age-related loss of skeletal muscle mass, is associated with increased physical disability and mortality. The main purpose was to evaluate the impact of severe sarcopenia on rehospitalization one year after TAVR in older patients. METHODS: All patients aged ≥75 referred for a TAVR in 2018 were included. Severe sarcopenia was defined by a loss of skeletal muscle mass defined on CT-scan measurement associated with a gait speed ≤0.8m/s. The main outcome was rehospitalization one year after TAVR. RESULTS: Median age of the 182 included patients was 84, and 35% had an unplanned hospitalization at one year. Severe sarcopenia was diagnosed in 9 patients (4.9%). Univariable analysis showed that gait speed was a factor associated with readmission [HR=0.32, 95% CI (0.10-0.97), p=0.04] but not severe sarcopenia. In multivariable analysis, only diabetes was significantly associated with rehospitalization [HR=2.06, 95% CI (1.11-3.84), p=0.02]. Prevalence of severe sarcopenia varied according to different thresholds of skeletal muscle mass on CT-scan. CONCLUSION: Even though severe sarcopenia was not correlated with rehospitalization and mortality at one year after TAVR, our results emphasize the changes in the prevalence according to cutoff used. It highlights the need to define standardized methods and international threshold for sarcopenia diagnosis by CT-scan measurements, in general population and for patients with valvular heart disease.

TAVR Patients Requiring Anticoagulation: Direct Oral Anticoagulant or Vitamin K Antagonist?

OBJECTIVES: Using French transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) registries linked with the nationwide administrative databases, the study compared the rates of long-term mortality, bleeding, and ischemic events after TAVR in patients requiring oral anticoagulation with direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) or vitamin K antagonists (VKAs). BACKGROUND: The choice of optimal drug for anticoagulation after TAVR remains debated. METHODS: Data from the France-TAVI and FRANCE-2 registries were linked to the French national health single-payer claims database, from 2010 to 2017. Propensity score matching was used to reduce treatment-selection bias. Two primary endpoints were death from any cause (efficacy) and major bleeding (safety). RESULTS: A total of 24,581 patients who underwent TAVR were included and 8,962 (36.4%) were treated with OAC. Among anticoagulated patients, 2,180 (24.3%) were on DOACs. After propensity matching, at 3 years, mortality (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.37; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.12-1.67; P < 0.005) and major bleeding including hemorrhagic stroke (HR: 1.64; 95% CI: 1.17-2.29; P < 0.005) were lower in patients on DOACs compared with those on VKAs. The rates of ischemic stroke (HR: 1.32; 95% CI: 0.81-2.15; P = 0.27) and acute coronary syndrome (HR: 1.17; 95% CI: 0.68-1.99; P = 0.57) did not differ among groups. CONCLUSIONS: In these large multicenter French TAVR registries with an exhaustive clinical follow-up, the long-term mortality and major bleeding were lower with DOACs than VKAs at discharge. The present study supports preferential use of DOACs rather than VKAs in patients requiring oral anticoagulation therapy after TAVR.

Sapien 3 Embolization From Ventricle to Aorta in the Setting of Noncalcified Aortic Regurgitation.

Transcatheter aortic valve replacement is currently used off-label for noncalcified aortic valve regurgitation and therefore is restricted to selected cases. In this setting we describe a rare complication of Sapien 3 (Edwards Lifesciences, Irvine, California) embolization from the left ventricle to the descending aorta. Given their technical challenges, such procedures require specific considerations and management. (Level of Difficulty: Advanced.).

Carotid versus femoral access for transcatheter aortic valve replacement: comparable results in the current era.

OBJECTIVES: The carotid approach for transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) has been shown to be feasible and safe. The goal of this study was to compare the 30-day outcomes of trans-carotid (TC) and transfemoral (TF) TAVR. METHODS: This retrospective study enrolled 500 consecutive patients treated by TC-TAVR (n = 100) or TF-TAVR (n = 400) with percutaneous closure between January 2018 and January 2020 at the Nantes University Hospital. The primary end-point was the occurrence of cardiovascular death and cerebrovascular events at 30 days. RESULTS: The mean age was 79.9 ± 8.1 in the TC group and 81.3 ± 6.9 (P = 0.069) in the TF group. The TC group had more men (69% vs 50.5%; P = 0.001) and more patients with peripheral vascular disease (86% vs 14.8%; P < 0.0001). Cardiac characteristics were similar between the groups, and the EuroSCORE II was 3.8 ± 2.6% vs 4.6 ± 6.0%, respectively (P = 0.443). The 30-day mortality was 2% in the TC group versus 1% in the TF group (P = 0.345). TC-TAVR was not associated with an increased risk of stroke (2% vs 2.5%; P = 0.999) or major vascular complications (2% vs 4%; P = 0.548). More permanent pacemakers were implanted in the TF group (14.9% vs 5.6%; P = 0.015), and no moderate or severe aortic regurgitation was observed in the TC group (0 vs 3.3%; P = 0.08). TC-TAVR was not associated with an increased risk of mortality or stroke at 30 days (odds ratio 1.32; 95% confidence interval 0.42-4.21; P = 0.63) in the multivariable analysis. CONCLUSIONS: No statistically significant differences between TC-TAVR and TF-TAVR were observed; therefore, TC-TAVR should be the first alternative in patients with anatomical contraindications to the femoral route.

Transcatheter aortic valve thrombosis: Data from a French multicenter cohort analysis.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effectiveness of anticoagulant therapies in patients with clinical transcatheter heart valve (THV) thrombosis, to describe complications, and to assess their risk profile was the objectives. BACKGROUND: Little research has been conducted on clinical THV thrombosis. METHODS: Patients with clinical THV thrombosis were identified based on greater than 50% increased transvalvular gradient on transthoracic echocardiogram confirmed by 4-dimensional computed tomography, transesophageal echocardiogram, or regression with anticoagulant therapy. A cohort free from thrombosis for more than 1,100 days postprocedure was used for comparison. RESULTS: Fifty-four patients with clinical THV thrombosis were identified. Most subjects (98.1%) received anticoagulant therapy which was effective (≥50% reduction in transvalvular gradient or return to postprocedure value) in 96%. The rate of serious hemodynamic or embolic complications in the thrombosis population was 31.5%. A multivariate analysis of subjects with and without thrombosis indicated a significantly increased risk of thrombosis from preexisting thrombocytopenia (odds ratio [OR] 9.96), absence of predilatation (OR = 5.67), renal insufficiency (OR = 4.84), and >10 mmHg mean transvalvular gradient postprocedure (OR = 3.36). No recurrence of thrombosis was identified during on average 685 days follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: These data, from one of the largest cohorts with clinical THV thrombosis confirm anticoagulants appear effective. The rate of serious associated complications was high. The findings underline the importance of recognizing risk factors for thrombosis.

Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation for Failed Surgical Aortic Bioprostheses Using a Self-Expanding Device (from the Prospective VIVA Post Market Study).

Patients with symptomatic aortic stenosis are often treated with a surgical valve replacement. Surgical bioprosthetic valves degenerate over time and therefore may necessitate a redo surgery. This analysis reports the 2-year clinical outcomes of the Valve-in-Valve study, which evaluated transcatheter aortic valve implantation using the CoreValve and Evolut R devices in patients with degenerated surgical aortic bioprostheses at high risk for surgery. The prospective Valve-in-Valve study enrolled 202 eligible patients with failing surgical aortic bioprostheses due to stenosis, regurgitation, or a combination of both. The Evolut R bioprosthesis was used in 90.5% of valve-in-valve transcatheter aortic valve implantation cases. Two-year all-cause and cardiovascular mortality rates were 16.5% and 11.1%, respectively. Other clinical events included stroke (7.9%), disabling stroke (1.7%), and new pacemaker implantation (10.1%). The 2-year all-cause mortality rate was significantly higher in patients with discharge mean gradients ≥20 mmHg vs. those with lower mean gradients (21.0% vs 7.6%, p = 0.025). Discharge mean gradients ≥20 mm Hg were associated with smaller surgical bioprostheses (OR, 7.2 [95% CI 2.3 to 22.1]. In patients with failing surgical aortic bioprostheses, valve-in-valve treatment using a supra-annular self-expanding bioprosthesis provides significant functional improvements with acceptable rates of complications, especially if a postprocedural mean gradient of <20 mmHg can be achieved.

Association of Preoperative Geriatric Assessment With Length of Stay After Combined Cardiac Surgery.

BACKGROUND: For older patients undergoing cardiac surgery, geriatric factors are known to increase postoperative complications and prolong length of stay (LOS). Comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) is an evidence-based method for geriatric evaluation to develop an individualized-care plan to optimize physical, functional, and social issues. This study analyzed the association between preoperative CGA and hospital LOS after combined cardiac surgery. METHODS: This retrospective monocentric study included all patients aged 75 years and greater who underwent combined cardiac surgery between 2014 and 2017. Hospital LOS, intensive care unit LOS, and postoperative complications were compared between patients with or without preoperative CGA before and after propensity-score matching. RESULTS: Mean age of the 407 patients was 79.6 years; 114 underwent a preoperative CGA (28%). For 305 patients (74.9%), coronary artery bypass was associated with aortic valve replacement. After propensity-score matching, a significant difference was found between the 2 groups (preoperative CGA versus none) for in-hospital LOS (12 versus 13 days; P = .04) and intensive care unit LOS (3 versus 4 days; P = .01). In multivariable analysis, a significant association remained between hospital LOS and CGA (P = .02), renal function (P = .02), mitral replacement (P = .001), and complications (P = .001). CONCLUSIONS: Our results favor the use of systematic preoperative CGA. These encouraging results need to be validated by prospective studies that assess the impact of individualized-care plan established after CGA on postoperative outcomes. With an aging population, efforts are required to determine how to implement preoperative individualized-care plans to improve postoperative outcomes for vulnerable patients undergoing cardiac surgery.

Standardized fractal bench test evaluation of coronary stents: Performances in bifurcation lesions treated by the re-proximal optimization technique.

BACKGROUND: Bifurcation lesions in coronary arteries are complex to treat with coronary stents, which are not designed for that purpose and can be unproperly deployed. Moreover, devices are constantly evolving, and so are angioplasty techniques. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to determine the performances of different stents in the treatment of bifurcation lesions using the re-proximal optimization technique (rePOT). METHODS: Eleven stent platforms were evaluated: Xience Sierra (Abbott), Xience Alpine (Abbott), Synergy (Boston), Coroflex Isar (Bbraun), Cobra PzF (Celonova), Ultimaster (Terumo), Resolute Integrity (Medtronic), Resolute Onyx (Medtronic), Optimax (Hexacath), Orsiro (Biotronik), and Absorb (Abbott). Stents were deployed in a silicone fractal bifurcation model using the rePOT. Micro-computed tomography was performed to assess side branch ostium coverage and strut malapposition, as well as the effect of rePOT on stent cell area. RESULTS: Our study showed significant differences between stent platforms regarding side branch ostium coverage (p = .002). The Synergy and Cobra PzF stents were the most performant devices to avoid ostium coverage. Strut malapposition varied significantly between devices (p = .008) but the percentage of malapposed struts was relatively low. Significant differences were observed between stents regarding the cell area before (p = .002) and also after rePOT (p = .003), and the increase in cell area caused by rePOT varied considerably between devices (p = .08). CONCLUSION: This study highlighted significant differences in the performances of stent platforms deployed in a fractal bifurcation model using rePOT, with a variable impact of the procedure on stent cell area.

Radiopacity of Coronary Stents, an In Vitro Comparative Study.

PURPOSE: Interventional cardiology devices and especially stents are constantly evolving. A good radiopacity is essential to properly position the stent and to reduce the risk of complications during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). We wanted to assess the radiopacity of coronary stents. METHODS: 9 stents were evaluated. Stents were deployed in a silicon bifurcation model and several pulsed fluoroscopy acquisitions (7.5 and 15 pulses/s) of each device were performed in a catheterization laboratory. Quantitative radiopacity assessment was performed using a radiopacity visual scale and qualitative radiopacity assessment was performed by showing the images to three experienced operators, single-blind. RESULTS: Our study showed statistically significant differences between stents regarding radiopacity assessed in a quantitative analysis (p < 0.000001) or a qualitative analysis (p < 0.000001), whether the acquisitions were made in 7.5 or 15 pulses/s. Resolute Onyx and Synergy were the most radio-opaque in both qualitative and qualitative analysis. Moreover, there was a statistically significant correlation between the radiopacity of stents, their strut thickness (p < 0.0001) and the presence of platinum in their metallic alloy (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: This study highlighted significant differences in the radiopacity of coronary stents deployed in a bench test model. The strut thickness and the presence of platinum increased the radiopacity.