A Comparison of Two Multi-Layer Sacral Foam Dressings for the Prevention of Hospital-Acquired Pressure Injuries.

Hospital-acquired pressure injuries (HAPIs) represent a significant detriment to patient health by increasing mortality risk, negatively impacting quality of life, and increasing risk of complications such as infection. Prophylactic use of sacral foam dressings is known to decrease the occurrence of HAPIs in various patient populations. This retrospective study compared the effect of two multi-layer sacral foam dressings on HAPI incidence in patients admitted to a short-term, acute care hospital during the years 2015 (dressing one: Mepilex® Border Protect sacral dressing [Mölnlycke Healthcare AB, Göteborg, Sweden]) and 2017 (dressing two: Optifoam® Gentle LQ silicone faced foam < border sacral dressing [Medline Industries, LP, Northfield, Illinois]). Patient medical charts were examined for full sample (n=297) and subsample (n=284) analysis, respectively. The HAPI incidence for dressing two was found to be significantly less than dressing one (full sample: 5.12% compared to 10.79% [p=0.0001], and subsample: 4.07% compared to 9.31% [p=0.0001]). The incidence rate ratio (IRR) for dressing two was 0.39 for the full sample and 0.35 for the subsample, indicating that compared to dressing one, the HAPI count was approximately 40% lower for dressing two for the full sample and approximately 35% lower for dressing two for the subsample. These results demonstrate that dressing two performed better than dressing one in HAPI prevention. The results of this study may inform clinicians in their choice of prophylactic dressings.

The Impact of Race and Socioeconomic Status on Total Joint Arthroplasty Care.

BACKGROUND: Racial minorities and patients from lower socioeconomic backgrounds are less likely to undergo total joint arthroplasty (TJA) for degenerative joint disease (DJD). However, when these patients do present for care, little is known about the overall severity of DJD and surgical wait times. METHODS: A retrospective cohort of 407 patients (131 black and 276 white) who presented to an arthroplasty clinic and went on to receive TJA was established. Severity of osteoarthritis was assessed radiographically via Kellgren-Lawrence (KL) grade. Preoperative Knee Society Score (KSS) and Harris Hip Score (HHS) were used to measure joint pain and function. Multivariate regression modeling and analysis of covariance were used to examine racial and socioeconomic differences in KL grade, KSS, HHS, and time to surgery. RESULTS: Black patients presented with significantly greater KL scores than white patients (P = .046, odds ratio = 1.65, 95% confidence interval [1.01, 2.70]). In contrast, there were no statistically significant racial differences in the mean preoperative KSS (P = .61) or HHS (P = .69). Black patients were also found to wait, on average, 35% longer for TJA (P = .03, hazard ratio = 1.35, 95% confidence interval [1.04, 1.75]). Low income was associated with higher KL grade (P = .002), lower KSS (P = .07), and lower HHS (P = .001). CONCLUSION: Despite presenting with more advanced osteoarthritis, black patients reported similar levels of joint dysfunction and had longer surgical wait times when compared with white patients. Lower socioeconomic status was similarly associated with more severe DJD.

Anticoagulation in Revision Total Joint Arthroplasty: A Retrospective Review of 1917 Cases.

Although several studies now support the use of aspirin for venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis in primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA), the optimal chemoprophylactic agent in revision THA and TKA is not clear. The purpose of this study was to determine if the type of chemoprophylaxis has an effect on the VTE rate in patients undergoing revision total joint arthroplasty (TJA). The second aim was to compare differences in rates of wound drainage in primary and revision TJA stratified by the postoperative chemoprophylaxis used. The authors retrospectively reviewed 1917 consecutive patients undergoing primary and revision TJA. Individual records were reviewed for patient demographics, medical comorbidities, type of chemoprophylaxis, VTE risk factors, intraoperative data, and postoperative complications. Outcomes, including VTE rate and wound complications, were compared between types of anticoagulant therapy used postoperatively. Of the 1917 patients, there were 742 (38.7%) primary TKAs, 326 (17%) revision TKAs, 608 (31.7%) primary THAs, and 241 (12.6%) revision THAs. The most common prophylactic agent used was rivaroxaban (40.6%), followed by warfarin (28.5%) and aspirin (27.6%). Type of chemoprophylaxis was not associated with postoperative VTE or wound drainage (P>.05). Although revision surgery was an independent risk factor for wound drainage (odds ratio, 3.201; 95% confidence interval, 1.594-6.426; P=.001), it was not a risk factor for VTE (odds ratio, 1.847; 95% confidence interval, 0.423-8.053; P=.414). Revision arthroplasty alone was not associated with an increased rate of VTE. Aspirin is as effective as other chemoprophylactic agents without the increased risk of bleeding in low-risk patients. [Orthopedics. 2019; 42(6):323-329.].

Surgical management of compartment syndrome and the gradual closure of a fasciotomy wound using a DermaClose device.

The immediate recognition and timely response of compartment syndrome due to damage caused by penetrating trauma has immense clinical outcomes. The following is a case report of a complicated fasciotomy in a 33-year-old male who suffered a gunshot wound to his left lower extremity and the surgical management leading to adequate limb salvage and recovery.

Clinical Outcomes and Survivorship of Lateral Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty: Does Surgical Approach Matter?

BACKGROUND: Lateral unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) has been shown to be an effective procedure to treat isolated lateral compartment osteoarthritis with excellent long-term survivorship. Whether a medial parapatellar approach or a lateral parapatellar approach is superior in lateral UKA is unknown. The purpose of this study was to determine if there is a difference in intermediate-term clinical outcomes in patients undergoing lateral UKA through a lateral vs medial parapatellar approach. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed a consecutive series of 65 patients who underwent lateral UKA with a minimum of 2-year follow-up. Fifty-two patients (80%) had a lateral approach and 13 (20%) a medial parapatellar approach. Patient demographics, preoperative and postoperative radiographic findings, need for revision surgery, Knee Society Score, and range of motion were assessed. RESULTS: Overall survivorship was 94% at a mean of 82 months; with the sample size available for study, there was no difference in survivorship between the groups. There was no difference in Knee Society Score or revision to total knee arthroplasty (5% vs 7%, P = 1.000) between the medial and lateral approach groups. Comparatively, the lateral approach group did have significantly greater postoperative flexion (123.6° vs 116.5°, P = .006) and greater improvement in flexion from preoperative measurements (3.0 vs -8.0°, P = .010). CONCLUSION: Although our sample size was small, we could not demonstrate a difference in revision rates or clinical outcome scores when comparing a lateral or a medial approach with lateral UKA at intermediate-term follow-up. A lateral approach did have greater postoperative flexion, but its clinical significance remains undetermined.

Intra-Articular Knee Injections Before Total Knee Arthroplasty: Outcomes and Complication Rates.

BACKGROUND: The relationship between intra-articular injections and complication rates after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) remains controversial. This study's purpose was to determine the relationship between the number and timing of intra-articular injections with complications and outcomes after TKA from a single surgeon's database. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed a series of 442 patients who underwent primary TKA from 2008-2015. Patient demographics, comorbidities, number and timing of ipsilateral intra-articular injections, and preoperative and postoperative functional outcome scores were recorded. Complications and infection rates at a minimum of 12-month follow-up were compared between patients who received 3 or less preoperative injections and those who received 4 or greater before TKA. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to identify independent risk factors for complications and poor short-term outcomes after TKA. RESULTS: Of the 442 patients enrolled in the study, 390 patients (90%) received an ipsilateral injection before TKA. Patients receiving 4 or more injections (175 patients, 40%) did not have a difference in complication rate (14% vs 17%, P = .346), poor functional outcomes (6% vs 9%, P = .299), or infection rate (2% vs 4%, P = .286). When controlling for confounding variables, intra-articular corticosteroid, viscosupplementation, and any injection within 90 days were not associated with an increase in complications, infection, or poor functional outcomes after TKA (all P > .05). CONCLUSION: Our data suggest that there is no relationship between timing and number of intra-articular injections with complication rate, infection, or poor short-term functional outcomes. Further larger studies are needed to confirm these findings.

Stability limits modulate whole-body motor learning.

Our daily movements exert forces upon the environment and also upon our own bodies. To control for these forces, movements performed while standing are usually preceded by anticipatory postural adjustments (APAs). This strategy is effective at compensating for an expected perturbation, as it reduces the need to compensate for the perturbation in a reactive manner. However, it can also be risky if one anticipates the incorrect perturbation, which could result in movements outside stability limits and a loss of balance. Here, we examine whether the margin for error defined by these stability limits affects the amount of anticipation. Specifically, will one rely more on anticipation when the margin for error is lower? Will the degree of anticipation scale with the margin for error? We took advantage of the asymmetric stability limits (and margins for error) present in the sagittal plane during upright stance and investigated the effect of perturbation direction on the magnitude of APAs. We also compared anticipatory postural control with the anticipatory control observed at the arm. Standing subjects made reaching movements to multiple targets while grasping the handle of a robot arm. They experienced forward or backward perturbing forces depending on the target direction. Subjects learned to anticipate the forces and generated APAs. Although subjects had the biomechanical capacity to adapt similarly in the forward and backward directions, APAs were reduced significantly in the backward direction, which had smaller stability limits and a smaller margin for error. Interestingly, anticipatory control produced at the arm, where stability limits are not as relevant, was not affected by perturbation direction. These results suggest that stability limits modulate anticipatory control, and reduced stability limits lead to a reduction in anticipatory postural control.