Predictors of left ventricular remodelling in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy - a cardiovascular magnetic resonance study.

AIMS: There is an important need for better biomarkers to predict left ventricular (LV) remodelling in dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM). We undertook a comprehensive assessment of cardiac structure and myocardial composition to determine predictors of remodelling. METHODS AND RESULTS: Prospective study of patients with recent-onset DCM with cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) assessment of ventricular structure and function, extracellular volume (T1 mapping), myocardial strain, myocardial scar (late gadolinium enhancement) and contractile reserve (dobutamine stress). Regression analyses were used to evaluate predictors of change in LV ejection fraction (LVEF) over 12 months. We evaluated 56 participants (34 DCM patients, median LVEF 43%; 22 controls). Absolute LV contractile reserve predicted change in LVEF (1% increase associated with 0.4% increase in LVEF at 12 months, P = 0.02). Baseline myocardial strain (P = 0.39 global longitudinal strain), interstitial myocardial fibrosis (P = 0.41), replacement myocardial fibrosis (P = 0.25), and right ventricular contractile reserve (P = 0.17) were not associated with LV reverse remodelling. There was a poor correlation between contractile reserve and either LV extracellular volume fraction (r = -0.22, P = 0.23) or baseline LVEF (r = 0.07, P = 0.62). Men were more likely to experience adverse LV remodelling (P = 0.01) but age (P = 0.88) and disease-modifying heart failure medication (beta-blocker, P = 0.28; angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor, P = 0.92) did not predict follow-up LVEF. CONCLUSIONS: Substantial recovery of LV function occurs within 12 months in most patients with recent-onset DCM. Women had the greatest improvement in LVEF. A low LV contractile reserve measured by dobutamine stress CMR appears to identify patients whose LVEF is less likely to recover.

A case of isolated bicuspid pulmonary valve.

We present a 73 years old woman who presented with pelvic cancer, ongoing sepsis and presumably a new diastolic murmur. Her transthoracic echocardiogram, as part of a sepsis screen, showed an abnormal pulmonary valve with moderate regurgitation. Trans-oesophageal echocardiography using 3D imaging showed a bicuspid pulmonary valve as the cause for the moderate regurgitation, but with no clear source of infection. Bicuspid pulmonary valve as an isolated clinical entity is a rare finding in clinical practice. Bicuspid pulmonary valves tend to be more commonly associated with other congenital cardiac anomalies. Whereas, the incidence of bicuspid aortic valve is estimated to be about 1-2%, the incidence of bicuspid pulmonary valve is thought to be much lower at around 0.1%. This could be an underestimate due to difficulty in visualising the pulmonary valve en-face on standard two-dimensional echocardiography. The true prevalence of the condition may be uncovered by the routine use of 3D echocardiography.

Resting Aortic Valve Area at Normal Transaortic Flow Rate Reflects True Valve Area in Suspected Low-Gradient Severe Aortic Stenosis.

OBJECTIVES: This study sought to assess the diagnostic impact of stress echocardiography (SE) in patients with suspected low-flow, low-gradient aortic stenosis but normal resting transvalvular flow rate. BACKGROUND: SE may help to distinguish between true severe aortic stenosis and pseudosevere aortic stenosis in patients with low aortic valve area (AVA) and mean gradient. However, if rest flow rate is normal, then SE may not confer any additional diagnostic value, irrespective of resting left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and indexed stroke volume (SVi). METHODS: Sixty-seven patients with suspected low-flow, low-gradient aortic stenosis who underwent SE were retrospectively studied. Following stratification by rest LVEF, SVi, and flow rate-using cutoffs of 50%, 35 ml/m(2), and 200 ml/s, respectively-we tested for significant changes in AVA during SE. RESULTS: Mean age was 77 ± 9 years and 60% of patients were male. Mean values for rest variables were as follows: AVA: 0.77 ± 0.12 cm(2); mean gradient: 27 ± 7 mm Hg; flow rate: 182 ± 37 ml/s; SVi: 32 ± 8 ml/m(2); and LVEF: 45 ± 15%. During SE, significant increases in AVA were observed regardless of resting LVEF and SVi state. In patients with rest flow rate ≥200 ml/s, AVA did not increase significantly during stress (rest AVA: 0.90 cm(2) vs. stress AVA: 0.97 cm(2); p = 0.11), and positive predictive value for confirming underlying true severe aortic stenosis was 84%. In adjusted analyses, rest flow rate was the only parameter associated with severe AS (odds ratio: 1.05, 95% confidence interval: 1.0 to 1.1; p = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: Rest AVA measured under normal flow rate conditions is likely to reflect the true severity of AS and unlikely to change significantly with SE. Flow normalization may only be required in patients with AVA <1 cm(2) and mean gradient <40 mm Hg when the rest flow rate is <200 ml/s.