Fish oil for kidney transplant recipients.

BACKGROUND: Calcineurin inhibitors used in kidney transplantation for immunosuppression have adverse effects that may contribute to nephrotoxicity and increased cardiovascular risk profile. Fish oils are rich in very long chain omega-3 fatty acids, which may reduce nephrotoxicity by improving endothelial function and reduce rejection rates through their immuno-modulatory effects. They may also modify the cardiovascular risk profile. Hence, fish oils may potentially prolong graft survival and reduce cardiovascular mortality. OBJECTIVES: This review aimed to look at the benefits and harms of fish oil treatment in ameliorating the kidney and cardiovascular adverse effects of CNI-based immunosuppressive therapy in kidney transplant recipients. SEARCH METHODS: We searched the Cochrane Kidney and Transplant Specialised Register (up to 17 March 2016) through contact with the Information Specialist using search terms relevant to this review. SELECTION CRITERIA: All randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi-RCTs of fish oils in kidney transplant recipients on a calcineurin inhibitor-based immunosuppressive regimen. RCTs of fish oil versus statins were included. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Data was extracted and the quality of studies assessed by two authors, with differences resolved by discussion with a third independent author. Dichotomous outcomes were reported as risk ratio (RR) and continuous outcome measures were reported as the mean difference (MD) with 95% confidence intervals using the random effects model. Heterogeneity was assessed using a Chi(2) test on n-1 degrees of freedom and the I(2) statistic. Data not suitable for pooling were tabulated and described. MAIN RESULTS: Fifteen studies (733 patients) were suitable for analysis. All studies were small and had variable methodology. Fish oil did not significantly affect patient or graft survival, acute rejection rates, or calcineurin inhibitor toxicity when compared to placebo. Overall SCr was significantly lower in the fish oil group compared to placebo (5 studies, 237 participants: MD -30.63 µmol/L, 95% CI -59.74 to -1.53; I(2) = 88%). In the subgroup analysis, this was only significant in the long-course (six months or more) group (4 studies, 157 participants: MD -37.41 µmol/L, 95% CI -69.89 to -4.94; I(2) = 82%). Fish oil treatment was associated with a lower diastolic blood pressure (4 studies, 200 participants: MD -4.53 mm Hg, 95% CI -7.60 to -1.45) compared to placebo. Patients receiving fish oil for more than six months had a modest increase in HDL (5 studies, 178 participants: MD 0.12 mmol/L, 95% CI 0.03 to 0.21; I(2) = 47%) compared to placebo. Fish oil effects on lipids were not significantly different from low-dose statins. There was insufficient data to analyse cardiovascular outcomes. Fishy aftertaste and gastrointestinal upset were common but did not result in significant patient drop-out. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: There is insufficient evidence from currently available RCTs to recommend fish oil therapy to improve kidney function, rejection rates, patient survival or graft survival. The improvements in HDL cholesterol and diastolic blood pressure were too modest to recommend routine use. To determine a benefit in clinical outcomes, future RCTs will need to be adequately powered with these outcomes in mind.

Probiotic treatment of vancomycin-resistant enterococci: a randomised controlled trial.

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether eating Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG (LGG) in the form of commercially available yoghurt improves clearance of vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE). DESIGN: Double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled trial. SETTING: Renal ward of Austin Health, a tertiary hospital, Feb-Oct 2005. PARTICIPANTS: 27 VRE-positive patients, 14 receiving active treatment and 13 controls. INTERVENTIONS: Subjects were randomly assigned to either a treatment group (receiving 100 g daily of yoghurt containing LGG for 4 weeks) or a control group (receiving standard pasteurised yoghurt). Faecal samples were obtained three times at about weekly intervals. Treated patients were tested for VRE again at 8 weeks. Patients in the control group who had failed to clear VRE after 4 weeks were then given LGG-containing yoghurt for 4 weeks, as an open continuation. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Number of faecal specimens clear of VRE. RESULTS: Of the 27 patients enrolled, 23 completed the study. Two patients were lost to follow-up, one died and one withdrew. All 11 patients in the treatment group who completed the study cleared VRE. Three subjects reverted to VRE positivity after using antibiotics to which LGG is sensitive, while all others remained negative for at least 4 weeks after trial completion. Twelve control subjects completed the study, of whom one cleared VRE and 11 remained VRE-positive. Eight of these 11 patients were subsequently crossed over to receive LGG yoghurt, and all cleared VRE within 4 weeks. CONCLUSION: To our knowledge, this is the first description of a probiotic therapy to successfully treat gastrointestinal carriage of VRE in renal patients. Further investigation of the use of LGG in VRE-positive patients is warranted.

Fish oil treatment for kidney transplant recipients: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

BACKGROUND: Calcineurin inhibitors have adverse effects that contribute to nephrotoxicity and cardiovascular risk profile, and these may be reduced by administration of fish oil. The aim of this review was to assess the benefits and harms of fish oil supplementation in kidney transplant recipients on a calcineurin inhibitor-based immunosuppressive regimen. METHODS: The Cochrane Controlled Trials Registry, MEDLINE, and EMBASE were searched for randomized controlled trials of fish oil treatment in kidney transplant recipients on a calcineurin inhibitor-based immunosuppressive regimen. Trials comparing fish oil to both placebo and statins were included. Data were extracted for patient and graft survival, acute rejection, calcineurin inhibitor toxicity, cardiovascular events, adverse effects, compliance, renal function, blood pressure, and lipid profile. Dichotomous outcomes were reported as relative risk and continuous outcome measures as weighted mean differences (WMD), with 95% confidence intervals. RESULTS: Sixteen suitable trials were analyzed. Fish oil treatment was associated with a lower diastolic blood pressure (WMD 4.5 mmHg, P=0.004) and higher high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol (WMD 0.12 mmol/L, P=0.01) but did not affect the other outcomes. Fishy aftertaste and gastrointestinal upset were common but did not result in significant dropout. Fish oil effects on lipids were not significantly different than low-dose statins. CONCLUSION: There is insufficient evidence from currently available randomized controlled trials to recommend fish oil therapy to improve renal function, rejection rates, and patient or graft survival. Improvements in HDL cholesterol and diastolic blood pressure were too modest to recommend routine use.