Analgesics and ASH medications in workers increase the risk of disability pension and mortality: prospective cohort.

BACKGROUND: Relying on medication for musculoskeletal and mental disorders are common, but may have long-term consequences. This study investigates whether use of analgesics and anxiolytic/sedative/hypnotic (ASH) medication increases the risk of disability pension and mortality. METHODS: After completing a survey in 2005, 7773 female eldercare workers were followed for 11 years in a national register. We estimated hazard ratios (HRs) for disability pension and mortality from using analgesics and ASH. RESULTS: During follow-up, 10.3% obtained disability pension and 2.4% died. For use of analgesics, a frequency-response association for the risk of disability pension existed with HR's (95% confidence interval) of 1.30 (1.07-1.57), 2.00 (1.62-2.46) and 3.47 (2.69-4.47) for monthly, weekly and daily use, respectively. For ASH, an increased risk of disability pension also existed (HR's between 1.51 and 1.64). For mortality risk, only daily use of analgesics and ASH remained significant. Population attributable fractions of analgesics and ASH, respectively, were 30% and 3% for disability pension and 5% and 3% for mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Frequent use of analgesics and ASH medication in workers increase the risk of disability pension and early death. Better management of musculoskeletal and mental health conditions, without excessive medication use, is necessary.

Prognostic value of the clinical and imaging arm of the ASAS criteria for progression of structural sacroiliac joint lesions.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the prognostic value of the two arms of the Assessment of SpondyloArthritis international Society (ASAS) criteria regarding the progression of structural lesions in the sacroiliac joints (SIJ). METHODS: Information on baseline fulfilment of the ASAS criteria and baseline and follow-up magnetic resonance imaging of the SIJ in 603 patients aged 18-40 years, referred with low back pain to an outpatient spine were collected. MRI-positivity was defined as bone marrow oedema (BMO) in ≥2 consecutive slices or ≥2 lesions in 1 slice, as described in ASAS definition of sacroiliitis. RESULTS: Of 71 participants fulfilling the ASAS criteria at baseline, 66(93%) fulfilled the 'imaging arm' and 14(20%) the 'clinical arm'. The 'clinical arm' predicted progression of erosions with an odds ratio of 55 (compared with not fulfilling the ASAS criteria), while the 'imaging arm' predicted progression of erosions with an odds ratio of 8. Moreover, in 24% of patients in the 'imaging arm', all having BMO at the SIJ at baseline, the BMO disappeared without neither erosions nor ankylosis emerging. CONCLUSION: We found that the 'clinical arm' was a strong predictor for progression of sacroiliac joint erosion, while the 'imaging arm' had a more modest prognostic value for structural progression.

Trajectories of disability in low back pain.

INTRODUCTION: Low back pain (LBP) is the leading course of years lived with disability. Unfortunately, not much knowledge exists about distinct trajectories of recovery from disability after LBP and their potential psychological predictors. OBJECTIVES: Hence, the aim of the present study was to identify trajectories of functional disability in LBP and their potential baseline psychological predictors. METHODS: A 1-year consecutive cohort (N = 1048) of patients with LBP referred to the Spine Centre if they have not improved satisfactorily from a course of treatment in primary care after 1 to 2 months were assessed by self-report questionnaires at their first visit and at 6- and 12-month follow-up. Data from patients who responded to the Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire at least twice (N = 747) were used to assess trajectories of functional disability by Latent Growth Mixture Modeling. The following measures were used as baseline predictors of the trajectories: Pain Intensity Numerical Rating Scales, Pain Catastrophizing Scale, Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia, and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. RESULTS: Four distinct trajectories were identified: high-stable (22.0%), high-decreasing (20.4%), medium-stable (29.7%), and low-decreasing (27.9%). Using the low-decreasing trajectory as reference, baseline pain intensity, depressive symptoms, and pain-catastrophizing predicted membership of all 3 symptomatic trajectories. However, using the high-decreasing trajectory as reference, age, baseline pain intensity, and depression were predictors of the high-stable trajectory. CONCLUSION: In particular, the finding of a high-stable trajectory characterized by high levels of baseline psychological distress is of potential clinical importance because psychological distress may be targeted by cognitive behavioral therapeutic approaches.

Chronic low back pain, Modic changes and low-grade virulent infection: efficacy of antibiotic treatment.

Chronic low back pain (CLBP) has consistently been associated with the longest number of years lived with a disability in global studies, while commonly used treatments for CLBP are largely ineffective. In 2013 a randomized, double-blind, controlled study demonstrated significant improvements in CLBP patients demonstrating Modic changes type 1 on their MRI scans and undergoing long-term oral antibiotic treatment (100 days). Much of the ensuing debate has focused on whether this was a true infection or contamination. Newer and more advanced technologies clearly point to an ongoing low-grade infection. We have reviewed all of the clinical trials published in the recent past and conclude that there is compelling evidence for the effect of long-term oral antibiotic treatment for this patient group.

Prevalence of long-term opioid therapy in spine center outpatients the spinal pain opioid cohort (SPOC).

PURPOSE: No reference material exists on the scope of long-term problems in novel spinal pain opioid users. In this study, we evaluate the prevalence and long-term use of prescribed opioids in patients of the Spinal Pain Opioid Cohort. METHODS: The setting was an outpatient healthcare entity (Spine Center). Prospective variables include demographics, clinical data collected in SpineData, and The Danish National Prescription Registry. Patients with a new spinal pain episode lasting for more than two months, aged between 18 and 65 years, who had their first outpatient visit. Based on the prescription of opioids from 4 years before the first spine center visit to 5 years after, six or more opioid prescriptions in a single 1-year interval fulfilled the main outcome criteria Long-Term Opioid Therapy (LTOT). RESULTS: Overall, of 8356 patients included in the cohort, 4409 (53%) had one or more opioid prescriptions in the registered nine years period. Of opioid users, 2261 (27%) were NaiveStarters receiving their first opioid prescription after a new acute pain episode; 2148(26%) PreStarters had previously received opioids. The prevalence of LTOT in PreStarters/NaiveStarters was 17.2%/11.2% in their first outpatient year. Similar differences between groups were seen in all follow-up intervals. In the last follow-up year, LTOT prevalence in Prestarters/NaiveStarters was 12.5%/7.0%. CONCLUSIONS: Previous opioid treatment-i.e., before a new acute spinal pain episode and referral to a Spine Center-doubled the risk of LTOT 5 years later. The results underscore clinicians' obligation to carefully and individually weigh the benefits against the risks of prescribing opioid therapy. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE I: Diagnostic: individual cross-sectional studies with consistently applied reference standard and blinding.

Somatic Experiencing® for patients with low back pain and comorbid posttraumatic stress symptoms - a randomised controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Low back pain (LBP) and comorbid post-traumatic stress symptoms (PTSS) are common after traumatic injuries, and a high level of PTSS is associated with more severe pain and pain-related disability. Few randomised controlled trials (RCT) exist targeting comorbid PTSS and chronic pain, and only one has assessed the effect of Somatic Experiencing®. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to assess the effect of Somatic Experiencing® (up to 12 sessions) + physiotherapeutic intervention (4-8 sessions) (SE+PT) compared with the physiotherapeutic intervention alone (4-8 sessions) (PT) for pain-related disability in LBP with comorbid PTSS. METHODS: The study was a two-group RCT in which participants (n = 114) were recruited consecutively from a large Danish Spine Centre. Patients were randomly allocated to either SE+PT or PT alone. Outcomes were collected at baseline before randomisation, 6 and 12-month post-randomisation. The primary outcome was pain-related disability as measured with the modified version of the Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire at 6-month post-randomisation. Secondary outcomes were PTSS, pain intensity, pain-catastrophising, kinesiophobia, anxiety and depression. RESULTS: No significant group differences were found on any of the outcomes at any timepoints. Both groups achieved a significant reduction in pain-related disability (20-27%) as measured by the Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire at 6 and 12-month follow up. Also, both groups achieved a small reduction in PTSS. CONCLUSIONS: Although significant effects were achieved for both groups, the additional SE intervention did not result in any additional benefits in any of the outcomes.

Antecedentes: La lumbalgia y los síntomas comórbidos de estrés postraumático (SCET) son comunes luego de lesiones traumáticas, y un alto nivel de los SCET está asociado con dolor más severo y con discapacidad asociada al dolor. Existen escasos ensayos clínicos aleatorizados enfocados en los SCET y en dolor crónico, y solo uno ha evaluado el efecto de la Experiencia Somática®.Objetivo: El objetivo de este estudio fue el de evaluar el efecto de la Experiencia Somática® (hasta un máximo de 12 sesiones) adicionada a la intervención fisioterapéutica (entre 4 a 8 sesiones) (ES+IF), comparada con la intervención fisioterapéutica sola (entre 4 a 8 sesiones) (IF), sobre la discapacidad asociada al dolor en lumbalgia con SCET.Métodos: El estudio consistió en un ensayo clínico aleatorizado de dos grupos para el que se reclutó a participantes (n=144) consecutivamente de un gran Centro Danés de Columna Vertebral. Los pacientes fueron distribuidos aleatoriamente al grupo de ES+IF o al grupo de solo IF. Los puntos de corte se realizaron de base antes de la aleatorización, y a los 6 y 12 meses luego de la aleatorización. El resultado principal era la discapacidad asociada a dolor, medida mediante la versión modificada del Cuestionario de Discapacidad de Roland Morris a los seis meses luego de la aleatorización. Los resultados secundarios fueron los SCET, la intensidad del dolor, la catastrofización sobre el dolor, la quinesofobia, la ansiedad, y la depresión.Resultados: No se encontraron diferencias significativas entre los grupos sobre los resultados medidos, en ningún punto de corte. Ambos grupos alcanzaron una reducción significativa de la discapacidad asociada a dolor (20 ­ 27%), medida mediante el Cuestionario de Discapacidad de Roland Morris a los 6 y a los 12 meses. Además, ambos grupos alcanzaron una reducción pequeña en los SCET.Conclusiones: A pesar de que se alcanzaron resultados significativos en ambos grupos, la intervención adicional mediante Experiencia Somática® no aportó ningún beneficio adicional sobre ninguno de los resultados.

Long-Term Opioid Therapy in Spine Center Outpatients: Protocol for the Spinal Pain Opioid Cohort (SPOC) Study.

BACKGROUND: Spinal pain is the leading cause of patient-years lived with chronic pain and disability worldwide. Although opioids are well documented as an effective short-term pain-relieving medication, more than a few weeks of treatment may result in a diminishing clinical effect as well as the development of addictive behavior. Despite recognition of opioid addiction in pain patients as a major problem commonly experienced in the clinic, no reference material exists on the scope of long-term problems in novel opioid users and the link to clinical outcomes. OBJECTIVE: The main aims of this study are to describe baseline and follow-up characteristics of the Spinal Pain Opioid Cohort (SPOC), to evaluate the general use of opioids in spinal pain when an acute pain episode occurs, and to demonstrate the prevalence of long-term opioid therapy (LTOT). METHODS: Prospective clinical registry data were collected from an outpatient spine center setting during 2012-2013 including patients with a new spinal pain episode lasting for more than 2 months, aged between 18 and 65 years who had their first outpatient visit in the center. Variables include demographics, clinical data collected in SpineData, the Danish National Patient Register, and The Danish National Prescription Registry. The primary outcome parameter is long-term prescription opioid use registered from 4 years before the first spine center visit to 5 years after. RESULTS: This is an ongoing survey. It is estimated that more than 8000 patients fulfill the SPOC inclusion criteria. In 2019, we began the intellectual process of identifying the most relevant supplementary data available from the wide range of existing national registries available in Denmark. We have now begun merging SpineData with relevant opioid data from Danish national registers and will continue to extract data up to 2021-2022. We will also be looking at data regarding somatic or psychiatric hospitalization patterns, patient usage of health care resources, as well as their working status and disability pensions. CONCLUSIONS: To our knowledge, this survey will be the first to document the scope of long-term problems regarding LTOT and opioid addiction following new spinal pain episodes and comparing descriptive follow-up data between substance users and nonusers. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN Registry ISRCTN69685117; http://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN69685117. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): DERR1-10.2196/21380.

Catastrophization, fear of movement, anxiety, and depression are associated with persistent, severe low back pain and disability.

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Psychological characteristics are important in the development and progression of low back pain (LBP); however, their role in persistent, severe LBP is unclear. PURPOSE: To investigate the relationship between catastrophization, depression, fear of movement, and anxiety and persistent, severe LBP, and disability. STUDY DESIGN/ SETTING: One-year prospective cohort study. PATIENT SAMPLE: Participants were selected from the SpineData registry (Denmark), which enrolls individuals with LBP of 2 to 12 months duration without radiculopathy and without satisfactory response to primary intervention. OUTCOME MEASURES: Psychological characteristics, including catastrophization, depression, fear of movement, and anxiety, were examined at baseline using a validated screening questionnaire. Current, typical, and worst pain in the past 2 weeks were assessed by 11-point numeric rating scales and an average pain score was calculated. Disability was measured using the 23-item Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire. METHODS: Participants completed baseline questionnaires on initial presentation to the Spine Center (Middelfart, Denmark), and follow-up questionnaires were sent and returned electronically. Statistical analysis involved multivariable Poisson regression to investigate the association between psychological factors and the number of episodes of severe pain or disability. This study received no direct funding. RESULTS: Of the 952 participants at baseline, 633 (63.4%) provided data 1 year later. Approximately half of the participants reported severe LBP (n=299, 47.2%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 43.3%-51.2%) or disability (n=315, 57.6%, 95% CI 53.3%-61.8%) at a minimum of one time point, and 14.9% (n=94, 95% CI 12.2%-17.9%) and 24.3% (n=133, 95% CI 20.8%-28.1%) experienced severe LBP or disability at two time points, respectively. Multivariable Poisson regression showed a relationship between catastrophization, depression, fear of movement, and anxiety and a greater number of time points with severe LBP and disability, after adjusting for age, gender, body mass index, and duration of symptoms. However, when all psychological factors were added to the regression model, only catastrophization and depression remained significantly associated. CONCLUSIONS: This study showed that persistent, severe LBP, and disability is common in a secondary care population with LBP and is associated with a variety of psychological risk factors, in particular catastrophization and depression, highlighting the importance of considering these factors in the design and evaluation of outcomes studies for LBP.

What Level of Inflammation Leads to Structural Damage in the Sacroiliac Joints? A Four-Year Magnetic Resonance Imaging Follow-Up Study of Low Back Pain Patients.

OBJECTIVE: Sacroiliac (SI) joint bone marrow edema (BME) is considered to be pivotal in the detection of early spondyloarthritis. However, the link between BME and development of spondyloarthritis-related bone remodeling remains unclear. This study was undertaken to investigate the evolution of BME and structural lesions in the SI joints over time. METHODS: Baseline and 4-year follow-up magnetic resonance imaging scans were conducted in 604 patients ages 18-40 years who were referred with low back pain to an outpatient spine clinic. Eight SI joint regions were scored for BME and categorized as absent, limited (<25% of subcortical bone region), intermediate (25-50%), or extensive (>50%). Structural lesions including erosions and fat lesions were scored as absent or present. RESULTS: SI joint BME was seen at either time point (baseline or at 4 years) in 41% of participants but was persistent at both time points in only 16% of participants. Structural SI joint lesions developed according to the extent of BME at baseline: limited, intermediate, and extensive BME (as compared to absent BME) were independently associated with erosion at follow-up with odds ratios (ORs) of 3, 5, and 46, respectively, and with fat lesions (ORs 3, 7, and 33, respectively). In regions with limited and intermediate BME at baseline, 60% and 50% had resolved by follow-up, respectively, while only 2% and 7% had evolved into extensive BME by follow-up. CONCLUSION: While extensive SI joint BME was a strong independent predictor of development of structural lesions, limited and intermediate BME were mostly transient and only rarely evolved into extensive BME or structural lesions. These findings enhance our understanding of the natural development of SI joint lesions and indicate different progression patterns for limited/intermediate versus extensive BME, possibly due to different etiologies.

New insights link low-virulent disc infections to the etiology of severe disc degeneration and Modic changes.

Within the last 5 years, international research collaborations including those of several research groups skilled in microbiology, immunology and pathophysiology, have identified a low-virulent intradiscal infection with the ability to provoke gradual and progressive disc degeneration, end-plate disruption, Modic changes and persistent clinical lower-back pain. Certain strains of the Propionibacterium acne bacterium seem able to invade, colonize and develop a protective biofilm inside the disc. The interaction of P. acne, disc tissues and mononuclear cells of the bone marrow are shown to trigger a relevant immunological response and an ensuing destructive inflammation of the disc and adjacent vertebrae. This process presents on MRI as Modic changes. Recent proof-of-concept data provide compelling evidence for this bacterial disc infection hypothesis.

Is pseudarthrosis after spinal instrumentation caused by a chronic infection?

HYPOTHESIS: To assess whether a chronic bacterial infection is present in a subset of patients with pseudarthrosis after instrumented spinal fusion. METHODS: This was a prospective diagnostic study including adult patients with previous instrumented spinal fusion. Patients underwent revision surgery for either pseudarthrosis or other causes (e.g. implant removal, curve progression or junctional kyphosis) (control group). Five separate biopsies were randomly collected, intraoperatively, from the pseudarthrosis site and cultivated under both aerobic (5 days) and anaerobic (14 days) conditions. If cultivation was positive in at least 2/5 tissue samples, the biopsy was sectioned and stained using peptide nucleic acid fluorescence in situ hybridization (PNA-FISH). Confocal laser scanning microscopy was used to examine the sections and visualize bacterial aggregates. RESULTS: The study included 32 pseudarthrosis and 32 control patients. Cultivation yielded bacteria in at least 1/5 biopsies in 52% of patients with no difference between the groups (p = 1.0). Bacteria of the same species was found in at least 2/5 samples in seven pseudarthrosis patients and four controls (p = 0.509). Propionibacterium acnes was found in 8 of these 11 samples. Microscopy demonstrated tissue-embedded bacterial aggregates in two of these patients but with no inflammatory cells indicating an active infection. The presence of bacteria was not associated with the number of previous spinal procedures or the pre-revision fusion length (p ≥ 0.503). CONCLUSIONS: Pseudarthrosis after instrumented spinal surgery was not significantly associated with the presence of bacteria at the pseudarthrosis site. Positive cultivation results are common after spinal instrumentation, but our results indicate that they rarely represent an organized infection. These slides can be retrieved under Electronic Supplementary Material.

Somatic experiencing® for patients with low back pain and comorbid posttraumatic stress disorder - protocol of a randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Research has almost exclusively focused on the neck in order to explain the mechanisms of persistent pain after motor vehicle collisions (MVC). However, studies have shown that low back pain after MVC is as common as neck pain. Also, posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) is common after MVCs, and evidence indicate that PTSD may be linked to the development of pain and disability. PTSD has even been proposed as "the missing link" for some in the development of chronic low back pain. Unfortunately, PTSD often goes unattended in low back pain rehabilitation and very few randomized controlled studies exists targeting both conditions. Hence, the aim of the present study is to investigate the potential additional effect of the trauma therapy "Somatic Experiencing®" (SE) in addition to physiotherapy (PT) compared to PT alone for patients with chronic low back pain and comorbid PTSD. METHODS: The study is a two-group randomized controlled clinical trial in which participants (n = 140) are recruited consecutively from a large Danish spine center in the Region of Southern Denmark, between January 2016 and December 2017. Patients are randomly allocated to one of the two conditions: SE + PT or PT alone. Measurements of effect are carried out at baseline before randomization, post-intervention, 6 and 12 months post-randomization. The primary outcome is a 20% reduction in disability (Rolland Morris Disability Questionnaire) at 6 months post-randomization. Secondary outcomes are: PTSD symptoms, pain intensity, pain-catastrophizing, fear of movement, anxiety and depression. DISCUSSION: Comorbid PTSD is currently not targeted in back pain rehabilitation although highly prevalent. If the SE intervention shows to have an additional effect on disability and pain, the study is likely to have a positive impact on the management of chronic low back pain and will have immediate clinical applicability. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Current Controlled Trials Registration August 4, 2017: NCT03244046 . Retrospectively registered.

The impact of attachment insecurity on pain and pain behaviors in experimental pain.

OBJECTIVES: Pain perception and pain behaviors are distinct phenomena with different functions. Pain behaviors are protective in their functions, which include eliciting empathy or caring behaviors from others. Moreover, pain behaviors are intertwined with interpersonal relationships with significant others, which is why attachment orientations have been suggested as interpersonal schemas moderating the association between pain and pain behaviors. The aim of the current study was to assess the impact of insecure attachment dimensions on pain behaviors in laboratory-induced pain. METHODS: This experimental study included a sample of 60 patients with low back pain recruited from a large spine center in a hospital in Region of Southern Denmark. Patients were recorded on video during a cold pressor procedure and asked to rate their level of pain. Prior to the procedure, attachment orientations were assessed by the Revised Adult Attachment Scale. Two assessors independently coded the recorded video material for protective and communicative pain behaviors. RESULTS: A positive correlation of moderate size was found between pain intensity and pain communication. As hypothesized, attachment anxiety moderated the association between pain and pain behaviors. A high level of attachment anxiety was associated with at weaker association between pain and pain behaviors. None of the attachment dimensions correlated with pain intensity or pain behaviors. CONCLUSION: The results indicate that patients with high levels of attachment anxiety may downplay pain and communication thereof. This finding is of potential clinical importance, since pain communication, among others, serves the function of eliciting caring behavior from healthcare personnel.

Bacterial biofilms: a possible mechanism for chronic infection in patients with lumbar disc herniation - a prospective proof-of-concept study using fluorescence in situ hybridization.

A relationship has been suggested between lumbar disc herniation (LDH) and chronic bacterial infection frequently involving Propionibacterium acnes, which is known to cause chronic infection through the formation of biofilm aggregates. The objective of the study was to assess whether a disc infection involving biofilm formation is present in patients with LDH. A total of 51 LDH patients and 14 controls were included. Bacterial DNA was detected by real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) in 16/51 samples in the LDH group and 7/14 controls (p = 0.215). Sequencing identified bacteria in 9/16 and 6/7 PCR positive samples in the LDH and control groups, respectively. All samples were stained using fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) and examined by confocal laser scanning microscopy. Microscopy demonstrated tissue-embedded bacterial aggregates with host inflammatory cells in 7/51 LDH patients and no controls. The presence of both bacterial aggregates and inflammatory cells suggests a chronic infection in a subset of LDH patients. The finding of bacterial 16S rDNA in both LDH and control disc tissue highlights the importance of microscopic observation to discriminate infection vs contamination. Our findings may have therapeutic implications, as the treatment of biofilm infections is different and more challenging than traditional infections.

Association Between Inflammatory Back Pain Characteristics and Magnetic Resonance Imaging Findings in the Spine and Sacroiliac Joints.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the association between magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings at the sacroiliac (SI) joints and vertebral endplates and pain characteristics assumed to be indicative of axial inflammation. METHODS: Patients ages 18-40 years with persistent low back pain referred to an outpatient spine clinic participated, including an unknown proportion of axial spondyloarthritis patients. Data included MRI of the spine and SI joints and self-reported responses to questions covering the Calin, Berlin, Assessment of Spondyloarthritis International Society, and Bailly inflammatory back pain (IBP) definitions. RESULTS: In the 1,020 included patients, 53% were women, and the median age was 33 years. Positive associations were found between the SI joint MRI findings and pain characteristics, odds ratios ranging from 1.4 to 2.7. SI joint bone marrow edema (BME) was associated with morning stiffness >60 minutes, and SI joint erosions with the Calin, Berlin, and Bailly IBP definitions, alternating buttock pain, and good response to nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs. SI joint fatty marrow deposition (FMD) was associated with insidious onset, and SI joint sclerosis with pain at night. In addition, the spinal MRI changes were associated with IBP, odds ratios ranging from 1.4 to 2.0; vertebral endplate BME was associated with morning stiffness, and vertebral endplate FMD with the Calin and Bailly IBP definitions, improvement with exercise, morning stiffness >30 minutes, and pain worst in the morning. CONCLUSION: The identified associations between inflammatory MRI findings and pain characteristics indicate that axial inflammation to some degree induces a specific pain pattern. Thus, the results add to knowledge of axial inflammatory processes. However, all identified associations were weak, which compromises the use of IBP as a marker of axial inflammation.

Chronic neck pain patients with traumatic or non-traumatic onset: Differences in characteristics. A cross-sectional study.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Patients with chronic neck pain can present with disability, low quality of life, psychological factors and clinical symptoms. It is unclear whether patients with a traumatic onset differ from those with a non-traumatic onset, by having more complex and severe symptoms. The purpose of this study was to investigate the clinical presentation of chronic neck pain patients with and without traumatic onset by examining cervical mobility, sensorimotor function, cervical muscle performance and pressure pain threshold in addition to the following self-reported characteristics: quality of life, neck pain and function, kinesiophobia, depression, and pain bothersomeness. METHODS: This cross-sectional study included 200 participants with chronic neck pain: 120 with traumatic onset and 80 with non-traumatic onset. Participants were recruited from physiotherapy clinics in primary and secondary health care. For participants to be included, they were required to be at least 18 years of age, have had neck pain for at least 6 months, and experienced neck-related activity limitation as determined by a score of at least 10 on the Neck Disability Index. We conducted the following clinical tests of cervical range of motion, gaze stability, eye movement, cranio-cervical flexion, cervical extensors, and pressure pain threshold. The participants completed the following questionnaires: physical and mental component summary of the Short Form Health Survey, EuroQol-5D, Neck Disability Index, Patient-Specific Functional Scale, Pain Bothersomeness, Beck Depression Inventory-II, and TAMPA scale of kinesiophobia. The level of significance for all analyses was defined as p<0.01. Differences between groups for the continuous data were determined using either a Student's t-test or Mann Whitney U test. RESULTS: In both groups, the majority of the participants were female (approximately 75%). Age, educational level, working situation and sleeping patterns were similar in both groups. The traumatic group had symptoms for a shorter duration (88 vs. 138 months p=0.001). Participants in the traumatic group showed worse results on all measures compared with those in the non-traumatic group, significantly on neck muscle function (cervical extension mobility p=0.005, cranio-cervical flexion test p=0.007, cervical extensor test p=0.006) and cervical pressure pain threshold bilateral (p=0.002/0.004), as well on self-reported function (Neck Disability Index p=0.001 and Patient-Specific Functional Scale p=0.007), mental quality of life (mental component summary of the Short Form Health Survey p=0.004 and EuroQol-5D p=0.001) and depression (Beck Depression Inventory-II p=0.001). CONCLUSIONS: This study showed significant differences between chronic neck pain patients when differentiated into groups based on their onset of pain. However, no specific clinical test or self-reported characteristic could differentiate between the groups at an individual patient level. IMPLICATIONS: Pressure pain threshold tests, cervical muscle performance tests and patient-reported characteristics about self-perceived function and psychological factors may assist in profiling chronic neck pain patients. The need for more intensive management of those with a traumatic onset compared with those with a non-traumatic onset should be examined further.

A randomized controlled trial of brief Somatic Experiencing for chronic low back pain and comorbid post-traumatic stress disorder symptoms.

Background: It is well documented that comorbid post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) in chronic pain is associated with a more severe symptom profile with respect to pain, disability and psychological distress. However, very few intervention studies exist targeting both PTSD and pain. The current study is the first randomized controlled trial evaluating the effect of the body-oriented trauma approach of Somatic Experiencing (SE) for comorbid PTSD and low back pain. Although the method is well recognized by clinicians and widely used, SE still needs to be tested in a randomized clinical trial in comparison with an active control group. Objective: The aim of the current study was to compare the effect of an SE intervention in addition to treatment-as-usual (TAU) for patients with chronic low back pain and comorbid PTSD compared to TAU alone. Method: The study was a two-group randomized controlled clinical trial. A cohort of patients (n = 1045) referred to a large Danish spine centre between February 2013 and October 2014 were screened for PTSD and randomized to either TAU (4-12 sessions of supervised exercises for low back pain) or TAU plus SE (6-12 sessions). In total, 91 patients fulfilled the inclusion criteria and volunteered to participate in the study. Treatment effects were evaluated by self-report questionnaires comparing baseline measures with 12-month follow-up measures. Results: The additional SE intervention significantly reduced the number of PTSD symptoms compared with TAU alone, corresponding to a large effect size. Also, fear of movement was significantly reduced (moderate effect size). Both groups achieved a large reduction in pain-catastrophizing, disability and pain. Conclusions: A brief additional SE intervention was found to have a significant effect on PTSD and fear of movement compared to TAU alone. However, the overall effect of SE was less than expected and the clinical importance of the effects can be questioned.

Limited Reliability of Radiographic Assessment of Sacroiliac Joints in Patients with Suspected Early Spondyloarthritis.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the reproducibility of evaluation of sacroiliac joint (SIJ) radiographs among readers with varying levels of experience, and to identify potential drivers of disagreement in classification among 5 predefined radiographic lesion types. METHODS: The study sample consisted of 104 consecutive patients aged 18-40 with low back pain ≥ 3 months of duration who met the Assessment of SpondyloArthritis international Society (ASAS) definition for a positive SIJ magnetic resonance image, or were HLA-B27-positive and had ≥ 1 spondyloarthritis (SpA)-related clinical/laboratory feature according to the ASAS classification criteria for axial SpA. Seven blinded readers (2 musculoskeletal radiologists, 5 rheumatologists) classified pelvic radiographs according to the modified New York criteria (mNY) and recorded presence/absence of 5 lesion types in both SIJ: erosion, sclerosis, ankylosis, joint space widening, and joint space narrowing. Reproducibility of mNY classification among 21 reader pairs was assessed and potential drivers of disagreement were identified among 5 lesion types. A generalized linear mixed logistic regression model served to analyze to what extent discordance in lesion type was associated with discrepant mNY classification. RESULTS: Mean κ values (percent concordance) were 0.39 (84.1%) for mNY classification over 21 reader pairs, 0.46 (79.8%) between 2 musculoskeletal radiologists, and 0.55 (86.5%) and 0.36 (77.9%) between the most experienced rheumatologist and the 2 radiologists. Erosion showed the lowest agreement (25%) among patients with discordant classification and gave the highest OR of 13.5 for disagreement. CONCLUSION: Reproducibility of radiographic SIJ classification in an SpA inception cohort was only fair to at best moderate among 7 readers with varying levels of experience, questioning the applicability of mNY in early SpA.