Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
1.
Cardiovasc Revasc Med ; 40: 113-119, 2022 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34916157

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To analyze the characteristics and outcome of Impella mechanical circulatory support (MCS) for Takotsubo syndrome (TS) with cardiogenic shock. BACKGROUND: TS is an acute heart failure syndrome characterized by transient severe reduction of left ventricular (LV) systolic function, with cardiogenic shock occurring in around 10% of patients. Since inotropes should be avoided due to their role in TS pathogenesis and aggravation of LV outflow tract obstruction, the use of MCS as treatment is a viable treatment option, however, studies are lacking. METHODS: The catheter-based ventricular assist device (cVAD) registry and local MCS databases were screened for TS patients with cardiogenic shock (TS-CS) supported with an Impella percutaneous ventricular assist device (pVAD). Patient and treatment characteristics and in-hospital outcomes were retrospectively analyzed. RESULTS: At 10 US and European centers, 16 TS-CS patients supported with an Impella pVAD were identified between December 2013 and May 2018 (mean age, 61.8 ± 15.5 years; 87.5% women). LV ejection fraction (LVEF) at presentation was severely reduced (mean, 19.4 ± 8.3%). Prior to MCS, 13 patients (81.3%) were mechanically ventilated, 4 patients (25.0%) had been resuscitated, and mean serum lactate was 4.7 ± 3.5 mmol/L. Mean duration of Impella support was 1.9 ± 1.0 days (range, 1-4 days). Thirteen patients (81.3%) survived to discharge, and all survivors experienced cardiac recovery with significant improvement of LVEF at discharge compared to baseline (20.4 ± 8.8 vs. 52.9 ± 12.0, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: This is the first series of TS-CS patients supported with an Impella pVAD. Mortality was low, and LV systolic function recovered in all survivors. Prospective studies of Impella support in this special condition are warranted.


Subject(s)
Heart-Assist Devices , Takotsubo Cardiomyopathy , Aged , Female , Heart-Assist Devices/adverse effects , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Prospective Studies , Retrospective Studies , Shock, Cardiogenic/diagnosis , Shock, Cardiogenic/etiology , Shock, Cardiogenic/therapy , Takotsubo Cardiomyopathy/diagnostic imaging , Takotsubo Cardiomyopathy/therapy , Treatment Outcome
2.
Cardiovasc Revasc Med ; 31: 71-75, 2021 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33309042

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Vasopressors and inotropes are the primary pharmacologic agents in the management of cardiogenic shock. Increased use of these agents in the setting of cardiogenic shock treated with the Impella is associated with increased mortality. This study evaluates the use of vasopressors and inotropes as predictors of mortality in patients treated with the Impella for acute cardiogenic shock. METHODS: This retrospective study included 276 patients treated with the Impella 2.5, Impella CP, or Impella 5.0 from March 2011 to January 2020 at a single, tertiary referral center for acute cardiogenic shock. RESULTS: All-cause in-hospital mortality was 44.6%. Mortality significantly increased with escalating use of vasopressors and inotropes, with the most significant increase in mortality from use of 2 agents to the use of 3 agents (8.1% vs 39.7%, p < 0.001). There was no difference in mortality whether dobutamine or milrinone was used (44.4% vs 35.7%, p = 0.41); there was increased mortality with use of multiple inotropes. Patients treated with only vasopressors had increased mortality compared to those treated with a combination of agents that included 1 inotrope. CONCLUSIONS: The escalating need for vasopressors and inotropes and particular combinations of these agents are significant predictors of mortality that may help determine whether the Impella or higher level of support is more appropriate to treat acute cardiogenic shock.


Subject(s)
Heart-Assist Devices , Shock, Cardiogenic , Hospital Mortality , Humans , Retrospective Studies , Shock, Cardiogenic/diagnosis , Shock, Cardiogenic/drug therapy , Treatment Outcome , Vasoconstrictor Agents/adverse effects
3.
Circulation ; 139(3): 337-346, 2019 01 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30586728

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: In ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), infarct size correlates directly with heart failure and mortality. Preclinical testing has shown that, in comparison with reperfusion alone, mechanically unloading the left ventricle (LV) before reperfusion reduces infarct size and that 30 minutes of unloading activates a cardioprotective program that limits reperfusion injury. The DTU-STEMI pilot trial (Door-To-Unload in STEMI Pilot Trial) represents the first exploratory study testing whether LV unloading and delayed reperfusion in patients with STEMI without cardiogenic shock is safe and feasible. METHODS: In a multicenter, prospective, randomized exploratory safety and feasibility trial, we assigned 50 patients with anterior STEMI to LV unloading by using the Impella CP followed by immediate reperfusion (U-IR) versus delayed reperfusion after 30 minutes of unloading (U-DR). The primary safety outcome was a composite of major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events at 30 days. Efficacy parameters included the assessment of infarct size by using cardiac magnetic resonance imaging. RESULTS: All patients completed the U-IR (n=25) or U-DR (n=25) protocols with respective mean door-to-balloon times of 72 versus 97 minutes. Major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular event rates were not statistically different between the U-IR versus U-DR groups (8% versus 12%, respectively, P=0.99). In comparison with the U-IR group, delaying reperfusion in the U-DR group did not affect 30-day mean infarct size measured as a percentage of LV mass (15±12% versus 13±11%, U-IR versus U-DR, P=0.53). CONCLUSIONS: We report that LV unloading using the Impella CP device with a 30-minute delay before reperfusion is feasible within a relatively short time period in anterior STEMI. The DTU-STEMI pilot trial did not identify prohibitive safety signals that would preclude proceeding to a larger pivotal study of LV unloading before reperfusion. An appropriately powered pivotal trial comparing LV unloading before reperfusion to the current standard of care is required. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov . Unique identifier: NCT03000270.


Subject(s)
Anterior Wall Myocardial Infarction/therapy , Heart-Assist Devices , Myocardial Reperfusion/methods , Prosthesis Implantation/instrumentation , ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction/therapy , Ventricular Function, Left , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Anterior Wall Myocardial Infarction/diagnostic imaging , Anterior Wall Myocardial Infarction/physiopathology , Cerebrovascular Disorders/etiology , Cerebrovascular Disorders/physiopathology , Cerebrovascular Disorders/prevention & control , Feasibility Studies , Female , Humans , Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Cine , Male , Middle Aged , Myocardial Reperfusion/adverse effects , Myocardial Reperfusion Injury/etiology , Myocardial Reperfusion Injury/physiopathology , Myocardial Reperfusion Injury/prevention & control , Pilot Projects , Prospective Studies , Prosthesis Implantation/adverse effects , Recovery of Function , Recurrence , Risk Factors , ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction/diagnostic imaging , ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction/physiopathology , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome , United States , Young Adult
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...