Outcomes of nurse-led clinic for patients treated with percutaneous coronary intervention: A retrospective analysis.

BACKGROUND: With an increasing prevalence of coronary heart disease, secondary prevention forms a major cornerstone of management. A dedicated nurse-led clinic for patients post percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) offers a great opportunity to address risk factors in order to reduce cardiovascular events. PURPOSE: To determine the impact of a nurse-led clinic follow up of patients post PCI in relation to the 30 day mortality rate and re-admission, and patient satisfaction. Risk factor assessment, compliance with dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT), and interventions at the clinic visit were also assessed. METHODS: A retrospective review of parameters recorded at clinic appointments from January 2015-December 2017. The data of patients were examined for baseline characteristics, risk factor assessment, and interventions at the clinic visit. Thirty day mortality and re-admission rates and patient satisfaction were major outcomes. RESULTS: 1325 individual patient records were retrospectively reviewed in our clinic. Mean age was 64 and 78% were males. The indications for PCI were STEMI (22.7%), NSTEMI (21.9%), and unstable and stable angina (43.1%). 5 patients (0.4%) died and 132 patients (10%) were re-admitted within 30 days after the follow-up visit. However, only 24 (1.8%) of the re-admissions were due to cardiac reasons. At the clinic appointment, 852 (64.3%) patients had non-pharmacological intervention and 473 (35.7%) patients had a pharmacological intervention. 712 (53.7%) patients had LDL-C above target and their statin therapy was amended accordingly. CONCLUSION: Nurse-led PCI clinics provide satisfactory assessment and management of risk factors achieving high patient satisfaction rates without increased risk of poor outcomes.

Randomized study comparing incidence of radial artery occlusion post-percutaneous coronary intervention between two conventional compression devices using a novel air-inflation technique.

AIM: To compare post-percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) radial artery occlusion (RAO) incidence between two conventional radial artery compression devices using a novel air-inflation technique. METHODS: One hundred consecutive patients post-PCI were randomized 1:1 to Safeguard or TR band compression devices. Post-radial sheath removal, each compression device was inflated with additional 2 mL of air above index bleeding point during air-filled device application and gradually down-titrated accordingly. RAO was defined as absence of Doppler flow signal performed at 24 h and at 6 wk post-PCI. Patients with missing data were excluded. Statistical significance was defined as P < 0.05. RESULTS: All patients had 6F radial sheath inserted. No significant differences were observed between Safeguard Radial (n = 42) vs TR band (n = 42) in terms of age (63 ± 11 years vs 67 ± 11 years), clinical presentation (electives, n = 18 vs n = 16; acute coronary syndrome, n = 24 vs n = 26) and total procedural heparin (7778 ± 2704 IU vs 7825 ± 2450 IU). RAO incidence was not significantly different between groups at 24 h (2% vs 0%, P = 0.32) and 6 wk (0%, both). CONCLUSION: Safeguard Radial and TR band did not demonstrate significant between-group differences in short-term RAO incidence. Lack of evidence of RAO in all post-PCI patients at 6 wk follow-up, regardless of radial compression device indicate advantage of using the novel and pragmatic air-inflation technique. Further work is required to more accurately confirm these findings.