Multimechanistic (sumatriptan-naproxen) early intervention for the acute treatment of migraine.

BACKGROUND: Research suggests treating a migraine at the first sign of pain increases the likelihood of the best clinical outcome. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the efficacy and tolerability of a fixed-dose, single-tablet formulation of sumatriptan 85 mg, formulated with RT Technology, and naproxen sodium 500 mg (sumatriptan/naproxen) as early intervention acute therapy for migraine. METHODS: Patients (aged 18 to 65 years) with International Headache Society-defined migraine with or without aura were enrolled in one of two identically designed, randomized, double-blind, parallel group, placebo-controlled studies. Patients treated a single migraine within 1 hour of onset of migraine head pain and while the pain was mild with either sumatriptan/naproxen or placebo. The primary efficacy measure was the percentage of patients who became pain-free 2 hours postdose. RESULTS: Intent-to-treat analyses consisted of 576 and 535 migraineurs. At 2 hours, 52% and 51% of sumatriptan/naproxen-treated patients were pain free, as compared to 17% and 15% of placebo-treated patients (p < 0.001). Significant pain-free responses in favor of sumatriptan/naproxen were demonstrated as early as 30 minutes, maintained at 1 hour, and sustained from 2 to 24 hours. At 2 and 4 hours, sumatriptan/naproxen provided significantly lower rates of traditional migraine-associated symptoms (nausea, photophobia, and phonophobia) and nontraditional migraine-associated symptoms (neck pain/discomfort and sinus pain/pressure). The most commonly reported adverse events were nausea (< or =4%) and dizziness (< or =2%). CONCLUSION: The fixed-dose single-tablet formulation of sumatriptan/naproxen was effective and well tolerated in an early intervention paradigm for the acute treatment of migraine, including traditional and nontraditional symptoms.

Randomized controlled trial of an oral CGRP receptor antagonist, MK-0974, in acute treatment of migraine.

OBJECTIVE: To determine an effective and tolerable dose of a novel oral calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) receptor antagonist, MK-0974, for the acute treatment of migraine. METHODS: Randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, clinical trial with a two-stage, adaptive, dose-ranging design. Patients were allocated to treat a moderate or severe migraine attack with MK-0974 (25, 50, 100, 200, 300, 400, or 600 mg), rizatriptan 10 mg, or placebo taken orally. The primary endpoint was pain relief (reduction to mild or none) 2 hours after dosing. Secondary endpoints included pain freedom at 2 hours and sustained pain relief at 24 hours. A prespecified, blinded, automated interim analysis was used to discontinue randomization to less effective doses. RESULTS: Per the adaptive study design, the four lowest MK-0974 groups (25, 50, 100, 200 mg) were discontinued due to insufficient efficacy. For the remaining treatment groups, the estimated pain relief proportions at 2 hours were 300 mg (n = 38) 68.1%, 400 mg (n = 45) 48.2%, 600 mg (n = 40) 67.5%, rizatriptan 10 mg (n = 34) 69.5%, and placebo (n = 115) 46.3%. The prespecified primary efficacy hypothesis test, which compared the average 2-hour pain relief response proportion of the combined 300, 400, and 600 mg MK-0974 groups to placebo, was significant (P = 0.015). A generally similar efficacy pattern was seen for other endpoints. MK-0974 was generally well tolerated and there did not appear to be an increase in adverse events with increasing dose. CONCLUSIONS: The novel, orally administered calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) receptor antagonist, MK-0974, was effective and generally well tolerated for the acute treatment of migraine.

Rizatriptan for the acute treatment of ICHD-II proposed menstrual migraine: two prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind studies.

These are the first prospective studies to use criteria for menstrual migraine proposed in the 2004 revision of the International Classification of Headache Disorders (ICHD-II) to examine the efficacy of rizatriptan for treatment of a menstrual attack. Two identical protocols (MM1 and MM2) were randomized, parallel, placebo-controlled, double-blind studies. Adult women with ICHD-II menstrual migraine were assigned to either rizatriptan 10-mg tablet or placebo in a 2 : 1 ratio. Patients treated a single menstrual migraine attack of moderate or severe pain intensity. The primary end-point was 2-h pain relief and the secondary end-point was 24-h sustained pain relief. A total of 707 patients (MM1 357, MM2 350) treated a menstrual migraine attack. The percentage of patients reporting 2-h pain relief was significantly greater for rizatriptan than for placebo (MM1 70% vs. 53%, MM2 73% vs. 50%), as was the percentage of patients reporting 24-h sustained pain relief (MM1 46% vs. 33%; MM2 46% vs. 33%). Rizatriptan 10 mg was effective for the treatment of ICHD-II menstrual migraine, as measured by 2-h pain relief and 24-h sustained pain relief.

Patient satisfaction with rizatriptan versus other triptans: direct head-to-head comparisons.

This study summarises the impact of treatment with rizatriptan 10 mg versus other 5-HT 1B/1D receptor agonists (triptans) on patient satisfaction with medication. Rizatriptan is a potent, selective 5-HT1B/1D receptor agonist shown to be fast, effective and well tolerated in the acute treatment of migraine. We investigated patients' overall satisfaction with treatment in studies in which direct comparisons with other triptans were made. Data from five double-blind, placebo-controlled trials in which rizatriptan 10 mg was compared with another triptan were included in the analysis. Rizatriptan 10 mg was compared with sumatriptan 100 mg in one parallel study (n = 916), sumatriptan 50 mg in two crossover studies (n = 1599), naratriptan 2.5 mg in one parallel study (n = 502), and zolmitriptan 2.5 mg in one parallel study (n = 701). Satisfaction was reported by patients on a seven-point scale ranging from 'completely satisfied, couldn't be better' to 'completely dissatisfied, couldn't be worse' at 2 hours after dosing. The percent of patients in the top two 'satisfied' categories (completely or very satisfied) were analysed. More patients on rizatriptan 10 mg were completely or very satisfied compared with sumatriptan 100 mg (33% vs 26%, p < 0.05), sumatriptan 50 mg (40% vs 35%, p < 0.05), naratriptan 2.5 mg (33% vs 19%, p < 0.01), and zolmitriptan 2.5 mg (38% vs 30%, p < 0.05). In all five studies more patients treated with rizatriptan 10 mg or other triptans were completely or very satisfied with treatment than patients receiving placebo (p < 0.001, except naratriptan vs placebo p = 0.004). The results, combined with the superior efficacy profile (fast, effective, well tolerated) of rizatriptan 10 mg, should enhance the treatment of migraine headache and lead to improved therapeutic intervention in clinical practice.

Epidemiology and impact of primary headache disorders.

Migraine is a common disorder that remains largely undiagnosed and has a profound economic impact. In the future, better recognition and treatment can decrease costs and improve the lives of millions of Americans.

Naratriptan as short-term prophylaxis of menstrually associated migraine: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the efficacy of naratriptan 1-mg and 2.5-mg tablets twice daily compared with placebo as short-term prophylaxis of menstrually associated migraine. BACKGROUND: Approximately 60% of women with migraine report headaches associated with their menstrual cycles. Results from an open-label study suggest that short-term administration of sumatriptan is useful in the prophylaxis of menstrually associated migraine. METHODS: A randomized, double-blind, three-arm, parallel-group, placebo-controlled study was conducted in women aged 18 years or older with a history of migraine with or without aura, as defined by the International Headache Society, of at least 6 months. Two dose strengths of naratriptan (1 mg, 2.5 mg) or identical-appearing placebo tablets (1:1:1) were administered twice daily for 5 days starting 2 days prior to the expected onset of menses across four perimenstrual periods. End points included the number of menstrually associated migraines, total migraine days, peak headache severity, lost work/activity time, migraine-related quality of life, and incidence of adverse events. RESULTS: Overall, the intent-to-treat population comprised 206 women (naratriptan 1 mg, n = 70; naratriptan 2.5 mg, n = 70, and placebo, n = 66); 171 women treated four perimenstrual periods. Significantly more perimenstrual periods per subject treated with naratriptan, 1 mg, were headache-free compared with placebo (50% versus 25%, P =.003). Naratriptan, 1 mg, significantly reduced the number of menstrually associated migraines (2.0 versus 4.0, P <.05) and menstrually associated migraine days (4.2 versus 7.0, P <.01) compared with placebo. More patients treated with naratriptan, 1 mg, were headache-free across all treated perimenstrual periods compared with placebo (23% versus 8%). No difference in headache severity was observed in breakthrough headaches. The incidence and severity of adverse events was similar across treatment groups. Naratriptan, 2.5 mg, was not statistically superior to placebo for any measure. CONCLUSIONS: Naratriptan, 1 mg, with tolerability similar to placebo, is an effective, short-term, prophylactic treatment for menstrually associated migraine.

Venlafaxine extended release (XR) for the prophylaxis of migraine and tension-type headache: A retrospective study in a clinical setting.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy of extended-release venlafaxine in the prophylaxis of migraine and chronic tension-type headache. BACKGROUND: Venlafaxine, a structurally novel antidepressant, is a selective serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor. This study is the first to test the effects of extended-release venlafaxine on headaches. METHODS: Patients were evaluated on a retrospective basis. Fifty-six patients with chronic tension-type headache and 114 patients with migraine were prescribed extended-release venlafaxine. Nearly all the study subjects had been resistant to several previous preventive medications. Patients took venlafaxine for an average of 6 months with a median dose of 150 mg (range, 37.5 to 300 mg). RESULTS: The mean frequency of headaches in the group with chronic tension-type headache fell from 24.0 to 15.2 per month (P <.0001). The group with migraine showed a reduction from 16.1 to 11.1 headaches per month (P <.0001). The medicine was well tolerated. CONCLUSIONS: This trial indicates that extended-release venlafaxine has potential in headache prophylaxis based on its efficacy and safety profile. We recommend a double-blind, placebo-controlled study to further assess the role of extended-release venlafaxine in headache prevention.

Rizatriptan tablet versus wafer: patient preference.

After taking both conventional oral rizatriptan tablets and oral disintegrating rizatriptan tablets in the treatment of migraine with or without aura, patients were permitted to select their formulation preference. All adult patients who had requested continuation of rizatriptan during a 6-month period were included in the study. Of the 367 patients studied, 188 selected the oral disintegrating tablet, while 179 preferred the conventional tablet. Although individual patients had strong preferences for one preparation over the other, no group preference was found.

Impact of headache education program in the workplace.

We evaluated the impact of a headache education program in a workplace setting. A 45-minute standardized educational program was delivered to 492 participants at eight companies. Participants completed questionnaires regarding their headaches and headache management techniques, the Short Form (SF)-36, and the Headache Disability Inventory (HDI) before and 1 month after the presentation. The intervention significantly improved health-related quality of life, decreased headache-related disability, and promoted the use of self-management techniques.

Effect of guided imagery on quality of life for patients with chronic tension-type headache.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the effect of adjuvant guided imagery on patients with chronic tension-type headache. BACKGROUND: Management of chronic tension-type headache often requires a combination of pharmacological and nonpharmacological therapies. Guided imagery is a relaxation technique based on visualizing pleasant images and body awareness. METHODS: One hundred twenty-nine patients with chronic tension-type headache completed the Headache Disability Inventory and the Medical Outcomes Study Short Form (SF-36) at their initial visit to a specialty headache center and again 1 month after the visit. In addition to individualized headache therapy, patients listened to a guided imagery audiocassette tape daily for the month. One hundred thirty-one control subjects received individualized therapy without guided imagery. RESULTS: Controls and the patients who listened to the guided imagery tape improved in headache frequency, headache severity, patient global assessment, quality of life, and disability caused by headache. More guided imagery patients (21.7%) than controls (7.6%) reported that their headaches were much better (P = .004). The guided imagery patients had significantly more improvement than the controls in three of the SF-36 domains: bodily pain (95% CI; guided imagery patients 11.0, controls 0.2), vitality (95% CI; guided imagery patients 10.9, controls 1.7), and mental health (95% CI; guided imagery patients 7.8, controls 0.4). CONCLUSIONS: Guided imagery is an effective adjunct therapy for the management of chronic tension-type headache.

Quality of life in migraine.

Health-related quality of life (QoL) is becoming an important outcome measure in the field of migraine. Several generic and migraine-specific questionnaires have been evaluated for reliability and validity in migraine. The generic instruments demonstrate the severe impairment in the QoL of migraine patients compared to patients with other chronic diseases and to the general population. The migraine-specific instruments are designed to measure the short- and long-term impact of migraine on QoL and are responsive to changes in QoL secondary to migraine therapy. The widespread use of these standardized instruments can increase awareness of the burden of migraine and lead to improved therapeutic intervention for migraine.

Migraine preventive medications: a reappraisal.

Newer acute care migraine medications demonstrate improved rapidity of action, consistent effectiveness, excellent safety profiles, and rarely cause rebound headaches. Their use could decrease the need for migraine-preventive medication. The present analysis derives a formula that can be used by practitioners to determine the cost-effectiveness of various migraine-preventive medications relative to selected acute-care medications. We propose a measure called the cost-equivalent number (CEN), the number of headaches per month at which the cost of the preventive medication equals the cost savings in acute-care treatment realized by using the preventive medication. The use of the CEN individualizes the decision of whether to use a migraine-preventive medication, weighing both the efficacy and cost of the preventive medication against the cost of the acute-care medication. A CEN lower than the migraine frequency suggests that use of a preventive medication will be cost-effective.

Alcohol, smoking, and caffeine use among headache patients.

We reviewed the charts of 151 headache patients, seen initially in a specialty headache center between 1988 and 1994, to collect information regarding reported alcohol consumption, smoking, daily number of caffeinated beverages, and medications. Charts of 50 patients in a general medicine clinic were reviewed for the same information. No significant differences between headache patients and general medicine patients were found in consumption of alcohol, smoking, or caffeinated beverages. Thirty headache patients (20%) used caffeine-containing medications more frequently than recommended; 24 of these patients used the products daily; 18 of those had a greater caffeine intake from medications than from beverages. Over-the-counter caffeine-containing analgesics were overused by 12 of the patients compared to 21 patients who overused prescription caffeine-containing preparations. Headache patients consume minimal amounts of alcohol, tobacco, and caffeinated beverages. However, headache patients often use caffeine-containing analgesics more frequently than recommended, which may lead to rebound and withdrawal headache.