Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
1.
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging ; 37(10): 2849-2859, 2021 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33993421

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Histopathological or intracoronary image assessment of healed plaques (HPs) has been reported. However, the lesion characteristics of HPs remains undetermined yet. We assessed the healed plaque components in patients with coronary artery lesions using multiple imaging modalities. METHODS: We enrolled 33 stable angina pectoris (SAP) patients with 36 native coronary culprit lesions with angiography severe stenosis and without severe calcification undergoing pre-intervention optical coherence tomography (OCT) and coronary angioscopy (CAS). HPs were defined as layered phenotype on OCT. Lesion morphologies and plaque characteristics of HPs were assessed using OCT and CAS. RESULTS: HPs were observed in 19 lesions (52.8%). HP lesions had higher frequent B2/C lesions (89.4% vs. 52.9%, p = 0.02), worse pre-PCI coronary flow (corrected thrombolysis in myocardial infarction count 21.6 ± 13.5 vs. 13.8 ± 6.2, p = 0.047) and greater lumen-area stenosis (79.6 ± 10.6% vs. 68.0 ± 21.6%, p = 0.047) than non-HP lesions. HP lesions had higher prevalence of OCT-thin-cap fibroatheroma (TCFA) (31.6% vs. 0.0%, p = 0.02), OCT-macrophage (89.5% vs. 41.2%, p = 0.004), and CAS-red thrombus (89.5% vs. 41.2%, p = 0.004) than non-HP lesions. The combination of 3 features including OCT-TCFA, macrophages, and CAS-red thrombus showed higher predictive valuer for HPs on OCT than each single variable. Post-PCI irregular tissue protrusion was more frequently observed in lesions with HPs than in those without (52.6% vs. 13.3%, p = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: SAP lesions with HPs might have more frequent vulnerable plaques with intraplaque inflammation and thrombus than those without, suggesting that layered phenotype on OCT might reflect not only healing process but also potential risks for future coronary events.


Subject(s)
Coronary Artery Disease , Myocardial Infarction , Percutaneous Coronary Intervention , Plaque, Atherosclerotic , Angioscopy , Coronary Angiography , Coronary Artery Disease/diagnostic imaging , Coronary Vessels/diagnostic imaging , Humans , Percutaneous Coronary Intervention/adverse effects , Predictive Value of Tests , Tomography, Optical Coherence
3.
J Interv Card Electrophysiol ; 48(2): 167-175, 2017 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27943112

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Data on uninterrupted rivaroxaban taken preoperatively for radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA) of atrial fibrillation (AF) is limited. The aim was to evaluate safety and efficacy of rivaroxaban taken in the morning for AF ablation, especially with regard to asymptomatic cerebral emboli (ACE) and anticoagulation parameters. METHODS: We prospectively evaluated 147 consecutive patients who underwent RFCA (mean age 66, 110 patients with paroxysmal AF), 76 of whom were on rivaroxaban, 71 on warfarin. The drugs were continued throughout the periprocedural period, including the morning of RFCA. Heparin infusion was maintained during RFCA to achieve an activated clotting time (ACT) of >300 s. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in basic patient characteristics and ablation procedure between the two groups. ACT during the procedure correlated significantly with prothrombin time and international normalized ratio in each group (correlation coefficient 0.799 in rivaroxaban, 0.705 in warfarin, p < 0.01). D-dimer level was more elevated after RFCA in the warfarin group than in the rivaroxaban group (warfarin 0.37 ± 0.28 to 0.67 ± 0.81, rivaroxaban 0.41 ± 0.33 to 0.51 ± 0.25, p = 0.02). One major bleeding event (1.3%), a cardiac tamponade, was observed in the warfarin group. No symptomatic thromboembolic complications were observed in either group. Two patients (3%) in each group had minor bleeding, specifically, groin hematoma. Postprocedural MRI indicated ACE in 5/46 (11%) patients in the rivaroxaban group and 4/39 (10%) in the warfarin group (p = 0.99). CONCLUSIONS: Uninterrupted rivaroxaban taken preoperatively for AF ablation is clinically effective and safe. Its ACE profile is similar to warfarin. ACT is sufficient for monitoring anticoagulation.


Subject(s)
Atrial Fibrillation/epidemiology , Atrial Fibrillation/surgery , Catheter Ablation/statistics & numerical data , Intracranial Embolism/epidemiology , Intracranial Embolism/prevention & control , Rivaroxaban/administration & dosage , Warfarin/administration & dosage , Aged , Anticoagulants/administration & dosage , Causality , Comorbidity , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Drug Administration Schedule , Factor Xa Inhibitors/administration & dosage , Female , Humans , Japan/epidemiology , Male , Postoperative Hemorrhage/epidemiology , Postoperative Hemorrhage/prevention & control , Premedication , Preoperative Care/methods , Prevalence , Risk Factors , Treatment Outcome
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...