Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 1 de 1
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Mayo Clin Proc ; 73(1): 10-6, 1998 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9443673

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To determine which factors are associated with duration of use of a levonorgestrel implant (Norplant) for contraception in adolescents and young adults. DESIGN: We retrospectively studied 144 young women (14 to 21 years of age) who chose a levonorgestrel contraceptive implant at Mayo Clinic Rochester between April 1990 and December 1993. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The following information was obtained at the time of insertion of the implant and from any follow-up visits: demographics, prior contraceptive experiences, frequency and management of complications, complications noted at removal of the implant, and subsequent contraceptive choice. The duration of use was examined. RESULTS: Of the 144 young women who underwent insertion of a Norplant system, 75 telephoned or made a medical appointment because of implant-related side effects. During the follow-up period, 64 patients had the Norplant system removed. The Kaplan-Meier estimate of the probability of the Norplant system remaining in place for at least 12 months was 83 % and for at least 24 months was 63 %. Duration of Norplant use was not found to differ with respect to age, prior contraceptive use, or timing of insertion, but it was significantly shorter among those with a prior pregnancy than in those who had never been pregnant. CONCLUSION: These findings suggest that a group of young women who are likely to continue use of a contraceptive implant (with or without treatment for side effects) are those who have never been pregnant.


PIP: A retrospective study of 144 US women 14-21 years of age who requested and received the Norplant contraceptive implant system at the Mayo Clinic (Rochester, Minnesota) in 1990-93 analyzed the factors associated with duration of method use. Of the 124 women who reported past use of contraception, 94 (76%) had been pregnant at least once. The method most commonly used before Norplant was oral contraception (57%). The reasons for Norplant selection were its convenience (86%) and problems tolerating the pill (14%). Of the 130 Norplant users who either telephoned or made a clinic appointment after insertion, 60% reported side effects such as breakthrough bleeding, headache, and depression or mood swings. 64 women had the implants removed. The median duration of Norplant use was 29 months. The Kaplan-Meier estimate of the probability of the Norplant system remaining in place for at least 12 months was 83% and 63% for at least 24 months. Age, prior contraceptive use, and timing of insertion had no impact on duration of Norplant use. Multivariate analysis indicated that women with at least 1 prior pregnancy had a two-fold increased risk of Norplant removal compared to those who had never been pregnant. Larger studies are needed to identify additional factors associated with long-term use of injectable contraception among young women and to suggest interventions that would improve compliance with routine follow-up.


Subject(s)
Contraceptive Agents, Female/therapeutic use , Levonorgestrel/therapeutic use , Adolescent , Adult , Contraception/methods , Contraceptive Agents, Female/adverse effects , Female , Humans , Levonorgestrel/adverse effects , Pregnancy , Retrospective Studies
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...