ABSTRACT
This study examined whether emergency medical technicians (EMTs) withhold oxygen from hypothetical patients whom emergency physicians would treat with high-flow oxygen, particularly chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients. A survey describing 12 hypothetical patients was distributed to 33 emergency physicians, 30 newly trained EMTs, and 27 experienced EMTs. For each patient, the respondents were asked to identify the most appropriate prehospital oxygen administration rate as "low flow" or "high flow". Using an alpha value of .05, chi 2 analysis was used to compare the frequency of high-flow oxygen administration for the three groups. Newly trained EMTs were significantly more likely than physicians to administer high-flow oxygen to patients with COPD who were not receiving home oxygen. Otherwise, the oxygen administration practices of EMTs were not inconsistent with those of emergency physicians.
Subject(s)
Emergency Medical Technicians , Emergency Medicine , Oxygen Inhalation Therapy , Adult , Aged , Attitude of Health Personnel , Chi-Square Distribution , Child , Emergency Medical Services , Emergency Medical Technicians/education , Female , Home Care Services , Humans , Lung Diseases, Obstructive/therapy , Male , Middle Aged , Oxygen/administration & dosage , Oxygen Inhalation Therapy/methods , Respiratory Insufficiency/therapyABSTRACT
Although pulse oximeters have been proven accurate in the prehospital environment, they have not been proven to be necessary. This study was undertaken to determine if emergency medical services (EMS) providers can identify hypoxemia without pulse oximetry. An oximeter was placed at the ambulance entrance to the emergency department (ED), and EMS personnel obtained saturation levels on all patients on arrival. Hypoxemia was defined as a saturation level of 95% or less. The hypoxemia was classified as "recognized" if the patient received aggressive intervention and "unrecognized" if the patient did not. One hundred eighty patients were enrolled in the study; 30 had a saturation level of 95% or less. Twenty-seven (90%) of those patients had "unrecognized" hypoxemia. Twenty-three (85.2%) of the 27 patients with "unrecognized" hypoxemia did not complain of respiratory distress. Thus, there are patients whose hypoxemia is unrecognized by EMS providers, and this occurs most frequently in patients who do not complain of respiratory distress.
