Diabetic Ketoacidosis at Diagnosis of Type 1 Diabetes in Colorado Children, 2010-2017.

OBJECTIVE: We examined trends in diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) at diagnosis of type 1 diabetes at a large pediatric diabetes center between 2010 and 2017, overlapping with the Affordable Care Act's overhaul of U.S. health care. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Colorado residents <18 years old who were diagnosed with type 1 diabetes from 2010 to 2017 and subsequently followed at the Barbara Davis Center for Diabetes were included. Logistic regression models were used to test associations among age, sex, race/ethnicity, insurance, language, year of diagnosis, and rural/nonrural residence and DKA at diagnosis. Linear regression models were used to test the association of each predictor with HbA1c at diagnosis. RESULTS: There were 2,429 subjects who met the inclusion criteria. From 2010 to 2017, the rate of DKA increased from 41 to 58%. It increased from 35.3 to 59.6% among patients with private insurance (odds ratio 1.10 [95% CI 1.05-1.15]; P < 0.0001) but remained unchanged (52.2-58.8%) among children with public insurance (1.03 [0.97-1.09]; P = 0.36). In the multivariable model, public insurance (1.33 [1.08-1.64]; P = 0.007), rural address (1.42 [1.08-1.86]; P = 0.013), and HbA1c (1.32 [1.26-1.38]; P < 0.0001) were positively associated with DKA, whereas age, race/ethnicity, sex, and primary language were not. CONCLUSIONS: The increase in the rate of DKA in patients with newly diagnosed type 1 diabetes was driven by patients with private insurance. This paradoxically occurred during a time of increasing health insurance coverage. More study is needed to understand the factors driving these changes.

Initial Presentation of Type 2 Diabetes in Adolescents Predicts Durability of Successful Treatment with Metformin Monotherapy: Insights from the Pediatric Diabetes Consortium T2D Registry.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Many adolescents with type 2 diabetes (T2D) have rapid deterioration of glycemic control on metformin monotherapy within 2 years of diagnosis. METHODS: Enrollment data from the Pediatric Diabetes Consortium T2D Registry were used to categorize 276 youth with a T2D duration ≥2 years into two groups: (1) participants with HbA1c <7.5% on metformin monotherapy (group 1, n = 75) and (2) participants treated with insulin ± metformin (group 2, n = 201). The characteristics of the groups were compared. RESULTS: At enrollment, groups 1 and 2 did not differ in age (16.2 vs. 16.8 years) or BMI percentile (99 vs. 98%); group 2 had higher HbA1c (9.9% [85 mmol/mol] vs. 5.9% [41 mmol/mol], p < 0.001). Lower HbA1c and metformin monotherapy at diagnosis were associated with a greater likelihood of adequate control with metformin alone (p < 0.001). In multivariable analysis, HbA1c at diagnosis (p = 0.001) and diabetes duration (p = 0.009) were associated with adequate control on metformin. The HbA1c trajectory after diagnosis was worse in group 2. CONCLUSION: Durable metabolic control of T2D with metformin monotherapy is most likely in youth presenting with lower HbA1c and with shorter diabetes duration, independent of age, race-ethnicity, and BMI. Elevated HbA1c levels in those on insulin therapy highlight the importance of early diagnosis and a better understanding of glycemic control barriers.