Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 22
Filter
1.
Heart Rhythm O2 ; 3(1): 79-90, 2022 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35243439

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Compared with short-term electrocardiogram (ECG) monitors, insertable cardiac monitors (ICMs) have been shown to increase atrial fibrillation (AF) detection rates and the opportunity to treat recurrent AF in patients postablation. OBJECTIVE: To examine healthcare utilization and clinical outcomes following AF ablation, in patients with vs without ICM. METHODS: Retrospective analysis pooling Optum Clinformatics and Medicare Fee-for-service 5% Sample claims databases. Patients with an AF ablation between January 1, 2011, and March 31, 2018 who received an ICM implant within 1 year pre-/postablation were propensity score matched 1:3 to patients without ICM. Outcomes included AF-related healthcare utilization, medication use, and occurrence of composite severe cardiovascular events (stroke / transient ischemic attack, major bleeds, systemic embolism, AF- or heart failure-related hospitalization, or death). RESULTS: A total of 1000 ICM patients and 2998 non-ICM patients were included. During mean follow-up of 33 ± 16 months postablation, ICM patients experienced significantly fewer severe cardiovascular events (1.09 ± 2.22 vs 1.37 ± 4.19, P = .008) and associated costs ($20,757 vs $29,106, P = .0005). ICM patients had a greater number of AF-related clinic visits (16.8 vs 11.6 visits, P < .0001) and were more likely to receive a repeat ablation (38.7% vs 32.4%, P = .0003). Total all-cause costs during follow-up were not statistically different. Discontinuation of oral anticoagulation was higher in ICM patients at 1 year (44% vs 31%, P < .0001) and 2 years (73% vs 64%, P = .0012). CONCLUSION: A shift from acute, reactive care to routine outpatient management was observed in patients with long-term ECG monitoring. Results suggest closer patient management in patients with long-term monitoring after an AF ablation and an improvement in outcomes, at similar overall cost.

2.
Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol ; 12(12): e007809, 2019 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31826649

ABSTRACT

AF-mediated cardiomyopathy (AMC) is an important reversible cause of heart failure that is likely underdiagnosed in today's clinical practice. AMC describes AF either as the sole cause for ventricular dysfunction or exacerbating ventricular dysfunction in patients with existing cardiomyopathy or heart failure. Studies suggest that irreversible ventricular and atrial remodeling can occur in AMC, making timely diagnosis and intervention critical to optimize clinical outcome. Clinical correlation between AF onset/burden and progression of cardiomyopathy/heart failure symptoms provides strong evidence for the diagnosis of AMC. Cardiac MRI, continuous cardiac monitoring, and biomarkers are important diagnostic tools. From the therapeutic standpoint, early data suggest that AF ablation may improve long-term outcomes in AMC patients compared with medical rate and rhythm control. Patients with more AF burden and less severe underlying structural heart disease are more likely to experience left ventricle function recovery with successful AF ablation. Despite recent advances, significant knowledge gaps exist in our understanding of the epidemiology, mechanisms, diagnosis, management strategies, and prognosis of AMC.


Subject(s)
Atrial Fibrillation/physiopathology , Atrial Remodeling , Cardiomyopathies/physiopathology , Ventricular Dysfunction/physiopathology , Ventricular Remodeling , Atrial Fibrillation/diagnosis , Atrial Fibrillation/epidemiology , Atrial Fibrillation/therapy , Cardiomyopathies/diagnosis , Cardiomyopathies/epidemiology , Cardiomyopathies/therapy , Clinical Decision-Making , Death, Sudden, Cardiac/epidemiology , Death, Sudden, Cardiac/prevention & control , Humans , Prevalence , Prognosis , Risk Factors , Ventricular Dysfunction/diagnosis , Ventricular Dysfunction/epidemiology , Ventricular Dysfunction/therapy
4.
J Am Heart Assoc ; 7(15)2018 07 20.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30030215

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is an increasingly prevalent public health problem and one of the most common causes of emergency department (ED) visits. We aimed to investigate the trends in ED visits and hospital admissions for AF. METHODS AND RESULTS: This is a repeated cross-sectional analysis of ED visit-level data from the Nationwide Emergency Department Sample for 2007 to 2014. We identified adults who visited EDs in the United States, with a principal diagnosis of AF. A sample of 864 759 ED visits for AF, representing a weighted total of 3 886 520 ED visits, were analyzed. The annual ED visits for AF increased by 30.7% from 411 406 in 2007 (95% confidence interval, 389 819-432 993) to 537 801 (95% confidence interval, 506 747-568 855) in 2014. Patient demographics remained consistent, with an average age of 69 to 70 years and slight female predominance (51%-53%) throughout the study period. Hospital admission rates were stable at ≈70% between 2007 and 2010, after which they gradually declined to 62% in 2014 (Ptrend=0.017). Despite the decline in hospital admission rates, AF hospitalizations increased from 288 225 in 2007 to 333 570 in 2014 because of the increase in total annual ED visits during the study. The adjusted annual charges for admitted AF patients increased by 37% from $7.39 billion in 2007 to $10.1 billion in 2014. CONCLUSIONS: Annual ED visits and hospital admissions for AF increased significantly between 2007 and 2014, despite a reduction in admission rates. These data emphasize the need for widespread implementation of effective strategies aimed at improving the management of patients with AF to reduce hospital admissions and the economic burden of AF.


Subject(s)
Atrial Fibrillation/epidemiology , Cost of Illness , Emergency Service, Hospital/economics , Hospitalization/trends , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Atrial Fibrillation/therapy , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Incidence , Male , Middle Aged , Prevalence , Retrospective Studies , Time Factors , United States/epidemiology
5.
PLoS One ; 13(1): e0190968, 2018.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29338024

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Mitochondrial membrane potential (ΔΨm) arises from normal function of the electron transport chain. Maintenance of ΔΨm within a narrow range is essential for mitochondrial function. Methods for in vivo measurement of ΔΨm do not exist. We use 18F-labeled tetraphenylphosphonium (18F-TPP+) to measure and map the total membrane potential, ΔΨT, as the sum of ΔΨm and cellular (ΔΨc) electrical potentials. METHODS: Eight pigs, five controls and three with a scar-like injury, were studied. Pigs were studied with a dynamic PET scanning protocol to measure 18F-TPP+ volume of distribution, VT. Fractional extracellular space (fECS) was measured in 3 pigs. We derived equations expressing ΔΨT as a function of VT and the volume-fractions of mitochondria and fECS. Seventeen segment polar maps and parametric images of ΔΨT were calculated in millivolts (mV). RESULTS: In controls, mean segmental ΔΨT = -129.4±1.4 mV (SEM). In pigs with segmental tissue injury, ΔΨT was clearly separated from control segments but variable, in the range -100 to 0 mV. The quality of ΔΨT maps was excellent, with low noise and good resolution. Measurements of ΔΨT in the left ventricle of pigs agree with previous in in-vitro measurements. CONCLUSIONS: We have analyzed the factors affecting the uptake of voltage sensing tracers and developed a minimally invasive method for mapping ΔΨT in left ventricular myocardium of pigs. ΔΨT is computed in absolute units, allowing for visual and statistical comparison of individual values with normative data. These studies demonstrate the first in vivo application of quantitative mapping of total tissue membrane potential, ΔΨT.


Subject(s)
Membrane Potential, Mitochondrial , Animals , Positron-Emission Tomography , Swine
6.
JACC Clin Electrophysiol ; 3(11): 1240-1248, 2017 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29759619

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: This study sought to investigate the utilization of and in-hospital complications in patients undergoing catheter ablation in the United States from 2000 to 2013 by using the National Inpatient Sample and Nationwide Inpatient Sample. BACKGROUND: Catheter ablation has become a mainstay in the treatment of a wide range of cardiac arrhythmias. METHODS: This study identified patients 18 years of age and older who underwent inpatient catheter ablation from 2000 to 2013 and had 1 primary diagnosis of any of the following arrhythmias: atrial fibrillation, atrial flutter, supraventricular tachycardia, or ventricular tachycardia. RESULTS: An estimated total of 519,951 (95% confidence interval: 475,702 to 564,200) inpatient ablations were performed in the United States between 2000 and 2013. The median age was 62 years (interquartile range: 51 to 72 years), and 59.3% of the patients were male. The following parameters showed increasing trends during the study period: annual volume of ablations, number of hospitals performing ablations, mean age and comorbidity index of patients, rate of ≥1 complication, and length of stay (p < 0.001 for each). Substantial proportions (27.5%) of inpatient ablation procedures were performed in low-volume hospitals and were associated with an increased risk for complications (odds ratio: 1.26; 95% confidence interval: 1.12 to 1.42; p < 0.001). Older age, greater numbers of comorbidities, and complex ablations for atrial fibrillation and ventricular tachycardia were independent predictors of in-hospital complications and in-hospital mortality. In addition, female sex and lower hospital volumes were independent predictors of complications. CONCLUSIONS: From 2000 to 2013, there was a substantial increase in the annual number of in-hospital catheter ablation procedures, as well as the rate of periprocedural complications nationwide. Low-volume centers had a significantly higher rate of complications.


Subject(s)
Arrhythmias, Cardiac/therapy , Catheter Ablation/adverse effects , Hospital Mortality/trends , Aged , Arrhythmias, Cardiac/diagnosis , Arrhythmias, Cardiac/physiopathology , Catheter Ablation/methods , Catheter Ablation/statistics & numerical data , Comorbidity , Female , Hospitals, Low-Volume/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Length of Stay , Male , Middle Aged , Postoperative Complications/epidemiology , Predictive Value of Tests , Retrospective Studies , United States/epidemiology
7.
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol ; 27(4): 399-403, 2016 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26756289

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Because of the absence of a dedicated reversal agent, the outcome of pericardial effusion (PE) following procedures performed with uninterrupted apixaban or rivaroxaban is unknown. We report the characteristics of PEs presenting with tamponade in patients undergoing AF ablation with uninterrupted factor Xa inhibition (FXaI) to understand their management and prognosis. METHODS AND RESULTS: We performed a multicenter cross-sectional survey in 10 centers across the United States. Patient data were obtained by chart review. In all patients the procedure was performed with uninterrupted FXaI. A total of 16 PEs requiring intervention were reported from 5 centers. Two patients were on apixaban 5 mg BD, the remaining on rivaroxaban 20 mg OD. Eleven PEs occurred in the periprocedural setting, and 5 PEs occurred from 1 to 28 days after the procedure. Pericardiocentesis and drainage were performed in all cases. Protamine and 4-factor prothrombin complex concentrate (4F-PCC) were given in all periprocedural cases. Two patients required surgery: in one case coagulation of the pericardial blood prevented effective drainage, and in the other bleeding was secondary to a steam pop-induced atrial tear. None of the postprocedural cases required FXaI reversal and the dose of rivaroxaban was temporarily reduced. No fatal outcomes or thromboembolic events were reported. CONCLUSION: Pericardiocentesis and drainage with FXaI reversal proved effective in the management of acute PEs with tamponade occurring periprocedurally in patients undergoing AF ablation with uninterrupted FXaI. Early postprocedural effusions can be treated with pericardiocentesis without the need of a reversal agent.


Subject(s)
Atrial Fibrillation/surgery , Balloon Occlusion/methods , Catheter Ablation/adverse effects , Factor Xa Inhibitors/administration & dosage , Pericardial Effusion/prevention & control , Thromboembolism/prevention & control , Aged , Anticoagulants/administration & dosage , Atrial Fibrillation/complications , Cross-Sectional Studies , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Drug Administration Schedule , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Pericardial Effusion/etiology , Postoperative Complications/prevention & control , Premedication/methods , Prognosis , Thromboembolism/etiology , Treatment Outcome , United States
8.
J Am Coll Cardiol ; 64(7): 647-56, 2014 Aug 19.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25125294

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Catheter ablation is important for treatment of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF). Limited animal and human studies suggest a correlation between electrode-tissue contact and radiofrequency lesion generation. OBJECTIVES: The study sought to assess the safety and effectiveness of an irrigated, contact force (CF)-sensing catheter in the treatment of drug refractory symptomatic PAF. METHODS: A prospective, multicenter, nonrandomized study was conducted. Enrollment criteria included: ≥3 symptomatic episodes of PAF within 6 months of enrollment and failure of ≥1 antiarrhythmic drug (Class I to IV). Ablation included pulmonary vein isolation with confirmed entrance block as procedural endpoint. RESULTS: A total of 172 patients were enrolled at 21 sites, where 161 patients had a study catheter inserted and 160 patients underwent radiofrequency application. Procedural-related serious adverse events occurring within 7 days of the procedure included tamponade (n = 4), pericarditis (n = 3), heart block (n = 1, prior to radiofrequency application), and vascular access complications (n = 4). By Kaplan-Meier analyses, 12-month freedom from atrial fibrillation/atrial flutter/atrial tachycardia recurrence was 72.5%. The average CF per procedure was 17.9 ± 9.4 g. When the CF employed was between investigator selected working ranges ≥80% of the time during therapy, outcomes were 4.25 times more likely to be successful (p = 0.0054; 95% confidence interval: 1.53 to 11.79). CONCLUSIONS: The SMART-AF trial demonstrated that this irrigated CF-sensing catheter is safe and effective for the treatment of drug refractory symptomatic PAF, with no unanticipated device-related adverse events. The increased percent of time within investigator-targeted CF ranges correlates with increased freedom from arrhythmia recurrence. Stable CF during radiofrequency application increases the likelihood of 12-month success. (THERMOCOOL® SMARTTOUCH® Catheter for Treatment of Symptomatic Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation; NCT01385202).


Subject(s)
Atrial Fibrillation/surgery , Catheter Ablation/methods , Catheters , Heart Conduction System/surgery , Tachycardia, Paroxysmal/surgery , Atrial Fibrillation/physiopathology , Electrocardiography , Equipment Design , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Heart Conduction System/physiopathology , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Prospective Studies , Pulmonary Veins/surgery , Recurrence , Tachycardia, Paroxysmal/physiopathology , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome
9.
Europace ; 16(10): 1508-14, 2014 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24906607

ABSTRACT

AIMS: To determine the incidence and predictors of atrial fibrillation (AF) and its impact on survival in patients with other forms of supraventricular arrhythmias (SVAs) including atrial flutter (AFL), atrial tachycardia (AT), atrioventricular reentrant (AVRT), and AV nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT). We hypothesized that SVA may increase risk of AF and concomitant AF may influence long-term survival. METHODS AND RESULTS: All patients who underwent catheter ablation for SVA from 2000 to 2010 were included in this study. The patients were identified retrospectively and the vital status determined prospectively. Observed survival in the study cohort was compared with survival rates in the age- and sex-matched general population. The study group included 1573 patients (mean age 50.5 ± 18 years, 47% female) with AVNRT (38.5%), AFL (29.6%), AVRT (22.6%) and AT (9.3%). The patients were followed for a mean of 35 months (median 23 months). Atrial fibrillation was documented in 424 patients (27%) with a higher incidence in males (35 vs. 18%). Atrial fibrillation was present in 19.6% of patients before the ablation and developed in 9.07% after ablation. Atrial fibrillation commonly occurred in patients with AFL (57.5%), AT (27.4%), AVRT (13.5%), and AVNRT (9.7%). Older age, prolonged PR interval, dilated left atrium, low left ventricular ejection fraction and presence of AFL were independent predictors for concomitant AF. Long-term survival was worse in the presence of AF. CONCLUSION: The incidence of AF is high in patients with other forms of SVA. The most common association is between AFL and AF. Long-term survival is decreased in those who have concomitant AF, although AF did not emerge as an independent predictor of mortality when adjusted for other covariates.


Subject(s)
Atrial Fibrillation/epidemiology , Atrial Fibrillation/etiology , Atrial Flutter/complications , Atrial Flutter/surgery , Catheter Ablation , Comorbidity , Female , Humans , Incidence , Male , Middle Aged , Predictive Value of Tests , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , Sex Factors , Survival Rate , Tachycardia, Atrioventricular Nodal Reentry/complications , Tachycardia, Atrioventricular Nodal Reentry/surgery , Tachycardia, Supraventricular/complications , Tachycardia, Supraventricular/surgery
10.
Am J Cardiol ; 114(2): 260-5, 2014 Jul 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24878121

ABSTRACT

Although atrial fibrillation (AF) symptom severity is used to guide clinical care, a simple, standardized assessment tool is not available for routine clinical use. We sought to develop and validate a patient-generated score and classification scheme for AF-related symptom severity and burden. Atrial Fibrillation Symptom and Burden, a simple 2-part questionnaire, was designed to assess (1) AF symptom severity using 8 questions to determine how symptoms affect daily life and (2) AF burden using 6 questions to measure AF frequency, duration, and health-care utilization. The resulting score was used to classify patients into 4 classes of symptom and burden severity. Patients were asked to complete the questionnaire, a survey evaluating the questionnaire, and an Short Form-12v2 generic health-related quality-of-life form. Validation of the questionnaire included assessments of its reliability and construct and known groups validity. The strength of interrater agreement between patient-generated and blinded provider-generated classifications of AF symptom severity was also assessed. The survey had good internal consistency (Cronbach α>0.82) and reproducibility (intraclass correlation coefficient=0.93). There was a good linear correlation with health-related quality-of-life aggregates measured by Pearson correlation coefficient (r=0.62 and 0.42 vs physical component summary and mental component summary, respectively). Compared with physical and mental component summary scores, the patient-generated symptom severity classification scheme showed robust discrimination between mild and moderate severity (p<0.0001 and p=0.0009) and between moderate and severe groups (p=0.0001 and p=0.012). In conclusion, this simple patient-generated AF classification scheme is robust, internally consistent, reproducible, and highly correlated with standardized quality-of-life measures.


Subject(s)
Atrial Fibrillation/classification , Psychometrics/methods , Quality of Life , Aged , Atrial Fibrillation/diagnosis , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Reproducibility of Results , Retrospective Studies , Severity of Illness Index , Surveys and Questionnaires
11.
J Am Coll Cardiol ; 63(10): 982-8, 2014 Mar 18.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24412445

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the feasibility and safety of uninterrupted rivaroxaban therapy during atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation. BACKGROUND: Optimal periprocedural anticoagulation strategy is essential for minimizing bleeding and thromboembolic complications during and after AF ablation. The safety and efficacy of uninterrupted rivaroxaban therapy as a periprocedural anticoagulant for AF ablation are unknown. METHODS: We performed a multicenter, observational, prospective study of a registry of patients undergoing AF ablation in 8 centers in North America. Patients taking uninterrupted periprocedural rivaroxaban were matched by age, sex, and type of AF with an equal number of patients taking uninterrupted warfarin therapy who were undergoing AF ablation during the same period. RESULTS: A total of 642 patients were included in the study, with 321 in each group. Mean age was 63 ± 10 years, with 442 (69%) males and 328 (51%) patients with paroxysmal AF equally distributed between the 2 groups. Patients in the warfarin group had a slightly higher mean HAS- BLED (hypertension, abnormal renal/liver function, stroke, bleeding history or predisposition, labile international normalized ratio, elderly, drugs/alcohol concomitantly) score (1.70 ± 1.0 vs. 1.47 ± 0.9, respectively; p = 0.032). Bleeding and embolic complications occurred in 47 (7.3%) and 2 (0.3%) patients (both had transient ischemic attacks) respectively. There were no differences in the number of major bleeding complications (5 [1.6%] vs. 7 [1.9%], respectively; p = 0.772), minor bleeding complications (16 [5.0%] vs. 19 [5.9%], respectively; p = 0.602), or embolic complications (1 [0.3%] vs. 1 [0.3%], respectively; p = 1.0) between the rivaroxaban and warfarin groups in the first 30 days. CONCLUSIONS: Uninterrupted rivaroxaban therapy appears to be as safe and efficacious in preventing bleeding and thromboembolic events in patients undergoing AF ablation as uninterrupted warfarin therapy.


Subject(s)
Atrial Fibrillation/surgery , Catheter Ablation/methods , Morpholines/administration & dosage , Thiophenes/administration & dosage , Thromboembolism/prevention & control , Administration, Oral , Aged , Anticoagulants/administration & dosage , Atrial Fibrillation/diagnosis , Atrial Fibrillation/drug therapy , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Factor Xa Inhibitors , Feasibility Studies , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Perioperative Period , Postoperative Complications/prevention & control , Prospective Studies , Registries , Rivaroxaban , Treatment Outcome
12.
Interv Cardiol Clin ; 3(2): xi, 2014 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28582178
13.
J Interv Card Electrophysiol ; 38(2): 95-100, 2013 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24026968

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Radiation exposure in the electrophysiology (EP) lab is a major concern to most electrophysiologists. A new technology, MediGuide™ nonfluoroscopic catheter tracking system, has been used for the first time in the USA recently. We intended to evaluate the efficacy of this novel catheter tracking system in reducing radiation exposure. METHODS: We performed a prospective observational study by comparing the radiation exposure with MediGuide™ system to that of conventional mapping systems. The first 45 EP procedures performed with the MediGuide™ system were compared to 45 matched patients undergoing similar procedures during the same time frame using conventional mapping systems (CARTO and NavX) and fluoroscopy. We collected and compared baseline characteristics, procedural variables including fluoroscopic exposure between both groups. RESULTS: Forty-five patients underwent EP procedures using the MediGuide™ technology. They were matched with an equal number of patients with conventional mapping systems. Of the 45 patients included in the study, 33 underwent right atrial flutter ablations, 5 underwent atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia ablations, 4 underwent ablation of Wolf-Parkinson-White syndrome, and 3 underwent EP studies with no ablation. There were no differences in mean age, gender distribution, and body mass index between the groups. Procedure duration in the MediGuide™ group was significantly lower than the duration in the conventional group (103 vs. 142 min, p = 0.03). The fluoroscopic time was significantly less during the procedures performed with the MediGuide™ technology when compared to the control group (8 vs. 21 min, p < 0.001). No major complications occurred during the procedures in either group. CONCLUSION: MediGuide™, a new nonfluoroscopic catheter tracking system, is associated with more than a 50 % reduction in fluoroscopic time when compared to conventional mapping systems.


Subject(s)
Air Pollution, Radioactive/prevention & control , Arrhythmias, Cardiac/surgery , Catheter Ablation/adverse effects , Environmental Exposure/prevention & control , Radiation Monitoring/instrumentation , Surgery, Computer-Assisted/statistics & numerical data , Arrhythmias, Cardiac/diagnosis , Arrhythmias, Cardiac/epidemiology , Body Surface Potential Mapping/instrumentation , Body Surface Potential Mapping/statistics & numerical data , Catheter Ablation/instrumentation , Catheter Ablation/statistics & numerical data , Environmental Exposure/statistics & numerical data , Equipment Design , Equipment Failure Analysis , Female , Fluoroscopy/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Pilot Projects , Prevalence , Radiation Dosage , Radiometry/statistics & numerical data , Registries , Risk Factors , Surgery, Computer-Assisted/instrumentation , Treatment Outcome , United States/epidemiology
14.
J Am Coll Cardiol ; 59(13): 1168-74, 2012 Mar 27.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22305113

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the feasibility and safety of periprocedural dabigatran during atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation. BACKGROUND: AF ablation requires optimal periprocedural anticoagulation for minimizing bleeding and thromboembolic complications. The safety and efficacy of dabigatran as a periprocedural anticoagulant for AF ablation are unknown. METHODS: We performed a multicenter, observational study from a prospective registry including all consecutive patients undergoing AF ablation in 8 high-volume centers in the United States. All patients receiving dabigatran therapy who underwent AF ablation on periprocedural dabigatran, with the dose held on the morning of the procedure, were matched by age, sex, and type of AF with an equal number of patients undergoing AF ablation with uninterrupted warfarin therapy over the same period. RESULTS: A total of 290 patients, including 145 taking periprocedural dabigatran and an equal number of matched patients taking uninterrupted periprocedural warfarin, were included in the study. The mean age was 60 years with 79% being male and 57% having paroxysmal AF. Both groups had a similar CHADS(2) score, left atrial size, and left ventricular ejection fraction. Three thromboembolic complications (2.1%) occurred in the dabigatran group compared with none in the warfarin group (p = 0.25). The dabigatran group had a significantly higher major bleeding rate (6% vs. 1%; p = 0.019), total bleeding rate (14% vs. 6%; p = 0.031), and composite of bleeding and thromboembolic complications (16% vs. 6%; p = 0.009) compared with the warfarin group. Dabigatran use was confirmed as an independent predictor of bleeding or thromboembolic complications (odds ratio: 2.76, 95% confidence interval: 1.22 to 6.25; p = 0.01) on multivariate regression analysis. CONCLUSIONS: In patients undergoing AF ablation, periprocedural dabigatran use significantly increases the risk of bleeding or thromboembolic complications compared with uninterrupted warfarin therapy.


Subject(s)
Anticoagulants/therapeutic use , Atrial Fibrillation/therapy , Benzimidazoles/therapeutic use , Registries , Warfarin/therapeutic use , beta-Alanine/analogs & derivatives , Aged , Anticoagulants/adverse effects , Benzimidazoles/adverse effects , Catheter Ablation , Dabigatran , Feasibility Studies , Female , Hemorrhage/chemically induced , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Perioperative Care , Prospective Studies , Thromboembolism/chemically induced , Treatment Outcome , beta-Alanine/adverse effects , beta-Alanine/therapeutic use
16.
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol ; 20(12): 1336-42, 2009 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19732234

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Sites of complex fractionated atrial electrograms (CFAE) with a short mean cycle length (MCL) and sites with a high dominant frequency (DF) have been advocated as targets for ablation in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation (AF). However, there are little data on the relationship between theses 2 markers. This study assessed the relationship between the DF and electrogram MCL after pulmonary vein (PV) isolation in patients with persistent AF. METHODS AND RESULTS: A total of 44 patients with persistent AF were studied. Four-second bipolar electrograms were obtained with a multielectrode mapping catheter at regions throughout the left atrium after isolation of the pulmonary veins, with analysis of the MCL and DF at each site. The DF was defined as the largest frequency peak within a 2.5- to 16-Hz spectral profile generated with fast Fourier transformation of the electrogram. A total of 9,262 electrograms from the 44 patients were analyzed. The average MCL and DF post-PV isolation were 135 +/- 24 ms and 6.1 +/- 0.6 Hz, respectively. There was a statistically significant but weak correlation between the MCL and DF (r = 0.21, P < 0.001). Additionally, analysis of this relationship within each patient did not demonstrate a strong correlation (range of r values per patient =-0.18 to 0.47). CONCLUSIONS: There is a poor correlation between the electrogram MCL and DF in patients with persistent AF. Ablation strategies targeting DF and those targeting CFAE are therefore unlikely to direct ablation toward similar left atrial sites. Comparative studies are necessary to determine the effectiveness of each strategy in guiding catheter ablation of persistent AF.


Subject(s)
Atrial Fibrillation/diagnosis , Body Surface Potential Mapping/methods , Diagnosis, Computer-Assisted/methods , Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted , Algorithms , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Reproducibility of Results , Sensitivity and Specificity
17.
Heart Rhythm ; 5(11): 1548-55, 2008 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18984531

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Three-dimensional (3D) reconstruction of the left atrium (LA) can be performed using real-time intracardiac echocardiography (ICE) to facilitate image integration during atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation. Current users of this technology generally image the LA indirectly from the right atrium (RA). OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to assess the feasibility and accuracy of image integration with placement of the ICE catheter directly in the LA to visualize the LA. METHODS: Thirty consecutive patients undergoing an AF ablation with the CARTO-Sound system were enrolled. A 10-Fr phased-array ICE catheter was used to obtain two-dimensional echocardiographic images of the LA; in 15 patients the ICE probe was placed in the LA, and in 15 patients it was placed only in the RA. Sequential images were obtained and merged with a preacquired computed tomography/magnetic resonance image. The accuracy of image integration was assessed by the value of the average image integration error after surface registration. RESULTS: Thirty patients (60% paroxysmal AF, LA size = 42 +/- 7 mm, ejection fraction = 62% +/- 10%) were studied. There was no difference in the time required to create the LA anatomic map and perform image integration with imaging from the LA versus the RA (22 +/- 22 vs. 24 +/- 16 minutes; P = .8). The number of ultrasound contours obtained was also similar (LA = 26 +/- 17 vs. RA = 24 +/- 16; P = .7). The average integration error was less with direct LA imaging (LA = 1.83 +/- 0.32 vs. RA = 2.52 +/- 0.58 mm; P = .0004). CONCLUSION: Direct LA imaging with ICE is feasible and results in improved LA visualization and image integration.


Subject(s)
Atrial Fibrillation/diagnostic imaging , Atrial Fibrillation/surgery , Catheter Ablation , Echocardiography , Heart Atria/diagnostic imaging , Aged , Feasibility Studies , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Time Factors , Tomography, X-Ray Computed
18.
J Interv Card Electrophysiol ; 22(3): 205-10, 2008 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18506606

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Magnetic resonance (MR) imaging of the left atrium (LA) can be integrated with electroanatomic mapping systems to guide catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF). The usefulness of this technique is dependent on the accuracy of image integration. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to determine the effect of heart rhythm at the time of pre-procedure MR imaging and heart rhythm at the time of ablation on integration error. METHODS: Fifty-two consecutive patients who underwent catheter ablation for AF were included. All patients underwent MR imaging of LA and pulmonary veins and image integration with real-time electroanatomic mapping. The rhythm at the time of MR imaging and on the day of ablation was recorded. CARTO-Merge software (Biosense-Webster) was used to calculate the average accuracy of integration of electroanatomic points with MR-derived reconstructions. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in integration error between patients who were in AF at the time of their MR vs. those who were in sinus rhythm at the time of their MR (1.76 +/- 0.26 vs. 1.88 +/- 0.31 mm, p = 0.15). There was also no significant difference in integration error between patients who were in concordant vs. discordant rhythms at the time of MR vs. day of ablation (1.81 +/- 0.23 vs. 1.89 +/- 0.32 mm, p = 0.40). There was a trend toward less integration error between patients who were in AF on the day of ablation vs. those in sinus rhythm (1.74 +/- 0.26 vs. 1.89 +/- 0.31 mm, p = 0.07). CONCLUSIONS: Image integration can be performed to direct catheter ablation of AF regardless of the rhythm at the time of imaging and ablation.


Subject(s)
Atrial Fibrillation/diagnosis , Atrial Fibrillation/surgery , Body Surface Potential Mapping/methods , Catheter Ablation/methods , Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy/methods , Subtraction Technique , Surgery, Computer-Assisted/methods , Adult , Aged , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Treatment Outcome , Young Adult
20.
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol ; 19(1): 32-8, 2008 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17900251

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Esophageal temperature rise (ETR) during ablation inside left atrium has been reported as a marker for esophageal thermal injury. We sought to investigate the possible relationships between chest pain and ETR during radiofrequency (RF) ablation, and ETR and locations of RF application, in patients undergoing pulmonary vein (PV) isolation under moderate sedation. METHODS AND RESULTS: We analyzed anatomical locations of each RF application and its association with esophageal temperature and presence/absence of pain. Data from 40 consecutive patients (mean age: 56 +/- 10 years) were analyzed. There were a total of 4,071 RF applications resulting in 291 episodes of pain (7.1%) and 223 ETRs (5.5%). Thirty-five patients (87.5%) experienced at least one pain episode and 32 (80.0%) had at least one ETR. While 77.4% of posterior wall applications that caused pain also corresponded to an ETR (P < 0.0001), only 0.8% of pain-free posterior wall applications were associated with ETRs (P < 0.0001). The sensitivity and specificity of pain during ablation for ETR were 94% and 98%, respectively. No ETRs were observed during anterior wall applications. ETRs occurred more frequently during ablation on the left (86.1%) versus the right (13.9%), and in inferior (70.4%) versus superior (29.6%) segments. CONCLUSION: In patients undergoing PV isolation, ETR was encountered when ablating in the posterior left atrium with the distribution left > right and inferior > superior. Pain during ablation was associated with ETR, and lack of pain was strongly associated with absence of ETR. Pain during RF ablation may thus serve as a predictor of esophageal heating and potential injury.


Subject(s)
Atrial Fibrillation/surgery , Catheter Ablation/adverse effects , Esophagus/injuries , Pain/etiology , Pulmonary Veins/surgery , Risk Assessment/methods , Atrial Fibrillation/complications , Body Temperature , Female , Humans , Male , Massachusetts , Middle Aged , Risk Factors
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...