Malnutrition in Head and Neck Free Flap Reconstruction as a Predictor of Adverse Outcomes.

INTRODUCTION: Malnutrition is associated with increased mortality in patients with head and neck (H&N) cancer. Because albumin levels are used as a surrogate for nutritional status, the purpose of this study is to assess whether malnutrition is associated with adverse postoperative outcomes in H&N free flap reconstruction. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The 2006-2018 National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Database was queried for patients undergoing flap procedures of the H&N based on Current Procedure Terminology codes. Patients were included if they were operated on by an otolaryngologist or when the primary surgical site was H&N. Nutritional status was categorized as malnourished (preoperative albumin level <3.5 g/dL) or normal (preoperative albumin level ≥3.5 g/dL). Major complications included pulmonary complications, cardiac complications, deep vein thrombosis/pulmonary embolism, and sepsis/septic shock. Minor complications included surgical infection, urinary tract infection, bleeding, and dehiscence. Data were analyzed via univariate chi-square and multivariate regression analyses. RESULTS: Of the patients, 2532 (83.3%) had normal albumin and 506 (16.7%) had hypoalbuminemia. Patients with hypoalbuminemia were more likely to have smoking history (P = 0.008), pulmonary comorbidity (P < 0.001), renal comorbidity (P = 0.018), disseminated cancer (P < 0.001), steroid use (P < 0.001), recent weight loss (P < 0.001), bleeding disorder (P = 0.023), and preoperative transfusion (P < 0.001). After adjustment for preoperative variance, malnourished patients were more likely to experience death (P < 0.001), return to operating room (P < 0.001), free flap failure (P = 0.008), pulmonary complication (P < 0.001), deep vein thrombosis/pulmonary embolism (P = 0.019), wound disruption (P = 0.042), intraoperative transfusion (P < 0.001), minor complication (P < 0.001), major complication (P < 0.001), and extended length of stay (P < 0.001). Of the patients with normal albumin, 2.1% experienced flap failure compared with 6.3% of patients with hypoalbuminemia. It should be noted that malnourished patients were 3.370 times more likely to experience flap failure (95% confidence interval, 1.383-8.212; P = 0.008) and 3.975 times more likely to experience death (95% confidence interval, 1.700-9.626; P = 0.001) than those with normal albumin. CONCLUSION: Malnutrition is associated with death, flap failure, minor complications, and other major complications following H&N free flap surgery, even after controlling for preoperative variance. Optimizing preoperative nutrition status before free flap procedures may ameliorate morbidity and mortality in H&N patients.

Is YouTube Propagating Concerns About Breast Implant Illness?

BACKGROUND: An increasing number of patients who underwent breast implant surgery are reporting a cluster of concerning physical and psychological symptoms-newly coined term breast implant illness (BII). YouTube is a popular educational tool for plastic surgery patients. OBJECTIVES: The purposes of this study were to assess the quality and reliability of YouTube videos on BII, compare the quality and reliability of different video categories and publishers, and determine the frequencies of reported BII symptoms. METHODS: On YouTube, videos were searched for the term breast implant illness , and the first 100 results were collected. Engagement parameters and symptoms of BII mentioned in each video were recorded. Video power index, a modified DISCERN instrument, and the Global Quality Scale (GQS) were used to assess popularity, reliability, and quality, respectively. RESULTS: Ninety videos met the inclusion criteria. More than half mentioned fatigue (66%), cognitive dysfunction (59%), or muscle and/or joint pain (57%). Videos with a plastic surgeon present had higher DISCERN ( P = 0.001) and GQS ( P = 0.002) scores than those without. Educational videos had higher DISCERN and GQS scores than patient experience ( P < 0.0001, P = 0.001) and entertainment and advertisement videos ( P = 0.014, P = 0.022). Videos published by plastic surgeons had higher Video power index ( P = 0.033), DISCERN ( P < 0.0001), and GQS scores ( P < 0.0001) than those by nonmedical publishers. CONCLUSIONS: The top YouTube videos for BII are generally of low reliability and low-to-moderate quality. Patients unaware of YouTube's limited quality control measures for health education videos are susceptible to misinformation. Additional social media content created by plastic surgeons can improve the quality and accuracy of videos viewed by patients.

A multimetric health literacy analysis of online gender affirmation surgery materials: From facial to genital surgery.

BACKGROUND: The transgender patient population is expanding, and gender affirming surgery (GAS) volume is increasing. Accurate, comprehensive, and easily navigable resources on GAS are lacking. We aim to evaluate the readability of online materials for specific gender affirming surgical procedures to identify mechanisms of improving information access for transgender patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: "Facial feminization", "facial masculinization", "MTF breast augmentation", "FTM chest masculinization", "MTF vaginoplasty", "metoidioplasty", and "FTM phalloplasty" were searched on Google. Per keyword, the first 75 text-containing results were included. Text was analyzed for reading difficulty using the Flesch-Kincaid Reading-Ease (FKRE) test and grade level using the Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level (FKGL) formula, Gunning Fog Index (GFI), Simple Measure of Gobbledygook (SMOG), and Coleman-Liau Index (CLI). Scores were compared using independent t-and ANOVA tests (α = 0.05). RESULTS: Mean readability scores (FKRE 37.44) and grade-levels (FKGL 12.87, GFI 15.61, SMOG 11.91, CLI 15.00) correlated with college-level difficulty. Masculinizing surgical materials were more difficult to read than feminizing ones (p ≤ 0.023). Top surgery materials were easier to read than facial and genital surgery materials (p ≤ 0.013). Specifically, chest masculinization resources were more difficult to read than those for breast augmentation (p ≤ 0.006). No differences were found between facial feminization and masculinization surgery resources, nor between resources for different gender affirming genital surgeries. CONCLUSION: Online GAS materials are written above the recommended 6th grade reading-level, with resources for transgender men being significantly more challenging to understand. Improving readability of online resources can help overcome barriers to care for the transgender patient population.

Trends in Female Plastic Surgery Resident Authorship - Signs of Changing Times?

OBJECTIVE: Gender discrepancies exist in academia for leadership positions, advancement opportunities, and research. As of 2019, the ratio of total male-to-female attending plastic and reconstructive surgeons was 4.8:1. However, the ratio of male-to-female residents in integrated plastic surgery programs fell to 1.3:1, indicating rising female representation. With more balanced gender distributions of residents, the authors sought to determine whether this translates to greater equality of opportunities and achievements. Specifically, this study compares the academic productivity of male and female integrated plastic surgery residents. METHODS: A list of integrated plastic surgery residency programs was obtained from the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education website and ranked by reputation using the Doximity Residency Navigator. Integrated plastic surgery residents from 2019 to 2020 were identified via program websites and social media accounts. Works published during residency were identified through PubMed and Scopus from July 1 of each resident's intern year through August 10, 2020. Demographic variables for residents, including training class and medical school, as well as for programs, including geographic region, Doximity ranking, and medical school affiliation, were collected. Medical schools were ranked according to US News by research. Research productivity was assessed through the number of total research articles with authorship position (first, second, or last), the number of articles published in plastic surgery journals with the highest impact factors (Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery and Aesthetic Surgery Journal), and H-indices. Chi-Squared tests and Mann-Whitney U-tests were used to make comparisons between male and female residents (α = 0.05). RESULTS: In total, 931 residents in 81 integrated plastic surgery programs were identified, including 534 (57.4%) male and 397 (42.6%) female residents. There were no differences between male and female residents in terms of training year or program geography. Female residents were more likely to come from a top-50 medical school than males (54.7% vs. 48.1%, p = 0.049). There were no significant differences in gender distribution of residents from top-20 programs or programs affiliated with a top-20 medical school. The median (IQR) number of publications in total, and for each gender, was 3 (1-6). There was no difference in the number of total publications by training year by gender, besides the second-year resident class where male residents had a median (IQR) of 2 (1-4) compared to 1 (0-3) (p = 0.028). Male and female residents did not differ with regards to authorship position or proportion of times publishing in top journals. The distribution of H-indices for male residents was slightly higher than female residents (p = 0.003), but the median (IQR) was the same at 3 (1-5). CONCLUSIONS: Currently, male and female integrated plastic surgery residents have similar levels of academic productivity. This suggests that female representation is slowly increasing along the pipeline in academia, representing a paradigm shift from previous trends of gender inequality in plastic surgery.

Barriers To Finding A Gender Affirming Surgeon.

BACKGROUND: Gender affirmation surgery is increasingly prevalent; however, finding a surgeon continues to be difficult. Additionally, the majority of transgender patients utilize the internet for information before elective surgery. Therefore, it is imperative to explore potential online barriers in finding a gender affirming surgeon. AIMS: The authors sought to use the Internet to search for gender affirming surgeons practicing in the USA, and therefore, reflect the process that patients potentially undergo. We highlight the barriers to information and care that we encountered. METHODS: We conducted a comprehensive review of public online transgender surgery directories for currently practicing surgeons that provide facial feminization, facial masculinization, breast augmentation, chest masculinization, vaginoplasty, metoidioplasty, and/or phalloplasty in the USA. Each surgeon's name, surgical specialty, the current practice's name, state, and zip code, and procedures provided were recorded. Chi-square analysis was used for comparisons of categorical variables. RESULTS: There are currently 660 gender affirmation surgeons in the USA, with most specializing in plastic surgery, followed by otolaryngology and urology. In total, 30.5% of surgeons practice in the West, 25.6% in the Northeast, 25.3% in the South, and 18.6% in the Midwest. The most common surgery provided was chest masculinization (70.2%), followed by facial feminization (42.7%) and chest feminization (42.6%). CONCLUSION: Plastic surgeons are most likely to perform gender affirmation surgery compared to other specialties. Geographic distribution of surgeons, does not, however, match the distribution of patients. Additionally, we encountered significant hardship in confirming that a surgeon performs the procedure listed in their profile on popular online gender affirmation surgeon directories. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: V.