Effect of Daytime versus Nighttime on Prehospital Care and Outcomes after Severe Traumatic Brain Injury.

Background/Objectives: Severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a frequent cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. In the Netherlands, suspected TBI is a criterion for the dispatch of the physician-staffed helicopter emergency medical services (HEMS) which are operational 24 h per day. It is unknown if patient outcome is influenced by the time of day during which the incident occurs. Therefore, we investigated the association between the time of day of the prehospital treatment of severe TBI and 30-day mortality. Methods: A retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data from the BRAIN-PROTECT study was performed. Patients with severe TBI treated by one of the four Dutch helicopter emergency medical services were included and followed up to one year. The association between prehospital treatment during day- versus nighttime, according to the universal daylight period, and 30-day mortality was analyzed with multivariable logistic regression. A planned subgroup analysis was performed in patients with TBI with or without any other injury. Results: A total of 1794 patients were included in the analysis, of which 1142 (63.7%) were categorized as daytime and 652 (36.3%) as nighttime. Univariable analysis showed a lower 30-day mortality in patients with severe TBI treated during nighttime (OR 0.74, 95% CI 0.60-0.91, p = 0.004); this association was no longer present in the multivariable model (OR 0.82, 95% CI 0.59-1.16, p = 0.262). In a subgroup analysis, no association was found between mortality rates and the time of prehospital treatment in patients with combined injuries (TBI and any other injury). Patients with isolated TBI had a lower mortality rate when treated during nighttime than when treated during daytime (OR 0.51, 95% CI 0.34-0.76, p = 0.001). Within the whole cohort, daytime versus nighttime treatments were not associated with differences in functional outcome defined by the Glasgow Outcome Scale. Conclusions: In the overall study population, no difference was found in 30-day mortality between patients with severe TBI treated during day or night in the multivariable model. Patients with isolated severe TBI had lower mortality rates at 30 days when treated at nighttime.

Etomidate versus Ketamine as Prehospital Induction Agent in Patients with Suspected Severe Traumatic Brain Injury.

BACKGROUND: Severe traumatic brain injury is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality among young people around the world. Prehospital care focuses on the prevention and treatment of secondary brain injury and commonly includes tracheal intubation after induction of general anesthesia. The choice of induction agent in this setting is controversial. This study therefore investigated the association between the chosen induction medication etomidate versus S(+)-ketamine and the 30-day mortality in patients with severe traumatic brain injury who received prehospital airway management in the Netherlands. METHODS: This study is a retrospective analysis of the prospectively collected observational data of the Brain Injury: Prehospital Registry of Outcomes, Treatments and Epidemiology of Cerebral Trauma (BRAIN-PROTECT) cohort study. Patients with suspected severe traumatic brain injury who were transported to a participating trauma center and who received etomidate or S(+)-ketamine for prehospital induction of anesthesia for advanced airway management were included. Statistical analyses were performed with multivariable logistic regression and inverse probability of treatment weighting analysis. RESULTS: In total, 1,457 patients were eligible for analysis. No significant association between the administered induction medication and 30-day mortality was observed in unadjusted analyses (32.9% mortality for etomidate versus 33.8% mortality for S(+)-ketamine; P = 0.716; odds ratio, 1.04; 95% CI, 0.83 to 1.32; P = 0.711), as well as after adjustment for potential confounders (odds ratio, 1.08; 95% CI, 0.67 to 1.73; P = 0.765; and risk difference 0.017; 95% CI, -0.051 to 0.084; P = 0.686). Likewise, in planned subgroup analyses for patients with confirmed traumatic brain injury and patients with isolated traumatic brain injury, no significant differences were found. Consistent results were found after multiple imputations of missing data. CONCLUSIONS: The analysis found no evidence for an association between the use of etomidate or S(+)-ketamine as an anesthetic agent for intubation in patients with traumatic brain injury and mortality after 30 days in the prehospital setting, suggesting that the choice of induction agent may not influence the patient mortality rate in this population.

Reproductive outcomes in women with mild intrauterine adhesions; a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Moderate to severe intrauterine adhesions (IUAs) may greatly impact fertility, predisposing to pregnancy and obstetric complications. The impact of mild IUAs on reproductive performance remains unclear. A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed to examine the long-term reproductive outcomes in women with hysteroscopic identified and treated mild IUAs mild intrauterine adhesions (IUAs). METHODS: An electronic literature search was conducted using MEDLINE and EMBASE from inception to June 2019. All prospective cohort, cross-sectional studies or randomized controlled trials Clinical trials in which reproductive outcomes of women with mild IUAs, were reported were included. RESULTS: Five studies, reporting on reproductive outcomes of 229 women with hysteroscopic identified and treated mild IUAs, were included. The pregnancy rate was 62.3% (142 of 228; 95% CI: 0.55-0.72, I2 25%, p = .21) and in 86.6% (123 of 142) a live birth was encountered (95% CI: 0.71-0.97) with 83.1% (108 out of 130) term deliveries (95% CI: 0.53-0.95). A miscarriage was reported in 10% (13 of 130; 95% CI: 0.02-0.26). Due to the lack of a control group, reproductive outcomes were compared to a general population. Pregnancy and live birth rates were significantly lower in women with identified and treated mild IUAs, 90% versus 62.3% and respectively 99.5% versus 86.6%. The miscarriage rate was similar. Data on obstetric and neonatal outcomes are lacking. CONCLUSIONS: Women with hysteroscopic identified and treated mild IUAs seem to have lower pregnancy and live birth rate compared to the general population. Future studies consisting of a large cohort of women with hysteroscopic identified and treated IUAs with structural follow-up and a control group are needed to confirm our findings.