Antidepressant Use Among People Prescribed Opioids for Chronic Noncancer Pain.

OBJECTIVE: Although depression and chronic pain often coexist, few studies have examined antidepressant use among people with pain. This study examines the prevalence and characteristics associated with antidepressant use among people prescribed opioids for chronic noncancer pain (CNCP). DESIGN: Baseline data from a prospective cohort study. SETTING: Australian community. SUBJECTS: A total of 1166 people prescribed opioids for CNCP. METHODS: Baseline data collection consisted of a self-completed seven-day medication diary and telephone interview to collect information on sociodemographic characteristics and mental/physical health using validated questionnaires. Logistic regression was used to examine characteristics associated with antidepressant use, reporting adjusted odds ratios (AORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). RESULTS: Of the 1166 participants, 668 (57.3%) were female, and the median (interquartile range) age was 59 (49-68) years. About half the cohort (N = 637, 54.6%) used antidepressants. Of these, 329 (51.7%) reported moderate to severe depression. Amitriptyline was the most commonly used antidepressant (17.3%). Factors independently associated with antidepressant use were being female (AOR = 1.47, 95% CI = 1.13-1.92), more years lived in pain (AOR = 1.01, 95% CI = 1.00-1.02), and use of nonopioid analgesics (AOR = 1.34, 95% CI = 1.01-1.78), benzodiazepines and related drugs (AOR = 1.84, 95% CI = 1.36-2.49), antiepileptics (AOR = 1.86, 95% CI = 1.38-2.51), and antipsychotics (AOR = 2.15, 95% CI = 1.22-3.77). CONCLUSIONS: Antidepressant use is common among people with CNCP prescribed opioids. Those using antidepressants were more likely to use other psychotropic medicines concurrently, highlighting that they are a high-risk population requiring comprehensive assessment to optimize outcomes and reduce potential harms from polypharmacy.

Corruption practices in drug prescribing in Vietnam - an analysis based on qualitative interviews.

BACKGROUND: Results from a previous study showed that 40 to 60% of the price of off-patent medicines in Vietnam was typically spent to induce prescribers to use the medicines, and to persuade procurement officers within hospitals to buy them. In this article we examine how and why inducements were paid by the pharmaceutical industry to health care providers in Vietnam. METHODS: We use a theoretically informed analysis to understand pharmaceutical companies' account of giving inducements and prescribers' account of taking them, elicited through in-depth interviews. RESULTS: Analysis of the emergent concepts derived from our qualitative data led to viewing the constructs from the theoretical framework of opportunities; pressures; and rationalization within a hierarchy of systemic factors and individual factors. Economic survival pressures in an imperfectly competitive market reportedly encouraged pharmaceutical companies and prescribers to be linked financially. Although individual factors such as professional ethics and personal values influenced doctors' responses to corrupt practices, entrenched systemic issues, including lack of transparency, accountability, poor enforcement of legislation and prevalence of corruption emerged as important factors supporting corrupt practice or even making it very difficult for individuals to opt out of corrupt practices. CONCLUSIONS: Our theoretically informed analysis of inducements provides an in-depth understanding of an angle of corruption in Vietnam's health sector, showing the need for multifaceted strategies in the fight against corruption in the health sector. Remedial strategies need to address both systemic and individual factors including interventions to relieve dependencies for survival of health care services on the corrupt system.

Inflated medicine prices in Vietnam: a qualitative study.

One third of the world's population lacks regular access to essential medicines partly because of the high cost of medicines. In Vietnam, the cost to patients of medicines was 47 times the international reference price for originator brands and 11 times the price for generic equivalents in the public sector. In this article, we report the results of a qualitative study conducted to identify the principal reasons for inflated medicine prices in Vietnam.Between April 2008 and December 2009, 29 semi-structured interviews were conducted with staff from pharmaceutical companies, private pharmacies, the Ministry of Health, and the Ministry of Finance of Vietnam. Study participants were recruited using a combination of purposive and snowball sampling techniques. Interviews were recorded, transcribed and coded using NVivo8® software and analyzed using a framework of structure-conduct-performance (SCP).Participants attributed high prices of originator medicines to a monopoly of supply. The prices of generic medicines were also considered to be excessive, reportedly due to the need to recoup the cost of financial inducements paid to prescribers and procurement officers. These inducements constituted a dominant cost component of the end price of generic medicines. Poor market intelligence about current world prices, as well as failure to achieve economies of scale because of unwarranted duplication in pharmaceutical production and distribution system were also factors contributing to high prices. This was reported to be further compounded by multiple layers in the supply chain and unregulated retail mark-ups.To address these problems a multifaceted approach is needed encompassing policy and legislative responses. Policy options include establishing effective monitoring of medicine quality assurance, procurement, distribution and use. Rationalization of the domestic pharmaceutical production and distribution system to achieve economies of scale is also required. Appropriate legal responses include collaborations with the justice and law enforcement sectors to enforce existing laws.

Policy options for pharmaceutical pricing and purchasing: issues for low- and middle-income countries.

Pharmaceutical expenditure is rising globally. Most high-income countries have exercised pricing or purchasing strategies to address this pressure. Low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), however, usually have less regulated pharmaceutical markets and often lack feasible pricing or purchasing strategies, notwithstanding their wish to effectively manage medicine budgets. In high-income countries, most medicines payments are made by the state or health insurance institutions. In LMICs, most pharmaceutical expenditure is out-of-pocket which creates a different dynamic for policy enforcement. The paucity of rigorous studies on the effectiveness of pharmaceutical pricing and purchasing strategies makes it especially difficult for policy makers in LMICs to decide on a course of action. This article reviews published articles on pharmaceutical pricing and purchasing policies. Many policy options for medicine pricing and purchasing have been found to work but they also have attendant risks. No one option is decisively preferred; rather a mix of options may be required based on country-specific context. Empirical studies in LMICs are lacking. However, risks from any one policy option can reasonably be argued to be greater in LMICs which often lack strong legal systems, purchasing and state institutions to underpin the healthcare system. Key factors are identified to assist LMICs improve their medicine pricing and purchasing systems.

All-cause mortality of elderly Australian veterans using COX-2 selective or non-selective NSAIDs: a longitudinal study.

WHAT IS ALREADY KNOWN ABOUT THIS SUBJECT: • Previous studies have found varying impact of exposure to COX-2 selective and non-selective NSAIDs. WHAT THIS STUDY ADDS: • Individuals receiving a COX-2 selective NSAID had an increased risk of all-cause mortality after correction for age, sex and cardiovascular risk as measured by co-prescription. • Despite differences in the pharmacokinetic properties of the COX-2 selective inhibitor drugs, our study lends no support to clinicians preferring any one COX-2 selective inhibitor drug, or substituting one for another on the grounds of mortality risk alone. • The Australian Department of Veterans' Affairs data sets make it possible to conduct timely record linkage studies of all-cause mortality from use of medicines in a large and clinically relevant population. AIM: To determine hazard ratios for all-cause mortality in elderly Australian veterans taking COX-2 selective and non-selective NSAIDs. METHODS: Patient cohorts were constructed from claims databases (1997 to 2007) for veterans and dependants with full treatment entitlement irrespective of military service. Patients were grouped by initial exposure: celecoxib, rofecoxib, meloxicam, diclofenac, non-selective NSAID. A reference group was constructed of patients receiving glaucoma/hypothyroid medications and none of the study medications. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed using Cox proportional hazards regression models. Hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were estimated for each exposure group against each of the reference group. The final model was adjusted for age, gender and co-prescription as a surrogate for cardiovascular risk. Patients were censored if the gap in supply of study prescription exceeded 30 days or if another study medication was initiated. The outcome measure in all analyses was death. RESULTS: Hazard ratios and 95% CIs, adjusted for age, gender and cardiovascular risk, for each group relative to the reference group were: celecoxib 1.39 (1.25, 1.55), diclofenac 1.44 (1.28, 1.62), meloxicam 1.49 (1.25, 1.78), rofecoxib 1.58 (1.39, 1.79), non-selective NSAIDs 1.76 (1.59, 1.94). CONCLUSIONS: In this large cohort of Australian veterans exposed to COX-2 selective and non-selective NSAIDs, there was a significant increased mortality risk for those exposed to either COX-2-selective or non-selective NSAIDs relative to those exposed to unrelated (glaucoma/hypothyroid) medications.

Uncovering the potential risk of serotonin toxicity in Australian veterans using pharmaceutical claims data.

AIMS: We examined potential risk of serotonin toxicity in Australian veterans by quantifying the concomitant use of serotonergic medicine combinations from claims data collected by the Department of Veterans' Affairs (DVA). METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study of 273 228 Australian veterans, war widows, widowers and dependents aged >or=55 years and holding full treatment entitlement for the period July 2000 to June 2004 or until death. The main outcome measure was potential concomitant use, estimated as the number of cohort members with an overlap in days of supply for serotonergic medicine combinations over the 4 year period for all medicine combinations and potentially life threatening combinations. RESULTS: From July 2000 to June 2004, 115 969 (42%) cohort members were dispensed at least one serotonergic medicine. 20 658 (8%) had at least one episode of potential concomitant use. We identified 1811 (0.7%) cohort members with at least one overlapping period of potentially life-threatening serotonergic medicine combinations, 937 of whom had the combinations dispensed within the recommended washout period. Three hundred and seventeen of these individuals were dispensed potentially life-threatening medicine combinations on the same day. The most common combinations were moclobemide with a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor or tramadol. CONCLUSIONS: The individuals potentially at risk of mild to moderate serotonin toxicity were considerable and potentially life threatening combinations were not infrequent. While we were unable to determine how many individuals experienced serotonin toxicity this study indicates, for the first time, the potential size of the problem in a subgroup of elderly Australians. Clinicians and patients need to be vigilant regarding inadvertent concomitant use, especially that of moclobemide with a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor or tramadol.

The effects of the market withdrawal of temazepam gel capsules on benzodiazepine injecting in Sydney, Australia.

INTRODUCTION AND AIMS: This study assessed the impact on benzodiazepine injection among IDU in Sydney of removing temazepam gel capsule preparations from the Australian market. DESIGN AND METHODS: Several data sources were used: (1) data from the NSW Illicit Drug Reporting System (IDRS) (an annual, cross-sectional survey of regular IDU in Sydney) for the period 1996 - 2005; (2) data from inner Sydney outreach services and the Sydney Medically Supervised Injecting Centre (MSIC) on last drug injected; and (3) national benzodiazepine prescription data, by formulation, from the Drug Utilisation Sub-Committee for the period 2001 - 06. RESULTS: Removal of temazepam gel capsule formulations from the Australian market in 2004 resulted in increased prescribing of tablet formulations but overall benzodiazepine prescription numbers remained stable. Injection of benzodiazepines ceased as a mode of administration of benzodiazepines among IDU in inner Sydney, but very frequent oral use of benzodiazepines remained highly prevalent. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: Removal of an easily injectable form of benzodiazepines appeared to halt injection of benzodiazepines among disadvantaged IDU. However, IDU continue to use the drug heavily and interventions to assist IDU with reducing dependent benzodiazepine use are warranted. There is a need for continued vigilance to emergent injecting drug use risks to implement timely harm reduction strategies.

Making new choices about antidepressants in Australia: the long view 1975-2002.

OBJECTIVE: To examine trends in types of antidepressant medications prescribed in Australia between 1975 and 2002. DESIGN: Sales data from the Australian pharmaceutical industry were used to examine trends in overall antidepressant prescribing and changes in the types of antidepressants prescribed between 1975 and 2002. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Antidepressant sales were expressed as defined daily doses (DDDs) per 1000 people per day, using the estimated Australian population for each year obtained from the Australian Bureau of Statistics. RESULTS: Average annual growth in the sales of antidepressants was 1.1% per year from 1975 to 1990, after which growth rose steeply to reach 29% in 1995. By 2002 the rate of growth had slowed to 6.6%. Eighty per cent of total sales were accounted for by four drugs in 1975, 1980 and 1985; five in 1990; seven drugs in 1995 and 2000; and six drugs in 2001 and 2002. CONCLUSIONS: The rapid growth in antidepressant prescribing that was characteristic of the early 1990s, and reflected the emergence of new classes of agents, did not continue into the late 1990s. Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors now dominate antidepressant prescribing in Australia.

Length of therapy with selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors and tricyclic antidepressants in Australia.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the proportion of patients starting on either selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) or tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs) who continued treatment for a period consistent with recommended guidelines for major depression, that is at least 6 months. METHOD: Cohort study using a national dispensing claims database involving patients eligible for social security entitlements in Australia. Two 'new user' cohorts were established of patients who were supplied a prescription for either an SSRI (6026) or a TCA (4158) in the first week of April 2000 and who had not received a prescription for any antidepressant in the preceding three months. The main outcome measure was the proportion of patients who were still having any SSRI or TCA prescription, respectively, dispensed between 6 and 8 months after initiation. Additionally, for patients starting on either a leading SSRI (sertraline) or TCA (dothiepin), the proportions of those that remained on these drugs or had changed to other antidepressants were determined. The dispensing data are not linked to reason for prescribing in the national dataset. RESULTS: 2267 SSRI 'new users' (38%) were still receiving SSRIs 6-8 months later, compared with 1269 (31%) of the 4158 TCA 'new users' (p < 0.001). The difference between the groups occurred early, by the 2-4 month time interval. 1038 (41%) of patients starting on the individual SSRI and 385 (38%) of patients starting on the individual TCA were receiving some type of antidepressant therapy at 6-8 months, with no significant difference (p = 0.6) in the proportions that had changed to another antidepressant. CONCLUSIONS: In 2000, only 40% of patients started on an antidepressant continued to be prescribed some antidepressant therapy 6-8 months later. Patients were more likely to continue on SSRIs as a class than on TCAs and the difference in continuation between these two classes occurred within the first 2 months of therapy. However, patients starting on an individual SSRI or TCA were equally likely to change to another antidepressant.

Lessons from early large-scale adoption of celecoxib and rofecoxib by Australian general practitioners.

OBJECTIVE: To assess trends in the first two years of prescribing of COX-2-selective non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (C2SNs) by Australian general practitioners. DESIGN: Retrospective analysis of deidentified electronic patient records from GPs enrolled in the General Practice Research Network (GPRN). SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Overall prescription rates for C2SNs and NSAIDs were assessed for all GPRN participants (437 GPs) between 1 September 1999 and 30 September 2002. Also, three cohorts of patients, with at least 12 months of prescription data, who received their first prescription for celecoxib between August and October 2000 (Cohort 1, 2366 patients), celecoxib between February and April 2001 (Cohort 2, 640 patients), and rofecoxib between February and April 2001 (Cohort 3, 608 patients) were selected for further analysis. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Age and sex of patients; reason for prescription; previously prescribed pain medications and concomitant use of medications that could predispose to an adverse renal or bleeding event. RESULTS: Prescriptions for C2SNs increased dramatically after they were listed on the Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme (PBS). C2SN prescriptions for patients aged less than 65 years accounted for 52.6%, 59.5% and 50.7% of those in Cohorts 1, 2 and 3, respectively; large numbers of patients in the study cohort had reasons recorded for prescription that did not comply with PBS restrictions, and between 36.7% and 61.3% of patients in the three cohorts had not received a prescription for any pain medication in the year before being prescribed a C2SN. Between 4.7% and 7.9% were coprescribed drugs that could cause renal complications. CONCLUSIONS: Rapid, early adoption of C2SNs by Australian GPs has resulted in prescribing and drug use patterns that were not in accord with quality use of medicine (QUM) principles.

Association between antidepressant prescribing and suicide in Australia, 1991-2000: trend analysis.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the association between trends in antidepressant prescribing and suicide rates in Australia for 1991-2000. DESIGN: Analysis of databases of suicide and rates of antidepressant prescribing according to age and sex. SETTING: Australian Bureau of Statistics data, sales data from the Australian pharmaceutical industry, prescribing data in general practice. SUBJECTS: Men and women aged 15 years and over in 10 year age groups. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Trends in suicide rates and trends in antidepressant prescribing. Association measured by Spearman's rank correlations. RESULTS: While overall national rates of suicide did not fall significantly, incidence decreased in older men and women and increased in younger adults. In both men (r(s)=-0.91; P<0.01) and women (r(s)=-0.76; P<0.05) the higher the exposure to antidepressants the larger the decline in rate of suicide. CONCLUSIONS: Changes in suicide rates and exposure to antidepressants in Australia for 1991-2000 are significantly associated. This effect is most apparent in older age groups, in which rates of suicide decreased substantially in association with exposure to antidepressants. The increase in antidepressant prescribing may be a proxy marker for improved overall management of depression. If so, increased prescribing of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors in general practice may have produced a quantifiable benefit in population mental health.

Use of antidepressants by general practitioners and psychiatrists in Australia.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the antidepressant prescribing patterns of psychiatrists and general practitioners (GPs) in Australia, focusing specifically on: the prescribed daily dose, the relative proportions (from subsidized dispensing data) of prescriptions written, and how these proportions change over time for a newly listed antidepressant drug (using paroxetine as an example). METHOD: Retrospective analyses of subsidized claims data (comprising nearly 90% of the community supply of antidepressants) and prescriber surveys. RESULTS: General practitioners prescribe 86% of subsidized antidepressants in Australia. Almost three-quarters of the antidepressant prescriptions prescribed in primary care management are also initiated by a GP. Psychiatrists prescribed higher doses than general practitioners for all the antidepressants examined. For paroxetine, a higher than average proportion of scripts were written by psychiatrists when the drug was initially available and it only reached the GP/psychiatrist split seen with an established drug in the same therapeutic class (fluoxetine) four years after marketing. The most prominent type of depression that GPs believed they were treating was 'chronic mild depression', which contrasts with the subsidized indication for all newer antidepressant classes of 'major depressive disorders'. CONCLUSIONS: General practitioners are the major providers of treatment for depression in Australia. When writing prescriptions for tricyclic antidepressants GPs use doses lower than those recommended for major depression, however, most management in primary care is not for conditions regarded by the GP as major depression. A significant number of prescriptions for the newer antidepressants may not accord with the Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme (PBS) restrictions for use.

A 5-year follow-up of general practice patients experiencing depression.

BACKGROUND: Depression is a common disease in primary care and produces significant morbidity in the community. Little is known about the outcomes of depression in general practice. OBJECTIVES: This research set out to explore both the longitudinal management and outcomes of depression as seen in general practice. METHODS: The Medic-GP database is a collection of the medical records of >50 000 people seen in nine Australian general practices. It was used to follow the management of depressed patients over 4-5 years. Records from 1994-1995 were searched for depression or similar words. Individual records of patients whose notes mentioned depression were randomly selected and examined to determine if they were diagnosed with depression. Records of patients who were diagnosed as suffering from depression were examined to determine progress over the ensuing 5 years. RESULTS: Six hundred of 5889 patients were examined in detail. A total of 382 patients (63.7%) were diagnosed with depression; 219 had been diagnosed during this time interval. The main findings were 64.7% of patients were female; 93.6% of patients received an antidepressant at some time during the study; 16% of patients were referred to a psychiatrist; 7.3% were hospitalized; 30% of patients who ceased antidepressants without a recurrence had courses of antidepressants of 3 months or less; and only 22.5% of patients had a single episode of depression. CONCLUSION: Unlike cross-sectional studies, this study has shown a high rate of prescription of antidepressants. GPs often prescribed short courses of antidepressants, and depression behaves as a chronic, recurrent disease.

A quality use of medicines program for continuity of care in therapeutics from hospital to community.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate adherence to an agreed minimum dataset for patient medication information exchange between hospitals and general practitioners. DESIGN: Quasi pre-post design with a supplementary post-program comparison group; sequential descriptive surveys of patients following recent discharge from public hospitals; opinion questionnaire for key hospital informants; stakeholder forum to review data and Quality Use of Medicines (QUM) action plans between pre- and post-program surveys. PARTICIPANTS AND SETTING: GPs and hospitals from the South East Area Health Service, Sydney. During 2000-2001, 81/124 GPs (65%) returned 147 patient questionnaires in initial follow-up; 88/119 GPs (74%) returned 131 questionnaires in final follow-up; a supplementary group of 54/120 GPs (45%) returned 66 questionnaires; 32/45 (71%) of nominated key informants responded to the hospital survey. RESULTS: Direct notification of GPs by hospitals of their patient's admission was unchanged from the initial level of 22%. The proportion of GPs providing medication information to the hospital increased from 38% to 51% at Stage 2 (P < 0.05) and remained at 52% at Stage 3. The proportion of GPs receiving discharge summaries directly (initially 2%) increased to 26% at Stage 2 (P < 0.001) and remained at 27% at Stage 3. CONCLUSIONS: System change is slow to occur, but changes that are implemented are maintained. The stakeholder forum suggested that a specific person should be responsible for GP liaison.