Anticoagulant therapy and TEVAR in a patient with antiphospholipid syndrome presenting with pulmonary embolisms and multiple arterial embolisms due to thoracic aortic mural thrombosis　.

We often observe patients with antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) presenting with both venous and arterial thrombi. Anticoagulant therapy is effective for venous and peripheral arterial embolisms in these patients; however, it has opposite effects when applied for thoracic aortic mural thrombosis because of the risk of new arterial embolisms. Recently, thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) has been used to prevent arterial embolisms due to aortic thrombosis. However, we generally hesitate to implant artificial materials in patients in a hypercoagulable state because this can cause new thrombi to develop. Here, we present a case of successful treatment by anticoagulant therapy and TEVAR in an APS patient presenting with pulmonary embolisms (PEs) and multiple arterial embolisms due to thoracic aortic mural thrombosis. A 46-year-old man was referred to our hospital due to dyspnea and leg pain. Since contrast-enhanced computed tomography revealed PEs, thoracic aortic mural thrombosis, and lower limb arterial embolisms, we administered anticoagulation therapy. Three days later, contrast-enhanced computed tomography revealed new arterial embolisms in the right kidney. To prevent further arterial embolisms due to thoracic aortic mural thrombosis, we performed emergent TEVAR in addition to anticoagulant therapy. Thereafter, no venous or arterial embolisms recurred during the 13-month follow-up period. .

Intracoronary administration of nicorandil during primary percutaneous coronary intervention: Impact on restoration of regional myocardial perfusion in reperfused myocardium during the subacute phase of myocardial infarction.

BACKGROUND: The impact of nicorandil as adjunctive therapy for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) is controversial. We performed 15O-labeled water positron emission tomography (PET) to quantify regional myocardial perfusion in patients with STEMI who received nicorandil or no adjunctive therapy during PCI. METHODS: PCI was performed within 8 h after STEMI onset in 33 patients. 14 patients received intracoronary nicorandil 2 mg immediately after recanalization of the culprit lesion (Nico group). After 3-4 weeks, PET was performed in which myocardial blood flow (MBF) was measured at baseline and during adenosine triphosphate (ATP)-induced hyperemia. Myocardial vascular resistance (MVR) was calculated for all segments. Data were obtained from the reperfused (Rep) and normal segments (Cont) in each patient. RESULTS: In patients not given nicorandil (No-Nico group), the MBF was significantly lower in Rep than that in Cont at baseline and during hyperemia (Cont vs. Rep: 0.82 ± 0.14 vs. 0.68 ± 0.11, P = 0.001, ATP-Cont vs. ATP-Rep: 2.00 ± 0.72 vs. 1.52 ± 0.61, P = 0.017), which was restored in the Nico group (Cont vs. Rep: 0.79 ± 0.17 vs. 0.78 ± 0.20; ATP-Cont vs. ATP-Rep: 2.02 ± 0.84 vs. 1.84 ± 0.62). MVR was elevated in Rep at baseline and during hyperemia in the No-Nico group. MVR elevation in Rep was prevented in the Nico group. CONCLUSIONS: 15O-labeled water PET was feasible for segmental analysis of MBF during the subacute phase of STEMI. It revealed that intracoronary administration of nicorandil to STEMI patients who underwent PCI prevented MVR elevation and thus restored MBF in the reperfused segments to a level similar to that in the normal segments.