Developing Tools to Report Racism in Maternal Health for the CDC Maternal Mortality Review Information Application (MMRIA): Findings from the MMRIA Racism & Discrimination Working Group.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this report from the field is to describe the process by which an multidisciplinary workgroup, selected by the CDC Foundation in partnership with maternal health experts, developed a definition of racism that would be specifically appropriate for inclusion on the Maternal Mortality Review Information Application (MMRIA) form. DESCRIPTION: In the United States Black women are nearly 4 times more likely to experience a pregnancy-related death. Recent evidence points to racism as a fundamental cause of this inequity. Furthermore, the CDC reports that 3 of 5 pregnancy related deaths are preventable. With these startling facts in mind, the CDC created the Maternal Mortality Review Information Application (MMRIA) for use by Maternal Mortality Review Committees (MMRC) to support standardized data abstraction, case narrative development, documentation of committee decisions, and analysis on maternal mortality to inform practices and policies for preventing maternal mortality. ASSESSMENT: Charged with the task of defining racism and discrimination as contributors to pregnancy related mortality, the work group established four goals to define their efforts: (1) the desire to create a product that was inclusive of all forms of racism and discrimination experienced by birthing people; (2) an acknowledgement of the legacy of racism in the U.S. and the norms in health care delivery that perpetuate racist ideology; (3) an acknowledgement of the racist narratives surrounding the issue of maternal mortality and morbidity that often leads to victim blaming; and (4) that the product would be user friendly for MMRCs. CONCLUSION: The working group developed three definitions and a list of recommendations for action to help MMRC members provide suggested interventions to adopt when discrimination or racism were contributing factors to a maternal death. The specification of these definitions will allow the systematic tracking of the contribution of racism to maternal mortality through the MMRIA and allow a greater standardization of its identification across participating jurisdictions with MMRCs that use the form.

MENTAL HEALTH DISORDERS SUBSEQUENT TO GESTATIONAL DIABETES MELLITUS DIFFER BY RACE/ETHNICITY.

INTRODUCTION: The relationship between gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) and postpregnancy mental health disorders has been inconsistently reported. Additionally, race/ethnicity data are limited. We sought to elucidate the intersection of these relationships. METHODS: We analyzed 18,109 women aged 18-40 with self-reported race/ethnicity. Women with (n = 659) and without (n = 14,461) GDM were followed for a median of 4.4 (interquartile range 1.4-6.8) and 4.0 (1.5-6.4) years, respectively, for incident mental health disorders. Multivariable repeated measures analyses were conducted to examine associations between GDM and postpregnancy mental health disorders, race/ethnicity, and the interaction of these factors. RESULTS: Women with compared to women without GDM were older (mean ± standard deviation, 32 ± 5 vs. 30 ± 5 years; P < .001) and had higher body mass index (29.0 ± 7.2 vs. 25.3 ± 5.2 kg/m(2) ; P < .001). GDM was associated with increased risk for depression and anxiety after adjusting for age and pregnancy complications; however, loss of significance in the fully adjusted model for depression (odds ratio [95% CI]: 1.29 [0.98, 1.70]; P = .064) and anxiety (1.14 [0.83, 1.57], P = .421) suggested that clinical and socioeconomic factors influence this relationship. Hispanic compared to white women had a greater risk for depression (1.40 [1.15, 1.72]; P = .001), even after multivariable adjustment. The interaction between GDM and race was evident in complication-adjusted but not fully adjusted models. CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of mental health disorders subsequent to GDM was attenuated after adjustment for clinical and socioeconomic factors. Moreover, race/ethnicity influenced this relationship. Further investigation is warranted to clarify potential underlying mechanisms.