Peripheral Arterial Disease Located in the Feet of Patients With Diabetes and Foot Ulceration Demands a New Approach to the Assessment of Ischemia.

Peripheral arterial disease (PAD) is common below the knee in diabetes but arteries in the foot are controversially said to be spared of occlusive disease. This is relevant to the convenient site of vascular assessment that is recommended in guidelines. Should assessment be distal at toe/forefoot to detect foot disease or only proximal to detect disease at ankle level? The objective was to determine frequency of PAD at foot and ankle level. This was a cross-sectional observational study, evaluating arterial disease proximally by palpation of pedal pulses and Ankle Brachial Index (ABI), and distally by Toe Brachial Index (TBI), and forefoot transcutaneous oxygen tension (tcpO2), in consecutive patients presenting with foot ulceration. We assessed 301 limbs in 154 patients: 59% of limbs were ulcerated. PAD in the foot was detected in 70% and 74% of limbs by TBI and forefoot tcpO2, respectively, but PAD at ankle level only in 51% and 34% by pulse palpation and ABI, respectively. In limbs with "normal" ABI, PAD was present in the foot in 70% as indicated by low TBI, and in 73% by low tcpO2, with 70% to 64% having associated ulceration, respectively. When compared with arterial waveforms, as a measure of PAD, TBI gave an excellent AUC (area under the curve of the receiver operating characteristic curve) of 0.81 (95% confidence interval: 0.73-0.89), but ABI gave a poor AUC of 0.65 (95% confidence interval: 0.55-0.76). In conclusion, arterial disease is important in the foot and can be detected by TBI, which should be performed even when ABI is normal. Guidelines that recommend TBI only if ABI is artificially raised need updating.

Isolated low toe-brachial index is associated with increased mortality and morbidity: a retrospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVE: The aim was to assess the prognostic impact of perfusion assessments including ankle-brachial Index (ABI) and toe-brachial Index (TBI) on survival of patients who present with diabetic foot ulceration and to analyse clinical outcomes when patients are categorised into three levels of limb ischaemia. METHOD: This was a retrospective cohort analysis of consecutive patients presenting with foot ulceration. Patients continued with their standard of care, after having baseline assessments of limb perfusion. Patients were retrospectively categorised into three groups according to baseline ABI and TBI: Group 1 (n=31) non-ischaemic (TBI≥0.75, ABI≥0.9), Group 2 (n=67) isolated low TBI with foot ischaemia (TBI<0.75, ABI≥0.90) and Group 3 (n=30) foot-leg ischaemia (TBI<0.75, ABI<0.90). RESULTS: A total of 128 patients took part in the study. Low TBI was associated with a significant decrease in patient survival (42±20 versus 51±16 months, p=0.011). There was a progressive and significant decline in mean patient survival time (51±16 versus 44±20 versus 39±22 months, respectively, for ANOVA across the three groups, p=0.04). Patients with isolated low TBI had angioplasty and bypass at a rate similar to that of patients in Group 3 (low ABI and low TBI). The proportion of angioplasties was significantly higher in the isolated low TBI (19.4% (13/67) versus the non-ischaemic 3.2% (1/31), p=0.033). Such revascularisation resulted in ulcer healing within the foot ischaemic group that was similar to the non-ischaemic group (68% versus 60% over 12 months, p=0.454). CONCLUSION: Regardless of ABI level, measurement of TBI identifies patients with isolated low TBI who require specialised care pathways and revascularisation to achieve ulcer healing that is similar to non-ischaemic patients.

Surgical Diabetic Foot Debridement: Improving Training and Practice Utilizing the Traffic Light Principle.

Comprehensive management of a severe diabetic foot infection focus on clear treatment pathways. Including rapid, radical debridement of all infection in addition to intravenous antibiotics and supportive measures. However, inexperienced surgeons can often underestimate the extent of infection, risking inadequate debridement, repeated theatre episodes, higher hospital morbidity, and hospital length of stay (LOS). This study aims to assess protocolized diabetic-foot-debridement: Red-Amber-Green (RAG) model as part of a value-based driven intervention. The model highlights necrotic/infected tissue (red-zone, nonviable), followed by areas of moderate damage (amber-zone), healthy tissue (green-zone, viable). Sequential training of orthopedic surgeons supporting our emergency service was undertaken prior to introduction. We compared outcomes before/after RAG introduction (pre-RAG, n = 48; post- RAG, n = 35). Outcomes measured included: impact on number of debridement/individual admission, percentage of individuals requiring multiple debridement, and length-of-hospital-stay as a function-of-cost. All-patients fulfilled grade 2/3, stage-B, of the Texas-Wound-Classification. Those with evidence of ischemia were excluded. The pre-RAG-group were younger (53.8 ± 11.0 years vs 60.3 ± 9.2 years, P = .01); otherwise the 2-groups were matched: HbA1c, white blood cell count, and C-reactive protein. The post-RAG-group underwent significantly lower numbers of debridement's (1.1 ± 0.3 vs 1.5 ± 0.6/individual admission, P = .003); equired fewer visits to theatre (8.6% vs 38%, P = .003), their LOS was reduced (median LOS pre-RAG 36.0 vs post-RAG 21.5 days, P = .02). RAG facilitates infection clearance, fewer theatre-episodes, and shorter LOS. This protocolized-management-tools in acute severely infected diabetic foot infection offers benefits to patients and health-care-gain.