EFOMP's protocol quality controls in PET/CT and PET/MR.

This article presents the protocol on Quality Controls in PET/CT and PET/MRI published online in May 2022 by the European Federation of Organisations for Medical Physics (EFOMP), which was developed by the Working group for PET/CT and PET/MRI Quality Control (QC) protocol. The main objective of this protocol was to comprehensively provide simple and practical procedures that may be integrated into clinical practice to identify changes in the PET/CT/MRI system's performance and avoid short- and long-term quality deterioration. The protocol describes the quality control procedures on radionuclide calibrators, weighing scales, PET, CT and MRI systems using selected and measurable parameters that are directly linked to clinical images quality. It helps to detect problems before they can impact clinical studies in terms of safety, image quality, quantification accuracy and patient radiation dose. CT and MRI QCs are described only in the context of their use for PET (attenuation correction and anatomical localization) imaging. Detailed step-by-step instructions have been provided, limiting any misinterpretations or interpersonal variations as much as possible. This paper presents the main characteristics of the protocol illustrated together with a brief summary of the content of each chapter. A regular QC based on the proposed protocol would guarantee that PET/CT and PET/MRI systems operate under optimal conditions, resulting in the best performance for routine clinical tasks.

Incidence and Predictive Factors of Hidden Atrial Fibrillation Detected by Implantable Loop Recorder After an Embolic Stroke of Undetermined Source.

BACKGROUND: The term embolic stroke of undetermined source (ESUS) has been defined for patients with ischemic strokes, where neither a cardioembolic nor a non-cardiac source can be detected. These patients may have asymptomatic episodes of atrial fibrillation (AF). Prolonged monitoring with implantable loop recorder (ILR) and daily remote interrogation in patients after an ESUS has shown an incidence of AF of about 25%. AIMS: The main objective of this study was to analyze the incidence and predictive factors of atrial fibrillation in patients with ESUS who underwent an ILR implantation. METHODS: It was a single center study. From June 2013 to January 2017 all consecutive patients with an ESUS, who underwent an ILR implantation searching for hidden AF, were included. Possible predictive factors of AF were also analyzed. RESULTS: 65 patients were included (mean age 65.4±13.8 years, 55.4% males, mean CHA2DS2VASc score 2.3± 1.5). After a median follow-up of 17.1±10.7 months, AF was detected in 19 (29.2%) of patients. Variables associated with AF were: age > 65 years (HR 9.45 (CI 95% 1.25-71.34); p= 0.02), CHA2DS2VASC score≥2 (HR 4.09 (CI 95% 0.93-17.87); p=0,06), left atrial enlargement (HR 2.29 (CI 95% 0.89-5.91); p=0.08) and presence of Supraventricular premature complex(SVC) on 24-hour Holter (HR 4.05 (CI 95% 1.55-10.57); p = 0.004) A cut-point of 0.15% for SVC was identified to predict AF with a sensitivity and specificity of 88.9 and 90%, respectively. A CHA2DS2VASc score<2 and age<65 years showed a negative predictive value to exclude AF of 91.3% and 96%, respectively. CONCLUSION: A high incidence of AF was detected in this population. Age >65 years, LA enlargement, CHA2DS2VASC score≥2 and presence of SVC on 24-hour Holter are predictive factors of AF in patients with ESUS.