'Distant socializing,' not 'social distancing' as a public health strategy for COVID-19.

Social distancing, also referred to as physical distancing, means creating a safe distance of at least two meters (six feet) between yourself and others. This is a term popularized during the COVID-19 pandemic, as it is one of the most important measures to prevent the spread of this virus. However, the term 'social distancing' can be misleading, as it may imply that individuals should stop socializing. However, socializing in a safe context (i.e. over the phone, video-chat, etc.) is especially important during this time of crisis. Therefore, in this narrative review, we suggest the term 'distant socializing' as more apt expression, to promote physical distancing measures while also highlighting the importance of maintaining social bonds. Further, articles discussing the practice, implementation, measurement, and mental health effects of physical distancing are reviewed. Physical distancing is associated with psychiatric symptoms (such as anxiety and depression), suicidal ideation, and domestic violence. Further, unemployment and job insecurity have significantly increased during COVID-19, which may exacerbate these negative mental health effects. Governments, medical institutions, and public health bodies should therefore consider increasing mental health resources both during and after the pandemic, with a specific focus on frontline workers, COVID-19 survivors, and marginalized communities.

Prevalence of obstructive sleep apnea in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

STUDY OBJECTIVES: Although previous studies suggested an increased prevalence of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) among patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), no existing large prospective study has addressed this association using objective measures. This study aims to assess the prevalence of OSA using polysomnography (PSG) in patients with RA and its relationship with RA activity. METHODS: Patients with RA who presented at the rheumatology clinic at a university hospital from 2017 to 2018 were eligible. In the first stage, data from the Disease Activity Score 28, Berlin questionnaire, and Epworth Sleepiness Scale were obtained, along with personal data and a comprehensive medical history. The second stage involved a case-control study confirming OSA with PSG. OSA was defined as an apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) ≥ 5 events/h, whereas patients with an AHI ≥ 15 events/h were categorized as having moderate-severe OSA. RESULTS: In total, 199 patients with RA were recruited, 110 patients (55%) underwent PSG, and 5 were excluded. The mean age was 48.93 ± 12.7 years, and the mean body mass index was 31.70 ± 9.74 kg/m²; 94% were female. In total, 67 participants (33.2%) were at high risk for OSA (36 [55.4%] underwent PSG), whereas 132 (66.8%) were at low risk (69 [51.5%] underwent PSG). The estimated prevalence of OSA (AHI ≥ 5 events/h) in the whole population was 58.1%, whereas the prevalence of moderate-to-severe OSA (AHI ≥ 15) was 22.9%. CONCLUSIONS: This prospective PSG-based study demonstrated that OSA is more common in patients with RA than in the general population, but there appears to be no relationship with disease activity.

Resistance Training Leads to Clinically Meaningful Improvements in Control of Glycemia and Muscular Strength in Untrained Middle-aged Patients with type 2 Diabetes Mellitus.

BACKGROUND: Previous studies in diverse ethnic groups have reported that progressive resistance training is effective for glycemic control. However, it is unknown whether this form of exercise therapy leads to clinically meaningful changes in metabolic, cardiovascular and anthropometric parameters in Asian Indians. AIM: The study was designed to investigate the efficacy of progressive resistance training on glycemic, musculoskeletal, anthropometric and cardiovascular variables in untrained middle-aged type 2 diabetic patients living in North India. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty-eight untrained patients, 35 men and 13 women (mean ± SD age, 44.7 ± 4.2 years), with a diagnosis of type 2 diabetes were randomly divided into 2 groups: A group receiving progressive resistance training and a control group who provided participative involvement. The primary outcomes were glycemic control and muscle strength. Additionally, anthropometric and cardiovascular risk parameters were evaluated at baseline and after intervention or control program at 8 weeks. RESULTS: Mixed ANOVA revealed a significant group-by-time interaction for the main outcomes of the study. Change in glycosylated hemoglobin was mean ± SD, 0.6 ± 0.5 in progressive resistance training group compared to no change in control group (P < .001). Progressive resistance training group showed a greater improvement in upper and lower body muscle strength (P < .001), waist circumference (P = .008), and high density lipoprotein cholesterol (P = .004). However, no significant group-by-time interaction was detected on body weight, total cholesterol, triglycerides, low density lipoprotein cholesterol, and systolic and diastolic blood pressure. CONCLUSIONS: A short-term progressive resistance training program leads to clinically meaningful improvements in glycemic control and muscle strength in untrained middle-aged type 2 diabetic patients of Asian Indian ethnicity.