Comparative early results of in situ fenestrated endovascular aortic repair and other emergent complex endovascular aortic repair techniques for ruptured suprarenal and thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms at a regional aortic center.

INTRODUCTION: Emergent endovascular repair of suprarenal (SRAAAs) and thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms (TAAAs) poses a significant challenge due to the need for branch vessel incorporation, time constraints, and lack of dedicated devices. Techniques to incorporate branch vessels have included parallel grafting, physician-modified endografts, double-barrel/reversed iliac branch device, and in situ fenestration (ISF). This study describes a single-center experience and the associated outcomes when using these techniques for ruptured SRAAAs and TAAAs. METHODS: A retrospective review of patients who underwent endovascular repair of ruptured SRAAAs and TAAAs from July 2014 to March 2021 with branch vessel incorporation was performed. Clinical presentation, intraoperative details, and postoperative outcomes of those who underwent ISF were compared with those who underwent repair using non-ISF techniques. The primary outcome of interest was in-hospital mortality. Secondary outcomes were major adverse events including myocardial infarction, respiratory failure, renal dysfunction, new onset dialysis, bowel ischemia, stroke, and spinal cord ischemia. RESULTS: Forty-two patients underwent endovascular repair for ruptured SRAAAs and TAAAs, 18 of whom underwent ISF repair. Seventy-two percent of ISF patients were hypotensive before surgery, compared with 46% of the patients who underwent repair using non-ISF techniques (physician-modified endografts, parallel grafting, or double-barrel/reversed iliac branch device). The total procedural and fluoroscopy times were similar between the two groups despite a greater mean number of branch vessels incorporated with the ISF technique (3.1 vs 2.2 per patient, P = .015). In-hospital mortality was 19% for all ruptures and 25% for ruptures with hypotension. Compared with the non-ISF group, in-hospital mortality trended lower in the ISF group (11% vs 25%, P = .233), reaching statistical significance when comparing patients who presented with hypotension (8% vs 45%, P = .048). The rate of major adverse events was 57% across all techniques and did not significantly differ between the ISF and non-ISF groups, with postoperative renal dysfunction being the most frequent complication (48%). Overall, ISF became the most commonly used technique later in the study period. CONCLUSIONS: Although emergent endovascular repair of ruptured SRAAAs/TAAAs remains a challenge, a number of techniques are available for expeditious treatment. In this series, ISF was associated improve survival, including a fivefold reduction in mortality in patients presenting with hypotension, and has now become the dominant technique at our center. Despite these advantages, postoperative complications and reinterventions are common. Further experience and longer-term follow-up are needed to validate these initial results and assess durability.

Impact of Perioperative Blood Transfusion in Anemic Patients Undergoing Infra Inguinal Bypass.

OBJECTIVE: Patients who present with lower extremity ischemia are frequently anemic and the optimal transfusion threshold for this cohort remains controversial. We sought to evaluate the impact of blood transfusion on postoperative major adverse cardiac events (MACE), including myocardial infarction, dysrhythmia, stroke, congestive heart failure, and 30-day mortality for these patients. METHODS: All consecutive patients who underwent infra-inguinal bypass at our institution from 2011 to 2020 were included. Perioperative red blood cell transfusion was the primary exposure, and the primary outcome was MACE. Univariate and multivariable analyses were performed to assess the impact of patient and procedural variables, including red blood cell transfusion, stratified by hemoglobin (Hgb) nadir: <7, 7-8, and >8 g/dL. RESULTS: Of the 287 patients reviewed for analysis, 146 (50.9%) had a perioperative transfusion (mean: 1.6 ± 3 units). Patients who received a transfusion had a mean nadir Hgb of 8.3 ± 1.0 g/dL, compared to 10.1 ± 1.7 g/dL without a transfusion. The overall incidence of MACE was 15.7% (45 of 287 patients). Univariate analysis demonstrated that MACE was associated with blood transfusion (P = 0.009), lower Hgb nadir (P = 0.02), and higher blood loss (P = 0.003). On multivariate analysis, transfusion was independently associated with MACE for patients with a Hgb nadir >8 g/dL (OR: 3.09; P = 0.006), but not for patients with Hgb nadir 7-8 g/dL (OR: 0.818; P = 0.77). Additionally, patients with MACE had significantly longer length of hospital stay than for patients without (13 vs. 7.7 days, P = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: For patients undergoing infra-inguinal bypass, receiving a red blood cell transfusion with a Hgb nadir >8 g/dL was associated with a 3-fold increase in MACE, with nearly twice the length of stay. For patients with a Hgb 7-8 g/dL, transfusion did not increase or reduce the incidence of MACE. These findings suggest no benefit of blood transfusion for patients with Hgb nadir >7 g/dL and harm for Hgb >8 g/dL, however causation cannot be proven due to the retrospective nature of the study and randomized studies are needed to confirm or refute these findings.

Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus portends a poor prognosis after endovascular repair of mycotic aortic aneurysms and aortic graft infections.

OBJECTIVE: Mycotic aortic aneurysms and aortic graft infections (aortic infections [AIs]) are rare but highly morbid conditions. Open surgical repair is the "gold standard" treatment, but endovascular repair (EVR) is increasingly being used in the management of AI because of the lower operative morbidity. Multiple organisms are associated with AI, and bacteriology may be an important indication of mortality. We describe the bacteriology and associated outcomes of a group of patients treated with an EVR-first approach for AI. METHODS: All patients who underwent EVR for native aortic or aortic graft infections between 2005 and 2016 were retrospectively reviewed. Primary end points were 30-day mortality and overall mortality. The primary exposure variable was bacteria species. Logistic regression analysis was used to determine association with mortality. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was used to estimate survival. RESULTS: A total of 2038 EVRs were performed in 1989 unique and consecutive patients. Of those, 27 patients had undergone EVR for AI. Thirteen presented ruptured (48%). Eighteen (67%) were hemodynamically unstable. Ten had a gastrointestinal bleed (37%), whereas others presented with abdominal pain (33%), fever (22%), chest or back pain (18.5%), and hemothorax (3.7%). Twenty patients had a positive blood culture (74%), with the most common organism being methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) isolated in 37% (10). Other organisms were Escherichia coli (3), Staphylococcus epidermidis (2), Streptococcus (2), Enterococcus faecalis (1), vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus (1), and Klebsiella (1). Thirteen patients had 4 to 6 weeks of postoperative antibiotic therapy, six of whom died after therapy. Fourteen were prescribed lifelong therapy; 10 died while receiving antibiotics. On univariate analysis for mortality, smoking history (P = .061) and aerodigestive bleeding on presentation (P = .109) approached significance, whereas MRSA infection (P = .001) was strongly associated with increased mortality. On multivariate analysis, MRSA remained a strong, independent predictor of mortality (adjusted odds ratio, 93.2; 95% confidence interval, 1.9-4643; P = .023). Overall 30-day mortality was 11%, all MRSA positive. At mean follow-up of 17.4 ± 28 months, overall mortality was 59%. Overall survival at 1 year, 3 years, and 5 years was 49%, 31%, and 23%. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis demonstrated that MRSA-positive patients had a significantly lower survival compared with other pathogens (1-year, 20% vs 71%; 5-year, 0% vs 44%; P = .0009). CONCLUSIONS: In our series of AI, the most commonly isolated organism was MRSA. MRSA is highly virulent and is associated with increased mortality compared with all other organisms, regardless of treatment. Given our results, EVR for MRSA-positive AI was not a durable treatment option.

The financial value of vascular surgeons as operative consultants to other surgical specialties.

OBJECTIVE: Vascular surgeons provide assistance to other surgical specialties through planned and unplanned joint operative cases. The financial impact to the hospital of vascular surgeons as consultants in this context has yet to be quantified. We sought to quantify the financial value of services provided by consulting vascular surgeons in the performance of joint operative procedures, both planned and unplanned. METHODS: Hospital financial data were reviewed for all inpatient operative cases during a 3-year period (2013-2015). Cases in which a vascular surgeon provided operative assistance as a consultant to a nonvascular surgeon were identified and designated planned or unplanned. Contribution margin, defined as hospital revenue minus variable cost, was determined for each case. In addition, the contribution margin ratio (contribution margin divided by revenue) was determined for each cohort. Financial data for consulting cases was compared with all nonconsult cases. Data analysis was performed with nonparametric statistics. RESULTS: There were 208 cases with a primary nonvascular surgeon that required a vascular co-surgeon during the study period, 169 planned and 39 unplanned. For comparison, 19,594 nonconsult cases of other surgical specialties were identified. The median contribution margin was higher for vascular surgery consult cases compared with nonconsult cases ($14,406 [interquartile range, $63,192] vs $5491 [interquartile range $28,590]; P = .002). The overall contribution margin ratio was higher for vascular surgery consult cases (0.41) compared with control nonconsult cases (0.35). There was no difference in contribution margin and contribution margin ratio between planned and unplanned vascular surgery consult cases. CONCLUSIONS: Vascular surgeons provide essential operative assistance to other surgical specialties. This operative assistance is frequent and provides significant financial value, with high contribution margin and contribution margin ratio. Vascular surgeons, as consulting surgeons, enable the completion of highly complex cases and in this capacity provide significant financial value to the hospital.

Vascular surgery: An essential hospital resource in modern health care.

OBJECTIVE: In modern health care, vascular surgeons frequently serve as a unique resource to other surgical specialties for vascular exposure, repair, reconstruction, or control. These services occur both in planned and unplanned clinical settings. We analyzed the frequency, outcomes, and value of vascular services in this setting to other surgical specialties and the hospital. METHODS: Intraoperative planned and unplanned vascular surgery operative consultations were reviewed over a 3-year period (2013-2016). Patient demographics, requesting surgical specialty, indication and type of vascular intervention, and work relative value units generated were recorded. Univariate and multivariate analysis of factors affecting a composite outcome of in-hospital and 30-day mortality or morbidity, or both, was performed. RESULTS: Seventy-six vascular surgery intraoperative consultations were performed, of which 56% of the consultations were unplanned. The most common unplanned consultation was for bleeding (33%). The aorta and lower extremity were the most common vascular beds requiring vascular services. The mean work relative value units generated per vascular surgery intervention was 23.8. In-hospital and 30-day mortality was 9.2%. No difference in mortality and morbidity was found between planned and unplanned consultations. Factors associated with the composite mortality/morbidity outcome were coronary artery disease (P = .002), heart failure (P = .02), total operative blood loss (P = .009), consultation for limb ischemia (P = .013), and vascular consultation for the lower extremity (P = .01). On multivariate analysis, high operative blood loss (>5000 mL) remained significant (P = .04), and coronary artery disease approached significance (P = .06). CONCLUSIONS: The need for vascular surgery services is frequent, involves diverse vascular beds, and occurs commonly in an unplanned setting. When requested, vascular surgery services effectively facilitate the completion of the nonvascular procedure, even those associated with significant intraoperative blood loss. Vascular surgery services are essential to other surgical specialties and the hospital in today's modern health care environment.