Impact of fluoroscopic injection location on immediate and delayed pain relief in patients with greater trochanteric pain syndrome.

OBJECT: The purpose of this study was to assess whether fluoroscopically guided corticosteroid injections into the extrabursal tissues, trochanteric (subgluteus maximus) bursa, or subgluteus medius bursa provide better immediate and short-term pain relief. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All fluoroscopically guided corticosteroid injections performed over a 67-month period for greater trochanteric pain syndrome were retrospectively reviewed. Procedural images were reviewed by two musculoskeletal radiologists to determine the dominant injection site based on final needle positioning and contrast spread pattern, with discrepancies resolved by consensus. Statistical analysis of the association between pain score reduction and dominant injection site was performed. RESULTS: One hundred forty injections in 121 patients met the inclusion criteria. The immediate and 1-week post-injection pain reduction was statistically significant for trochanteric bursa, subgluteus medius bursa, and non-bursal injections. However, there was no statistically significant difference in the degree of pain reduction between the groups. There was statistically significant increase in the 1-week post-injection mean pain score compared with immediate post-injection mean pain score in the subgluteus medius bursa and non-bursal injection groups (p < 0.01) but not in the trochanteric bursa group. CONCLUSION: Fluoroscopy is frequently chosen over blind injection or ultrasound guidance for trochanteric steroid injections in patients with a high body mass index. Our results indicate that fluoroscopically guided steroid injections into the trochanteric bursa and subgluteus medius bursa significantly reduced immediate and 1-week post-injection pain scores, as do non-bursal injections. Steroid injection into the subgluteus medius bursa and non-bursal sites may be less effective in maintaining pain reduction at 1-week post-injection.

Effect of Clinical Decision Support on Appropriateness of Advanced Imaging Use Among Physicians-in-Training.

OBJECTIVE: Clinical decision support (CDS) tools have been shown to reduce inappropriate imaging orders. We hypothesized that CDS may be especially effective for house staff physicians who are prone to overuse of resources. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Our hospital implemented CDS for CT and MRI orders in the emergency department with scores based on the American College of Radiology's Appropriateness Criteria (range, 1-9; higher scores represent more-appropriate orders). Data on CT and MRI orders from April 2013 through June 2016 were categorized as pre-CDS or baseline, post-CDS period 1 (i.e., intervention with active feedback for scores of ≤ 4), and post-CDS period 2 (i.e., intervention with active feedback for scores of ≤ 6). Segmented regression analysis with interrupted time series data estimated changes in scores stratified by house staff and non-house staff. Generalized linear models further estimated the modifying effect of the house staff variable. RESULTS: Mean scores were 6.2, 6.2, and 6.7 in the pre-CDS, post-CDS 1, and post-CDS 2 periods, respectively (p < 0.05). In the segmented regression analysis, mean scores significantly (p < 0.05) increased when comparing pre-CDS versus post-CDS 2 periods for both house staff (baseline increase, 0.41; 95% CI, 0.17-0.64) and non-house staff (baseline increase, 0.58; 95% CI, 0.34-0.81), showing no differences in effect between the cohorts. The generalized linear model showed significantly higher scores, particularly in the post-CDS 2 period compared with the pre-CDS period (0.44 increase in scores; p < 0.05). The house staff variable did not significantly change estimates in the post-CDS 2 period. CONCLUSION: Implementation of active CDS increased overall scores of CT and MRI orders. However, there was no significant difference in effect on scores between house staff and non-house staff.