Phase II study of accelerated fractionation radiation therapy with carboplatin followed by PCV chemotherapy for the treatment of anaplastic gliomas.

PURPOSE: To conduct a Phase II one-arm study to evaluate the long-term efficacy and safety of accelerated fractionated radiotherapy combined with i.v. carboplatin for patients with previously untreated anaplastic gliomas. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Between 1988 and 1992, 90 patients received 1.9-2.0-Gy radiation 3 times a day with 2-h infusions of 33 g/m(2) carboplatin for two 5-day cycles separated by 2 weeks. After radiotherapy, patients received procarbazine, lomustine (CCNU), and vincristine (PCV) for 1 year or until the tumor progressed. RESULTS: Ninety patients were evaluable for analysis. Histologically, 69 had anaplastic astrocytoma; 14, anaplastic oligoastrocytoma; and 7, anaplastic oligodendroglioma. Gross total resection was performed in 20 (22%), subtotal resection in 45 (50%), and biopsy in 25 (28%); reoperation (total or subtotal resection) was performed in 50 (56%) patients. A multivariate analysis showed that a younger age (p = 0.026), Karnofsky performance score (KPS; p = 0.009), and brain necrosis (p = 0.0002) were predictive of a better survival. Results from analysis of extent of surgery (biopsy, subtotal resection, gross total resection) approached significance (p = 0.058). Radiation dose, irradiated tumor volume, and techniques used (boost and fields) were not significant variables. The median survival (MS) of all anaplastic glioma patients was 28.1 months; for anaplastic astrocytoma patients, MS was 28.7 months and 40.8 months for the combined anaplastic oligodendroglioma/oligoastrocytoma patients. Long-term survival occurred in 25% of anaplastic glioma patients who were alive 8.6 years after treatment was initiated. Treatment-induced necrosis was documented by surgery or autopsy in 19 (21%) patients; 21 (23%) had a mixed pattern of necrosis and tumor; and an additional 13 (14%) patients who did not have surgical or autopsy demonstration of predominant radiation necrosis had magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) evidence of radiation necrosis. Serious clinical neurologic deterioration and/or dementia requiring full-time caregiver attention were observed in 9 (10%) patients. CONCLUSION: When comparable selection criteria are applied, the rate of MS in this study is inferior to results attainable with current radiation and chemotherapy approaches, although the rates of long-term survival are comparable. Theoretically, patients failing therapy and dying earlier than anticipated may be because of excessive central nervous system (CNS) toxicity resulting from the combination of accelerated fractionated irradiation, intensive carboplatin chemotherapy before each radiation fraction, and postirradiation PCV chemotherapy. On the other hand, patients with treatment-induced necrosis survived significantly longer than patients who did not demonstrate MRI or histologic evidence of necrosis (MS, 106 months vs. 18-33 months).

Malignant gliomas: MR imaging spectrum of radiation therapy- and chemotherapy-induced necrosis of the brain after treatment.

PURPOSE: To describe both the common and less frequently encountered magnetic resonance (MR) imaging features of radiation therapy- and chemotherapy-induced brain injury, with particular emphasis on radiation necrosis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A cohort of 148 adult patients underwent surgical resection of malignant brain (glial) tumors and were subsequently entered into a research protocol that consisted of accelerated radiation therapy with carboplatin followed by chemotherapy with procarbazine, lomustine, and vincristine. Patients typically underwent sequential MR imaging at 6-8-week intervals during the 1st year and at 3-6-month intervals during subsequent years. In all patients, histopathologic confirmation of lesion composition was performed by board-certified neuropathologists. RESULTS: The patients exhibited different types of MR imaging-detected abnormalities of the brain: pure radiation necrosis in 20 patients, a mixture of predominantly radiation necrosis with limited recurrent and/or residual tumor (less than 20% of resected tissue) in 16 patients, radiation necrosis of the cranial nerves and/or their pathways in two patients, radiation-induced enhancement of the white matter in 52 patients, and radiation-induced enhancement of the cortex in nine patients. CONCLUSION: The frequent diagnostic dilemma of recurrent neoplasm versus radiation necrosis is addressed in this study through a description of the varying spatial and temporal patterns of radiation necrosis at MR imaging.

Stereotactic radiosurgery for brain metastases: results and prognostic factors.

This study was conducted to determine prognostic factors for tumor response and patient survival after stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for brain metastasis. Eighty-four patients with brain metastasis underwent SRS at a single institution. After fixation of the head with a stereotactic frame, computed tomography treatment planning was performed. The metastatic lesion was treated with multiple arcs to a median dose of 19 Gy. Forty-seven patients (56%) had a solitary brain lesion. Fifty-nine patients (70%) had evidence of extracranial disease at the time of SRS. The median survival duration from SRS was 7 months. Sixty-three percent of the patients had an objective radiographic response to SRS, which in turn was associated with superior central nervous system control. Age, collimator size, number of arcs, tumor location, and histology did not influence objective response rates. Patients who had a solitary lesion or who received treatment within 2 weeks after diagnosis were more likely to have an objective response than were those who did not (P < 0.05). Progressive brain disease accounted for 37% of the deaths. Nineteen patients (23%) had an in-field relapse. Four severe complications were attributed to SRS. This study confirms the role of SRS as an acceptable treatment option for patients with solitary or limited brain metastases. Int. J. Cancer (Radiat. Oncol. Invest.) 90, 157-162 (2000).

A phase II trial of high-dose bromodeoxyuridine with accelerated fractionation radiotherapy followed by procarbazine, lomustine, and vincristine for glioblastoma multiforme.

PURPOSE: To conduct a Phase II study to evaluate the long-term efficacy and safety of high-dose 5'-bromodeoxyuridine (BrdU) and accelerated radiotherapy followed by procarbazine, lomustine (CCNU), and vincristine (PCV) chemotherapy in patients with glioblastoma multiforme. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Between 1994 and 1996, 88 patients were enrolled to receive 1.9 Gy of radiation three times a day for two 5-day cycles separated by 2 weeks; each 5-day cycle was preceded by a continuous 96-hour infusion of BrdU at a dose of 2.1 g/m2/day. After radiotherapy, patients received PCV chemotherapy. RESULTS: Median survival for all 88 patients was 50 weeks. Seventy (79.5 %) received one or more courses of PCV; their median survival was 57 weeks. Covariates predictive of improved survival were gross total versus subtotal resection or biopsy (p = 0.0048) and radiation dose > or = 56 Gy (p = 0.019). While receiving BrdU, 47 patients (53%) suffered grade 3 or 4 thrombocytopenia or leukopenia; 22 patients (25%) suffered grade 3 or 4 dermatologic toxicity. CONCLUSION: Survival was not extended in patients with glioblastoma or gliosarcoma who received BrdU at the dose and administration schedule used in this study. The BrdU dose used in this study resulted in substantial myelosuppressive and dermatologic toxicity.

Non-metastatic Ewing's sarcoma: twenty years of experience suggests that surgery is a prime factor for successful multimodality therapy.

Eighty-five patients (37 female, 48 male; median age 14 years) with non-metastatic Ewing's sarcoma received definitive treatment at the University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center between 1969 and 1988. Multidisciplinary therapy was administered as follows: combination chemotherapy (CC) and local radiotherapy (XRT): 65 patients; CC, XRT and surgery, 19 patients; and XRT and surgery, 1 patient. This permitted a 10-20 year follow-up for 75% of our patients. The overall survival at 5 and 10-20 years was 46.1%, and 37.2%, respectively. At 5 years, 80.5% of live patients had control of local disease. The influence of sex, age, ethnicity, primary site, size, lactic dehydrogenase (LDH) level, presence or absence of systemic symptoms, and XRT dose (<60 Gy and

Brain metastases as the only manifestation of an undetected primary tumor.

BACKGROUND: The prognosis of patients with brain metastasis as the only manifestation of an undetected primary tumor generally is considered to be poor. Therefore, most treatment is palliative. The authors reviewed the clinical outcomes and treatment results of patients presenting with brain metastasis from an undetected primary tumor at The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center. METHODS: Between 1977-1996, 220 patients were referred to the study department for the treatment of brain metastasis from an undetected primary tumor. The patients' records were reviewed to identify those for whom brain metastasis was the only manifestation of the primary tumor. The majority of patients were excluded from the current analysis because extracranial metastasis also were present. Thirty-nine patients qualified for this retrospective review. The level of neurosurgical excision varied, but all patients received radiotherapy. Tumor control in the brain and survival were analyzed by various tumor-related and treatment-related factors. RESULTS: In 31 patients, the brain metastasis were adenocarcinomas, whereas the remaining patients had tumors of various other histologies. In 12 patients, the primary tumor eventually was found, most commonly in the lung. The median survival time for all patients was 13.4 months. Overall survival rates (OS) at 1, 3, and 5 years were 56%, 19%, and 15%, respectively. Intracranial disease control was 72% at 5 years. Patients who received gross total resection (GTR) and radiotherapy had significantly better OS than patients who received radiotherapy alone. The OS of patients whose primary tumor was identified was similar to that of patients in whom the primary tumor remained occult. CONCLUSIONS: Brain metastasis as the only manifestation of an unknown primary tumor is a distinct clinical entity. The prognosis for patients with this presentation is better than that of patients with brain metastasis in general. Although the majority of patients die of extracranial disease, a few will achieve long term survival. Treatment to the brain is effective in controlling local disease; aggressive treatment with GTR and radiotherapy is recommended.

Outcomes of high-dose unilateral kidney irradiation in patients with gastric lymphoma.

PURPOSE: To review the long-term clinical effects of unilateral kidney irradiation on overall renal function and blood pressure in patients with gastric lymphoma. METHODS AND MATERIALS: In the study were 27 patients with Stage I or II gastric lymphoma who had undergone irradiation of at least 24 Gy to > or = 1/3 of the left kidney. They include 16 women and 11 men, aged 31 to 77, with a mean age of 57.6 years (median 56). Fifteen patients had Stage I and 12 had Stage II disease. In 13 patients the whole kidney had been irradiated, and 14 had had partial kidney irradiation, at doses ranging between 24 and 40.5 Gy. All patients received combined chemotherapy with various drugs: all patients received corticosteroids, and five received cis-platinum. Their follow-up ranged between 0.7 and 7.8 years (mean 3.4 years). Data on possible effects of the treatment on blood pressure, renal function as assessed by blood urea and creatinine, and kidney shrinkage as seen by serial computed tomography scanning were collected on all patients. RESULTS: Three patients had persistent, mild elevations of urea and creatinine levels, which did not require special treatment. All three also received cis-platinum. Ipsilateral kidney shrinkage was evident in most patients. In 19 patients the craniocaudal measurement of the kidney shrank by > or = 1.6 cm. Shrinkage in other dimensions was also evident. The degree of atrophy was related to the volume of kidney irradiated. Only two patients developed hypertension, both at a low level of 150/90; one patient had had 40 Gy to the whole kidney, the other 40 Gy to half the kidney. Neither patient had elevated urea or creatinine. CONCLUSIONS: Notwithstanding the shrinkage to the irradiated part of the kidney, the treatment did not lead to clinically significant hypertension or renal dysfunction. The administration of cis-platinum to patients with gastric lymphoma that requires kidney irradiation should be further evaluated.

External radiation of brain metastases from renal carcinoma: a retrospective study of 119 patients from the M. D. Anderson Cancer Center.

PURPOSE: Approximately 10% of patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma are diagnosed with brain metastases. Most of these patients receive palliative radiotherapy and die of progressive brain metastatic disease. This retrospective study examines the M. D. Anderson Cancer Center experience with such patients who received only whole brain radiation therapy (WBRT). METHODS AND MATERIALS: Records of 200 patients with brain metastases from renal carcinoma who were treated at M. D. Anderson Cancer Center between 1976 and 1993 were reviewed. Of these patients, 119 received WBRT only and constitute the basis of this study. Different prognostic factors were analyzed. RESULTS: Overall median survival time from diagnosis of the brain metastases was 4.4 months. Multiple brain tumors were treated in 70 patients (58.8%) who had a survival of 3.0 months compared with 4.4 months for patients having a single brain metastasis (p = 0.043). Among 117 patients the causes of death were neurologic in 90 (76%), systemic cancer in 19 (16%), and unknown in 9 (8%). Survival rates at 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years, were 33.6, 16.8, and 5.9%, respectively. Patients in whom brain metastases were diagnosed synchronously with a renal primary (n = 24) had a median survival time of 3.4 months compared with 3.2 months for those 95 who were diagnosed metachronously (p < 0.79, NS). In the Cox multivariate analysis of 13 possible prognostic factors, only a single brain metastasis (p = 0.0329), lack of distant metastases at the time of diagnosis (p = 0.0056), and tumor diameter < or = 2 cm (p < 0.0016) were statistically significant. CONCLUSION: These unsatisfactory results with WBRT suggest that more aggressive approaches, such as surgery or radiosurgery should be applied whenever possible.

Comparison of miniature multileaf collimation (MMLC) with circular collimation for stereotactic treatment.

PURPOSE: A prototype Miniature Multi-Leaf Collimator (MMLC) designed specifically for radiosurgery and small field radiotherapy has been fabricated and evaluated at the University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center (UTMDACC). This work demonstrates the advantages of a computer-controlled MMLC vs. conventional circular collimation for the treatment of an irregularly shaped target volume in the brain. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Two patient treatments were selected for this comparison from 38 intracranial tumors treated with radiosurgery at UTMDACC from 8/6/91 to 5/10/94. Target contours and critical structures defined for one of the patients was used to create a simulated target volume and critical structures in a spherical head phantom. Computer simulations were performed using traditional single isocenter treatment with a circular collimator for a set of six arcs. The same arc paths were used to compute the dose distribution for the MMLC and conformed beam geometries were defined using a three-dimensional (3D) treatment planning system with beam's eye view capabilities. Then, the calculated dose distribution for a single isocenter, conformal treatment was delivered to the spherical head phantom under static conditions by shaping the MMLC to conform the target volume shape projected as a function of couch rotation and gantry angle. Planar dose distributions through the target volume were measured using therapy verification film located in the phantom. The measurements were used to verify that the 3D treatment planning system was capable of simulating the MMLC technique. For the second patient with a peanut-shaped tumor, the 3D treatment planning calculations were used to compare dose distributions for the MMLC and for traditional single and multiple isocenter treatments using circular collimators. The resulting integral dose-volume histograms (DVHs) for the target volume, normal brain, and critical structures for the three treatment techniques were compared. RESULTS: (a) Analysis of the film dosimetry data exemplified the degree of conformation of the high-dose region to the target shape that is possible with a computer-controlled MMLC. (b) Comparison of measured and calculated dose distributions indicates that the 3D treatment planning system can simulate the MMLC treatment. (c) Comparison of DVHs from the single isocenter MMLC and circular collimator treatments shows similar coverage of the target volume with increased dose to the brain for circular collimation (4). Comparison of DVHs from the single isocenter MMLC with the multiple isocenter circular collimator treatment approach shows a more inhomogeneous dose distribution through the target volume and increased dose to the brain for the latter. CONCLUSION: Dosimetry data for single isocenter treatments using computer-controlled field shaping with a MMLC demonstrate the ability to conform the dose distribution to an irregularly shaped target volume. DVHs validated that the single isocenter MMLC treatment is preferable to both single and multiple isocenter, circular collimator treatment because it provides a more uniform dose distribution to an irregularly shaped target volume and reduces the dose to surrounding brain tissue for the example cases.

Radiotherapy for meningiomas.

Because of a substantial overall recurrence rate of meningiomas, the role of surgery as the sole treatment for every case must be evaluated. Also, occasionally, the patient's age and/or the location of the tumor precludes considering him/her as a candidate for surgery. In these instances, radiotherapy or radiosurgery may be advisable. The article presents two cases treated at M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, those of a 65-year-old male with a tumor in the left temporal lobe and 74-year-old female with a tumor in the right petroclival region. It also reviews the roles that radiotherapy plays in treating patients with meningiomas. Retrospective analyses of outcomes provide ample evidence that conventional radiation after incomplete resection reduces the incidence of progression of tumor over a long period. Information on patients who have had only external radiation is meager, since most patients have at least a partial resection. Complete resection for benign meningiomas is sufficient. For malignant meningiomas, adjuvant radiation should be administered, regardless of the extent of surgical excision. When surgery poses a high risk of morbidity or mortality, radiation therapy and radiosurgery are promising alternatives.

Phase II study of accelerated fractionation radiation therapy with carboplatin followed by vincristine chemotherapy for the treatment of glioblastoma multiforme.

PURPOSE: To conduct a Phase II one-arm study to evaluate the long-term efficacy and safety of accelerated fractionated radiotherapy combined with intravenous carboplatin for patients with previously untreated glioblastoma multiforme tumors. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Between 1988 and 1992, 83 patients received 1.9-2.0 Gy radiation three times a day with 2-h infusions of 33 mg/m2 carboplatin for two 5-day cycles separated by 2 weeks; following radiotherapy, patients received procarbazine, lomustine (CCNU), and vincristine (PCV) for 1 year or until tumor progressed. RESULTS: Eighty-three patients were evaluable for analysis. Seventy-four of the 83 patients (89%) received one or more courses of PCV; their median survival was 55 weeks. Total resection was performed in 20% (15 of 74), subtotal resection in 69% (51 of 74), and biopsy in 11% (8 of 74); reoperation (total or subtotal resection) was performed in 28 patients (37%). Survival was worst for those > or = 61 year old (median 35 weeks). Fits of the Cox proportional hazards regression model showed covariates individually predictive of improved survival were younger age (p < 0.01), smaller log of radiation volume (p = 0.008), total or subtotal resection vs. biopsy (p = 0.056), and higher Karnofsky performance status (p = 0.055). A multivariate analysis showed that age (p = 0.013) and extent of initial surgery (p = 0.003) together were predictive of a better survival with no other variables providing additional significance. Only 8.4% (7 of 83) of patients had clinically documented therapy-associated neurotoxicity ("radiation necrosis"). CONCLUSION: When comparable selection criteria were applied, the survival in this study is similar to the results currently attainable with other chemoradiation approaches. The relative safety of accelerated fractionated radiotherapy, as used in this study with carboplatin, enables concomitant full-dose administration of chemotherapy or radiosensitizing agents in glioblastoma multiforme patients.

Randomized phase I/II trial of two variants of accelerated fractionated radiotherapy regimens for advanced head and neck cancer: results of RTOG 88-09.

PURPOSE: To establish the feasibility of performing split-course accelerated hyperfractionation (AHFX-S) and concomitant boost accelerated fractionation radiotherapy (AFX-C) for advanced head and neck cancer in a multi-institutional cooperative trial setting and to evaluate the tumor clearance rate and acute and late toxicity of these fractionation schedules. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Between February 1989 and January 1990, 75 patients with Stage III or IV squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck were randomized to receive: (a) AHFX-S: 1.6 Gy/fraction, twice daily (6-h interval), 5 days/week, to a total dose of 67.2 Gy/42 fractions/6 weeks, with a 2-week rest after 38.4 Gy; or (b) AFX-C: 1.8 Gy/fraction/day, 5 daily fractions/week to 54 Gy/30 fractions/6 weeks to a large field and 1.5 Gy/fraction/day to a boost field, 6 h after large field treatment during the last 11 treatment days, to a total dose of 70.5 Gy/41 fractions/6 weeks. Acute and late toxicities were scored according to the RTOG normal tissue reaction scales and tumor clearance was evaluated at completion of therapy and at regular intervals thereafter. RESULTS: Of the 70 analyzable patients, 38 received AHFX-S and 32 received AFX-C. The two arms were balanced with respect to sex, age, T-stage, and Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS). However, the AHFX-S arm had a higher proportion of oropharyngeal primaries (63% vs. 44%), and Stage IV disease (82% vs. 50%) and lower proportion of oral cavity lesions (3% vs. 22%) and N0 disease (16% vs. 31%) than the AFX-C arm. The median follow-up was 2 years (range: 0.03-4.87 years). Tolerance of both variants of accelerated fractionated radiotherapy was satisfactory. There was no significant difference in local-regional control, disease-free survival, or survival between the two arms. The 2-year local-regional failure rate, survival, and disease-free survival was 50, 50, and 40%, respectively, for the entire group of patients. Acute radiation mucositis was increased in both arms. There was no significant difference in the incidence of grade 3 acute toxicities (63% vs. 56%) and grade 3 (14% vs. 14%) or grade 4 (6% vs. 17%) late toxicities. Permanent grade 4 late toxicity was observed in 6 and 7% of the patients, respectively. CONCLUSION: Results of this randomized Phase I/II trial showed that the two accelerated fractionated schedules studied can be successfully given in a multi-institutional cooperative trial. There was no significant difference in acute or late toxicities, local-regional control, disease-free survival, or survival in this small scale study. Therefore, a Phase III trial comparing the relative efficacy of these two accelerated fractionation schedules against standard fractionation and hyperfractionation has been activated.

Fast-neutron therapy in advanced head and neck cancer: a collaborative international randomized trial.

PURPOSE: To compare the efficacy of fast-neutron radiotherapy with that of conventionally fractionated photon therapy in the management of patients with locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Patients with Stage III or IV disease were randomized to receive either 20.4 Gy/12 fractions/4 weeks of neutrons or 70 Gy/35 fractions/7 weeks of photons (control). Between April 1986 and March 1991, 178 patients were entered, 169 of whom were eligible for analysis. The treatment arms were balanced for age, stage, and performance status, but not for primary site of origin. RESULTS: Complete response occurred in 70 and 52% with neutrons and photons, respectively (p = 0.006). Local regional failure at 3 years for all patients was 63% for neutrons and 68% for photons. Actuarial overall survival curves were virtually identical in both study arms, falling to 27% at 3 years. Acute toxicity was similar in the two arms, but late grade 3-5 toxicity was 40% with neutrons compared to 18% with photons (p = 0.008). CONCLUSION: Although the initial response rate was higher with neutrons, permanent local control and survival were not improved, and the incidence of late normal tissue toxicity was increased. As a result, fast-neutron therapy for advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck can only be recommended for patients in whom the logistic benefit of treatment in 12 sessions over 4 weeks outweighs the increased risk of late toxicity.

MR of toxic effects of accelerated fractionation radiation therapy and carboplatin chemotherapy for malignant gliomas.

PURPOSE: To present MR findings of parenchymal brain injury after accelerated fractionation radiation therapy combined with carboplatin chemotherapy in the treatment of malignant brain gliomas. METHODS: Eighty-one evaluable subjects in an ongoing treatment protocol for malignant gliomas form the patient base for this report. After surgical resection of tumors, patients underwent a course of accelerated fractionation radiation therapy to a total dose of 60 Gy. Carboplatin was infused intravenously before each radiation treatment. Precontrast and postcontrast MR scans were obtained before treatment and at 4-week intervals afterward and were analyzed retrospectively. RESULTS: Posttreatment MR imaging in 20 of the 81 patients showed development of unusual parenchymal lesions or enlarging masses needing debulking, and these patients underwent second operations. Two groups emerged: those with tumor and necrotic brain (n = 11) and those with necrosis and reactive gliosis but no definitive tumor (n = 9). Enhancing lesions in the tumor-negative group appeared later than those in the tumor-positive group, were often multiple, and were usually located several centimeters away from the tumor resection site or even contralaterally. Common locations were the corpus callosum and corticomedullary junctions. Lesions in the tumor-positive group were more often solitary and located immediately adjacent to the surgical site. Positive and negative results of positron emission tomography with fludeoxyglucose F 18 were obtained in both groups. The incidence of brain necrosis without associated tumor was 11%. CONCLUSIONS: A pattern of unusual enhancing parenchymal brain lesions was seen on MR imaging after accelerated fractionation radiation therapy and concomitant carboplatin chemotherapy. The abnormalities seem more extensive than focal necrotic lesions on enhanced CT or MR imaging after conventional radiation therapy, and they may mimic recurrent tumor.

Photon versus fast neutron external beam radiotherapy in the treatment of locally advanced prostate cancer: results of a randomized prospective trial.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the effectiveness of fast neutron radiation therapy in treatment of locally advanced carcinomas of the prostate. METHODS AND MATERIALS: From April 1986 to October 1990, 178 patients were entered on a prospective, multi-institutional randomized study of the NCI-sponsored Neutron Therapy Collaborative Working Group. This trial compared external beam photon irradiation (7000-7020 cGy) with external beam neutron irradiation (2040 ncGy) for patients with high-grade T2 or T3-4, N0-1, M0 adenocarcinomas of the prostate. Eighty-nine patients were randomized to each treatment. Six patients were subsequently judged to be ineligible, leaving 85 photon and 87 neutron randomized patients eligible for analysis. RESULTS: With a follow-up time ranging from 40 to 86 months (68 months median follow-up) the 5-year actuarial clinical local-regional failure rate for patients treated with neutrons was 11%, vs. 32% for photons (p < 0.01). Incorporating the results of routine posttreatment prostate biopsies, the resulting "histological" local-regional tumor failure rates were 13% for neutrons vs. 32% for photons (p = 0.01). To date, actuarial survival and cause-specific survival rates are statistically indistinguishable for the two patient cohorts, with 32% of the neutron-treated patient deaths and 41% of the photon-treated patient deaths caused by prostate cancer (p = n.s.). Prostate specific antigen (PSA) values were elevated in 17% of neutron-treated patients and 45% of photon-treated patients at 5 years (p < 0.001). Severe late complications of treatment were higher for the neutron-treated patients (11% vs. 3%), and were inversely correlated with the degree of neutron beam shaping available at the participating institutions. Neutron treatment delivery utilizing a fully rotational gantry and multileaf collimator did not result in an increase in severe late effects when compared to photon treatment. CONCLUSION: High energy fast neutron radiotherapy is safe and effective when adequate beam delivery systems and collimation are available, and it is significantly superior to external beam photon radiotherapy in the local-regional treatment of large prostate tumors.

Neutron vs. photon radiation therapy for inoperable regional non-small cell lung cancer: results of a multicenter randomized trial.

PURPOSE: To determine, with a prospective, multicenter randomized study, whether fast neutron radiation therapy improves the outcome for patients with non-small cell lung cancer, as compared to conventional photon radiotherapy. METHODS AND MATERIALS: From September 1986 to March 1991, a total of 200 patients with inoperable regional non-small cell lung cancer were randomized to 20.4 Gy in 12 fractions with neutrons versus 66 Gy in 33 fractions with photons. Inoperable patients with Radiation Therapy Oncology Group Stages I, II, III, or IV(M0) disease, Karnofsky Performance Score > or = 70, and who had received no previous therapy for their non-small cell lung cancer were eligible for the study. Of the 200 patients randomized, a total of 193 patients, 99 on the neutron arm and 94 on the photon arm, were eligible for analysis. The two treatment groups were balanced with regards to prognostic factors. At the time of this analysis, the median at-risk follow-up was 33 months, with a minimum follow-up of 16 months. RESULTS: No difference in overall survival was observed; however, there was a statistically significant improvement in survival for patients with squamous cell histology (p = 0.02), and a trend toward improved survival for those with favorable prognostic factors (i.e., patients who were not T4, N3, and had no pleural effusion or weight loss > 5% from baseline) (p = 0.15), favoring the neutron-treated group. With the exception of skin and subcutaneous changes, acute and late toxicity was similar in both arms. CONCLUSION: In selected patients with inoperable regional non-small cell lung cancer (e.g., squamous cell histology, favorable prognostic factors), fast neutron irradiation provides a therapeutic benefit over conventional photon radiotherapy.

Neutron versus photon irradiation for unresectable salivary gland tumors: final report of an RTOG-MRC randomized clinical trial. Radiation Therapy Oncology Group. Medical Research Council.

PURPOSE: To compare the efficacy of fast neutron radiotherapy versus conventional photon and/or electron radiotherapy for unresectable, malignant salivary gland tumors a randomized clinical trial comparing was sponsored by the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group in the United States and the Medical Research Council in Great Britain. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Eligibility criteria included either inoperable primary or recurrent major or minor salivary gland tumors. Patients were stratified by surgical status (primary vs. recurrent), tumor size (less than or greater than 5 cm), and histology (squamous or malignant mixed versus other). After a total of 32 patients were entered onto this study, it appeared that the group receiving fast neutron radiotherapy had a significantly improved local/regional control rate and also a borderline improvement in survival and the study was stopped earlier than planned for ethical reasons. Twenty-five patients were study-eligible and analyzable. RESULTS: Ten-year follow-up data for this study is presented. On an actuarial basis, there continues to be a statistically-significant p = 0.009) but there is no improvement in overall survival (15% vs. 25%, p = n.s.). Patterns of failure are analyzed and it is shown that distant metastases account for the majority of failures on the neutron arm and local/regional failures account for the majority of failures on the photon arm. Long-term, treatment-related morbidity is analyzed and while the incidence of morbidity graded "severe" was greater on the neutron arm, there was no significant difference in "life-threatening" complications. This work is placed in the context of other series of malignant salivary gland tumors treated with definitive radiotherapy. CONCLUSIONS: Fast neutron radiotherapy appears to be the treatment-of-choice for patients with inoperable primary of recurrent malignant salivary gland tumors.

Fast neutron radiotherapy for locally advanced prostate cancer. Final report of Radiation Therapy Oncology Group randomized clinical trial.

Between June 1977 and April 1983 the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) sponsored a Phase III randomized trial investigating the use of fast neutron radiotherapy for patients with locally advanced (Stages C and D1) adenocarcinoma of the prostate gland. Patients were randomized to receive either conventional photon radiation or fast neutron radiation used in a mixed-beam (neutron/photon) treatment schedule. A total of 91 analyzable patients were entered into the study, and the two patient groups were balanced with respect to the major prognostic variables. Actuarial curves are presented for local/regional control and "overall" survival. Ten-year results for clinically assessed local control are 70% for the mixed-beam group versus 58% for the photon group (p = 0.03) and for survival are 46% for the mixed-beam group versus 29% for the photon group (p = 0.04). This study suggests that a regional method of treatment can influence both local tumor control and survival in patients with locally advanced adenocarcinoma of the prostate gland.

Evaluation of the dose for postoperative radiation therapy of head and neck cancer: first report of a prospective randomized trial.

PURPOSE: This study was designed to determine in a prospective randomized trial the optimal dose of conventionally fractionated postoperative radiotherapy for advanced head and neck cancer in relation to clinical and pathologic risk factors. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Between January 1983 and March 1991, 302 patients were enrolled on the study. This analysis is based on the first 240 patients entered through September 1989, of whom 221 (92%) had AJC Stage III or IV cancers of the oral cavity, oropharynx, hypopharynx, or larynx. The patients were stratified by postulated risk factors and randomized to one of three dose levels ranging between 52.2 Gy and 68.4 Gy, all given in daily doses of 1.8 Gy. Patients receiving > 57.6 Gy had a field reduction at this dose level such that boosts were only given to sites of increased risk. RESULTS: The overall crude and actuarial 2-year local-regional recurrence rates were 25.4% and 26%, respectively. Patients who received a dose of < or = 54 Gy had a significantly higher primary failure rate than those receiving > or = 57.6 Gy (p = 0.02). No significant dose response could be demonstrated above 57.6 Gy except for patients with extracapsular nodal disease in the neck in whom the recurrence rate was significantly higher at 57.6 Gy than at > or = 63 Gy. Analysis of prognostic factors predictive of local-regional recurrence showed that the only variable of independent significance was extracapsular nodal disease. However, clusters of two or more of the following risk factors were associated with a progressively increased risk of recurrence: oral cavity primary, mucosal margins close or positive, nerve invasion, > or = 2 positive lymph nodes, largest node > 3 cm, treatment delay greater than 6 weeks, and Zubrod performance status > or = 2. Moderate to severe complications of combined treatment occurred in 7.1% of patients; these were more frequent in patients who received > or = 63 Gy. CONCLUSION: With daily fractions of 1.7 Gy, a minimum tumor dose of 57.6 Gy to the whole operative bed should be delivered with a boost of 63 Gy being given to sites of increased risk, especially regions of the neck where extracapsular nodal disease is present. Treatment should be started as soon as possible after surgery. Dose escalation above 63 Gy at 1.8 Gy per day does not appear to improve the therapeutic ratio.

Tinea corporis confined to irradiated skin. Radiation port dermatophytosis.

BACKGROUND: Radiation port dermatophytosis (RPD) is an uncommon condition in which patients receiving radiation therapy concurrently have tinea corporis that is confined primarily to the irradiated skin. METHODS: The case of a 33-year-old man is reported who was receiving cobalt-60 radiation therapy for a nasopharyngeal carcinoma. During therapy, a dermatophyte infection developed in the treated field. RESULTS: Including this patient, there have been only three cases of RPD reported in the world literature. The clinical characteristics of patients with RPD are reviewed. The diagnosis, management, and pathogenesis of this condition are discussed. CONCLUSIONS: Because the cutaneous manifestations of RPD may be misinterpreted clinically as acute radiation-induced dermatitis, this condition may be more prevalent than the paucity of published reports suggests.