Pharmacological treatment of COPD - New evidence.

Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) is currently the 4th leading cause of death worldwide but is projected to be the 3rd leading cause of death by 2020. In Portugal, the estimated prevalence of COPD in the Lisbon region is 14.2%, and a large proportion of underdiagnosed disease has been detected. In 2016, a Portuguese panel of experts proposed pharmacological treatment approaches to COPD based on the evidence available at the time. However, given that the GOLD 2017 report introduced considerable changes to the 2016 version, and that new evidence has emerged regarding treatment options, these proposals need to be updated. Also, and based on several studies, the concept of Pre-GOLD patients, which has diagnostic, prognostic and therapeutic implications, is introduced, along with a proposed algorithm for the identification and treatment of these patients.

COPD: A stepwise or a hit hard approach?

Current guidelines differ slightly on the recommendations for treatment of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) patients, and although there are some undisputed recommendations, there is still debate regarding the management of COPD. One of the hindrances to deciding which therapeutic approach to choose is late diagnosis or misdiagnosis of COPD. After a proper diagnosis is achieved and severity assessed, the choice between a stepwise or "hit hard" approach has to be made. For GOLD A patients the stepwise approach is recommended, whilst for B, C and D patients this remains debatable. Moreover, in patients for whom inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) are recommended, a step-up or "hit hard" approach with triple therapy will depend on the patient's characteristics and, for patients who are being over-treated with ICS, ICS withdrawal should be performed, in order to optimize therapy and reduce excessive medications. This paper discusses and proposes stepwise, "hit hard", step-up and ICS withdrawal therapeutic approaches for COPD patients based on their GOLD group. We conclude that all approaches have benefits, and only a careful patient selection will determine which approach is better, and which patients will benefit the most from each approach.

Infliximab for treating sarcoidosis patients, Portuguese experience.

Despite aggressive treatment, sarcoidosis may be debilitating and progressive. The role of tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-a in the genesis of granulomas is ambiguous. It has proven to be critical in the formation and maintenance of granulomatous inflammation and its antagonist, Infliximab, has therefore been used with success in the treatment of patients with sarcoidosis. There are, however, reports of onset of sarcoidosis in patients in treatment for other conditions and that had no outbursts before submission to this therapy. We used Infliximab in the treatment of patients with sarcoidosis who either didn't respond to corticosteroids and other conventional drugs or developed unacceptable side effects to these drugs. The initial dose was 5mg/Kg body weight and subsequent doses were given at weeks 2, 4 and then every other 8 weeks for a total period of one year. We treated ten patients with biopsy proven sarcoidosis, five men and five women, with a mean age of 47.1 years ranging from 28 to 63 years of age. Three patients had severe neurological symptoms, two had hepatic cirrhosis, one had granulomatous inflammation of the lachrymal gland and had already been submitted to many surgeries, one had extensive pulmonary involvement (stage III), one had disfiguring lupus pernio and two presented disabling cutaneous nodules. In four patients the dosage of corticosteroids or other immunosuppressive drugs was suspended, in three the dosage was reduced and in one, corticosteroids were added to the Infliximab therapy. In five of the patients there was a significant improvement. One of the patients with neurological symptoms displayed a complete recovery, while another had significant improvement of vision deficit enabling her to read again. Two patients withdrew from therapy, one due to lack of improvement of neurological symptoms and the other due to the onset of organizing pneumonia spawned by Infliximab. Two patients developed anti-histone antibodies during treatment. Infliximab seems effective in treating patients who are either refractory or develop side effects to a standard regimen of corticosteroids and immunosuppressive agents. These patients, treated with Infliximab, should be under tight surveillance in order to quickly identify possible secondary effects.

[Malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors: A case report]. / Tumor maligno da bainha dos nervos periféricos do pulmão: A propósito de um caso clínico.

Malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors comprehend a rare group of soft tissue sarcomas that tend to occur in patients with neurofibromatosis type 1 or several years after radiotherapy treatments. Its thoracic localization is a very unusual entity. The typical symptoms are due to nerve roots compression which can persist for several months or years before diagnosis. Due to very few patients with this type of tumor its therapeutic approach is still a matter of permanent debate, being surgery the main treatment. This tumor has a bad prognosis because of high local recurrence and metastasis. The clinical case we describe serves as a glimpse for discussion.