ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The role and optimal sequence of ventricular tachycardia (VT) induction, mapping, and ablation when combined with substrate modification is unclear. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to test the benefits of starting the scar-related VT ablation procedure with substrate modification vs the standard protocol of VT induction, mapping, and ablation as the first step. METHODS: Forty-eight consecutive patients with structural heart disease and clinical VTs were randomized to simplified substrate ablation procedure with scar dechanneling as the first step (group 1, n = 24) or standard procedure with VT induction, mapping, and ablation followed by scar dechanneling (group 2, n = 24). Procedure and fluoroscopy times, the need for external cardioversion, acute results, and VT recurrence during follow-up were compared between groups. RESULTS: Thirty-seven patients had ischemic cardiomyopathy, 10 nonischemic cardiomyopathy, and 1 arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy. Before substrate ablation, 32 VTs were induced and targeted for ablation in 23 patients of group 2. Procedure time (209 ± 70 minutes vs 262 ± 63 minutes; P = .009), fluoroscopy time (14 ± 6 minutes vs 21± 9 minutes; P = .005), and electrical cardioversion (25% vs 54%; P = .039) were lower in group 1. After substrate ablation, 16 patients (66%) of group 1 and 12 patients (50%) of group 2 were noninducible (P = .242). End-procedure success (after residual inducible VT ablation) was achieved in 87.5% and 70.8% of patients, respectively (P = .155). There were no differences in VT recurrence rate between groups during a mean follow-up of 22 ± 14 months (log rank, P = .557). CONCLUSION: VT induction and mapping before substrate ablation prolongs the procedure, radiation exposure, and the need for electrical cardioversion without improving acute results and long-term ablation outcomes.
Subject(s)
Body Surface Potential Mapping/methods , Catheter Ablation/methods , Tachycardia, Ventricular/surgery , Aged , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Male , Tachycardia, Ventricular/diagnosis , Tachycardia, Ventricular/physiopathology , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The identification of conducting channels (CCs) based on its relative high voltage or the presence of electrograms with delayed components has been proposed for substrate-guided scar-related ventricular tachycardia (VT) ablation. The relationship of these channels with the VT isthmuses remains unclear. OBJECTIVE: To assess the link between CCs identified during sinus rhythm (SR) and VT isthmuses in patients with arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy (ARVC). METHODS: Twenty-two consecutive patients with ARVC undergoing substrate-guided VT ablation (scar dechanneling technique) were analyzed. High-density endocardial and epicardial electroanatomic maps were obtained during SR. Standard bipolar cutoff values (0.5-1.5 and <0.5 mV) were used to define border zone and dense scar. The CCs were identified by voltage threshold adjustment (voltage channels) or by tagging the electrograms with delayed components that are sequentially activated (late potential channels). RESULTS: A total of 87 CCs were identified; 65 (74.7%) of them on the epicardial surface. Twenty-four (27.6%) CCs were voltage channels, and compared with late potential CCs, these had a higher bipolar voltage (0.96 [0.48-1.29] mV vs 0.39 [0.26-0.50] mV; P < .001] and required more radiofrequency applications (5 [4-7] vs 3 [2-5]; P = .048]. Eighteen (90%) of 20 identified VT isthmuses were located on the epicardium. Only 8 (40%) VT isthmuses were related to a voltage CC. The remaining 12 (60%) VT isthmuses were linked to a late potential CC. CONCLUSION: Late potential CCs more frequently act as the VT substrate in ARVC and therefore should also be considered to guide SR substrate-guided ablation.
