Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 6 de 6
Filter
Add more filters










Language
Publication year range
1.
Med. intensiva (Madr., Ed. impr.) ; 35(1): 13-21, ene.-feb. 2011. ilus, tab
Article in Spanish | IBECS | ID: ibc-97239

ABSTRACT

Objetivo Comprobar que el marcapasos diafragmático es una forma de soporte respiratorio que puede usarse para facilitar la retirada del respirador volumétrico en pacientes con lesión medular cervical y parálisis diafragmática, mediante su comparación con el respirador volumétrico tradicional. Diseño Análisis retrospectivo de una base de datos prospectiva y de tipo caso-control apareado por edad. Ámbito Unidad de Cuidados Intensivos y Unidad de Cuidados Intermedios Respiratorios del Hospital Nacional de Parapléjicos de Toledo. Pacientes Se han recogido los datos de todos los pacientes dados de alta del hospital con soporte respiratorio permanente mediante respirador volumétrico o marcapasos diafragmático con un periodo de seguimiento de 25 años y se han realizado entrevistas personales para valorar la calidad de vida relacionada con la salud. Para las comparaciones estadísticas se han usado tests de comparaciones y de supervivencia. Intervenciones Cuestionario de calidad de vida. Variables de interés Datos demográficos y clínicos, estancia hospitalaria, mortalidad, readaptación familiar y calidad de vida relacionada con la salud. Resultados Hemos examinado las historias clínicas de 101 pacientes, 37 con marcapasos y 64 con un respirador volumétrico. Nuestros resultados muestran tanto una duración del ingreso en UCI y de la hospitalización como una reintegración familiar sin diferencias significativas, con tendencia a una mayor supervivencia en los pacientes con marcapasos (18,18 frente a 9,67 años por el método de Kaplan-Meier, p<0,001), aunque esta diferencia deja de ser estadísticamente significativa (p=0,06) tras controlar (..) (AU)


Objective To verify that the diaphragmatic pacemaker is a form of respiratory support that can be used to replace a volumetric respirator in cervical spinal injury patients with cervical spinal lesion and diaphragmatic paralysis by means of its comparison with the traditional volumetric respirator. Design Retrospective study of a prospective database and age-matched case-control study. Setting Intensive Care Unit and Intermediate Care Respiratory Unit, Paraplegics National Hospital, Toledo (Spain).Patients We collected data on all patients discharged from the Hospital with permanent respiratory support by volumetric respirator or diaphragmatic pacemaker during a follow-up period of 25 years. Personal interviews were conducted to evaluate health-related quality of life. Comparison and survival tests were used for statistical comparisons. Interventions Quality of life questionnaire. Main variables The main variables collected were demographic data, hospital stay, mortality, family reintegration and health-related quality of life. Results We evaluated the clinical records of 101 patients, 37 in the pacemaker-group and 64 in the volumetric respirator-group. Our results show that ICU admission duration and hospitalization as well as family reintegration, without significant differences, with a tendency to greater survival in pacemaker patients (18.18 versus 9.67 years by the Kaplan-Meier method, p<0.001). However, this difference becomes non-significant (p=0.06) after adjustment of the groups by age. Furthermore, better quality of life was found in these same patients with pacemakers in terms of security, communication, sociability, comfort and mobility in the patients. Conclusions Diaphragmatic pacemaker ventilation is an effective alternative to mechanical ventilation with similar efficacy that improve quality of life in patients with severe respiratory failure due to cervical spinal cord injury (AU)


Subject(s)
Humans , Respiratory Paralysis/therapy , Respiration, Artificial/methods , Pacemaker, Artificial , Spinal Cord Injuries/complications , Retrospective Studies , Quality of Life , Paraplegia/therapy
2.
Med Intensiva ; 35(1): 13-21, 2011.
Article in Spanish | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21232823

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To verify that the diaphragmatic pacemaker is a form of respiratory support that can be used to replace a volumetric respirator in cervical spinal injury patients with cervical spinal lesion and diaphragmatic paralysis by means of its comparison with the traditional volumetric respirator. DESIGN: Retrospective study of a prospective database and age-matched case-control study. SETTING: Intensive Care Unit and Intermediate Care Respiratory Unit, Paraplegics National Hospital, Toledo (Spain). PATIENTS: We collected data on all patients discharged from the Hospital with permanent respiratory support by volumetric respirator or diaphragmatic pacemaker during a follow-up period of 25 years. Personal interviews were conducted to evaluate health-related quality of life. Comparison and survival tests were used for statistical comparisons. INTERVENTIONS: Quality of life questionnaire. MAIN VARIABLES: The main variables collected were demographic data, hospital stay, mortality, family reintegration and health-related quality of life. RESULTS: We evaluated the clinical records of 101 patients, 37 in the pacemaker-group and 64 in the volumetric respirator-group. Our results show that ICU admission duration and hospitalization as well as family reintegration, without significant differences, with a tendency to greater survival in pacemaker patients (18.18 versus 9.67 years by the Kaplan-Meier method, p<0.001). However, this difference becomes non-significant (p=0.06) after adjustment of the groups by age. Furthermore, better quality of life was found in these same patients with pacemakers in terms of security, communication, sociability, comfort and mobility in the patients. CONCLUSIONS: Diaphragmatic pacemaker ventilation is an effective alternative to mechanical ventilation with similar efficacy that improve quality of life in patients with severe respiratory failure due to cervical spinal cord injury.


Subject(s)
Cervical Vertebrae/injuries , Diaphragm , Respiration, Artificial , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Case-Control Studies , Child , Child, Preschool , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Quality of Life , Retrospective Studies , Surveys and Questionnaires , Young Adult
3.
Av. periodoncia implantol. oral ; 21(1): 45-52, abr. 2009.
Article in Spanish | IBECS | ID: ibc-84488

ABSTRACT

En el presente trabajo se realiza una revisión bibliográfica de los sustitutos no óseos disponibles en el mercado para mejorar y acelerar la regeneración ósea centrándonos en los polímeros de ácido poliláctico y poliglicólico por su relativa novedad para dicha aplicación. Los resultados obtenidos permiten confirmar la capacidad osteoconductora de dichos sustitutos en los procesos reparativos óseos pero a menudo también pueden actuar como barrera del proceso fisiológico de autor remodelación ósea al requerir un tiempo de reabsorción demasiado largo (AU)


The goal of the present study is to describe the non-bony sustitutes available to improve and to accelerate the bone regeneration pointing us polilactide and poliglycolide acid polymers by its relative newness for this application. The results confirm the osteoconductive capacity of this sustitutes in the bone regeneration even thought they can also be a barrier on the osseous autoremodelation of the physiological process as they need long time to be reabsorbed (AU)


Subject(s)
Humans , Bone Substitutes/analysis , Bone Regeneration , Alveolar Bone Loss/surgery , Polyglycolic Acid/therapeutic use , Durapatite/therapeutic use , Treatment Outcome
4.
Neurocirugia (Astur) ; 20(1): 39-43, 2009 Feb.
Article in Spanish | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19266130

ABSTRACT

The present study was designed with to determine the prevalence of pleural effusion after posterior approach for spinal fixation in patients with traumatic spinal fracture with underlying spinal cord lesion. The study included 20 patients over two years. The postoperative monitoring has been done in the Intensive Care Unit and have been practiced complementary examinations control, including chest x-ray study. The prevalence of pleural effusion was 75%, the time of diagnosis was within the first 48 hours after the operation. The pleural effusion does not preference for either side, and has generally been small claims. Only 4 patients it has been need drainage due to respiratory symptoms restrictive, and the outcome have been favourable in rest of the cases at conservative treatment.


Subject(s)
Fracture Fixation, Internal/adverse effects , Pleural Effusion/etiology , Postoperative Complications , Spinal Cord Injuries , Spinal Fractures/surgery , Adolescent , Adult , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Spinal Cord Injuries/complications , Spinal Cord Injuries/pathology , Spinal Cord Injuries/surgery , Treatment Outcome , Young Adult
5.
Neurocir. - Soc. Luso-Esp. Neurocir ; 20(1): 39-43, ene.-feb. 2009.
Article in Spanish | IBECS | ID: ibc-61066

ABSTRACT

El presente estudio se ha diseñado con la finalidadde determinar la prevalencia del derrame pleural trasla intervención de fijación espinal por vía posterior enpacientes con fractura espinal traumática con lesiónsubyacente de la médula espinal. Se han incluido 20pacientes intervenidos a lo largo de dos años. Todosellos han cursado el postoperatorio en la Unidad de CuidadosIntensivos y se les ha practicado exámenes complementariosde control, que incluye estudio radiológicodel tórax. La prevalencia de derrame pleural ha sidodel 75%. El momento del diagnóstico ha sido dentro delas primeras 48 horas tras la intervención. El derrameno muestra predominio de ninguno de los dos lados yen general ha sido de escasa cuantía. Sólo en 4 casos seha precisado su drenaje por ocasionar sintomatologíarespiratoria restrictiva, y en el resto de los casos la evoluciónha sido favorable con medidas conservadoras (AU)


The present study was designed with to determinethe prevalence of pleural effusion after posterior approachfor spinal fixation in patients with traumatic spinalfracture with underlying spinal cord lesion. The studyincluded 20 patients over two years. The postoperativemonitoring has been done in the Intensive Care Unitand have been practiced complementary examinationscontrol, including chest x-ray study. The prevalence ofpleural effusion was 75%, the time of diagnosis waswithin the first 48 hours after the operation. The pleuraleffusion does not preference for either side, and hasgenerally been small claims. Only 4 patients it has beenneed drainage due to respiratory symptoms restrictive,and the o utcome have been favourable in rest of thecases at conservative treatment (AU)


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Adolescent , Adult , Middle Aged , Fracture Fixation, Internal/adverse effects , Pleural Effusion/etiology , Postoperative Complications , Spinal Cord Injuries , Spinal Fractures/surgery , Spinal Cord Injuries/surgery , Spinal Cord Injuries/pathology , Spinal Cord Injuries/complications , Treatment Outcome
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...