Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 12 de 12
Filter
1.
Actas Urol Esp (Engl Ed) ; 48(5): 364-370, 2024 Jun.
Article in English, Spanish | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38191025

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE: The implementation of Enhanced Recover After Surgery (ERAS) multimodal rehabilitation protocols in radical cystectomy has shown to improve outcomes in hospital stay and complications. The aim of this analysis is to evaluate the impact of laparoscopic surgery on radical cystectomy within a multimodal rehabilitation program. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The study was carried out in a third level center between 2011 and 2020 including patients with bladder cancer submitted to radical cystectomy according to an ERAS (Enhanced Recovery After Surgery) protocol and the Spanish Multimodal Rehabilitation Group (GERM) with 20 items to be fulfilled. RESULTS: A total of 250 radical cystectomies were performed throughout the study period, 42.8% by open surgery (OS) and 57.2% by laparoscopic surgery (LS). The groups are comparable in demographic and clinical variables (p > 0.05). Operative time was longer in the LS group (248.4 ±â€¯55.0 vs. 286.2 ±â€¯51.9 min; p < 0.001). However, bleeding was significantly lower in the LS group (417.5 ±â€¯365.7 vs. 877.9 ±â€¯529.7 cc; p < 0.001), as was the need for blood transfusion (33.6% vs. 58.9%; p < 0.001). Postoperative length of stay (11.5 ±â€¯10.5 vs. 20.1 ±â€¯17.2 days; p < 0.001), total and major complications were also significantly lower in this group (LS). The readmission rate was lower in the LS group but not significantly (36.4% vs. 29.4%; p = 0.237). The difference between 90-day mortality in both groups was not statistically significant (2.8% LS vs. 4.3% OS; p = 0.546). The differences were maintained in the multivariate models. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic surgery within a multimodal rehabilitation program increases operative time but significantly decreases intraoperative bleeding, transfusion requirements, postoperative length of stay, and complications.


Subject(s)
Cystectomy , Laparoscopy , Urinary Bladder Neoplasms , Humans , Cystectomy/rehabilitation , Cystectomy/methods , Male , Laparoscopy/rehabilitation , Female , Urinary Bladder Neoplasms/surgery , Urinary Bladder Neoplasms/rehabilitation , Aged , Treatment Outcome , Middle Aged , Enhanced Recovery After Surgery , Retrospective Studies , Postoperative Complications/epidemiology , Clinical Protocols , Length of Stay/statistics & numerical data , Combined Modality Therapy
2.
Rev. esp. anestesiol. reanim ; 68(6): 357-360, Jun-Jul. 2021. ilus
Article in Spanish | IBECS | ID: ibc-232504

ABSTRACT

La meningitis séptica secundaria a anestesia epidural es una complicación rara, pero grave, que suele estar relacionada con contaminación exógena a partir de técnicas de asepsia inadecuadas, por lo que los microorganismos más frecuentes observados son S. aureus y S. salivarius. Nosotros describimos el caso de una mujer que, tras la realización de anestesia epidural para un parto eutócico, presentó una meningitis séptica por Enterococcusfaecium (E. faecium), que recidivó posteriormente, probablemente debido a una ventriculitis piogénica que pasó inadvertida en el primer episodio. Destacamos la rareza del caso, hacemos hincapié en extremar las medidas de asepsia y revisamos la literatura sobre el tratamiento más adecuado en este tipo de complicaciones.(AU)


Septic meningitis secondary to epidural anesthesia is a rare but serious complication that is usually related to exogenous contamination from inadequate aseptic techniques, so the most frequent microorganisms observed are S. aureus and S. salivarius. We describe the case of a woman who, after receiving epidural anesthesia for normal delivery, presented septic meningitis due to E. faecium with recurrence after antibiotic treatment, probably secondary to pyogenic ventriculitis undetected in the first episode. We highlight the rarity of the case, emphasizing the need for strict aseptic technique, and review the literature on the most appropriate treatment for this type of complication.(AU)


Subject(s)
Humans , Female , Adult , Meningitis , Enterococcus faecium , Anesthesiology , Anesthesia , Anesthesia, Epidural
3.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34130933

ABSTRACT

Septic meningitis secondary to epidural anesthesia is a rare but serious complication that is usually related to exogenous contamination from inadequate aseptic techniques, so the most frequent microorganisms observed are S. aureus and S. salivarius. We describe the case of a woman who, after receiving epidural anesthesia for normal delivery, presented septic meningitis due to E. faecium with recurrence after antibiotic treatment, probably secondary to pyogenic ventriculitis undetected in the first episode. We highlight the rarity of the case, emphasizing the need for strict aseptic technique, and review the literature on the most appropriate treatment for this type of complication.


Subject(s)
Anesthesia, Epidural , Enterococcus faecium , Gram-Positive Bacterial Infections , Meningitis, Bacterial , Anesthesia, Epidural/adverse effects , Female , Humans , Meningitis, Bacterial/diagnosis , Staphylococcus aureus
4.
Actas Urol Esp (Engl Ed) ; 45(4): 247-256, 2021 05.
Article in English, Spanish | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33516599

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: Radical cystectomy with urinary diversion associated with extended pelvic lymphadenectomy continues to be the treatment of choice in muscle invasive bladder cancer. Sixty-four percent of patients submitted to this procedure present postoperative complications, with urinary infection being responsible in 20-40% of cases. The aim of this project is to assess the rate of urinary infection as a cause of re-admission after cystectomy, and to identify protective and predisposing factors for urinary infection in our environment. Finally, we will evaluate the outcomes after the establishment of a prophylactic antibiotic protocol after removal of ureteral catheters. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Retrospective descriptive study of cystectomized patients in the Urology Service of the Hospital Clínico Universitario of Zaragoza, from January 2012 to December 2018. A urinary tract infection (UTI) prevention protocol after catheter removal is established for all patients since October 2017. RESULTS: UTI is responsible for 54.7% of readmissions, with 55.1% of these being due to UTI after removal of ureteral catheters. Of the patients who received with prophylaxis, 9.5% presented UTIs after withdrawal, compared to 10.6% in the group of patients without prophylaxis. The patient who is re-admitted for UTI after withdrawal has a mean catheter time of 24.3±7.2 days, compared to 24.5±7.4 days for patients in the group without UTI (P=.847). CONCLUSIONS: The type of urinary diversion performed is not related to the rate of urinary infection. The regression model does not identify antibiotic prophylaxis, nor catheter time, as independent factors of UTI after catheter removal.


Subject(s)
Urinary Diversion , Urinary Tract Infections , Antibiotic Prophylaxis , Cystectomy/adverse effects , Humans , Retrospective Studies , Urinary Diversion/adverse effects , Urinary Tract Infections/epidemiology
5.
Article in English, Spanish | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33358426

ABSTRACT

Septic meningitis secondary to epidural anesthesia is a rare but serious complication that is usually related to exogenous contamination from inadequate aseptic techniques, so the most frequent microorganisms observed are S. aureus and S. salivarius. We describe the case of a woman who, after receiving epidural anesthesia for normal delivery, presented septic meningitis due to E. faecium with recurrence after antibiotic treatment, probably secondary to pyogenic ventriculitis undetected in the first episode. We highlight the rarity of the case, emphasizing the need for strict aseptic technique, and review the literature on the most appropriate treatment for this type of complication.

6.
Rev. esp. anestesiol. reanim ; 65(10): 564-588, dic. 2018. tab
Article in Spanish | IBECS | ID: ibc-177211

ABSTRACT

La importancia de la seguridad de nuestros pacientes en el entorno quirúrgico ha impulsado multitud de proyectos dirigidos al mejor control y actuación clínica de las variables que intervienen o modulan los resultados de los procesos quirúrgicos y que tienen relación directa sobre los mismos. La Sociedad Española de Anestesiología, Reanimación y Terapéutica del Dolor -SEDAR- mantiene una constante preocupación por una variable que determina claramente los resultados de nuestros procesos clínicos, la hipotermia no intencionada que se desarrolla en todos los pacientes sometidos a un procedimiento anestésico-quirúrgico. SEDAR ha promovido, en colaboración con otras sociedades científicas y asociaciones de pacientes, la elaboración de esta guía de práctica clínica, que pretende dar respuesta a cuestiones clínicas no resueltas aun y para las cuales no existen hasta ahora documentos basados en la mejor evidencia científica disponible. Con metodología GRADE y la asistencia técnica de la oficina de Colaboración Cochrane Iberoamericana, esta guía de práctica clínica presenta 3 recomendaciones (débil a favor) para los métodos activos de calentamiento para la prevención de la hipotermia (cutáneos, de líquidos o gases); 3 para la priorización de las estrategias de prevención de la hipotermia (2 débil a favor y una fuerte a favor); 2 para las estrategias de precalentamiento previas a la inducción anestésica (2 débil a favor); y 2 para investigación


The importance of the safety of our patients in the surgical theatre, has driven many projects. The majority of them aimed at better control and clinical performance; mainly of the variables that intervene or modulate the results of surgical procedures, and have a direct relationship with them. The Spanish Society of Anesthesiology, Critical Care and Therapeutic Pain (SEDAR), maintains a constant concern for a variable that clearly determines the outcomes of our clinical processes, "unintentional hypothermia" that develops in all patients undergoing an anesthetic or surgical procedure. SEDAR has promoted, in collaboration with other scientific Societies and patient Associations, the elaboration of this clinical practice guideline, which aims to answer clinical questions not yet resolved and for which, up to now, there are no documents based in the best scientific evidence available. With GRADE methodology and technical assistance from the Ibero-American Cochrane Collaboration office, this clinical practice guideline presents three recommendations (weak in favor) for active heating methods for the prevention of hypothermia (skin, fluid or gas); three for the prioritization of strategies for the prevention of hypothermia (too weak in favor and one strongly in favor); two of preheating strategies prior to anesthetic induction (both weak in favor); and two for research


Subject(s)
Humans , Hypothermia/therapy , Anesthesia/methods , Monitoring, Physiologic/methods , Patient Safety/statistics & numerical data , Intraoperative Complications , Evaluation of Results of Preventive Actions , Body Temperature Regulation/physiology
7.
Rev Esp Anestesiol Reanim (Engl Ed) ; 65(10): 564-588, 2018 Dec.
Article in English, Spanish | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30447894

ABSTRACT

The importance of the safety of our patients in the surgical theatre, has driven many projects. The majority of them aimed at better control and clinical performance; mainly of the variables that intervene or modulate the results of surgical procedures, and have a direct relationship with them. The Spanish Society of Anesthesiology, Critical Care and Therapeutic Pain (SEDAR), maintains a constant concern for a variable that clearly determines the outcomes of our clinical processes, "unintentional hypothermia" that develops in all patients undergoing an anesthetic or surgical procedure. SEDAR has promoted, in collaboration with other scientific Societies and patient Associations, the elaboration of this clinical practice guideline, which aims to answer clinical questions not yet resolved and for which, up to now, there are no documents based in the best scientific evidence available. With GRADE methodology and technical assistance from the Ibero-American Cochrane Collaboration office, this clinical practice guideline presents three recommendations (weak in favor) for active heating methods for the prevention of hypothermia (skin, fluid or gas); three for the prioritization of strategies for the prevention of hypothermia (too weak in favor and one strongly in favor); two of preheating strategies prior to anesthetic induction (both weak in favor); and two for research.


Subject(s)
Hypothermia/prevention & control , Intraoperative Complications/prevention & control , Rewarming/methods , Adult , Anesthesia/adverse effects , Blood Transfusion , Evidence-Based Medicine , Fluid Therapy , Health Priorities , Humans , Hypothermia/etiology , Hypothermia/physiopathology , Hypothermia/therapy , Intraoperative Complications/etiology , Intraoperative Complications/physiopathology , Intraoperative Complications/therapy , Monitoring, Intraoperative/methods , Observational Studies as Topic , Preoperative Care , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Rewarming/instrumentation , Risk Factors , Surgical Procedures, Operative/adverse effects , Thermometry/methods
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...