Heterologous vaccination interventions to reduce pandemic morbidity and mortality: Modeling the US winter 2020 COVID-19 wave.

COVID-19 remains a stark health threat worldwide, in part because of minimal levels of targeted vaccination outside high-income countries and highly transmissible variants causing infection in vaccinated individuals. Decades of theoretical and experimental data suggest that nonspecific effects of non-COVID-19 vaccines may help bolster population immunological resilience to new pathogens. These routine vaccinations can stimulate heterologous cross-protective effects, which modulate nontargeted infections. For example, immunization with Bacillus Calmette-Guérin, inactivated influenza vaccine, oral polio vaccine, and other vaccines have been associated with some protection from SARS-CoV-2 infection and amelioration of COVID-19 disease. If heterologous vaccine interventions (HVIs) are to be seriously considered by policy makers as bridging or boosting interventions in pandemic settings to augment nonpharmaceutical interventions and specific vaccination efforts, evidence is needed to determine their optimal implementation. Using the COVID-19 International Modeling Consortium mathematical model, we show that logistically realistic HVIs with low (5 to 15%) effectiveness could have reduced COVID-19 cases, hospitalization, and mortality in the United States fall/winter 2020 wave. Similar to other mass drug administration campaigns (e.g., for malaria), HVI impact is highly dependent on both age targeting and intervention timing in relation to incidence, with maximal benefit accruing from implementation across the widest age cohort when the pandemic reproduction number is >1.0. Optimal HVI logistics therefore differ from optimal rollout parameters for specific COVID-19 immunizations. These results may be generalizable beyond COVID-19 and the US to indicate how even minimally effective heterologous immunization campaigns could reduce the burden of future viral pandemics.

Extreme immunotherapy: emergency immunology to defeat pandemics.

The ongoing global COVID-19 pandemic has thrown into sharp relief the gap between modern biology's ability to investigate and respond to a novel pathogen and modern medicine's ability to marshal effective front-line interventions to limit its immediate health impact. While we have witnessed the rapid development of innovative vaccines against SARS-CoV-2 using novel molecular platforms, these have yet to alter the pandemic's long-term trajectory in all but a handful of high-income countries. Health workers at the clinical front lines have little more in their clinical armamentarium than was available a century ago-chiefly oxygen and steroids-and yet advances in modern immunology and immunotherapeutics suggest an underuse of extant and effective, if unorthodox, therapies, which we now call "Extreme Immunotherapies for Pandemics (EIPs)."

Heterologous vaccine interventions: boosting immunity against future pandemics.

While vaccines traditionally have been designed and used for protection against infection or disease caused by one specific pathogen, there are known off-target effects from vaccines that can impact infection from unrelated pathogens. The best-known non-specific effects from an unrelated or heterologous vaccine are from the use of the Bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) vaccine, mediated partly through trained immunity. Other vaccines have similar heterologous effects. This review covers molecular mechanisms behind the heterologous effects, and the potential use of heterologous vaccination in the current COVID-19 pandemic. We then discuss novel pandemic response strategies based on rapidly deployed, widespread heterologous vaccination to boost population-level immunity for initial, partial protection against infection and/or clinical disease, while specific vaccines are developed.

Anticipated reduction in COVID-19 mortality due to population-wide BCG vaccination: evidence from Germany.

Bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) vaccine is known to have "bystander benefits" in protecting against heterologous infections; interim analysis of the "ACTIVATE" trial shows protection against respiratory infections in the elderly population. Epidemiologic studies suggest a potential benefit of BCG vaccination on COVID-19 outcomes. Differential past BCG vaccination policies between the former East and West German states provides a unique natural experiment to assess the potential effect of prior BCG vaccination on COVID-19. We estimated a 5% heterologous vaccine efficacy in the highly vaccinated former East Germany using the COVID-19 International Modeling (CoMo) Consortium model. A comparable BCG vaccination campaign undertaken prior to the pandemic in former West Germany, instituted along with known country-wide transmission reduction measures, is associated with a 37% decrease in projected mortality by mid-summer, 2020. These findings support a combined heterologous vaccine and non-pharmaceutical interventions (HVI+NPI) approach to mitigate the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic until SARS-CoV-2 specific vaccines are widely distributed.

The Immunologists' Guide to Pandemic Preparedness.

Immunologists are central to fighting any pandemic. From pathogenesis to disease modeling, pharmaceuticals to vaccines, immunologists play a crucial role in translating basic science into effective response strategies. This article describes our view on how lessons from the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic can be developed into an immunologists' guide for preparedness for future pandemics.

Vasculitis reumatoidea como primera manifestación de artritis reumatoide / Rheumatoid vasculitis as first manifestation of rheumatoid arthritis

Resumen La vasculitis reumatoidea es la complicación extraarticular más grave de la artritis reumatoide, con morbilidad y mortalidad altas. Se trata de un proceso inflamatorio que afecta principalmente los vasos sanguíneos de pequeño y mediano calibre, sus manifestaciones clínicas sobrevienen de forma heterogénea, la vasculitis cutánea y la neuropatía son las más comunes. Su incidencia ha disminuido en las últimas décadas debido a la administración temprana de fármacos modificadores de la enfermedad en la artritis reumatoide. A pesar de la administración de ciclofosfamida y la existencia de medicamentos biológicos, continúa siendo un reto lograr el control de la enfermedad. Comunicamos el caso de un paciente de 50 años de edad, sin antecedentes médicos de importancia, salvo tabaquismo, que inició con neuropatía secundaria a vasculitis con factor reumatoide y anticuerpos antipéptido cíclico citrulinado positivos. La revisión bibliográfica pone al día los conocimientos acerca de la enfermedad para considerarla diagnóstico diferencial.

Abstract The rheumatoid vasculitis is the most serious complication of rheumatoid arthritis, with high morbidity and mortality. It is an inflammatory process that affects small and medium vessels and that has heterogeneous manifestations, being the cutaneous lesions and neuropathy the most common. Its incidence has declined in the last decades because of the early use of disease modifying antirheumatic drugs. Despite the use of cyclophosphamide and the existence of biologic drugs, achieving the control of the disease continues to be a challenge. We present the case of a 50 year-old man, without relevant antecedents, only tabaco use, that presented with a vasculitic neuropathy, rheumatoid factor and cyclic citrullinated peptide antibody positive. This bibliographic review has the intention to update the knowledge of this entity and to be considered a differential diagnosis.

Estímulo iatrotrópico y tiempo al diagnóstico en pacientes pediátricos con leucemia linfoblástica aguda / Iatrotropic stimulus and lag time for pediatric patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia

Introducción. La leucemia linfoblástica aguda (LLA) es una enfermedad potencialmente curable en la que el éxito del tratamiento depende de la detección oportuna de la enfermedad; por lo anterior, resulta relevante identificar los factores que influyen en el periodo previo al diagnóstico. El objetivo de este estudio es describir el intervalo entre el inicio de los síntomas atribuibles a la enfermedad y la confirmación diagnóstica, en términos del tiempo transcurrido (lag-time), del estímulo iatrotrópico y de la atención médica recibida, así como estimar la asociación de estos factores con la mortalidad. Métodos. Se revisaron los expedientes clínicos de 182 pacientes pediátricos con LLA en 9 centros de atención oncológica en la República Mexicana y se realizaron entrevistas a sus familiares para reconstruir el periodo previo al diagnóstico. Resultados. Se incluyeron 99 pacientes vivos y 83 que fallecieron, con una media de edad de 7.3 ± 4.7 años. El promedio de tiempo entre el inicio de los síntomas y el diagnóstico fue de 43.5 ± 22.5 días y acudieron a un promedio de 2.3 consultas antes de la confirmación diagnóstica. Los principales motivos para solicitar la atención médica fueron: astenia y adinamia (47.4%), fiebre (44.8%), palidez (44.3%), hiporexia/anorexia (20.9%) y cefalea (19.9%). El número de médicos especialistas no oncólogos consultados y de consultas previas al diagnóstico resultaron factores protectores para la mortalidad (OR 0.77 y 0.64, respectivamente). Conclusiones. El tiempo de espera entre el inicio de los síntomas y la confirmación diagnóstica es mayor al reportado en países desarrollados; esto se debe, principalmente, a la atención médica recibida. El número de médicos y de consultas previas resultaron factores protectores para mortalidad, probablemente como consecuencia de la detección oportuna y la vigilancia médica de los síntomas inespecíficos que orientan a la presencia de la enfermedad.

Background. Acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) is a potentially curable disease where success of the treatment depends on the timely detection of the disease; therefore, it is important to identify those influencing factors during the prediagnostic period. The objective of this study was to describe the interval time from onset of symptoms attributable to the disease to the diagnostic confirmation in terms of elapsed time (lag-time), iatrotropic stimulus and received medical care, as well as to estimate the association of these factors with mortality. Methods. We reviewed 182 clinical files from pediatric patients with ALL in nine cancer treatment centers in Mexico and conducted interviews with their families to rebuild the run-up time until diagnosis. Results. We included 99 living patients and 83 patients who died; average age of the patients was 7.3 ± 4.7 years. The average time between symptom onset and diagnosis was 43.5 ± 22.5 days. Patients had an average of 2.3 consultations prior to diagnostic confirmation. The main reasons for requesting medical attention were asthenia and adynamia (47.4%), fever (44.8%), pallor (44.3%), hyperoxia/anorexia (20.9%) and headache (19.9%). The number of non-oncological physicians surveyed and number of consultations until diagnosis were protective factors for mortality (OR 0.77 and 0.64, respectively). Conclusions. Time between symptom onset and diagnostic confirmation is longer than what has been reported in developed countries mainly due to medical attention received. The number of physicians and number of prior consultations were protective factors for mortality, probably as a result of early detection and medical surveillance of nonspecific symptoms that lead to the presence of the disease.