CT scan versus surgery: how reliable is the preoperative radiological assessment in patients with chronic otitis media?

The objective of the study was to evaluate the accuracy of the preoperative radiological assessment regarding 10 different middle ear structures in patients with chronic otitis media (COM). The setting of the prospective study was in a Tertiary university hospital. Fifty patients scheduled for a primary operation for COM. All patients underwent preoperative temporal bone high-resolution CT-scan (HRCT). AC(1)-statistics between the radiological report and the intra-operative findings were calculated. There was no correlation between the radiological assessment and the surgical findings in the scutum, attic area, and oval window. There was a poor or fair agreement on the condition of the malleus-incus complex, the status of the tympanic cavity, and the round window. There was a moderately strong agreement regarding the status of the lateral semicircular canal (LSCC) and tegmen tympani. This agreement was primarily observed, when no erosion/exposure was present in the LSCC or the dura. There was a very strong agreement in the mastoid air-cell complex and the sigmoid sinus, especially when the former was abnormal and the latter had no pathology. There are significant difficulties in radiological imaging for reliably assessing the middle ear in patients with chronic otitis media, using HRCT. The preoperative CT scan generally underestimates the actual pathology found by the surgeon in certain middle ear areas. The decision for surgical intervention should not be based on the radiological interpretation of certain middle ear structures, and ENT surgeons should be prepared to encounter conditions which are not reported by the radiologist preoperatively, and modify the operating strategy accordingly. EBM level: 2c.

Are intra-tympanically administered steroids effective in patients with sudden deafness? Implications for current clinical practice.

Over 60 years since its first report, sudden sensorineural hearing loss (SSNHL) still represents an ill-explained condition, with potentially devastating effects for the quality of life of previously well patients. The present study critically reviewed the available evidence regarding the efficacy of intra-tympanic steroid administration in the treatment of SSNHL. Factors affecting that efficacy were also explored. The literature was systematically reviewed in Medline and other database sources until July 2011, and analyzed through critical analysis of pooled data. The study selection included multi-center prospective randomized control trials, prospective randomized comparative, prospective comparative and prospective studies, retrospective comparative and retrospective studies. The total number of analyzed studies was 43. Intra-tympanic steroids appear to be effective as primary (strength of recommendation A), or salvage treatment (strength of recommendation B) in SSNHL. It is difficult to draw definite conclusions regarding the efficacy of combination therapy. The identification of a time window for effective treatment in the former two approaches yields a grade C strength of recommendation. Primary intra-tympanic treatment is the most effective modality in terms of complete hearing recovery (34.4% cure rate). There is not enough evidence to attribute treatment failures to impaired permeability of the round window membrane. Most complications of intra-tympanic treatment are minor, temporary, and conservatively managed. Intra-tympanic steroids can theoretically provide a more organ-specific treatment in patients with SSNHL. The observation that they seem effective both as primary and salvage treatment modalities with a very low complication rate may have serious implications for current clinical practice.

Efficacy assessment and complications of surgical management for superior semicircular canal dehiscence: a meta-analysis of published interventional studies.

Superior semicircular canal syndrome (SSCS) includes vestibular and audiological symptoms which result from the introduction of a third mobile window into the osseous cochlea. Surgical repair is considered in cases of incapacitating symptoms. The present paper aims at comparing the different surgical approaches and modes of dehiscence repair, regarding their respective efficacy and potential pitfalls. A systematic literature review and meta-analysis of pooled data were performed. Study selection included prospective- and retrospective-controlled studies, prospective- and retrospective-cohort studies, ex vivo studies, animal models, case-reports, systematic reviews and clinical guidelines. A total of 64 primary operations for SSC repair were identified; 56 ears were operated for vestibular and 7 for auditory complaints. A total of 33 ears underwent canal plugging, 16 resurfacing, and 15 capping. Success rates were 32/33, 8/16, and 14/15, respectively. The observed differences were statistically significant (P=0.001). Resurfacing proved less effective than both plugging (P=0.002), and capping (P=0.01) techniques. Temporalis fascia was commonly used as sealing material and was combined with bone-pâté/bone-wax (plugging), bone-graft (resurfacing), or hydroxyapatite-cement (capping). Most operations were performed via middle-fossa approach; higher success rates were associated with plugging and capping techniques. SNHL and disequilibrium were the most frequent complications encountered. Most cases were followed for 3-6 months. Precise criteria regarding follow-up duration and objective success measures are not determined. Surgical repair of SSCS is considered as a valid therapeutic option for patients with debilitating symptoms. Consensus regarding strict follow-up criteria and objective assessment of success is necessary before larger scale operations can be implemented in clinical practice.

Biofilms in ear, nose, and throat infections: how important are they?

BACKGROUND: Biofilms present a new challenging concept in sustaining chronic, common antibiotic-resistant ear, nose, and throat (ENT) infections. They are communities of sessile bacteria embedded in a matrix of extracellular polymeric substances of their own synthesis that adhere to a foreign body or a mucosal surface with impaired host defense. The aim of this paper is to review the literature on ENT diseases that can be attributed to biofilm formation and to discuss options for future treatment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Literature review from Medline and database sources. Electronic links and related books were also included. STUDY SELECTION: Controlled clinical trials, animal models, ex vivo models, laboratory studies, retrospective studies, and systematic reviews. DATA SYNTHESIS: Biofilm formation is a dynamic five-step process guided by interbacterial communicating systems. Bacteria in biofilms express different genes and have markedly different phenotypes from their planktonic counterparts. Detachment of cells, production of endotoxin, increased resistance to the host immune system, and provision of a niche for the generation of resistant organisms are biofilm processes that could initiate the infection process. Effective prevention and management strategies include interruption of quorum sensing, inhibition of related genes, disruption of the protective extrapolymer matrix, macrolides (clarithromycin and erythromycin), and mechanical debridement of the biofilm-bearing tissues. With regard to medical indwelling devices, surface treatment of fluoroplastic grommets and redesign of cochlear implants could minimize initial microbial colonization. CONCLUSION: As the role of biofilms in human infection becomes better defined, ENT surgeons should be prepared to deal with their unique and tenacious nature.